Network Model for Optimal Aircraft Location for Human Organ Transportation Activities.

BACKGROUND: The efficiency of transport phases is a key factor in successful organ transplant operations. Reliability, safety, and punctuality must be in compliance with the European Union and national frameworks and be consistent with economic, quantitative, and level-of-service parameters. In this study we investigated the optimal numbers and locations of aircraft in the Italian territory by comparing performance indexes related to different time intervals and service design scenarios. METHODS: An integer linear programming model is described as an optimal service solution for covering the demand for extraregional organ transport by air between June 2015 and May 2016. Restrictions on aircraft utilization and actual length of the missions in cases of incompatible activities are the relevant input data of the model. RESULTS: Based on mission durations and their origin and destination, the model returns the optimal number and location of aircraft in various scenarios. The performance parameters required by law and the need to guarantee the service from/to the whole territory, together with the transplant figures performed and transplant center locations, have been taken into account to determine the most efficient spatial and numerical allocation. CONCLUSION: The efficient design of an urgency-based service such as the transportation of organs for transplant purposes is not an easy task. Nevertheless, knowledge of the logistic chain and continuous monitoring and update of data and performance parameters can allow for collection of useful information to guarantee a high-performing service.

Analysis of the Trend Over Time of High-Urgency Liver Transplantation Requests in Italy in the 4-Year Period 2014-2017.

BACKGROUND: The national protocol for the handling of high-urgency (HU) liver organ procurement for transplant is administered by the Italian National Transplant Center. In recent years, we have witnessed a change in requests to access the program. We have therefore evaluated their temporal trend, the need to change the access criteria, the percentage of transplants performed, the time of request satisfaction, and the follow-up. METHODS: We analyzed all the liver requests for the HU program received during the 4-year period of 2014 to 2017 for adult recipients (≥18 years of age): all the variables linked to the recipient or to the donor and the organ transplants are registered in the Informative Transplant System as established by the law 91/99. In addition, intention to treat (ITT) survival rates were compared among 4 different groups: (1) patients on standard waiting lists vs (2) patients on urgency waiting lists, and (3) patients with a history of transplant in urgency vs (4) patients with a history of transplant not in urgency. RESULTS: Out of the 370 requests included in the study, 291 (78.7%) were satisfied with liver transplantation. Seventy-nine requests (21.3%) have not been processed, but if we consider only the real failures, this percentage falls to 13.1% and the percentage of satisfied requests rises to 86.9%. The average waiting period for liver transplantation (LT) is 1.7 days and most requests (74%) are met in less than 24 hours, if we consider the hours between the registration of the request and the donor reporting . The percentage of late retransplantations is 2.1%. The clinical indication for HU-LT that appears to improve over time is hepatic artery thrombosis (82.5%). The overall 1-year patient survival is 68.3%. The overall 1-year graft survival, performed on all the patients, is 89% and all the indications for HU-LT appear to go well over time with an average survival rate greater than 85%. CONCLUSIONS: The indications for HU-LT are changing according to the changes in the hepatologic field in recent years. The centralized management of requests has proven to be successful in optimizing responses. Urgent LT is confirmed to be lifesaving in its timeliness.

Incidence of neoplastic donors in Organizzazione Centro Sud Trapianti area during the 2003-2005 period.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of malignant tumors in cadaver donors and the possibility of neoplastic disease transmission to the recipients in the Organizzazione Centro Sud Trapianti (OCST) area. Among 1744 potential donors identified from 2003 to 2005, 125 (7.1%) showed an elevated malignant neoplastic risk. In 2003 a malignant tumor was diagnosed in 60 donors of mean age 59.6 +/- 19.9 years (median 62.5, M:36 F:24); in 2004, 33 donors of mean age, 61.4 +/- 15.9 years (median 63, M:19 F:14); in 2005, 32 donors of mean age of 62.8 +/- 15.5 years (median 65.5, M:20 F:12). Prostatic cancer was the most common tumor (23.2%). In 101 of 125 cases (80.8%) the tumor was diagnosed before organ retrieval, in 23 (18.4%) cases, during the donor operation but before the transplant, and in one case (0.8%) after transplantation. Each tumor was evaluated according to the histologic types and grades. From 12 of those donors with neoplasia, 24 organs were retrieved (10 livers, 11 kidneys, 3 hearts) transplanted in 23 recipients (one liver-kidney combined transplant). Three recipients died during the perisurgical period due to causes unrelated to the tumor and therefore were not considered in the follow-up evaluation. Among the remaining nine recipients who had a mean follow-up of 38.83 months (range 9-42), no donor-transmitted disease has become apparent by imaging control. A careful donor evaluation including histologic grading and strict application of Centro Nazionale Trapianti guidelines allowed us to use donors with malignant tumors in selected cases with an apparently reduced risk of transmitted neoplastic disease.

Analysis of the Organ Offers Received From European Union Countries Before and After the Introduction of a Dedicated Information Technology Portal: The COORENOR/FOEDUS Portal.

INTRODUCTION: To optimize the use of nontransplantable organs in their own territory, the European Commission, as part of a project led by Italy, has promoted the use of an information technology (IT) portal, the COORENOR portal, developed by the Czech Republic in 2012, which evolved to become FOEDUS in 2015. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of the portal on our reality, we analyzed the number and type of offers received and organs imported in the previous 48 months (period A) as well as the 48 months after the introduction of the portal (period B). We also examined the origin and the offer mode. RESULTS: The offers received were 404 and 753, respectively, in the two periods, with 315 (41.8%) organs received through the portal. The organs transplanted were 53 and 64, respectively, in the two periods; 20 (31.2%) were sent through the portal. The most commonly offered organs are lungs (36.7% and 29.3% of offers in periods A and B, respectively). The most transplanted organ is the liver (59.4% and 45% of transplants in periods A and B, respectively). The use of the portal has gradually increased, growing from 16.4% of the offer mode in 2012 to 84.7% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of offers related to the increase of donations and the attitude to the sharing of resources has determined an increase of 19.2% of total transplants, especially for certain types such as pediatric transplants. The portal, ensuring speed and simultaneity of offer, real time sharing of information and transparency of allocation, is also used for trade in the International Partnership Agreements. Therefore, transplants have been conditioned by the existing agreements with Greece, Malta, and the countries of the South Transplant Alliance.

Transport of Human Organs in Italy: Location, Time, and Performances.

INTRODUCTION: The outcome of transplantation activities depends on a variety of unpredictable factors. Up-to-date criteria on organ allocation foresee an efficient transport chain along with compliant performance parameters. METHODS AND OBJECTIVES: The Centro Nazionale Trapianti and the Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering of the University of Bologna (respectively, CNT and DICAM) have been updating a national database of organ transplantation activities to investigate performance parameters and the main causes of disruption. RESULTS: Between June 2015 and July 2016, 617 of 1061 organs have been shipped by air (making for 486 flight events), of which 407 were accompanied by medical equipment. Origin/destination and distance matrixes have been drawn for both road and air transport. Each airport node is ranked based on the n° of organs ingoing/outgoing and each route link on its frequency. Performance parameters such as average speed, distance covered, and time have been computed and compared with each organ's cold ischemia time (CIT). Average distance frontiers are rather homogeneous, but much effort is necessary to reduce the number of events performed with approximately 90% or more of CIT spent. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of organ transplantation activities' performance is a standalone action within Europe to support strategic policies to optimize the system. Thus, a clearer awareness on performances and issues related to organ transport has been made possible: analyses show that the higher uncertainty associated with total time of displacement by air is due to the steps which take place by road (length and paths must be optimized) and lung transports generally perform weaker than heart transports due to longer average distances travelled and smaller average speeds, often resulting in a total displacement time greater than 90% of CIT.

Hepatitis C Virus Positive Patients on the Waiting List for Liver Transplantation: Turnover and Characteristics of the Population on the Eve of the Therapeutic Revolution With Direct-Acting Antivirals.

INTRODUCTION: Antivirals direct acting (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) have brought a revolution in the field of transplantation. It is likely to think that in the future patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) will no longer be registered for HCV-related cirrhosis but for liver disease from other causes. On the eve of this change, we show a snapshot of the Italian waiting list for LT. METHODS: From October 1, 2012 to September 30, 2013, we estimated the total number of patients on the liver waiting list as intention to treat (ITT), the number of incident cases, and the delistings, particularly in the HCV positive (HCV+) population. Gender, median age, etiology and prognosis of liver disease, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), reason for delisting, mean waiting time for LT, and rate of death on waiting list were evaluated. RESULTS: In the time period, there were 517 new patients who were HCV+ (median age, 53 years): 255 (49.3%) mono-infected with HCV, 236 (45.7%) co-infected with HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV), 11 (2.1%) co-infected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and 15 (2.9%) co-infected with HCV, HBV, and HIV. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at listing was 17 and HCC was present in 206 (39.8%) cases. HCV+ patients delisted were 442 (61.9%), 355 (80.3%) for LT. The mean waiting time to transplantation was 1.9 months; the percentage of death was 7.6%. CONCLUSIONS: This snapshot of the waiting list for LT in the year before the advent of DAA drugs will allow us to assess whether and how they will change the waiting list for LT when we start to look at the impact of new therapies on the waiting list.

Optimizing the Use of Available Lungs.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplantation, the treatment of choice in organ failure, is penalized by the lack of organs. Because the increase in the number of donors is not proportional throughout the different age groups, there is no increase in lung transplantations. The aim of this work was to analyze the use of available lungs and evaluate strategies that may help increase transplantations. METHODS: We analyzed the activity of lung transplantation in 2015, divided into various allocation programs. We also examined the surplus organs, in particular, their origin, their destination, their offer's outcome, the characteristics of the donor and the proposed organ, and the reasons for rejection. RESULTS: In 2015, 112 lung transplantations were performed: 66 (68.9%) with regional organs, 46 (41.1%) with extraregional organs; 21 (45.6%) of these were allocated as emergencies/return, and 25 (54.4%) as surplus (19 in the North macroarea, 6 in the South macroarea). The number of surplus lungs was 148: 67 from the North macroarea, 71 from the South macroarea, and 10 from abroad. No organ procured in the North macroarea was transplanted in the South macroarea, whereas 6 lungs coming from the South macroarea were transplanted in the North. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptance criteria are not the same in different transplant centers and they include not only clinical parameters, but also ischemia time and composition of the waiting list at the time of the offer, quality and accessibility of the intensive care units where the donor is located, and organizational reasons. Offering organs which can not be transplanted within the region to other centers, without clinical foreclosures is a system that increases transplant activities by maximizing the available resources.

Liver Allocation in Urgent MELD Score ≥30: The Italian Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with an urgent MELD score ≥30 are managed by the Italian Operative National Transplant Center on the basis of a division of Italy into 2 main areas, the northern macro area (NMA) and the southern macro area (SMA). The object of this study was to evaluate the possibility and the need to transform the MELD score ≥30 macro area-based program into a nationwide one. PATIENTS AND METHODS: When a region reports the presence of a patient with a MELD score ≥30, the same macro area-compatible donors, in the absence of urgent national and 1B status, are offered primarily to this recipient. RESULTS: From August 2014 to August 2015, 132 requests for patients with urgent MELD score ≥30, 98 from the NMA and 34 from the SMA, were handled. The average waiting list in the NMA was significantly different from that of the SMA (2.74 ± 2.29 vs 4.5 ± 3.98, P < .05). A total of 73.7% of the received requests (n = 97) were satisfied: the NMA met 80.4% of the requests (n = 77), whereas the SMA met 55.5% (n = 20). A total of 35 requests (26.5%), 21 from the NMA (60%) and 14 (40%) from the SMA, were not met. The average waiting time of these recipients for a liver was significantly different between the NMA and the SMA (3.14 ± 3.21 vs 5.78 ± 4.59; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The MELD score is a priority allocation, and the longer the waiting time to transplantation for these recipients, the more their mortality increases. Given the differences in waiting times between the NMA and SMA, we should start thinking about transforming the macro area program into a national one.

Transportation of Organs by Air: Safety, Quality, and Sustainability Criteria.

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of organ transplantation activities are greatly affected by the ability to haul organs and medical teams quickly and safely. Organ allocation and usage criteria have greatly improved over time, whereas the same result has not been achieved so far from the transport point of view. Safety and the highest level of service and efficiency must be reached to grant transplant recipients the healthiest outcome. OBJECTIVES: The Italian National Transplant Centre (CNT), in partnership with the regions and the University of Bologna, has promoted a thorough analysis of all stages of organ transportation logistics chains to produce homogeneous and shared guidelines throughout the national territory, capable of ensuring safety, reliability, and sustainability at the highest levels. METHODS: The mapping of all 44 transplant centers and the pertaining airport network has been implemented. An analysis of technical requirements among organ shipping agents at both national and international level has been promoted. A national campaign of real-time monitoring of organ transport activities at all stages of the supply chain has been implemented. Parameters investigated have been hospital and region of both origin and destination, number and type of organs involved, transport type (with or without medical team), stations of arrival and departure, and shipping agents, as well as actual times of activities involved. RESULTS: National guidelines have been issued to select organ storage units and shipping agents on the basis of evaluation of efficiency, reliability, and equipment with reference to organ type and ischemia time. Guidelines provide EU-level standards on technical equipment of aircrafts, professional requirements of shipping agencies and cabin crew, and requirements on service provision, including pricing criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction in the Italian legislation of guidelines issuing minimum requirements on topics such as the medical team, packaging, labeling, safety and integrity, identification, real-time monitoring of temperature, and traceability of the organ during the logistics chain is deemed a valid response to the necessity of improving safety, reliability, and sustainability of organ transplantation activities in Italy.

Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV+ Recipients: Italian Experience.

INTRODUCTION: According to current estimates, there are about 540,000 patients who are infected with HIV in Western Europe, of which about 3100 are potential candidates for organ transplantation. In Italy, there are currently 85 HIV patients on the transplant list. METHODS: Organ transplantation activity in HIV recipients from 2002 to December 2014 was assessed from the database provided by the Transplant Center of Modena until the year 2011. For the years 2012 to 2014, data are from the Transplant Information System (SIT). The follow-up data have been extracted from the function "Quality" of the SIT. RESULTS: The transplant centers on Italian territory that meet the requirements according to national protocol are in total 29: 11 for the liver, 9 for the kidney including 1 pediatric, 3 for the heart, 3 for the lungs, and for 3 for the combined kidney-pancreas. Since 2002, 257 organ transplantations were carried out, including 185 liver, 59 kidney, 5 combined liver-kidney, 5 combined kidney-pancreas, 2 heart, and 1 double lung. The first cause of death is represented by co-hepatitis C virus infection, in particular in 26 liver recipients (37%) and in 3 kidney recipients (20%). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that transplantation activity in HIV is on the rise, especially in the last 2 years, with an outcome similar to that reported in the literature.

Can Dopamine Depletion at DAT Scan in a Non Parkinson Patient be the Cause a Refractory Overactive Bladder?

We report here the first case of treatment of idiopathic refractory overactive bladder with dopamine. A female patient consulted for urge incontinence. Management included all recommended treatments without success. DAT scan was finally performed showing clear reduction in dopamine secretion without diagnosis of any neurological condition. Patient started dopamine treatment. At 1 month, patient described persistence of mild urgency and frequency but complete resolution of urge incontinence. At 3 months patient was completely dry with only persistence of mild frequency. Functional imaging and central nervous system target might represent new ways of managing idiopathic overactive bladder.

Optimizing the organ procurement process: organizational prerequisites and monitoring strategies in a national network.

The current project sought to collect detailed information on the Italian donation system and in particular on the organization and functioning of the local coordinating centers. The final objective was to provide local and regional institutions with the information required to improve the system. While improving the knowledge of current Italian donation system, the project had constructive purposes. Our intention was to analyze how the national system is working, what the coordinating centers are actually doing, how they are organized, to what extent existing rules are obeyed, and what are the main limits of the system. This analysis sought to lead to the development of a set of proposals that can be summarized in two categories: (1) "intrinsic" actions, that is, those established and implemented at the hospital level; and (2) supporting "extrinsic" actions, that is, those identified by the National Transplant Centre and addressed to the regional and interregional coordinating networks. Finally, the analysis of the application of the existing rules should lead to the development of practice guidelines such that each center conforms to the existing regulations established by European directives.

Urgent liver, heart, and lung transplantation programs in Italy: activities and evaluation of outcomes.

The Italian national transplantation network has set up programs for liver, heart, and lung transplantation in urgent conditions. The aim of this study was to analyze the capability of these programs to meeting needs and their quality. In period between 2008 and 2011, the total number of urgent transplant requests was analyzed by organ, reason, and outcome, namely waiting time, graft origin, and number of transplantations with their one- and three-year graft survivals. There were urgent requests for 312 livers, 268 hearts, and 43 lungs totted among which 72%, 63%, and 79% were met, respectively. Actuarial graft survival rates at one and three years were 62% and 61% for liver and 73.1% and 70.5% for heart transplantations, respectively. The rate of satisfied requests and the graft outcomes showed that the national urgency programs meet the healthcare needs of patients with a short life expectancy, achieving good quality donor-recipient match.

Urgent lung transplantation national program: the Italian experience.

INTRODUCTION: An urgent lung transplantation national program in Italy was developed over the past three years. Indispensable conditions that were included in the program were invasive respiratory support and/or extracorporeal vascular device (DECAP excluded). The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of the program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed urgent lung requests received between 2009 and 2011 taking into account primary pathology, request outcome, average waiting time, and organ origin. Taking as reference the same period of time, we also examined the ordinary waiting list, waiting list mortality, and number of transplantations performed and we have compared them with another three-year period prior to the activation of the program. RESULTS: The total number of urgent requests was 43. Primary pathologies with the highest incidence proportion were cystic fibrosis (40%) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (26.6%). A total of 34 requests (79%) were successfully dealt with and 9 of them were suspended because of worsening conditions. The average waiting time was 17.9 days. During the same period of time 340 lung transplantations were performed and there were 499, 524, and 564 wait-listed patients in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. The mortality rate was 21.3%. Over the previous three-year period 295 transplantations were performed and there were 457, 476, and 464 wait-listed patients in 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Also the mortality rate was 25.3%. DISCUSSION: Urgent lung transplantations can provide patients in an imminent life-threatening situation with adequate care without affecting the mortality rate of patients on the ordinary waiting list.

Living organ donation, a therapeutic possibility, is still poorly used in Italy: a national analysis.

Validity of living donor kidney transplantation is universally accepted. In contrast, after enthusiastic adoption in the 1990s, living donor liver transplantation has decreased in recent years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate retrospectively the current use of this form of donation in Italy by comparing liver and kidney cadaveric and living donations from 2002 to 2010. The number of liver transplantations from living donors has decreased from 34 in 2002 (3.9% of total) to 13 in 2010 (1.3% of total). In contrast, kidney transplantation from living donors increased from 126 (7.9% of total) to 186 (11% of total). We observed that living donations for kidney transplantation are still underused, especially with unrelated donors. Living donor liver transplantation has decreased in recent years; this procedure should be reserved to centers with particular expertise. It would be appropriate to implement programs to increase the attention of health professionals and the general population and to integrate living donations into programs of deceased organ donation.

Solid organ transplantation: the Italian experience in the international context.

The Italian experience in the organization of transplantation procedures could represent a relevant example of an internal development at a national level, combined with a strengthening of international collaborations. These results can be attributed first to the creation of the Italian National Transplant Centre (Centro Nazionale Trapianti [CNT]), and then to an ongoing European process that is leading to a greater awareness of the importance of closer collaboration between the organizations already existing and operating in the field of transplantation. This article summarizes the role and the most significant achievements of the CNT.

Do "silent" brain deaths affect potential organ donation?

Brain death (BD) is not a stable, objective condition; in fact, it strongly depends on early intensive treatment before death, brain stem reflex testing, and intensive care unit (ICU) physician attitudes. Consequently, unpredictable "silent" BDs due to inadequate treatment or omitted declaration may affect potential organ donations. Several lines of evidence suggest that 55% to 65% of all deaths among patients with acute cerebral lesions (DACL) in the ICU may become brain deaths. Since DACL are easily measurable, deviations from the expected ratio of declarations will disclose "silent" BDs. Results from the National Registry of DACL in ICU settings have confirmed that BD declarations are consistently fewer than the number expected in Italy, particularly in regions where organ donation rates are low. Only 43% of the 10,304 referred DACL were potential donors in a 2-year period. Thus, around 1000 BDs per year are missing in Italy. Significant clinical factors for lost BDs may be older age and timing of death. As DACL represent the global donation potentiality (possible donors), we suggest the use of a new indicator-DACL in ICU per million population-and careful analyses of differences in DACL per million people among regions. In conclusion, since striking deviations from the expected ratio between BD declarations and deaths with an acute cerebral lesion exist in some regions, targeted training and support to ICUs should be planned. As adequate neurointensive treatment can improve outcomes and reduce "silent" BDs, more organ donors may exist where patients with acute cerebral lesion are better treated.

Emergency heart transplantation outcome: the Italian experience.

The National Program for Emergency Heart Transplantation (NP) was implemented in 2005 is managed at the national level by the Italian National Transplant Center. Patients admitted to the NP must be undergoing one of the following treatments: short-term Ventricular Assist Device (VAD); complicated medium or long-term VAD; complicated Total Artificial Heart; or mechanical ventilation associated with an Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump and Continuous Inotrope Therapy (intravenously). The aim of this study was to evaluate the NP experience from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2009. We analyzed the number of requests (both fulfilled and not fulfilled), the timeliness of organ availability as well as graft and recipient survivals at 1 year. During the study period, 108 patients were admitted to the NP. The most frequent causes of admission were dilated cardiomyopathies (42.7%) and congenital cardiomyopathies (28.7%). Overall, whereas 12 subjects improved 65 patients underwent heart transplantation (60.2%) and 43 did not undergo surgery (39.8%) because of 31 succumbing before a heart became available. The median waiting time for heart transplantation was 3 days (range = 0.1-22), compared with median waiting time for elective heart transplantation (EHT) of 2.47 years. Graft and recipient survivals were 76.0 ± 1.06 compared with superior graft and recipient survivals for EHT during the same period (87.1 ± 2.0). However, implementation of NP has guaranteed heart availability at a short median time, thus allowing equitable management of this procedure.