RESUMO
Bladder cancer (BC) presenting with pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph nodes presents a therapeutic challenge. The impact of chemoradiotherapy on pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis as a consolidation treatment has not been established. Between 2009 and 2020, 502 patients who were treated with first-line chemotherapy for BC in our center, were retrospectively identified. Patients who received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy with an equivalent radiation dose superior to 30 Gy were included in the RTCT group, and other patients were included in the control group (CT group). We performed an analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for these two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 89 patients were included, 24 in the RTCT group and 65 in the CT group. Chemoradiotherapy improved both OS (p = 0.034) and PFS (p = 0.009) in comparison with chemotherapy alone: 26.3 months (95% IC 0.0-52.9) and 19.4 months (95% IC 5.0-33.7), respectively, in the RTCT group versus 17.2 months (95% IC 13.7-20.6) and 11.2 months (95% IC 8.6-13.8), respectively, in the CT group. Grade 3/4 toxicity was related to chemotherapy and to chemoradiotherapy at levels of 31% and 24%, respectively. For mBC with metastatic regional or retroperitoneal lymph nodes, chemoradiotherapy seems to confer benefits for both OS and PFS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Starting a second-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common situation. The only therapeutic options in France are two broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), regorafenib (REG) and cabozantinib (CBZ), but no comparative real-life studies are available. AIM: To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with REG or CBZ, we investigated the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety of both drugs. To identify the variables associated with disease progression over time. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was performed on the clinical data of patients attending one of three referral centers (Avignon, Marseille, and Nice) between January 2017 and March 2021 using propensity score matching. PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis (MA) of progression risk factors over time was performed in matched-pair groups. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients 68 (62-74) years old with HCC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) B/C (86%), Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B (24%) received REG for 3.4 (1.4-10.5) mo as second-line therapy. Twenty-eight patients 68 (60-73) years, BCLC B/C (75%), CP-A/B (25%) received CBZ for 3.7 (1.8-4.9) mo after first-line treatment with sorafenib [3 (2-4) (CBZ) vs 4 (2.9-11.8) mo (REG), P = 0.0226]. Twenty percent of patients received third-line therapy. After matching, PFS and DCR were not significantly different after a median follow-up of 6.2 (2.7-11.7) mo (REG) vs 5.2 (4-7.2) mo (CBZ), P = 0.6925. There was no difference in grade 3/4 toxicities, dose reductions, or interruptions. The OS of CP-A patients was 8.3 (5.2-24.8) vs 4.9 (1.6-11.7) mo (CP-B), P = 0.0468. The MA of risk factors for progression over time identified C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 45 IU as predictive factors. CONCLUSION: This multicenter indirect comparative study found no significant difference in PFS between REG and CBZ as second-line therapy for advanced HCC. Elevated levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and NLR) and AST were associated with non-control of TKIs over time. A 2-mo online progression risk calculation is proposed.