Postoperative Nasal Conformers in Cleft Rhinoplasty: Are They Efficacious?

BACKGROUND: Lip and nose symmetry the goal of repair of unilateral cleft lip and different preoperative and postoperative treatments have been developed with this purpose. The objective of this study was to compare 2 techniques used for primary cleft lip nose repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an retrospective study between 2 groups of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary nasolabial repair either with or without postoperative nasal conformers. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of nasal symmetry through anthropometric measurements under general anesthesia during primary cleft palate repair. RESULTS: Our comparative study did not find a statistically significant difference regarding percentile indexes of nasal asymmetry between the 2 groups. Major revision requirement (>3 mm of asymmetry in any of the nose measurements) was observed in 3.84% of nasal conformer group and 4.65% of the group without nasal conformers. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained from this study provides showed that placement of postoperative nasal conformers did not improve nasal symmetry in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Based on these findings and available scientific evidence, definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of these devices on nasal symmetry after unilateral cleft lip nose repair cannot be drawn.

Buccal Fat Pad in Primary and Secondary Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence supporting the use of buccal fat pad (BFP) in primary and secondary cleft palate repair and its short- and long- term clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review conducted by 2 independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. SETTING: NONE PARTICIPANTS: Articles were identified from three databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase and Web of Science). Search terms included "cleft palate", "palatoplasty", "palate repair", "buccal fat pad". INTERVENTIONS: Use of BFP in primary and secondary cleft palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were immediate postoperative complications, postoperative fistula, and maxillary growth. Secondary outcomes were palatal length, speech, and donor site morbidity. RESULTS: Ninety-one reports were retrieved after excluding duplicates. Twenty-three studies were included (13 case series and 10 comparative studies). Overall level of evidence was low. Randomized and non-randomized studies had a high risk of bias. In primary palatoplasty, BFP was more frequently used filling lateral relaxing incisions(57.4%), or in the hard-soft palate junction and covering mucosal defects(30.1%). In these patients, post operative fistula incidence was 2.8%. Two studies found wider transverse maxillary dimensions after BFP use. No higher incidence of bleeding, infection, dehiscence, or flap necrosis was reported. In secondary palatoplasty, no recurrent fistulas were reported for patients undergoing BFP for fistula repair. CONCLUSIONS: BFP appears to be associated with a favorable impact in fistula prevention and management, as well as in transverse maxillary growth. However, there is a high heterogeneity among studies, high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence. More high-quality research with long-term follow-up is warranted.

Effect of Nonradical Intravelar Veloplasty in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Comparative Study and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 techniques used for primary muscular repair and perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effects of radical intravelar veloplasty (IVV) on nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. METHODS: This is an ambispective study between 2 groups of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who were operated using a radical and conservative form of IVV in Lima Peru. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of speech development and middle ear function of the patients. A systematic review of the literature for studies published until June 2020 to evaluate the effect using the radical IVV in patients with cleft lip and palate. RESULTS: Our comparative study did not find statistically significant differences in speech development between the studied techniques for unilateral cleft palate repair. Increased number of ear tube placements have been observed in the group treated with radical form of IVV. After systematic literature searching, 10 identified studies were qualified for the final analysis, which included 1367 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE scale was low. CONCLUSIONS: The results arising from this study provides statistical evidence that one technique let us obtain better speech outcomes. A technique with conservative IVV has statistical significant fewer rate of middle ear disorders after primary cleft palate repair. Based on available scientific evidence, definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of radical IVV on velopharyngeal and middle ear function cannot be drawn.

Is the Use of Opioids Safe after Primary Cleft Palate Repair? A Systematic Review.

Pharmacologic treatment of postoperative pain after cleft palate repair includes opioids and nonopioid analgesics, nerve blocks, and local anesthetic infiltration. Use of opioids in infants has concerns regarding sedation, risk of aspiration, respiratory depression, and respiratory distress. The main objective of this review was to analyze information available on the safety of the use of opioids during perioperative management of pain related to primary cleft palate repair in published studies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature for studies published until March 2020 was performed to evaluate the safety of opioid drugs during primary cleft palate repair pain management. The authors chose the following MesH terms for this systematic review: cleft lip and palate AND opioids AND pain management. The investigators performed a systematic literature search using the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: After a literature search resulting in 70 identified studies, 9 were qualified for the final analysis, which included 772 patients. There was a high level of evidence in the selected studies according to the Oxford CEBM Level of Evidence classification and GRADE scale. The most common adverse event reported was postoperative nausea and vomiting (from 5% to 25%). Episodes of oxygen desaturation have been reported from 2.5% to 7.4% of the studied patients. CONCLUSION: s: Definitive conclusions about the safety of opioid drugs during primary cleft palate repair pain management cannot be drawn. Vomiting and oxygen desaturation have been associated with the use of opioids in the studied population.

Mucoperiosteal Flap Necrosis after Primary Palatoplasty in Patients with Cleft Palate.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of flap necrosis after palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. The prevalence of mucoperiosteal flap necrosis after palatoplasty remains unknown, and this complication is rare. This event is highly undesirable for both the patient and the surgeon. We present here a new scale to evaluate the degree of hypoplasia of the palate and identify patients with cleft palate at high risk for the development of this complication. METHODS: In this case series, a 20-year retrospective analysis (1994-2014) identified patients from our records (medical records and screening day registries) with nonsyndromic cleft palate who underwent operations at 3 centers. All of these patients underwent operations using 2-flap palatoplasty and also underwent a physical examination with photographs and documentation of the presence of palatal flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty. RESULTS: Palatal flap necrosis was observed in 4 cases out of 1,174 palatoplasties performed at these centers. The observed prevalence of palatal flap necrosis in these groups was 0.34%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of flap necrosis can be reduced by careful preoperative planning, and prevention is possible. The scale proposed here may help to prevent this complication; however, further studies are necessary to validate its utility.

Risk factors leading to mucoperiosteal flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patents with cleft palate.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have been published reporting risk factors for flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. This complication is rare, and the event is a disaster for both the patient and the surgeon. This study was performed to explore the associations between different risk factors and the development of flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate. METHODS: This is a case-control study. A 20 years retrospective analysis (1994-2015) of patients with nonsyndromic cleft palate was identified from medical records and screening day registries). Demographical and risk factor data were collected using a patient´s report, including information about age at surgery, gender, cleft palate type, and degree of severity. Odds ratios and 95% confident intervals were derived from logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: All cases with diagnoses of flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty were included in the study (48 patients) and 156 controls were considered. In multivariate analysis, female sex, age (older than 15 years), cleft type (bilateral and incomplete), and severe cleft palate index were associated with significantly increased risk for flap necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that female sex, older age, cleft type (bilateral and incomplete), and severe cleft palatal index may be associated with the development of flap necrosis after primary palatoplasty in patients with cleft palate.

Evaluation of the use of auricular composite graft for secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal alar deformity repair.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgical outcome after using composite grafts for secondary cleft lip nasal deformities. A retrospective cohort study of one surgeon's outcome of 35 consecutive performed secondary cleft lip nasal deformity repair. Thirty-five patients with secondary nose deformity related to unsatisfactory cleft lip repair were operated using the proposed surgical technique since 2008. All these patients met the study criterion of having anthropometric measurements performed at least one year postoperatively. Measurement of nostril size was performed at the right and left side of the nose, preoperatively and at least one year postoperatively. The study found statistically significant differences between the preoperatory and postoperatory nose measurements. In addition, we have not found statistically significant differences between the cleft and noncleft nostril sizes measured at least one year postoperatively. The findings suggest that the proposed technique is a good alternative to address secondary nose deformity related to cleft lip primary repair.