Automatic Screening for Ocular Anomalies Using Fundus Photographs.

SIGNIFICANCE: Screening for ocular anomalies using fundus photography is key to prevent vision impairment and blindness. With the growing and aging population, automated algorithms that can triage fundus photographs and provide instant referral decisions are relevant to scale-up screening and face the shortage of ophthalmic expertise. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm that detects any ocular anomaly in fundus photographs and to evaluate this algorithm for "normal versus anomalous" eye examination classification in the diabetic and general populations. METHODS: The deep learning algorithm was developed and evaluated in two populations: the diabetic and general populations. Our patient cohorts consist of 37,129 diabetic patients from the OPHDIAT diabetic retinopathy screening network in Paris, France, and 7356 general patients from the OphtaMaine private screening network, in Le Mans, France. Each data set was divided into a development subset and a test subset of more than 4000 examinations each. For ophthalmologist/algorithm comparison, a subset of 2014 examinations from the OphtaMaine test subset was labeled by a second ophthalmologist. First, the algorithm was trained on the OPHDIAT development subset. Then, it was fine-tuned on the OphtaMaine development subset. RESULTS: On the OPHDIAT test subset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for normal versus anomalous classification was 0.9592. On the OphtaMaine test subset, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.8347 before fine-tuning and 0.9108 after fine-tuning. On the ophthalmologist/algorithm comparison subset, the second ophthalmologist achieved a specificity of 0.8648 and a sensitivity of 0.6682. For the same specificity, the fine-tuned algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 0.8248. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm compares favorably with human performance for normal versus anomalous eye examination classification using fundus photography. Artificial intelligence, which previously targeted a few retinal pathologies, can be used to screen for ocular anomalies comprehensively.

[Artificial intelligence: reinforcing the place of humans in our healthcare system]. / Artificial intelligence and ophthalmology.

Artificial intelligence and ophthalmology. Artificial intelligence is already very widely used in ophthalmic practice. The prospects opened up by its possible developments are quite considerable. It is important to seize as soon as possible the issues of spreading of artificial intelligence in terms of human resources in healthcare.

Intelligence artificielle et ophtalmologie. L'intelligence artificielle est déjà très largement utilisée dans la pratique ophtalmologique. Les perspectives ouvertes par ses développements possibles sont tout à fait considérables. Il importe de se saisir dans les meilleurs délais des enjeux de la diffusion de l'intelligence artificielle en termes de ressources humaines dans le domaine de la santé.

Towards population-independent, multi-disease detection in fundus photographs.

Independent validation studies of automatic diabetic retinopathy screening systems have recently shown a drop of screening performance on external data. Beyond diabetic retinopathy, this study investigates the generalizability of deep learning (DL) algorithms for screening various ocular anomalies in fundus photographs, across heterogeneous populations and imaging protocols. The following datasets are considered: OPHDIAT (France, diabetic population), OphtaMaine (France, general population), RIADD (India, general population) and ODIR (China, general population). Two multi-disease DL algorithms were developed: a Single-Dataset (SD) network, trained on the largest dataset (OPHDIAT), and a Multiple-Dataset (MD) network, trained on multiple datasets simultaneously. To assess their generalizability, both algorithms were evaluated whenever training and test data originate from overlapping datasets or from disjoint datasets. The SD network achieved a mean per-disease area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (mAUC) of 0.9571 on OPHDIAT. However, it generalized poorly to the other three datasets (mAUC < 0.9). When all four datasets were involved in training, the MD network significantly outperformed the SD network (p = 0.0058), indicating improved generality. However, in leave-one-dataset-out experiments, performance of the MD network was significantly lower on populations unseen during training than on populations involved in training (p < 0.0001), indicating imperfect generalizability.