RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients in whom cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas develop are at high risk for multiple subsequent skin cancers. Whether sirolimus is useful in the prevention of secondary skin cancer has not been assessed. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned transplant recipients who were taking calcineurin inhibitors and had at least one cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma either to receive sirolimus as a substitute for calcineurin inhibitors (in 64 patients) or to maintain their initial treatment (in 56). The primary end point was survival free of squamous-cell carcinoma at 2 years. Secondary end points included the time until the onset of new squamous-cell carcinomas, occurrence of other skin tumors, graft function, and problems with sirolimus. RESULTS: Survival free of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma was significantly longer in the sirolimus group than in the calcineurin-inhibitor group. Overall, new squamous-cell carcinomas developed in 14 patients (22%) in the sirolimus group (6 after withdrawal of sirolimus) and in 22 (39%) in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (median time until onset, 15 vs. 7 months; P=0.02), with a relative risk in the sirolimus group of 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.98). There were 60 serious adverse events in the sirolimus group, as compared with 14 such events in the calcineurin-inhibitor group (average, 0.938 vs. 0.250). There were twice as many serious adverse events in patients who had been converted to sirolimus with rapid protocols as in those with progressive protocols. In the sirolimus group, 23% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events. Graft function remained stable in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus had an antitumoral effect among kidney-transplant recipients with previous squamous-cell carcinoma. These observations may have implications concerning immunosuppressive treatment of patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas. (Funded by Hospices Civils de Lyon and others; TUMORAPA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133887.).
Assuntos
Inibidores de Calcineurina , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevenção & controle , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/efeitos adversos , Tacrolimo/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Open-heart surgery can result in adhesions, which can complicate resternotomy. AIMS: To document the occurrence of adhesions after the use of a new collagen membrane; to evaluate its tolerability; and to compare surgical parameters with control patients. METHODS: Paediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery with the collagen membrane (Cova™ CARD; Biom'up, Saint Priest, France) were analysed retrospectively for levels of adhesion and tolerability. The times of dissection and intervention and the transfusion of packed red blood cells and haemostatic products were compared to a historic cohort who did not receive an anti-adhesion device. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2011, 36 patients received a collagen membrane. Nineteen re-interventions were performed, after a mean of 169 days. No grade 3 adhesions were observed and no tolerability problems were reported. During re-interventions after more than 30 days, the propensity score-adjusted durations of dissection and the total process for patients with and without a collagen membrane were 32 vs 41 minutes and 151 vs 182 minutes, respectively (not significant). The mean quantities of red blood cells and biological glue administered in the two groups were 98 vs 139 mL and 1.2 vs 0.5 mL, respectively (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study shows the potential use of the new membrane in paediatric patients, both in terms of prevention from severe adherence and tolerability. This is the first study of this membrane in humans. A prospective, controlled study is necessary to provide strong evidence of its efficiency.