Impact of smoking, alcohol consumption, and NSAID use on risk for and phenotypes of eosinophilic esophagitis.

There are few data exploring modifiable risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine if smoking, alcohol consumption, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use were risk factors for EoE, and to assess their impact on EoE phenotypes and treatment outcomes. We performed a case-control study analyzing data collected from a prospective cohort of adults undergoing upper endoscopy for symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Incident EoE cases were diagnosed via consensus guidelines. Exposure data were collected via standardized patient questionnaire. Follow-up assessments for cases were made after treatment, with histologic response defined as <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf). Exposures were compared between EoE cases and controls, among EoE cases with and without fibrostenosis, and among EoE responders and nonresponders. A total of 115 cases and 225 controls were analyzed. Cases were less likely to have ever smoked cigarettes (23% vs. 47%, P < 0.001) or currently use NSAIDs (17% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) compared to controls. These relations persisted after multivariate analysis. Although alcohol use was more common among cases (75% vs. 51%, P < 0.001), the effect was abrogated after multivariate analysis. Smoking, alcohol, and NSAID use were not associated with the fibrostenotic phenotype. There was a trend toward improved histologic response among EoE patients concomitantly using NSAIDs (87% vs. 63%, P = 0.08; aOR 6.97 (95% CI: 0.81-60.3). In conclusion, NSAID and smoking were inversely associated with EoE compared to endoscopy-based controls. Alcohol use was more prevalent in the EoE cases, although not an independent risk factor. Concomitant NSAID use may improve treatment response and is worthy of future study.

Prospective assessment of serum periostin as a biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Periostin is highly expressed in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), but has not been extensively studied as a non-invasive biomarker. AIM: To assess whether serum periostin distinguished EoE from controls at baseline, had utility for monitoring treatment response, or was associated with IL-13 levels. METHODS: This was a sub-analysis of a prospective cohort study of adults undergoing out-patient upper endoscopy. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines. Controls were subjects with either GERD or dysphagia without EoE. EoE patients were treated with swallowed/topical steroids and had repeat endoscopy/biopsy. Serum periostin levels for cases and controls were compared at baseline, and pre/post-treatment levels were compared for cases. Serum IL-13 and tissue expression of periostin were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 61 incident EoE cases and 87 controls were analysed. Despite a marked increase in tissue periostin expression in cases, the median baseline serum periostin level was only slightly higher in cases than controls (22.1 ng/mL vs. 20.7; P = 0.04); there was no change in post-treatment levels. There was also no difference in serum periostin for cases by histologic response or atopic status. There was a strong trend towards higher serum IL-13 levels in cases in the highest periostin quartile (57.1 pg/mL vs. 2.6; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Serum periostin levels were similar in cases and controls, and there were no changes post-treatment. Given elevated IL-13 levels in the EoE patients with the highest periostin levels, future studies could explore periostin as a biomarker in EoE, perhaps in the setting of anti-IL-13 therapy.

Radiobiological experiments with plant seeds aboard the biosatellite Kosmos 1887.

The effects of spaceflight factors on the seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana and Crepis capillaris were studied provided with various protective measures: the seeds were located inside the satellite and in open space, protected with aluminium foil and also exposed without the foil cover. When the seeds were in open space without any protection, their viability was found to be suppressed; the survival rate and fertility of plants grown from these seeds were also diminished. An increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations (CA) and in the number of multiple injuries was registered in this case. Experiments with the aluminium foil shielding showed a decrease in the suppression of the seeds' viability, but mutational changes were found to be even more increased, while the survival and fertility of the plants decreased. An increase in the thickness of shielding resulted in a decrease in the effects up to the level of the control, except for the effects connected with CA and fertility of the plants. Analysis of the results shows that these impairments can be ascribed to the action of single heavy charged particles (HCP). The seeds can be thus regarded as an integral biological 'dosimeter' which allows estimation of the total effects of radiation, ecological and biological factors.