Development of Modernized Acinetobacter baumannii Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria for Recommended Antimicrobial Agents Using Pharmacometric Approaches.

Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex (referred to herein as A. baumannii) treatment guidelines contain numerous older antimicrobial agents with susceptibility test interpretive criteria (STIC, also known as susceptibility breakpoints) set using only epidemiological data. We utilized a combination of in vitro surveillance data, preclinical murine thigh and lung infection models, population pharmacokinetics, simulation, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment analyses to evaluate A. baumannii STIC for four commonly recommended antimicrobials from different classes (amikacin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline). Antimicrobial in vitro surveillance data were based on 1,647 clinical A. baumannii isolates obtained from 109 centers in the United States and Europe. Among these isolates, 5 were selected for evaluation in murine infection models based on fitness and MIC variability. PK and dose-ranging studies were conducted using neutropenic murine thigh and lung infection models The MIC ranges for the 5 isolates evaluated were as follows: amikacin, 2 to 32 µg/mL; ceftazidime, 4 to 16 µg/mL; ciprofloxacin, 0.12 to 2 µg/mL; minocycline, 0.25 to 4 µg/mL. All organisms grew ≥1.5 log10 CFU in both models in untreated controls. Plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) pharmacokinetics for all drugs were determined in mice using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods. For each isolate, 5 dose levels of each drug were tested individually in the thigh and lung infection model. The inoculum ranged from 7.9 to 8.4 and 6.8 to 7.7 log10 CFU/mL for the lung and thigh models, respectively. PK/PD targets associated with net bacterial stasis and 1- and 2-log10 CFU reductions from baseline were identified for each organism/infection model using Hill-type models. Population pharmacokinetic models for each agent were identified from the literature. Using demographic variables for simulated patients with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia or urinary tract infections (including acute pyelonephritis) who were administered maximal dosing regimens of each agent, estimates of protein binding, and ELF penetration ratios based on data from the literature, free-drug plasma and total-drug concentration-time profiles were generated, and PK/PD indices by MIC were calculated. Percent probabilities of attaining median and randomly assigned PK/PD targets associated with the above-described endpoints were determined. Recommended susceptible breakpoints for each agent were those representing the highest MIC at which the percent probabilities of achieving PK/PD targets associated with a 1-log10 CFU reduction from baseline approached or were ≥90%. The following susceptible breakpoints for A. baumannii were identified: amikacin, ≤8 µg/mL for pneumonia; ceftazidime, ≤32 and ≤8 µg/mL for pneumonia; ciprofloxacin, ≤1 µg/mL; and minocycline, ≤0.5/≤1 µg/mL which correspond to the standard and high minocycline dosing regimens of 200 mg per day and 200 mg every 12 h, respectively. Implementation of appropriate STIC will help clinicians optimally use the above-described agents and improve the likelihood of successful patient outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Ertapenem for Patients with Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.

Ertapenem provides activity against many pathogens commonly associated with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumoniae (HABP and VABP, respectively), including methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and numerous Gram-negative pathogens with one major gap in coverage, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target attainment analyses were conducted to evaluate ertapenem against the most prevalent Enterobacteriaceae causing HABP/VABP. The objective of these analyses was to provide dose selection support for and demonstrate the appropriateness of ertapenem to empirically treat patients with HABP/VABP when administered with murepavadin, a novel targeted antimicrobial exhibiting a highly specific spectrum of activity against P. aeruginosa A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model, a total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to free-drug serum penetration ratio, contemporary in vitro surveillance data for ertapenem against Enterobacteriaceae, and percentage of the dosing interval for which drug concentrations exceed the MIC value (%T>MIC) targets associated with efficacy were used to conduct Monte Carlo simulations for five ertapenem regimens administered over short or prolonged durations of infusion. Overall total-drug ELF percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment based on a %T>MIC target of 35% among simulated patients with HABP/VABP arising from Enterobacteriaceae based on pathogen prevalence data for nosocomial pneumonia ranged from 89.1 to 92.7% for all five ertapenem regimens evaluated. Total-drug ELF percent probabilities of PK-PD target attainment ranged from 99.8 to 100%, 97.9 to 100%, 10.6 to 74.1%, and 0 to 1.50% at MIC values of 0.06, 0.12, 1, and 4 µg/ml, respectively (MIC90 values for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively). Results of these analyses provide support for the evaluation of ertapenem in combination with murepavadin for the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP.

In Vitro Activity of the Novel Lactone Ketolide Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) against Contemporary Clinical Bacteria from a Global Surveillance Program.

Nafithromycin (WCK 4873), a novel antimicrobial agent of the lactone ketolide class, is currently in phase 2 development for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). A total of 4,739 nonduplicate isolates were selected from a 2014 global surveillance program at medical institutions located in 43 countries within the United States, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Nafithromycin and comparator agents were used for susceptibility testing by reference broth microdilution methods. Nafithromycin was active against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50/90, 0.06/>2 µg/ml), including erythromycin-resistant strains exhibiting an inducible clindamycin resistance phenotype (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 µg/ml) and telithromycin-susceptible strains (MIC50/90, 0.06/0.06 µg/ml), but it exhibited limited activity against most telithromycin-resistant and clindamycin-resistant isolates that were constitutively resistant to macrolides (MIC50/90, >2/>2 µg/ml). Nafithromycin was very active (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.06 µg/ml) against 1,911 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, inhibiting all strains, with MIC values of ≤0.25 µg/ml. Telithromycin susceptibility was 99.9% for Streptococcus pneumoniae strains, and nafithromycin was up to 8-fold more potent than telithromycin. Overall, 37.9% of S. pneumoniae strains were resistant to erythromycin, and 19.7% were resistant to clindamycin. Nafithromycin was highly active against 606 Streptococcus pyogenes strains (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.015 µg/ml), inhibiting 100.0% of isolates at ≤0.5 µg/ml, and MIC50/90 values (0.015/0.015 to 0.03 µg/ml) were similar for the 4 geographic regions. Nafithromycin and telithromycin demonstrated comparable in vitro activities against 1,002 Haemophilus influenzae isolates and 504 Moraxella catarrhalis isolates. Overall, nafithromycin showed potent in vitro activity against a broad range of contemporary (2014) global pathogens. These results support the continued clinical development of nafithromycin for treatment of CABP.

In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Contemporary Bacterial Pathogens from the United States and Europe, 2014.

The in vitro activities of delafloxacin and comparator antimicrobial agents against 6,485 bacterial isolates collected from medical centers in Europe and the United States in 2014 were tested. Delafloxacin was the most potent agent tested against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci, and beta-hemolytic streptococci and had activity similar to that of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against certain members of the Enterobacteriaceae Overall, the broadest coverage of the tested pathogens (Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli) was observed with meropenem and tigecycline in both Europe and the United States. Delafloxacin was shown to be active against organisms that may be encountered in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, respiratory infections, and urinary tract infections.

Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) In Vitro Activity against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Gepotidacin is a first-in-class, novel triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA replication and has in vitro activity against susceptible and drug-resistant pathogens. Reference in vitro methods were used to investigate the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of gepotidacin and comparator agents for Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli Gepotidacin in vitro activity was also evaluated by using time-kill kinetics and broth microdilution checkerboard methods for synergy testing and for postantibiotic and subinhibitory effects. The MIC90 of gepotidacin for 50 S. aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) and 50 S. pneumoniae (including penicillin-nonsusceptible) isolates was 0.5 µg/ml, and for E. coli (n = 25 isolates), it was 4 µg/ml. Gepotidacin was bactericidal against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and E. coli, with MBC/MIC ratios of ≤4 against 98, 98, and 88% of the isolates tested, respectively. Time-kill curves indicated that the bactericidal activity of gepotidacin was observed at 4× or 10× MIC at 24 h for all of the isolates. S. aureus regrowth was observed in the presence of gepotidacin, and the resulting gepotidacin MICs were 2- to 128-fold higher than the baseline gepotidacin MICs. Checkerboard analysis of gepotidacin combined with other antimicrobials demonstrated no occurrences of antagonism with agents from multiple antimicrobial classes. The most common interaction when testing gepotidacin was indifference (fractional inhibitory concentration index of >0.5 to ≤4; 82.7% for Gram-positive isolates and 82.6% for Gram-negative isolates). The postantibiotic effect (PAE) of gepotidacin was short when it was tested against S. aureus (≤0.6 h against MRSA and MSSA), and the PAE-sub-MIC effect (SME) was extended (>8 h; three isolates at 0.5× MIC). The PAE of levofloxacin was modest (0.0 to 2.4 h), and the PAE-SME observed varied from 1.2 to >9 h at 0.5× MIC. These in vitro data indicate that gepotidacin is a bactericidal agent that exhibits a modest PAE and an extended PAE-SME against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria and merits further study for potential use in treating infections caused by these pathogens.

In Vitro Activity of Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Gepotidacin (formerly GSK2140944) is a novel, first-in-class, triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial that inhibits bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV via a unique mechanism and has demonstrated in vitro activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae, including drug-resistant strains, and also targets pathogens associated with other conventional and biothreat infections. Broth microdilution was used to evaluate the MIC and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) activity of gepotidacin and comparators against 25 N. gonorrhoeae strains (including five ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible strains). Gepotidacin activity was also evaluated against three N. gonorrhoeae strains (including a ciprofloxacin-nonsusceptible strain) for resistance development, against three N. gonorrhoeae strains (including two tetracycline- and azithromycin-nonsusceptible strains) using time-kill kinetics and checkerboard methods, and against two N. gonorrhoeae strains for the investigation of postantibiotic (PAE) and subinhibitory (PAE-SME) effects. The MIC50 and MIC90 for gepotidacin against the 25 N. gonorrhoeae isolates tested were 0.12 and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively. The MBC50 and MBC90 for gepotidacin were 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively. Gepotidacin was bactericidal, and single-step resistance selection studies did not recover any mutants, indicating a low rate of spontaneous single-step resistance. For combinations of gepotidacin and comparators tested using checkerboard methods, there were no instances where antagonism occurred and only one instance of synergy (with moxifloxacin; fractional inhibitory concentration, 0.375). This was not confirmed by in vitro time-kill studies. The PAE for gepotidacin against the wild-type strain ranged from 0.5 to >2.5 h, and the PAE-SME was >2.5 h. These in vitro data indicate that further study of gepotidacin is warranted for potential use in treating infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae.

Update of the activity of telavancin against a global collection of Staphylococcus aureus causing bacteremia, including endocarditis (2011-2014).

The efficacy and safety of telavancin is under evaluation for the treatment of subjects with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and S. aureus right-sided infective endocarditis. This study evaluated the telavancin activity against a global collection of S. aureus causing bloodstream infections (BSI), including endocarditis, to support the development of bacteremia/endocarditis clinical indications. This study included a total of 4191 S. aureus [1490 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)], which were unique (one per patient) clinical isolates recovered from blood samples collected during 2011-2014 in a global network of hospitals. All isolates were deemed responsible for BSI, including endocarditis, by local guidelines. Isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution. Telavancin (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 µg/ml) inhibited all S. aureus at ≤0.12 µg/ml, the breakpoint for susceptibility. Equivalent minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 µg/ml) were obtained for telavancin against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA isolates, as well as MRSA from community and healthcare origins. Similar telavancin activities (MIC50, 0.03 µg/ml) were observed against MRSA subsets from North America and Europe, while isolates from the Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Latin America regions had MIC50 values of 0.06 µg/ml. MRSA with vancomycin MIC values of 2-4 µg/ml and the multidrug resistance (MDR) subset had telavancin MIC50 results of 0.06 µg/ml, although the MIC100 result obtained against these subsets remained identical to those of MSSA (MIC100, 0.12 µg/ml, respectively). This study updates the telavancin in vitro activity, which continues to demonstrate great potency against invasive S. aureus, regardless of the susceptibility phenotype or demographic characteristics (100.0% susceptible), and supports the sought-after subsequent indications.

Oritavancin in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms from European medical centers: a 10-year longitudinal overview from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2010-2019).

To assess oritavancin in vitro activity against clinically relevant Gram-positive pathogens in European (EU) hospitals, a total of 51,531 consecutive and unique clinical isolates collected in 2010-2019 were evaluated. All isolates were tested by CLSI broth microdilution methods. The key resistance phenotypes differed considerably between Eastern Europe (E-EU) and Western Europe (W-EU), respectively: methicillin-resistant (MR) Staphylococcus aureus 27.7%/22.9%; multidrug resistant (MDR) S. aureus, 19.7%/15.2%; MR coagulase-negative staphylococci, 77.3%/61.9%; vancomycin-resistant enterococci (E. faecium), 44.2%/20.9%; and MDR E. faecium, 63.8%/55.4%. There were no substantive differences in oritavancin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for the different species/organism groups over time or by EU region. Oritavancin inhibited 99.9% and 99.1% of all S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci at 0.12 mg/L, respectively, and all isolates of E. faecalis and E. faecium at ≤0.5 mg/L. Oritavancin susceptibility rates against ß-hemolytic and Viridans group streptococci isolates were 98.1% and 99.4%, respectively. Oritavancin had potent activity in vitro against this contemporary collection of European Gram-positive isolates from 2010 to 2019.

Metallo-beta-lactamase gene bla(IMP-15) in a class 1 integron, In95, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from a hospital in Mexico.

During 2003, 40 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates collected in a Mexican tertiary-care hospital were screened for metallo-beta-lactamase production. Thirteen isolates produced IMP-15, and 12 had a single pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern. The bla(IMP-15) gene cassette was inserted in a plasmid-borne integron with a unique array of gene cassettes and was named In95.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in the Asia-Pacific region (minus China, Australia and New Zealand): report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (2013-2015).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with healthcare-associated infections. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antipseudomonal cephalosporin combined with a well-established ß-lactamase inhibitor. A total of 1963 Gram-negative organisms (489 P. aeruginosa and 1474 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected using a prevalence-based approach from 14 medical centres in the APAC region. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution method as described by the CLSI and the results were interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam [MIC50/90, 0.25/4 µg/mL; 89.2/85.8% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] and meropenem [MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06 µg/mL; 96.3/96.5% susceptible (CLSI/EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other ß-lactam agents ranging from 85.8/81.0% for piperacillin/tazobactam to 74.4/72.7% for cefepime and 72.8/68.1% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 3.6% were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and 25.6% exhibited an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) non-CRE phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/90, 0.5/16 µg/mL), but not against isolates with a CRE phenotype (MIC50/90, >32/>32 µg/mL). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/4 µg/mL) ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 90.8% at an MIC of ≤4 µg/mL. Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited high rates of susceptibility to amikacin [91.2/89.4% (CLSI/EUCAST)] and colistin [98.4/100.0% (CLSI/EUCAST)]. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than available cephalosporins when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against contemporary Gram-positive and -negative organisms collected from Europe (2015).

Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 12,240 isolates was performed following CLSI/EUCAST guidelines. The percentage of susceptible MRSA isolates was higher for ceftobiprole (96.5% susceptible) than for ceftaroline (86.2% susceptible). Both ceftobiprole (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L) and ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) demonstrated potent activity against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC50/90 values of 0.5/2 mg/L); ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 2/8 mg/L) was 4-fold less active against these strains. Ceftobiprole activity was comparable to that of the other ß-lactam agents tested against S. pneumoniae (MIC90, 0.5 mg/L vs 0.12-2 mg/L [other ß-lactams]), viridans-group streptococci (MIC90,0.25 mg/L vs 0.006-1 mg/L [other ß-lactams]), and ß-hemolytic streptococci (MIC90,0.03 mg/L vs 0.015-0.06 mg/L [other ß-lactams]). Overall, 73.8% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested were susceptible to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 70.4% of P. aeruginosa at ≤4 mg/L and all isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis at ≤ 0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole was active in vitro against a broad range of clinically-relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Oritavancin in vitro activity against gram-positive organisms from European and United States medical centers: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for 2010-2014.

The in vitro activity of oritavancin was assessed against 44,715 gram-positive pathogens causing infections in European and United States (US) hospitals (2010-2014). There were no substantive differences (>±2-fold dilution) in oritavancin MIC50 or MIC90 values for different species/organism groups over time or by region. Oritavancin (99.9% susceptible) showed modal MIC, MIC50, and MIC90 results of 0.03, 0.03, and 0.06-0.12 mg/L when tested against Staphylococcus aureus, regardless of methicillin susceptibility, year, or region. Coagulase-negative staphylococci from the US and Europe demonstrated equal MIC50 values for oritavancin (MIC50, 0.03 mg/L). Oritavancin inhibited 99.9% of Enterococcus faecalis and all E. faecium at ≤0.5 mg/L, including vancomycin-resistant isolates. Oritavancin exhibited MIC50 results of 0.03 and ≤0.008 mg/L when tested against ß-hemolytic and viridans group streptococci isolates, respectively, regardless of geographical region. Oritavancin maintained potent activity in vitro against this contemporary collection of European and US gram-positive isolates over 5 years (2010-2014).

Complex clonal and plasmid epidemiology in the first outbreak of Enterobacteriaceae infection involving VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase in Spain: toward endemicity?

BACKGROUND: We report the emergence and spread of metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) among enterobacterial isolates at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). METHODS AND RESULTS: During the period from March 2005 through September 2006, 25 patients (52% of whom were in the intensive care unit) were infected and/or colonized with single or different MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates (Klebsiella pneumoniae, 14 patients; Enterobacter cloacae, 12 patients; Escherichia coli, 1 patient; and/or Klebsiella oxytoca, 1 patient). Clonal analysis (XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) revealed that all K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to the same clone, but 6 patterns were found among the E. cloacae isolates. Carbapenems were affected to different degrees (minimum inhibitory concentration, < or = 1 to > 8 microg/mL), as were aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin. The bla(VIM-1) MBL gene was present in all isolates; in addition, the bla(SHV-12) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gene was detected in K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates. The bla(VIM-1) gene was detected within a 4.0-kb class 1 integron (bla(VIM-1)-aacA4-dfrII-aadA1-catB2) in K. pneumoniae and E. coli and in a 2.5-kb class 1 integron (bla(VIM-1)-aacA4-aadA1) in E. cloacae and K. oxytoca isolates. The bla(VIM-1) gene was transferable (filter-mating) in 14 of 14 K. pneumoniae isolates, 4 of 11 E. cloacae isolates, and 1 of 1 E. coli isolate. A 60-kb plasmid belonging to the IncI1 group was detected in the epidemic VIM-1-K. pneumoniae clone. Plasmids of 300- or 435-kb belonging to IncH12 group were found among E. cloacae isolates. CONCLUSIONS: K. pneumoniae-MBL monoclonal epidemics coexisted with E. cloacae-MBL multiclonal epidemics in our hospital. The spread of the bla(VIM-1) gene among Enterobacteriaceae was driven by clonal spread associated with intergeneric plasmid transfer with different class I integron platforms. Such complex epidemiology might anticipate endemicity and should be considered for the design of containment epidemiology strategies.

Re-evaluation of the role of broad-spectrum cephalosporins against staphylococci by applying contemporary in-vitro results and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principles.

The potency of cefepime, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime was assessed by CLSI broth microdilution methods against 41,644 S. aureus (63.2% oxacillin-susceptible) and 14,266 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 22.2% oxacillin-susceptible) through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program database (1998-2004). Using normal volunteer pharmacokinetic data and a linear intermittent intravenous infusion model, and an animal-derived pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) target of > or = 40% time above MIC, expected probabilities of target attainment (PTA) for cephems were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. Current CLSI breakpoints would rank the tested agents cefepime > or = ceftriaxone > ceftazidime and by PK-PD PTA cefepime > ceftazidime > ceftriaxone. Cefepime has a potency advantage over ceftazidime (four- to eight-fold) and superiority at the usual dosing over ceftriaxone (22.7-66.1%) for oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. Ceftazidime pharmacokinetic overcomes by-weight activity disadvantages, while a low proportion (<5%) of active free-drug penalizes ceftriaxone in the PTA calculations. PTA remained at > or = 0.9 to a breakpoint of 8 mg/L for cefepime (1 g q8 or 12 hours) and ceftazidime and to a breakpoint of 2 mg/L for ceftriaxone. Regardless of applied breakpoint (CLSI or PKPD), cefepime has the widest and most potent anti-staphylococcal activity among commonly used "third- or fourth-generation" cephems. When used at doses > or = 3 g/day, cefepime assures maximal coverage of oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci whether using existing (CLSI) or modified (PK-PD) breakpoints. Ceftriaxone should be used with caution.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing healthcare-associated infections in Australia and New Zealand: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2013-2015).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparator agents tested against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients in Australia and New Zealand with healthcare-associated infection. METHODS: A total of 1459 gram-negative organisms (440 P. aeruginosa and 1019 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected from 11 medical centers located in Australia and New Zealand. The organisms were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods as described by the CLSI M07-A10 document and the results interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria. RESULTS: Ceftolozane-tazobactam (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5µg/mL; 97.7/95.9% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]), meropenem (MIC50/90, ≤0.06/≤0.06µg/mL; 99.8/99.9% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) and amikacin (MIC50/90, 2/4µg/mL; 99.8/99.6% susceptible [CLSI/EUCAST]) were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Enterobacteriaceae isolates displayed susceptibility rates to other ß-lactam agents ranging from 95.3/94.4% for cefepime, 94.1/91.4% for piperacillin-tazobactam, and 93.3/91.5% for ceftazidime using CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates tested, 0.1% were CRE and 6.6% exhibited an ESBL non-CRE phenotype. Whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype strains of Enterobacteriaceae (MIC50/90, 0.5/2µg/mL), it lacked useful activity (MIC, >32µg/mL) against the single isolate with a CRE resistant phenotype. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most potent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2µg/mL) ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 95.7% at an MIC of ≤4µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane-tazobactam was the most active ß-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

Antimicrobial activity of tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam tested against 18,386 Gram-negative organisms from Europe and the Asia-Pacific region (2013-2014).

A total of 18,386 organisms, including 13,224 Enterobacteriaceae, 3536 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1254 Acinetobacter spp., and 372Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were collected from Western Europe (WEU; n=10,021), Eastern Europe (EEU; n=4957), and the Asia-Pacific region (APAC; n=3408 [1052 from China]) in 2013-2014 as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program and tested by a reference broth microdilution method for susceptibility against tigecycline, cefoperazone/sulbactam, and comparator agents. Overall, 95.3% of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible (≤1µg/mL; EUCAST) to tigecycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/1µg/mL) with regional EUCAST susceptibility rates of 94.8-97.8% (98.9-99.6% inhibited at ≤2µg/mL [US FDA]). Among Acinetobacter spp., 66.1% (EEU) and 79.5% (WEU) were inhibited at ≤1µg/mL of tigecycline (94.9% and 97.3% inhibited at ≤2µg/mL; pan-European MIC50/90, 1/2µg/mL). For S. maltophilia, 65.4% (China) to 88.9% (EEU) of the isolates were inhibited at ≤1µg/mL of tigecycline. Cefoperazone/sulbactam inhibited 94.6/83.5/91.5% of Enterobacteriaceae at ≤16µg/mL in WEU/EEU/APAC, respectively.

Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001-2004).

In total, 54 731 Gram-negative bacilli isolated worldwide between 2001 and 2004 from diverse sites of infection were tested for susceptibility to polymyxin B by the broth reference microdilution method, with interpretation of results according to CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guidelines. Polymyxin B showed excellent potency and spectrum against 8705 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2621 Acinetobacter spp. isolates (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L and MIC90, 2 mg/L for both pathogens). Polymyxin B resistance rates were slightly higher for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (2.7%) and Acinetobacter spp. (2.8%), or multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa (3.3%) and Acinetobacter spp. (3.2%), when compared with the entire group (1.3% for P. aeruginosa and 2.1% for Acinetobacter spp.). Among P. aeruginosa, polymyxin B resistance rates varied from 2.9% in the Asia-Pacific region to only 1.1% in Europe, Latin America and North America, while polymyxin B resistance rates ranged from 2.7% in Europe to 1.7% in North America and Latin America among Acinetobacter spp. Polymyxin B also demonstrated excellent activity (MIC90, < or = 1 mg/L; > 98% susceptible) against Citrobacter spp., Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., but activity was more variable against Enterobacter spp. (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L; 83.3% susceptible) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L; 72.4% susceptible), and was very limited (MIC50, > 8 mg/L) against Burkholderia cepacia (11.8% susceptible), Serratia spp. (5.4% susceptible), indole-positive Proteus spp. (1.3% susceptible) and Proteus mirabilis (0.7% susceptible).

Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria isolated from European medical centres: results of the Daptomycin Surveillance Programme (2002-2004).

The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 9322 contemporary (2002-2004) gram-positive bacterial isolates collected from 31 medical centres in 14 countries in Europe were evaluated by broth microdilution methods according to CLSI guidelines. The isolates collected comprised Staphylococcus aureus (4842 isolates), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS; 1942 isolates), Enterococcus faecalis (1147 isolates), Enterococcus faecium (391 isolates), beta-haemolytic streptococci (660 isolates) and viridans group streptococci (340 isolates). The organisms were tested against daptomycin and more than 20 comparator agents in Mueller-Hinton broth, supplemented with calcium to 50 mg/L when testing daptomycin. Overall, methicillin (oxacillin) resistance rates were 26.7% and 77.0% for S. aureus (MRSA) and CoNS, respectively, and the vancomycin resistance rate among enterococci was 6.1%. MRSA rates varied from 0.6% in Sweden to 40.2-43.0% in Belgium, Greece, Ireland, the UK and Israel, and VRE rates varied from 0% in Switzerland to 21.2% in Ireland. More than 99.9% of isolates tested were considered susceptible to daptomycin according to breakpoints established by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the CLSI. Daptomycin was active against all gram-positive species, with the highest MIC being 2, 8, 0.5 and 2 mg/L for staphylococci, enterococci, beta-haemolytic streptococci and viridans group streptococci, respectively. Daptomycin activity was not influenced adversely by resistance to other agents among staphylococci or enterococci. This novel lipopeptide (daptomycin) appears to be an excellent alternative therapeutic option for serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-positive organisms isolated in Europe.

Health and economic outcomes of the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae-produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in a hospital with high prevalence of this infection.

INTRODUCTION: Klebsiella pneumoniae is of high prevalence in hospital infections, mainly in bloodstream infections (BSI), and some produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). For hospitals with a high prevalence of strains producing this enzyme, there is no reference material to show whether the use of the E-test method for their detection, which can be quite expensive, is actually required. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-benefit of the disk diffusion and E-test methods for the detection of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains in hospitals where a high prevalence of this resistance mechanism in BSI is found. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients with K. pneumoniae BSI were evaluated retrospectively. ESBL-producing strains were identified by the disk diffusion method and by the E-test method. We estimated the costs of both diagnostic methods based on antimicrobial therapy adequacy. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of K. pneumoniae infections were due to ESBL-producing strains. The disk diffusion method yielded a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.7% (95% CI: 88.9-100%) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1% (CI 95%: 90.8-101.4%) in relation to the E-test. We evaluated cost-effectiveness, i.e., we analyzed the cost of both E-test and disk diffusion methods with carbapenem and cephalosporins, and found that the use of the disk diffusion method accounts for approximately US$3300. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitals with a high prevalence of ESBL-producing strains, the disk diffusion method can be used to detect ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae without compromising the clinical progression of patients with BSI. The E-test showed higher accuracy but this method was more expensive than the disk diffusion method. However, the use of the E-test method was demonstrated to be more cost-effective, as we evaluated cost based on antimicrobial therapy adequacy.