Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients with Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres. BACKGROUND DATA: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement. METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres. RESULTS: 763 patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARC and 299 (39%) had LRRC. 544 patients (71%) who met predefined lower risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For LARC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤44%; comprehensive complication index (CCI): ≤30.2; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤4.3%; R0 resection rate: ≥79%. For LRRC patients, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤53%; CCI: ≤34.1; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤6%; R0 resection rate: ≥77%. CONCLUSIONS: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres.

Patient reported outcomes after multivisceral resection for advanced rectal cancers in female patients.

INTRODUCTION: Multivisceral resections for rectal cancer can lead to long-term functional disturbances. This study aims to evaluate the quality-of-life outcomes in female patients who underwent multivisceral resection for rectal cancer, specifically focusing on urinary and sexual functions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on female patients who underwent multivisceral rectal resections. Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-CR29. RESULTS: Out of 198 female patients that underwent multivisceral resections, 69 were assessable for functional outcomes. The uterus was removed in 42 patients (61%), and the posterior vaginal wall in 34 (49%). A vaginal reconstructive procedure was carried out in 30% (21 patients). Patients reported the most troubles with urinary frequency (mean: 69.6; SD: 9.9), hair loss (mean: 64.7; SD: 13.9), pain during intercourse (mean: 44; SD: 40.7), and bowel frequency (mean: 36.9; SD: -10.7) in this order. Amongst the functional scales, anxiety about future health (mean: 42.5; SD: -018.9) and interest in sex (mean: 57.2; SD: 33.2) scored the lowest. CONCLUSION: Multivisceral rectal resections in female patients are associated with physical and psychosocial changes resulting in urinary and bowel complaints, anxiety about future health, poor sexual health, and pain.

Colon cancer: feeling the imbalance?

While neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard of care for rectal cancers in most centres, there is much interest in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer after the recent publication of the FOxTROT trial. The management of colon cancers seems to be heading down the same path as rectal cancer, where the radicality of surgery is replaced by chemotherapy intensification. The role of demanding procedures such as complete mesocolic excision with central venous ligation in this new paradigm of upfront chemotherapy remains uncertain and uninvestigated.

The conundrum of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has fast become the paradigm in the management of rectal cancer. The widespread adoption of this approach across the world, not only for locally advanced cancers but even for cancers that otherwise would not merit chemotherapy, leads both to an increase in treatment-related toxicity for patients and burdens the healthcare services of the country. It is important to tailor treatment to each patient based not only on the tumour but, even more importantly, on the patient's expectations and goals. The intent of treatment while prescribing TNT needs to be clear, understanding that not all patients are suitable for an organ preservation (watch and wait) approach and that the survival benefits of TNT are not as obvious as most proponents believe.

Comparing robotic with laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer-a propensity-matched analysis.

AIM: Robotic surgery is increasingly being used for rectal resection, with short-term benefits such as reduced hospital stay, faster bowel recovery and fewer complications. However, its utility for advanced rectal cancers requiring beyond total mesorectal excision has not been adequately evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare robotic and laparoscopic approaches for extended rectal resection, with postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes as endpoints. METHOD: A retrospective, single-centre study of patients with advanced rectal cancer requiring extended rectal resection between January 2017 and December 2022 was carried out. Beyond total mesorectal excisions included pelvic exenteration, en bloc soft tissue or partial organ resection with the rectum, and lateral pelvic node dissection. Propensity score matching in a 4:1 ratio of laparoscopic to robotic was performed with age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, organs involved, clinical T stage and colonoscopic obstruction. RESULTS: A total of 425 beyond total mesorectal excisions were performed by minimally invasive approaches during the study period, and after propensity matching 228 laparoscopic operations were compared with 57 robotic resections. All baseline characteristics were balanced. No difference in blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, positive resection margin or nodal yield was found, but there was a somewhat longer operating duration in robotics. The 2-year disease-free and overall survival were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in postoperative or short-term oncological outcomes were found between robotic and laparoscopic beyond total mesorectal excisions for advanced tumours when performed by teams experienced in both robotics and laparoscopy.

Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?

AIM: Although complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer is oncologically sound, to date, there has been no consensus on the extent of lymphadenectomy in radical right colectomy. This study essentially compared the perioperative and survival outcomes of CME with two templates of lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer. METHOD: This was a propensity matched, retrospective analysis of a single centre, prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing elective right colectomy for nonmetastatic, biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma from November 2013 to October 2018. CME + D3 was adopted selectively, documented prospectively, and compared with patients undergoing CME + central vascular ligation (CVL). The only technical difference between the groups was the excision of the surgical trunk of Gillot in the CME + D3 group. Postoperative, long-term outcomes and patterns of recurrence were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Of the 244 eligible patients, 88 (36.1%) and 156 (63.9%) underwent CME + D3 and CME + CVL, respectively. Matched groups (72 [CME + D3] vs. 108 [CME + CVL]) showed no difference in histology, tumour grade, postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay. CME + D3 was preferentially performed laparoscopically (35.2% vs. 9%), was associated with lower blood loss (215 mL vs. 297 mL, p = 0.001), higher nodal yield (31 vs. 25 nodes, p = 0.003) and a higher incidence of chyle leak (4 vs. 0, p = 0.013). At a median follow-up of more than 57 months, there was no significant difference in local recurrence, disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, lymphadenectomy along the superior mesenteric vein, as a component of CME for right colon cancer, offered a higher nodal yield with no improvement in oncological outcome. Dissection of the SMV, over and above a D2 dissection, could therefore be restricted to specialized colorectal units until further studies establish the incremental oncological benefit of this extended lymphadenectomy or define a patient group in whom it is beneficial.

Postoperative Hyperbilirubinemia and Acute Liver Dysfunction after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC.

How to cite this article: Kannancheeri A, Solanki SL, Kazi M, Saklani A. Postoperative Hyperbilirubinemia and Acute Liver Dysfunction after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(1):80-81.

The RAPIDO trial-Reduction in disease-related treatment failure does not translate into improved overall survival: a mystery solved!

The initial publication of the RAPIDO trial resulted in widespread adoption of short-course radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. The impressive reduction in disease-related treatment failure did not, however, translate into any overall survival benefit. The recent update of the RAPIDO trial with its 5-year results provides much insight into the actual effect that this approach has on patient outcomes and the detriment in local control leads to the question as to whether this approach can still be considered as standard of care in high-risk rectal cancer.

Outcomes of extended total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: Extended total mesorectal excision (eTME) is a complex procedure involving en bloc resection of the structures surrounding the various quadrants of the rectum. This study, presenting the largest series so far of patients undergoing eTME, aimed to assess the surgical and survival outcomes of patients following treatment with eTME and to compare these outcomes with historical data on pelvic exenteration. METHOD: The study is a retrospective review of all patients with locally advanced rectal cancer requiring an eTME (2014-2020). The database includes the demographic profile, operative details, histopathological features and follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty three patients who underwent eTME were analysed. The overall Clavien-Dindo complication rate of > IIIa was 21.1%. The anterior quadrant was the most common anatomical site resected (68.5%). The R1 resection rate was 10.4%. After a median follow-up of 28 months, there were 51 recurrences in the study and twenty two deaths were recorded. The local recurrence rate was 7.3% among the study population. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were 66.7% and 80.4%, respectively, at 3 years. The majority of the recurrences were distant metastasis (84.3%). In univariate analysis, the quadrant involved did not affect survival. In multivariate analysis, signet ring histology, metastatic presentation, inadequate tumour response and R1 resection affected DFS. CONCLUSION: The recurrence pattern, R1 resection rate and survival outcomes of patients in the present study were comparable with those for patients undergoing an exenteration. Therefore, eTME is probably a safe alternative to pelvic exenterations when R0 resection is achievable and when the procedure is performed in high-volume specialist tertiary care centres.

Should anorectal manometry be routine before stoma reversal in patients after an intersphincteric resection?

INTRODUCTION: Anorectal manometry (ARM) is sometimes performed before ostomy reversal in patients with an intersphincteric resection (ISR) to predict bowel function. However, no clinical predictive data exist regarding its utility. METHODS: The single-centre, retrospective data of ISR patients who had an ARM prior to ostomy reversal, and bowel functional assessment with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and Wexner incontinence scores at least 6 months after reversal, were considered. Correlation statistics were performed with each of the manometric parameters and functional outcome categories. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included. The median basal and squeeze pressures were 41 and 100 mmHg, respectively. Any LARS (score ≥20) and major incontinence (score ≥11) was observed in 51.7% and 16.9%, respectively. None of the manometric parameters (median basal or maximum squeeze pressure, anal canal length, volume at urge and the ability to expel) correlated with LARS or incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry (ARM) before ostomy reversal to predict bowel function at 6 months or beyond was not helpful in patients with an ISR and diverting stoma. No manometric parameter correlated with the LARS or Wexner incontinence scores.

The use of an obstetric balloon as a pelvic spacer in preventing empty pelvis syndrome after total pelvic exenteration in rectal cancers - A prospective safety and efficacy study for the Bakri balloon.

AIM: Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a source of considerable morbidity following total pelvic exenteration. None of the available methods have been universally successful in mitigating this problem. The aim of this work was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the obstetric Bakri balloon in preventing empty pelvis syndrome. METHOD: This study was a combined prospective and retrospective study of all total pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers from a single institution performed between October 2013 and May 2022. Since December 2019 the Bakri balloon was used in all patients who provided consent. EPS within 90 days was the primary end point, and included bowel obstruction, pelvic collection and entero-perineal fistula. Comparison with those patients who did not have a Bakri balloon was performed. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with a Bakri balloon were compared with 96 patients without a balloon placed after pelvic exenteration. No patient experienced an untoward complication from balloon deployment. The incidence of EPS was 13.3% and 22.9% in the Bakri and no Bakri cohorts, respectively (p = 0.110). Every component of EPS was proportionally lower, without statistical significance. Based on point estimates, the number needed to treat to prevent EPS using the Bakri balloon was 10. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Bakri balloon was safe without serious adverse events. The incidence of EPS after total pelvic exenteration was not statistically different with the use of the Bakri balloon despite a 9.6% reduction. A larger comparative study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of the balloon.

International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG-ISR): modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome.

AIM: Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an oncologically complex operation for very low-lying rectal cancers. Yet, definition, anatomical description, operative indications and operative approaches to ISR are not standardized. The aim of this study was to standardize the definition of ISR by reaching international consensus from the experts in the field. This standardization will allow meaningful comparison in the literature in the future. METHOD: A modified Delphi approach with three rounds of questionnaire was adopted. A total of 29 international experts from 11 countries were recruited for this study. Six domains with a total of 37 statements were examined, including anatomical definition; definition of intersphincteric dissection, intersphincteric resection (ISR) and ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR); indication for ISR; surgical technique of ISR; specimen description of ISR; and functional outcome assessment protocol. RESULTS: Three rounds of questionnaire were performed (response rate 100%, 89.6%, 89.6%). Agreement (≥80%) reached standardization on 36 statements. CONCLUSION: This study provides an international expert consensus-based definition and standardization of ISR. This is the first study standardizing terminology and definition of deep pelvis/anal canal anatomy from a surgical point of view. Intersphincteric dissection, ISR and uLAR were specifically defined for precise surgical description. Indication for ISR was determined by the rectal tumour's maximal radial infiltration (T stage) below the levator ani. A new surgical definition of T3isp was reached by consensus to define T3 low rectal tumours infiltrating the intersphincteric plane. A practical flowchart for surgical indication for uLAR/ISR/abdominoperineal resection was developed. A standardized ISR surgical technique and functional outcome assessment protocol was defined.

Splenic flexure cancer: is right extended hemicolectomy better than left hemicolectomy?

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the optimal surgery for splenic flexure cancers. METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with splenic flexure cancer undergoing either a right extended hemicolectomy or left hemicolectomy at a tertiary care cancer hospital from 14.5.2010 to 16.9.2021. The primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity and hospital stay with secondary outcomes being overall survival, disease-free survival, and long-term patient reported functional and quality of life outcomes. RESULTS: The demographic variables were evenly distributed between groups, and median follow-up was 44 months. The groups were comparable in terms of postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo complication ≥ 3a 10.6% vs 10%, p = 0.322) and hospital stay (8 days vs 7 days, p = 0.316). Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups (3-year disease-free survival 71.8% vs 67.8%, p = 0.877, and 3-year overall survival 83.9% vs 75.8%, p = 0.787), and long-term patient-reported functional outcomes were excellent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oncological outcomes, post operative morbidity, and long-term patient reported functional outcomes are comparable in patients undergoing either a right extended or left hemicolectomy for splenic flexure cancer.

Empty pelvis syndrome: a retrospective audit from a tertiary cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) has been defined as a complications arising as a sequel of empty space created after extensive pelvic surgery involving perineal resection. However this definition has been heterogenous throughout the limited literature available. Hence, EPS is a significant yet under recognized complication vexing both patients and surgeons. Even till date, prevention and management of EPS remain a challenge. Various preventive strategies have been employed each with its own complications. Few small studies mentioned incidence of this dreaded complication in between 20 and 40%. But most of these studies quote vague evidence and especially only after TPE surgeries. To the best of our knowledge, incidence after APR and PE has never been mentioned in literature. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical burden of empty pelvis syndrome in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR), posterior exenteration (PE), or total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for low rectal cancers. METHODS: This is a retrospective audit from a high-volume tertiary cancer center in India. Patients who underwent APR, PE, or TPE between the years 2013 to 2021 were screened and analyzed for incidence, presentation, and management of empty pelvic syndrome (EPS). RESULTS: A total of 1224 patients' electronic medical records were screened for complications related to empty pelvis. The overall incidence of EPS was 95/1224 (7%) with 55/1024 (5%) in APR, 8/39 (20.5%) in PE, and 32/143 (21.9%) in TPE. The most common clinical presentation was small bowel obstruction 43/95 (45.2%) and most presented late, 56/95 (60%), i.e., after 30 days of surgery. Most of the patients who had EPS were managed conservatively 55/95 (57%). CONCLUSION: EPS is a significant clinical problem that can lead to major morbidity, especially after exenterative surgeries warranting effective preventive strategies.

Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery program (ERP) has demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes with increased compliance to pathway. However, there is scarce data on feasibility and safety in resource limited setting. The objective was to assess compliance with ERP and its impact on postoperative outcomes and return to intended oncological treatment (RIOT). METHODS: A single center prospective observational audit was conducted from 2014 to 2019, in elective colorectal cancer surgery. Before implementation, multi-disciplinary team was educated regarding ERP. Compliance to ERP protocol and its elements was recorded. Impact of quantum of compliance (≥80% vs. <80%) to ERP on postoperative morbidity, mortality, readmission, stay, re-exploration, functional GI recovery, surgical-specific complications, and RIOT was evaluated for open and minimal invasive surgery (MIS). RESULTS: During study, 937 patients underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery. Overall compliance with ERP was 73.3%. More than 80% compliance was observed in 332 (35.4%) patients in the entire cohort. Patients with <80% compliance had significantly higher overall, minor and surgery-specific complications, longer postoperative stay, delayed functional GI recovery for both open and MIS procedures. RIOT was observed in 96.5% patients. Duration to RIOT was significantly shorter following open surgery with ≥80% compliance. Compliance <80% to ERP was identified as one of the independent predictors for developing postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates beneficial impact of increased compliance to ERP on postoperative outcomes following open and minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Within a resource limited setting, ERP was found to feasible, safe, and effective in both open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.

Prognostic Nutritional Index Prior to Rectal Cancer Resection Predicts Overall Survival.

Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) correlates with postoperative complications and survival in colorectal cancers. Separate studies for rectal cancers are not available where the majority have preoperative radiation, operated by minimally invasive approaches and have diverting ostomies.Consecutive rectal resections between October 2014 and December 2017 from a single center were included. PNI was calculated as 10 x (serum Albumin) + 0.005 x TLC (per mm3) before operation. Multivariate cox regression was used with overall survival (OS) as the dependent variable. Interaction terms of PNI with neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach and postoperative complications were used to assess specific subgroups.Three-hundred forty elective rectal resections were included with a mean PNI of 46.711 (SD - 6.692), and a median follow up of 44 mo. In multivariable regression, PNI predicted OS (HR - 0.943; p-0.001). Interaction of PNI with preoperative radiation or surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) did not change its influence on survival. PNI predicted survival with similar hazard even in patients without major postoperative complicationsDespite routine diversion after rectal resections, PNI predicted OS with an absolute survival benefit of 1.2% at 3-year for every unit increase in PNI irrespective of preoperative therapy or surgical approach.

Bowel Functional Outcomes After Long-Course or Short-Course Radiation for Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite short-course radiation and chemotherapy gaining popularity because of similar or better oncological outcomes, functional outcomes relative to long-course radiation have not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare bowel function outcomes after long-course or short-course radiation and delayed operation for advanced rectal cancers. DESIGN: Propensity-matched analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary cancer center. Patients were operated on between 2014 and 2020. PATIENTS: The study included patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, mid, and low rectal cancers who underwent low anterior resection with stapled anastomosis and diverting ostomy. Extended or beyond total mesorectal excisions and lateral node dissections were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Long-course radiation delivered as a radiation dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions or short-course radiation (5 Gy in 5 fractions) and delayed surgery after 4 to 6 weeks with or without chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-time assessment of low anterior resections syndrome and Wexner incontinence scores at least 6 months after stoma reversal. RESULTS: After matching 124 patients in the 1:2 ratio between short- and long-course radiations, 93 patients were included for analysis. Any low anterior resection syndrome was found in 90.3% of short-course patients compared to 54.8% after long-course radiation (p < 0.001). Major incontinence was detected in 6.5% after short-course radiation as opposed to 8.1% of patients after long-course radiation (p = 0.781). On multivariate logistic regression, short-course radiation predicted the development of any low anterior resection syndrome with an OR of 4.4. LIMITATIONS: Selection and misclassification biases from retrospective recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic, mid, and low rectal cancers who underwent preoperative radiation followed by stapled low anterior resection, short-course radiation had higher probability of developing low anterior resection syndrome than long-course radiation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C37. RESULTADOS DE LA FUNCIN INTESTINAL DESPUS DE LA RADIACIN DE CICLO LARGO O CORTO EN CNCER DE RECTO AVANZADO UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de que la radiación de corta duración y la quimioterapia están ganando popularidad debido a resultados oncológicos similares o mejores, los resultados funcionales en relación con la radiación de larga duración no han sido evaluado.OBJETIVO:Comparar resultados de la función intestinal después de la radiación de ciclo largo o corto y cirugía diferida para los en cáncer de recto avanzado.DISEÑO:Análisis emparejado de propensión.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro único de cáncer terciario. Pacientes operados entre 2014 y 2020.PACIENTES:Cánceres de recto medio y bajo localmente avanzados, no metastásicos, que se sometieron a resección anterior baja con anastomosis grapada y ostomía de derivación. Se excluyeron las escisiones total de mesorecto extendidas o más allá del plano y las disecciones de los ganglios laterales.INTERVENCIONES:Radiación de ciclo largo administrada como 50 Gy en 25 fracciones o radiación de ciclo corto (5 Gy en 5 fracciones) y cirugía diferida después de 4 a 6 semanas con o sin quimioterapia.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Evaluación única del síndrome de reseccion anterior baja y escala de Wexner de incontinencia al menos seis meses después de la restitución del tránsito intestinal.RESULTADOS:Después de emparejar 124 pacientes en la proporción 1:2 entre radiación de ciclo corto y largo, se incluyeron 93 pacientes para el análisis. Se encontró cualquier síndrome de resección anterior baja en el 90,3% de los pacientes de ciclo corto en comparación con el 54,8% después de la radiación de ciclo largo (p < 0,001). Se detectó incontinencia grave en el 6,5% después de un tratamiento de corta duración frente al 8,1% de los pacientes que recibieron un tratamiento de radiación de larga duración (p = 0,781). En la regresión logística multivariable, la radiación de corta duración predijo el desarrollo de cualquier síndrome de resección anterior baja con una probabilidad de 4,4.LIMITACIONES:Sesgos de selección y clasificación errónea de reclutamiento retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Para los cánceres de recto medio e inferior localmente avanzados, no metastásicos, que se sometieron a radiación preoperatoria seguida de resección anterior baja con grapas, curso corto tuvo una mayor probabilidad de desarrollar síndrome de resección anterior baja en comparación con radiación de curso largo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C37. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).

Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy has not been widely evaluated as an alternative to traditional long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the oncological and short-term outcomes between short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective propensity-matched study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a colorectal department at a tertiary care oncology center in India. PATIENTS: There were 173 patients. Group A had 47 patients and group B had 126 patients. A 1:2.7 matching was done for age, sex, distance of tumor from the anal verge, sphincter preservation surgeries, MRI-based pretreatment T stage, and circumferential resection margin. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions performed were short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy (group A) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (group B) in locally advanced rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measures were pathological circumferential resection margin positivity, downstaging, tumor regression grade, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the patients, 52% had a positive circumferential resection margin on MRI, 57% had low rectal tumors, and 20% had T4 tumors. Distribution of rectal surgeries was similar between the 2 groups. pT downstaging and tumor regression scores were significantly better in group B ( p = 0.028 and 0.026). Pathological circumferential resection margin, distal resection margin, and nodal yield were similar. On multivariate analysis, pretreatment N status was the only independent predictive factor for pathological circumferential resection margin status. Grade 3 to 4 Clavien-Dindo complications, anastomotic leak rates, and hospital stay were similar between the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. Although propensity matching was performed, selection bias cannot be eliminated completely, as seen in the difference in the surgical approaches between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort containing a significant portion of MRI circumferential resection margin-positive low rectal cancers, short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy followed by delayed surgery resulted in lower T downstaging and lower tumor regression scores compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy, but pathological circumferential margin status, distal resection margin, nodal yield, and perioperative morbidity were similar between the 2 groups. This suggests that short-course radiotherapy + chemotherapy could be a viable alternative to long-course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . REDUCCIN DEL ESTADIO EN LOS CNCERES RECTALES AVANZADOS UNA COMPARACIN DE PROPENSIN EQUIPARADA ENTRE LA RADIACIN DE CICLO CORTO SEGUIDA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA Y LA QUIMIO RADIACIN DE CICLO LARGO: ANTECEDENTES:La radioterapia de ciclo corto seguida de quimioterapia no ha sido evaluada ampliamente como una alternativa a la tradicional quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:Estudio que compara los resultados oncológicos y a corto plazo entre la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia y la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Estudio comparado de propensión de manera retrospectiva.AJUSTE:Departamento colorrectal en un centro de atención oncológica de tipo terciario en la India.PACIENTES:Hubo 173 pacientes. El grupo A tenía 47 y el grupo B tenía 126 pacientes. Se realizó una comparación de 1: 2,7 para edad, sexo, distancia del tumor desde el margen anal, cirugías de preservación del esfínter, estadio T previo al tratamiento basada en resonancia magnética y margen de resección circunferencial (CRM).INTERVENCIONES:Radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia (grupo A) y quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo (grupo B) en cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (LARC).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Positividad histopatológica de CRM, reducción del estadio tumoral, grado de regresión tumoral, complicaciones posoperatorias.RESULTADOS:El 52% de los pacientes han tenido un margen de resección circunferencial positivo en la resonancia magnética, 57% de tumores rectales bajos, 20% de tumores T4. La distribución de cirugías rectales fue similar entre los 2 grupos. Las puntuaciones de regresión tumoral y de reducción del estadio de pT fueron significativamente mejores en el grupo B ( p = 0.028 y 0.026 respectivamente). El margen de resección circunferencial patológico, el margen de resección distal y los ganglios arrojados fueron similares. En el análisis multivariado, el estadio N previo al tratamiento fue el único factor predictivo independiente para el estadio de pCRM. Las complicaciones Clavien-Dindo de grado 3-4, las tasas de fuga anastomótica y la estancia hospitalaria fueron similares entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Retrospectiva; aunque la propensión coincide, existe potencial sesgo de selección.CONCLUSIONES:En una cohorte que contenía una porción significativa de cánceres rectales bajos con margen de resección circunferencial positivo por resonancia magnética, la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia seguida de cirugía tardía dio como resultado una mayor reducción del estadio T y de regresión tumoral en comparación con la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo. Pero el estatus histopatológico del margen circunferencial, el margen de resección distal, el rendimiento ganglionar y la morbilidad perioperatoria fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Esto sugiere que la radioterapia de ciclo corto + quimioterapia podría ser una alternativa viable a la quimio radioterapia de ciclo largo en cánceres rectales localmente avanzados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B855 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Bladder preserving robotic pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer-technique and short-term outcomes.

AIM: In selected patients with advanced rectal cancers involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, the bladder can be preserved to avoid the complications associated with an ileal conduit. The study was aimed at reviewing the technique and short-term outcomes of patients that underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with suprapubic cystostomy (SPC). METHODS: Case series of bladder preserving exenteration from a single tertiary care center. Technique for en-bloc prostatectomy with abdominoperineal resection is described. RESULTS: Five patients underwent bladder sparing robotic pelvic exenteration with SPC, all had R0 resections. Four patients had prostatic invasion and one patient had prostatic adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications were seen in three patients of which two were re-explored. At a median follow-up of 10 months, two patients developed systemic relapses. There were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: Robotic bladder sparing exenteration is technically feasible, provides acceptable short-term outcomes, and avoids complications of ileal conduit.

Learning curves for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision beyond the competency phase - a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis of 1000 rectal resections.

AIM: The learning curve of total mesorectal excision (TME) by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) beyond the competency phase has not been adequately reported with large numbers or using a statistical control limit. The aim of this work was to study the learning curve of MIS TME in the proficiency phase. METHOD: Risk-adjusted (RA) cumulative sum (CUSUM) and RA Bernoulli CUSUM charts were plotted for sequential MIS TME performed by a surgical team over 1000 cases. Surgical failure, a composite endpoint of conversions, complications of grade IIIA or above, R1 resections and inadequate nodal yield were used to monitor the performance. RESULTS: The RA CUSUM detected an inflection point around the 600th operation. Two peaks were identified that could be traced back to probable causes of surgical failure. Similar inflection points were detected at the 450th case for laparoscopic TME and the 367th case for sphincter preservation. No single definite threshold point was noticed for robotic or abdominoperineal operations. At no point did the curves cross the safety threshold. The probability of surgical failure reduced with increasing experience in the multivariate regression (OR 0.899, p = 0.000). This association persisted irrespective of the surgical approach (laparoscopic versus robotic) or the type of operation (sphincter preservation versus abdominoperineal resection). CONCLUSION: The learning curves for MIS TME did not cross the safety threshold beyond the competency phase. However, a 10% reduction of relative risk in surgical failure was observed for every 100 cases operated on.