Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic breast cancer and leptomeningeal disease: a single center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort. METHODS: In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data. RESULTS: We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0-101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1-78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2- or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32-0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25-3.30). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need.

Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty.

BACKGROUND: Adverse radiation effect (ARE) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging to distinguish from tumor progression. This study characterizes the clinical implications of radiologic uncertainty (RU). METHODS: Cases reviewed retrospectively at a single-institutional, multi-disciplinary SRS Tumor Board between 2015-2022 for RU following SRS were identified. Treatment history, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions performed upon RU resolution, and development of neurologic deficits surrounding intervention were obtained from the medical record. Differences in lesion volume and maximum diameter at RU onset versus resolution were compared with paired t-tests. Median time from RU onset to resolution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate associations between clinical characteristics and time to RU resolution were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 128 lesions with RU, 23.5% had undergone ≥ 2 courses of radiation. Median maximum diameter (20 vs. 16 mm, p < 0.001) and volume (2.7 vs. 1.5 cc, p < 0.001) were larger upon RU resolution versus onset. RU resolution took > 6 and > 12 months in 25% and 7% of cases, respectively. Higher total EQD2 prior to RU onset (HR = 0.45, p = 0.03) and use of MR perfusion (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001) correlated with shorter time to resolution; larger volume (HR = 1.05, p = 0.006) portended longer time to resolution. Most lesions (57%) were diagnosed as ARE. Most patients (58%) underwent an intervention upon RU resolution; of these, 38% developed a neurologic deficit surrounding intervention. CONCLUSIONS: RU resolution took > 6 months in > 25% of cases. RU may lead to suboptimal outcomes and symptom burden. Improved characterization of post-SRS RU is needed.

Neurocognitive considerations in the treatment of meningioma with radiation therapy: applications for quantitative neuroimaging and precision radiation medicine.

This article focuses on the role of radiotherapy in the management of meningioma, in the definitive and adjuvant setting and across the spectrum of meningioma grade. Treatment paradigms, informed by clinical evidence, are discussed. Notably, we focus on the impact of radiotherapy on normal brain tissues and neurocognitive function, particularly the dose-dependent changes in white matter and cerebral cortex thickness. Novel imaging techniques have allowed the identification of microstructural changes to eloquent white matter, cortex, and subcortical regions as biomarkers for understanding RT-induced changes in cognitive functioning. Deficits in multiple domains including attention, memory, language and executive function can become more pronounced following radiation. Longitudinal assessment with imaging and neurocognitive testing pre- and post-radiation have allowed correlation between dose to specific regions of the brain and decline in associated domains of neurocognitive function. These findings suggest incorporation of areas at higher risk for neurocognitive sequelae into precision radiation planning. Volumetric arc therapy, advanced planning with cortical sparing, proton therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery are reviewed as options for delivering therapeutic dose to target volumes while minimizing risk to adjacent sensitive regions. The treatment of meningioma is an evolving area, with improving outcomes for higher grade disease in modern trials, where care must be taken to maximize both disease control as well as quality of life for patients.

Neurocognitive Outcomes in Multiethnic Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients Treated With Proton Versus Photon Radiation.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed post-radiation (RT) neurocognitive outcomes in an ethnically diverse pediatric brain tumor population undergoing photon radiotherapy (XRT) and proton radiotherapy (PRT). PROCEDURE: Post-RT neurocognitive outcomes from 49 pediatric patients (37% Hispanic/Latino) with primary brain tumors were analyzed. Tests included cognitive outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and overall intelligence. For each outcome, proportion of patients with cognitive impairment (scores <1.5 SD) was calculated. The Fisher exact tests compared proportion of patients with impairment and t tests compared T-scores between XRT (n=32) and PRT (n=17) groups. Linear regression assessed associations between radiation modality and outcomes. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.2 and 1.8 years in the XRT and PRT groups, respectively. The median RT dose was 54.0 Gy. We found impairment in 16% to 42% of patients across most neurocognitive domains except executive function. There was no difference in scores between XRT and PRT groups. Regression analyses revealed no association of neurocognitive outcomes with radiation modality. Non-Hispanic patients had better Verbal Comprehension Index and General Ability Index scores than Hispanic patients ( P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among pediatric patients with brain tumors receiving RT, all cognitive domains were affected except executive function. Radiation modality was not associated with neurocognitive outcomes. Hispanic patients may be more vulnerable to posttreatment cognitive effects that warrant further study.

Metastasis and Mortality in Men With Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of AS for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified men with NCCN-classified low-risk and favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed progression to definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks regression. RESULTS: The cohort included 9,733 men, of whom 1,007 (10.3%) had intermediate-risk disease (773 [76.8%] favorable, 234 [23.2%] unfavorable), followed for a median of 7.6 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis was significantly higher for patients with favorable (9.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.5%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (19.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-25.9%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.9%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was also significantly higher for patients with favorable (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3%-5.7%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.8%-18.4%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%). In multivariable competing-risks regression, favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk patients had significantly increased risks of metastasis and PCSM compared with low-risk patients (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with low-risk patients, those with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with AS are at increased risk of metastasis and PCSM. AS may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, though identification of appropriate candidates and AS protocols should be tested in future prospective studies.

Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer in African American and non-Hispanic White men.

BACKGROUND: The safety of active surveillance (AS) for African American men compared with non-Hispanic White (White) men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer is unclear. METHODS: The authors identified patients with modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network favorable ("low-intermediate") and unfavorable ("high-intermediate") intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration database. They analyzed definitive treatment, disease progression, metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality by using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks (disease progression, metastasis, and PCSM) or Cox (all-cause mortality) regression. RESULTS: The cohort included 1007 men (African Americans, 330 [32.8%]; Whites, 677 [67.2%]) followed for a median of 7.7 years; 773 (76.8%) had low-intermediate-risk disease, and 234 (23.2%) had high-intermediate-risk disease. The 10-year cumulative incidences of definitive treatment were not significantly different (African Americans, 83.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.5%-88.7%; Whites, 80.6%; 95% CI, 76.6%-84.4%; P = .17). Among those with low-intermediate-risk disease, there were no significant differences in the 10-year cumulative incidences of disease progression (African Americans, 46.8%; 95% CI, 40.0%-53.3%; Whites, 46.9%; 95% CI, 42.1%-51.5%; P = .91), metastasis (African Americans, 7.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-11.8%; Whites, 10.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-14.6%; P = .17), or PCSM (African Americans, 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.6%-7.5%; Whites, 3.8%; 95% CI, 2.0%-6.3%; P = .69). In a multivariable regression including the entire cohort, African American race was not associated with increased risks of definitive treatment, disease progression, metastasis, PCSM, or all-cause mortality (all P > .30). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Health System were similar for African American and White men treated for low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer with AS.

The role of cancer in marijuana and prescription opioid use in the United States: A population-based analysis from 2005 to 2014.

BACKGROUND: For patients with cancer, marijuana may be an alternative to prescription opioid analgesics. This study analyzed self-reported marijuana and prescription opioid use among people with cancer over a 10-year time period. METHODS: Population-based data sets from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2005 and 2014 were compiled for respondents aged 20 to 60 years. Respondents with cancer and respondents without cancer were propensity score-matched (1:2) by demographics to compare substance use. Outcomes included current marijuana and prescription opioid use (ie, within the past 30 days). Pearson chi-square tests and logistic regressions were performed; a 2-tailed P value < .05 was significant. RESULTS: There were 19,604 respondents, and 826 people with cancer were matched to 1652 controls. Among the respondents with cancer, 40.3% used marijuana within the past year, and 8.7% used it currently. Respondents with cancer were significantly more likely to use prescription opioids (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.68-3.57; P < .001). Cancer was not associated with current marijuana use in a multivariable conditional logistic regression but was associated with current opioid use (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17-2.82; P = .008). Among all survey respondents, the odds of marijuana use significantly increased over time (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; P = .012), whereas the odds of opioid use did not significantly change. There were no significant differences in the longitudinal odds of marijuana or opioid use over time between respondents with a cancer diagnosis and those without one. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based analysis revealed a considerable proportion of respondents with cancer self-reporting marijuana use (40.3%) and a significantly higher prevalence of opioid use among respondents with cancer. In the midst of an opioid epidemic, an evolving political landscape, and new developments in oncology, quantifying the prevalence of opioid and marijuana use in the US population, especially among patients with cancer, is particularly relevant. Although opioid use did not significantly change from 2005 to 2014 among all respondents, marijuana use did increase, likely reflecting increased availability and legislative changes. A cancer diagnosis did not significantly affect longitudinal opioid or marijuana use.

Age 70 +/- 5 Years and Cancer-Specific Outcomes After Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

A secondary analysis of 2 randomized Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials demonstrated that age ≥70 years was a favorable prognostic factor among men treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In contrast, several series based on men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) suggested that older age was an unfavorable prognostic factor. Our study was initiated to determine whether these observations reflect a true but paradoxical underlying age-related treatment-dependent biological phenomenon. We conducted a systematic review (PubMed, January 1, 1999-January 30, 2023) evaluating the effect of age on cancer-specific outcomes after definitive local treatment with either RP or EBRT. Our main objective was to assess possible interactions between age (using a cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years) and treatment type, with regard to adverse cancer-specific outcomes (eg, pathology, biochemical failure, distant metastasis, or prostate cancer-specific survival). Forty-five studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review, including 30 and 15 studies with patients treated with RP and EBRT, respectively. Among patients treated with RP, 10 (50%) of these studies suggested that older age was associated with worse outcome(s) after RP. None suggested that age was a favorable prognostic factor after RP. Among the EBRT-based studies, 8 (53%) suggested that older age was associated with better outcomes, with an additional 3 studies (21%) trending to support a better outcome. None of these studies involving EBRT suggested that older age was an adverse prognostic factor. This systematic review suggests that age using a categorical cutoff of 70 +/- 5 years may be an adverse prognostic factor for men undergoing RP but a favorable prognostic factor for men treated with EBRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Androgen deprivation therapy and acute kidney injury in patients with prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is frequently utilized in conjunction with radiotherapy (RT) in the definitive management of prostate cancer. Prior studies have suggested an association between ADT use and acute kidney injury (AKI), however, these included heterogeneous populations undergoing a variety of treatments and relied on billing codes to ascertain the incidence of AKI. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 27,868 veterans undergoing definitive RT + /- ADT for prostate cancer between 2001 and 2015 using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI). Exposure was defined as use of ADT within one year of diagnosis. The primary outcome was AKI, defined by an increase in serum creatinine to at least 1.5 times the baseline value. AKIs were classified as mild, moderate, or severe in accordance with international guidelines. A multivariate competing risks model was used to account for demographic and oncologic factors as well as medications and procedures known to influence the risk of AKI. RESULTS: Most (n = 18,754) men received RT alone; 9,114 men received RT + ADT. The incidence of AKI at two years after diagnosis was 10.5% in the RT + ADT group and 7.9% in the RT group (Gray's test p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed ADT usage was associated with an increased risk for any AKI (SHR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.14-1.36, p < 0.01). ADT was also associated with an increased risk of mild AKI (SHR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.01-1.27, p = 0.04) and moderate AKI (SHR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.20-1.76, p < 0.01), though not severe AKI (SHR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.93-1.91, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that use of ADT is associated with an increased risk of AKI in patients undergoing definitive RT for prostate cancer. Clinicians should be alert to the potential for renal dysfunction in this population.

The relationship between radiation dose and bevacizumab-related imaging abnormality in patients with brain tumors: A voxel-wise normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) analysis.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab-related imaging abnormality (BRIA), appearing as areas of restricted diffusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and representing atypical coagulative necrosis pathologically, has been observed in patients with brain tumors receiving radiotherapy and bevacizumab. We investigated the role of cumulative radiation dose in BRIA development in a voxel-wise analysis. METHODS: Patients (n = 18) with BRIA were identified. All had high-grade gliomas or brain metastases treated with radiotherapy and bevacizumab. Areas of BRIA were segmented semi-automatically on diffusion-weighted MRI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images. To avoid confounding by possible tumor, hypoperfusion was confirmed with perfusion imaging. ADC images and radiation dose maps were co-registered to a high-resolution T1-weighted MRI and registration accuracy was verified. Voxel-wise normal tissue complication probability analyses were performed using a logistic model analyzing the relationship between cumulative voxel equivalent total dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and BRIA development at each voxel. Confidence intervals for regression model predictions were estimated with bootstrapping. RESULTS: Among 18 patients, 39 brain tumors were treated. Patients received a median of 4.5 cycles of bevacizumab and 1-4 radiation courses prior to BRIA appearance. Most (64%) treated tumors overlapped with areas of BRIA. The median proportion of each BRIA region of interest volume overlapping with tumor was 98%. We found a dose-dependent association between cumulative voxel EQD2 and the relative probability of BRIA (ß0 = -5.1, ß1 = 0.03 Gy-1, γ = 1.3). CONCLUSIONS: BRIA is likely a radiation dose-dependent phenomenon in patients with brain tumors receiving bevacizumab and radiotherapy. The combination of radiation effects and tumor microenvironmental factors in potentiating BRIA in this population should be further investigated.

Microstructural Cerebellar Injury Independently Associated With Processing Speed in Adult Patients With Primary Brain Tumors: Implications for Cognitive Preservation.

PURPOSE: The cerebellum's role in posttreatment neurocognitive decline is unexplored. This study investigated associations between cerebellar microstructural integrity using quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers and neurocognition among patients with primary brain tumors receiving partial-brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective trial, 65 patients underwent volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and memory, executive function, language, attention, and processing speed (PS) assessment before RT and at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System-Trail Making (D-KEFS-TM) visual scanning and number and letter sequencing and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, coding were used to evaluate PS. The cerebellar cortex and white matter (WM) and supratentorial structures subserving the previously mentioned cognitive domains were autosegmented. Volume was measured within each structure at each time point along with diffusion biomarkers (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity) in WM structures. Linear mixed-effects models assessed cerebellar biomarkers as predictors of neurocognitive scores. If associated, cerebellar biomarkers were evaluated as independent predictors of cognitive scores controlling for domain-specific supratentorial biomarkers. RESULTS: Left (P = .04) and right (P < .001) cerebellar WM volume declined significantly over time. Cerebellar biomarkers were not associated with memory, executive function, or language. Smaller left cerebellar cortex volume was associated with worse D-KEFS-TM number (P = .01) and letter (P = .01) sequencing scores. A smaller right cerebellar cortex volume correlated with worse D-KEFS-TM visual scanning (P = .02) and number (P = .03) and letter (P = .02) sequencing scores. Greater right cerebellar WM mean diffusivity, indicating WM injury, was associated with worse D-KEFS-TM visual scanning performance (P = .03). Associations remained significant after controlling for corpus callosum and intrahemispheric WM injury biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the cerebellum as measured with quantitative biomarkers correlates with worse post-RT PS, independent of corpus callosum and intrahemispheric WM damage. Efforts to preserve cerebellar integrity may preserve PS.

Fine Motor Skill Decline After Brain Radiation Therapy-A Multivariate Normal Tissue Complication Probability Study of a Prospective Trial.

PURPOSE: Brain radiation therapy can impair fine motor skills (FMS). Fine motor skills are essential for activities of daily living, enabling hand-eye coordination for manipulative movements. We developed normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for the decline in FMS after fractionated brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: On a prospective trial, 44 patients with primary brain tumors received fractioned RT; underwent high-resolution volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and comprehensive FMS assessments (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test Motor Speed [DKEFS-MS]; and Grooved Pegboard dominant/nondominant hands) at baseline and 6 months postRT. Regions of interest subserving motor function (including cortex, superficial white matter, thalamus, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and white matter tracts) were autosegmented using validated methods and manually verified. Dosimetric and clinical variables were included in multivariate NTCP models using automated bootstrapped logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression, and random forests with nested cross-validation. RESULTS: Half of the patients showed a decline on grooved pegboard test of nondominant hands, 17 of 42 (40.4%) on grooved pegboard test of -dominant hands, and 11 of 44 (25%) on DKEFS-MS. Automated bootstrapped logistic regression selected a 1-term model including maximum dose to dominant postcentral white matter. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression selected this term and steroid use. The top 5 variables in the random forest were all dosimetric: maximum dose to dominant thalamus, mean dose to dominant caudate, mean and maximum dose to the dominant corticospinal tract, and maximum dose to dominant postcentral white matter. This technique performed best with an area under the curve of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.70) on nested cross-validation. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first NTCP models for FMS impairment after brain RT. Dose to several supratentorial motor-associated regions of interest correlated with a decline in dominant-hand fine motor dexterity in patients with primary brain tumors in multivariate models, outperforming clinical variables. These data can guide prospective fine motor-sparing strategies for brain RT.

Dose-Dependent Atrophy in Bilateral Amygdalae and Nuclei After Brain Radiation Therapy and Its Association With Mood and Memory Outcomes on a Longitudinal Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Amygdalae are bilateral, almond-shaped structures located anterior to the hippocampi, critical to limbic system functions of emotional processing and memory consolidation. The amygdalae are heterogeneous, composed of multiple nuclei with distinct structural and functional properties. We prospectively assessed associations between longitudinal changes in amygdala morphometry, including component nuclei, and functional outcomes in patients with primary brain tumors receiving radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: On a prospective longitudinal trial, 63 patients underwent high-resolution volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging and testing for mood (Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory), memory (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised [BVMT] Total Recall and Delayed Recall; Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised [HVLT] Total Recall and Delayed Recall), and health-related quality-of-life outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain Social/Family Well-Being and Emotional Well-Being) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. Amygdalae, including 8 nuclei, were autosegmented bilaterally using validated techniques. Linear mixed-effects models assessed longitudinal change in amygdalae and nuclei volumes and associations with dose and outcomes. Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared amygdala volume change between patient groups with worse and more stable outcomes at each time point. RESULTS: Atrophy was found in the right amygdala at 6 months (P = .001) and the left amygdala at 12 months (P = .046). A higher dose was associated with atrophy of the left amygdala (P = .013) at 12 months. The right amygdala showed dose-dependent atrophy at 6 months (P = .016) and 12 months (P = .001). Worse BVMT-Total, HVLT-Total, and HVLT-Delayed performance was associated with smaller left lateral (P = .014, P = .004, and P = .007, respectively) and left basal (P = .034, P = .016, and P = .026, respectively) nuclei volumes. Increased anxiety at 6 months was associated with greater combined (P = .031) and right (P = .007) amygdala atrophy. Greater left amygdala atrophy (P = .038) was noted in patients with decreased emotional well-being at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral amygdalae and nuclei undergo time- and dose-dependent atrophy after brain RT. Atrophy in amygdalae and specific nuclei was associated with poorer memory, mood, and emotional well-being. Amygdalae-sparing treatment planning may preserve neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes in this population.

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Opioid Use Among Older Patients With Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: While opioids represent a cornerstone of cancer pain management, the timing and patterns of opioid use in the cancer population have not been well studied. This study sought to explore longitudinal trends in opioid use among Medicare beneficiaries with nonmetastatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within a cohort of 16,072 Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years old diagnosed with nonmetastatic cancer between 2007 and 2013, we determined the likelihood of receiving a short-term (0 to 6 mo postdiagnosis), intermediate-term (6 to 12 mo postdiagnosis), long-term (1 to 2 y postdiagnosis), and high-risk (morphine equivalent dose ≥90 mg/day) opioid prescription after cancer diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient and cancer risk factors associated with these opioid use endpoints. RESULTS: During the study period, 74.6% of patients received an opioid prescription, while only 2.66% of patients received a high-risk prescription. Factors associated with use varied somewhat between short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term use, though in general, patients at higher risk of receiving an opioid prescription after their cancer diagnosis were younger, had higher stage disease, lived in regions of higher poverty, and had a history of prior opioid use. Prescriptions for high-risk opioids were associated with individuals living in regions with lower poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal trends in opioid use in cancer patients depend on patient, demographic, and tumor characteristics. Overall, understanding these correlations may help physicians better identify patient-specific risks of opioid use and could help better inform future evidence-based, cancer-specific opioid prescription guidelines.

Post-treatment neuroendocrine outcomes among pediatric brain tumor patients: Is there a difference between proton and photon therapy?

Purpose: Pediatric brain tumor patients are vulnerable to radiotherapy (RT) sequelae including endocrinopathies. We compared post-RT neuroendocrine outcomes between pediatric brain tumor patients receiving photons (XRT) versus protons (PRT). Methods: Using a prospectively maintained single-institution database, we analyzed 112 pediatric primary brain tumor patients (80 XRT, 32 PRT) from 1996 to 2019. Patient/treatment characteristics and endocrinopathy diagnoses (growth hormone deficiency [GHD], sex hormone deficiency [SHD], hypothyroidism, and requirement of hormone replacement [HRT]) were obtained via chart review. Univariable/multivariable logistic regression identified neuroendocrine outcome predictors. Time-adjusted propensity score models accounted for treatment type. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) patients were evaluated as a sub-cohort. Results: Median follow-up was 6.3 and 4.4 years for XRT and PRT patients respectively. Medulloblastoma was the most common histology (38%). Half of patients (44% in XRT, 60% in PRT) received CSI. Common endocrinopathies were GHD (26% XRT, 38% PRT) and hypothyroidism (29% XRT, 19% PRT). CSI cohort PRT patients had lower odds of hypothyroidism (OR 0.16, 95% CI[0.02-0.87], p = 0.045) on multivariable regression and propensity score analyses. There were no significant differences in endocrinopathies in the overall cohort and in the odds of GHD or HRT within the CSI cohort. SHD developed in 17.1% of the XRT CSI group but did not occur in the PRT CSI group. Conclusion: Endocrinopathies were common among pediatric brain tumor survivors. Among CSI patients, PRT was associated with lower risk of hypothyroidism, and potentially associated with lower incidence of SHD. Future studies should involve collaborative registries to explore the survivorship benefits of PRT.

Cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab versus high-dose interferon as an adjuvant therapy in resected high-risk melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant ipilimumab was found to improve the overall survival and reduce toxicity compared to high-dose interferon (HDI) in patients with resected, high-risk melanoma. However, the cost of ipilimumab is substantially higher than HDI. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of ipilimumab as an adjuvant treatment in melanoma from a healthcare perspective. METHODS: We designed a Markov model simulating resected, high-risk melanoma patients receiving either ipilimumab or HDI. Transition probabilities, including risks of survival, disease progression, and toxicity, were ascertained from clinical trial data. Costs and quality of life measurements (health utilities) were extracted from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), assessed cost-effectiveness. ICERs <$100,000/QALY were deemed cost-effective. We measured model uncertainty with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In our base case model, ipilimumab increased costs by $107,100 and increased effectiveness by 0.43 QALY, yielding an ICER of $392,600/QALY. Our model was moderately sensitive to the costs of ipilimumab, though the cost of ipilimumab would need to decrease by 44% for ipilimumab to become cost-effective compared to HDI. The model was not sensitive to survival, toxicity, or other costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that HDI would remain the cost-effective treatment option 96.2% of the time at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant ipilimumab increases the survival and decreases the toxicity compared to HDI in resected, high-risk melanoma patients, though this would not be considered cost-effective due to the high price of ipilimumab.

Cost-effectiveness of Nivolumab-Ipilimumab Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Treatment with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy was found to improve overall survival compared with chemotherapy among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the CheckMate 227 clinical trial. However, these drugs are substantially more expensive than chemotherapy and, given the high incidence of advanced NSCLC, the incorporation of dual immune checkpoint inhibitors into the standard of care could have substantial economic consequences. Objective: To assess whether nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy is a cost-effective first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation designed a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy with platinum-doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. The Markov model was created to simulate patients with advanced NSCLC who were receiving either nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy or platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and treatment toxic effects, were derived using data from the CheckMate 227 clinical trial. Costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. Data analyses were conducted from November 2019 to September 2020. Exposures: Nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary study outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost in 2020 US dollars. Cost-effectiveness was measured using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with an ICER less than $100 000 per QALY considered cost-effective. Model uncertainty was assessed with 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: Treatment with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy was associated with an increase in overall cost of $201 900 and improved effectiveness of 0.50 QALYs compared with chemotherapy, yielding an ICER of $401 700 per QALY. The study model was sensitive to the cost and duration of immunotherapy. Treatment with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy became cost-effective when monthly treatment costs were reduced from $26 425 to $5058 (80.9% reduction) or when the maximum duration of immunotherapy was reduced from 24.0 months to 1.4 months. The model was not sensitive to assumptions about survival or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 status. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY, nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy was less cost-effective than chemotherapy 99.9% of the time. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, first-line treatment with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy was not found to be cost-effective at current prices despite clinical trial data indicating that this regimen increases overall survival among patients with advanced NSCLC.

Longitudinal change in fine motor skills after brain radiotherapy and in vivo imaging biomarkers associated with decline.

BACKGROUND: We explored fine motor skills (FMS) before and after brain radiotherapy (RT), analyzing associations between longitudinal FMS and imaging biomarkers of cortical and white matter (WM) integrity in motor regions of interest (ROIs). METHODS: On a prospective trial, 52 primary brain tumor patients receiving fractionated brain RT underwent volumetric brain MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and FMS assessments (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail Making Test Motor Speed [DKEFS-MS], Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hands [PDH], and Grooved Pegboard Nondominant Hands [PNDH]) at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-RT. Motor ROIs autosegmented included: sensorimotor cortices and superficial WM, corticospinal tracts, cerebellar cortices and WM, and basal ganglia. Volume (cc) was measured in all ROIs at each timepoint. Diffusion biomarkers (FA [fractional anisotropy] and MD [mean diffusivity]) were additionally measured in WM ROIs. Linear mixed-effects models assessed biomarkers as predictors of FMS scores. P values were corrected for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Higher RT dose was associated with right paracentral cortical thinning (ß = -2.42 Gy/(month × mm), P = .03) and higher right precentral WM MD (ß = 0.69 Gy/(month × µm2/ms), P = .04). Higher left (ß = 38.7 points/(month × µm2/ms), P = .004) and right (ß = 42.4 points/(month × µm2/ms), P = .01) cerebellar WM MD, left precentral cortical atrophy (ß = -8.67 points/(month × mm), P = .02), and reduced right cerebral peduncle FA (ß = -0.50 points/month, P = .01) were associated with worse DKEFS-MS performance. Left precentral cortex thinning was associated with worse PDH scores (ß = -17.3 points/(month × mm), P = .02). Left (ß = -0.87 points/(month × cm3), P = .001) and right (ß = -0.64 points/(month × cm3), P = .02) cerebellar cortex, left pons (ß = -19.8 points/(month × cm3), P = .02), and right pallidum (ß = -10.8 points/(month × cm3), P = .02) atrophy and reduced right internal capsule FA (ß = -1.02 points/month, P = .03) were associated with worse PNDH performance. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers of microstructural injury in motor-associated brain regions were associated with worse FMS. Dose avoidance in these areas may preserve FMS.

Quality of Life Is Independently Associated With Neurocognitive Function in Patients With Brain Tumors: Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted the first prospective longitudinal study examining the independent association between patient-reported health-related quality of life (hrQoL) (physical, social/family, emotional, functional, and brain cancer-specific) and neurocognitive function (NCF), while controlling for mood symptoms in patients with primary brain tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with primary brain tumors (n = 59) receiving brain radiation therapy underwent hrQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain), mood (Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories), and neurocognitive evaluation at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months postradiation therapy in a prospective clinical trial. Neurocognitive assessments measured attention/processing speed, memory, and executive function, including the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test. Subjects underwent neurocognitive, mood, and hrQoL assessments in the same testing session. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between hrQOL and NCF over time, controlling for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as timepoint-specific patient-reported mood (ie, anxiety and depression symptoms). P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: Higher physical hrQoL was associated with better verbal memory (HVLT-R Total Recall, P = .047), and higher functional hrQoL was associated with better executive function (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Verbal Fluency Switching Total, P = .009) and verbal memory (HVLT-R Delayed Recall, P = .006). Higher brain tumor-specific hrQoL was associated with better verbal and nonverbal memory (HVLT-R Total, P = .004 and Delayed Recall, P = .030; Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Total, P = .049 and Delayed Recall, P = .049). There was no association between social/family or emotional hrQoL and NCF after controlling for mood. CONCLUSIONS: Higher physical, functional, and brain tumor-specific hrQoL were associated with better executive function and memory among patients with primary brain tumors. Physical and functional impairments are correlated with cognitive performance. Interventions to maximize quality of life after treatment may influence neurocognition and vice versa.

Impact of Radiation on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Resectable Esophageal Cancer Patients With Medicare.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative radiotherapy improves outcomes for operable esophageal cancer patients, though the proximity of the heart to the esophagus puts patients at risk of radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. This study characterizes the impact of radiotherapy and different radiation techniques on cardiovascular morbidity among a cohort of esophageal cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1125 patients aged 65 and older diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 with esophageal cancer who received surgery alone, or surgery preceded by either preoperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiation from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. We used Medicare claims to identify severe perioperative and late cardiovascular events. Multivariable logistic regression and Fine-Gray models were used to determine the effect of presurgery treatment on the risk of perioperative and late cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation did not significantly increase the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications compared with surgery alone. Patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation had a 36% increased risk of having a late cardiovascular event compared with patients treated with surgery alone (subdistribution hazard ratio [SDHR]: 1.36; P=0.035). There was no significant increase in late cardiovascular events among patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy (SDHR: 1.18; P=0.40). Among patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, those receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy had a 68% decreased risk of having a late cardiovascular event compared with patients receiving conventional radiation (SDHR: 0.32; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an increased risk of cardiovascular complications among operative esophageal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation, though these risks might be reduced with more cardioprotective radiation techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy.