Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 158(3): 603-607, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571682

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors related with diverting ileostomy performance after colorectal resection and anastomosis, in advanced ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: We have previously demonstrated the risk factors associated with anastomotic leak after colorectal anastomosis: Advanced age at surgery, low serum albumin level, additional bowel resections, manual anastomosis and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge. However, use of diverting ileostomy is strongly variable and depends on individual surgeon preferences and training. Eight hospitals participated in this retrospective study. Data of 695 patients operated for ovarian cancer with primary colorectal anastomosis were included (January 2010-June 2018). Fourteen pre-/intraoperatively defined variables were identified and analysed as justification factors for use of diverting ileostomy. RESULTS: The rate of diverting ileostomy in the entire cohort was 19.13% (133/695; range within individual centers 4.6-24.32%). Previous treatment with bevacizumab [OR 2.8 (1.3-6.1); p=0.01]; additional bowel resections [OR 3.0 (1.8-5.1); p<0.001]; extended operating time [OR 1.005 (1.003-1.006); p<0.001] and intra-operative red blood transfusion [OR 2.7 (1.4-5.3); p<0.001] were found to be independently associated with diverting ileostomy performance. Assuming a 7% AL rate cut-off, up to 51.8% of DI presented an AL risk below 7% and might have been spared. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors that drive the gynecologic oncology surgeons to perform a diverting ileostomy, seem to differ from the actual risk factors that we have identified to be associated with postoperative anastomotic leak. Broader awareness of the risk factors that contribute to a higher perioperative risk profile, will facilitate a better risk stratification process and possibly avoid unnecessary stoma formation in ovarian cancer patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia/métodos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
BJOG ; 127(1): 99-105, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502397

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the intraoperative human papillomavirus (IOP-HPV) test has the same prognostic value as the HPV test performed at 6 months after treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) to predict treatment failure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Barcelona, Spain. POPULATION: A cohort of 216 women diagnosed with HSIL and treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). METHODS: After LEEP, an HPV test was performed using the Hybrid Capture 2 system. If this was positive, genotyping was performed with the CLART HPV2 technique. The IOP-HPV test was compared with HPV test at 6 months and with surgical margins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Treatment failure. RESULTS: Recurrence rate of HSIL was 6%. There was a strong association between a positive IOP-HPV test, a positive 6-month HPV test, positive HPV 16 genotype, positive surgical margins and HSIL recurrence. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the IOP-HPV test were 85.7, 80.8,24.0 and 98.8% and of the HPV test at 6 months were 76.9, 75.8, 17.2 and 98.0%. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative HPV test accurately predicts treatment failure in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3. This new approach may allow early identification of patients with recurrent disease, which will not delay the treatment. Genotyping could be useful in detecting high-risk patients. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: IOP-HPV test accurately predicts treatment failure in women with CIN 2/3.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Eletrocirurgia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/cirurgia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Colposcopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Genótipo , Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano/métodos , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/virologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Lesões Intraepiteliais Escamosas/virologia , Falha de Tratamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 153(3): 549-554, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30952369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine pre-/intraoperative risk factors for anastomotic leak after modified posterior pelvic exenteration (MPE) or colorectal resection in ovarian cancer and to create a practical instrument for predicting anastomotic leak risk. BACKGROUND: In advanced ovarian cancer surgery, there is rather limited published evidence, drawn from a small sample, providing information about risk factors for anastomotic leak. METHODS: Eight hospitals participated in this retrospective study. Data on 695 patients operated for ovarian cancer with primary anastomosis were included (January 2010-June 2018). Twelve pre-/intraoperative variables were analysed as potential independent risk factors for anastomotic leak. A predictive model was created to stablish the risk of anastomotic leak for a given patient. RESULTS: The anastomotic leak rate was 6.6% (46/695; range 1.7%-12.5%). A total of 457 patients were included in the final multivariate analysis. The following variables were found to be independently associated with anastomotic leakage: age at surgery (OR 1.046, 95% CI 1.013-1.080, p = 0.005), serum albumin level (OR 0.621, 95% CI 0.407-0.948, p = 0.027), one or more additional small bowel resections (OR 3.544, 95% CI 1.228-10.23, p = 0.019), manual anastomosis (OR 8.356, 95% CI 1.777-39.301, p = 0.007) and distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (OR 0.839, 95% CI 0.726-0.971, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Due to the low incidence of AL in ovarian cancer patients, a restrictive stoma policy based on the presence of risk factors should be the actual recommendation. Hand-sewn anastomosis should be avoided.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Exenteração Pélvica/efeitos adversos , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica/metabolismo , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 132(1): 98-101, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231134

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer and to compare to a previous series of patients from our institution undergoing the same procedure by conventional laparoscopy. METHODS: 17 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2, IIA2 and IIB-IVA) underwent pretherapeutic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy by robotic-assisted laparoscopy. Perioperative outcomes including age, BMI, FIGO stage, operating time, blood loss, complications and length of hospital stay were compared to a series of 83 patients from our institution undergoing the same procedure by conventional laparoscopy. RESULTS: The median values for operating time and hospital days for the robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy groups were 150 vs. 150 min and 2 vs 2 days, respectively. In the robotic group, blood loss was lower (90 vs 20 ml, p<0.05) and more aortic nodes were removed (14 vs 17 nodes, p<0.05). Docking time was 7 min (range 3-15). There were no intraoperative complications. There were no differences for postoperative complications (17.6% vs 8.4%). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy provide similar perioperative outcomes other than lower blood loss and higher number of aortic nodes removed (both without clinical impact) in robotic patients for the performance of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. We believe that robotic surgery is an additional tool to perform the same surgical procedure. HIGHLIGHTS: Robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy provide similar perioperative outcomes.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 125(2): 312-4, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22333995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess the location of aortic node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy to define the extent of the aortic lymphadenectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between August 2001 and December 2010, 100 consecutive patients with primary locally advanced cervical cancer underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. The location of aortic node metastases, inframesenteric or infrarenal was noted. RESULTS: The mean number±standard deviation (SD) of aortic nodes removed was 15.9 ± 7.8 (range 4-62). The mean number ± SD of inframesenteric (including common iliac) nodes removed was 8.8 ± 4.5 (range 2-41) and the mean number ± SD of infrarenal nodes removed was 7.8 ± 4.1 (range 2-21). Positive aortic nodes were observed in 16 patients, and in 5 (31.2%) of them the infrarenal nodes were the only nodes involved, with negative inframesenteric nodes. CONCLUSION: Inframesenteric aortic nodes are negative in the presence of positive infrarenal nodes in about one third of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and aortic metastases.


Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Robótica , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(12): 2545-2550, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922279

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A randomised trial implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for high complexity advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) surgery (PROFAST) demonstrated a reduction of median length of stay and hospital readmissions when compared to patients managed conventionally. One secondary objective was to determine if an ERAS pathway in the perioperative management of advanced ovarian cancer patients led to cost savings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary objective of a prospective randomised trial of patients with suspected or diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer allocated to conventional or ERAS perioperative management, carried out at a referral centre from June 2014 to March 2018. Treatment was determined by a computer-generated random allocation system. METHODS: Gross counting was employed to estimate the cost of hospitalisation in wards, intensive care unit (ICU) and surgical care, while micro-costing was used to obtain image and laboratory test costs. Mean costs between trial arms were considered. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (n = 50 ERAS group, n = 49 Conventional group) were included. Mean costs per patient were 10,719€ in the ERAS group and 11,028€ in the conventional group, leading to an average saving of 309€ per patient. These results were based on 96 patients, excluding 3 extreme outliers mainly related with very high ICU costs. Savings, which were significant for hospital ward costs (-33% total; 759€ per patient in first hospitalisation, and 914€ per partient/day of readmission) were found as robust in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ERAS pathway leads to cost savings when compared to conventional management after AOC surgery.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
7.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(8): 1272-1279, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31863354

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is a gap in knowledge regarding the impact of micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) found in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with endometrial cancer. Here, we present a meta-analysis of the published literature on the rate of MIC and ITCs after lymphatic mapping and determine trends in postoperative management. METHODS: Literature search of Medline and PubMed was done using the terms: micrometastases, isolated tumor cells, endometrial cancer, and sentinel lymph node. Inclusion criteria were: English-language manuscripts, retrospectives, or prospective studies published between January 1999 and June 2019. We removed manuscripts on sentinel node mapping that did not specify information on micrometastases or isolated tumor cells, non-English-language articles, no data about oncologic outcomes, and articles limited to ten cases or less. RESULTS: A total of 45 manuscripts were reviewed, and 8 studies met inclusion criteria. We found that the total number of patients with MIC/ITCs was 286 (187 and 99, respectively). The 72% of patients detected with MIC/ITCs in sentinel nodes received adjuvant therapies. The MIC/ITCs group has a higher relative risk of recurrence of 1.34 (1.07, 1.67) than the negative group, even if the adjuvant therapy was given. CONCLUSION: We noted that there is an increased relative risk of recurrence in patients with low-volume metastases, even after receiving adjuvant therapy. Whether adjuvant therapy is indicated remains a topic of debate because there are other uterine factors implicated in the prognosis. Multi-institutional tumor registries may help shed light on this important question.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Micrometástase de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA