Postoperative outcomes after total sevoflurane inhalation sedation using a disposable delivery system (Sedaconda-ACD) in cardiac surgery.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted our team to develop new solutions for performing cardiac surgery without intravenous anesthetics due to a shortage of these drugs. We utilized an anesthetic conserving device (Sedaconda-ACD) to administer total inhaled anesthesia because specific vaporizers were unavailable for administering inhaled agents during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in our center. We documented our experience and postoperative cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was the peak level of troponin, with secondary outcomes encompassing other cardiovascular complications. Material and methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted. We performed a multivariate analysis with a propensity score. This investigation took place at a large university referral center. Participants: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) who underwent elective cardiac surgery with CPB between June 2020 to March 2021. Intervention: During the inclusion period, two anesthesia protocols for the maintenance of anesthesia coexisted-total inhaled anesthesia with Sedaconda-ACD and our classic protocol with intravenous drugs during and after CPB. Primary endpoint: Troponin peak level recorded after surgery (highest level recorded within 48 h following the surgery). Results: Out of the 654 included patients, 454 were analyzed after matching (intravenous group = 297 and inhaled group = 157). No significant difference was found between the groups in postoperative troponin peak levels (723 ng/l vs. 993 ng/l-p = 0.2). Total inhaled anesthesia was associated with a decreased requirement for inotropic medications (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.99, p = 0.04). Conclusion: In our cohort, the Sedaconda-ACD device enabled us to achieve anesthesia without intravenous agents, and we did not observe any increase in postoperative complications. Total inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane was not associated with a lower incidence of myocardial injury assessed by the postoperative troponin peak level. However, in our cohort, the use of inotropic drugs was lower.

Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after combined mitral and tricuspid valve surgery.

Introduction: Low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) is a common complication in cardiac surgery, and we evaluated the incidence of its early occurrence after mitral and tricuspid combined cardiac surgery and its associated risk factors. Material and method: Retrospective, single institution study. We included 88 consecutive adult patients with severe mitral insufficiency scheduled for elective mitral and tricuspid valve replacement surgery between January 2015 and November 2018. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of LCOS, defined as the need for inotropic support or circulatory assistance after surgery. The secondary endpoint was mortality at 30 days. Results: LCOS occurred in 26 patients (29.5%) of the studied patients and its associated risk factors that appeared in the multivariate analysis were chronic kidney failure [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-9.9, p = 0.05], pre-operative left ventricular heart failure (OR 5.3; 95% CI 1.3-10.9, p = 0.002), pre-operative right ventricular heart failure (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.1-11.5, p = 0.02), and mitral valve replacement (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.2-12.6, p = 0.03). LCOS affected the survival of patients (HR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.1-27.7 p = 0.04). Conclusion: LCOS is a frequent complication after mitral and tricuspid combined surgery and is associated with poor prognosis.

The 90% effective dose of a sufentanil bolus for the management of painful positioning in intubated patients in the ICU.

CONTEXT: Pain and discomfort arising from the routine care of intubated patients in the ICU is managed by continuous infusion of narcotic and sedative drugs. There is benefit in keeping infusion rates low because lightening sedation improves clinical outcome, but this risks breakthrough pain. Management of this discomfort by bolus administration could permit lower background infusion rates, but the lowest effective bolus dose of sufentanil to achieve this is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effective analgesic dose in 90% of intubated patients (ED90) in the ICU given bolus sufentanil. Pain was assessed using a Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) requiring a score of 3-4 during moving to the lateral decubitus position. DESIGN: Prospective, dose response study. SETTING: A 16-bed multidisciplinary ICU in a French university hospital. Study period was from January to June 2010. PATIENTS: Intubated and ventilated patients were eligible for the study once they had reached a BPS of 3 or 4 and Ramsay score of 3-5 within 48 h of admission to the ICU. INTERVENTION: The analgesic efficacy of a sufentanil bolus was measured during successive lateral decubitus positioning over a 72-h study period, using the BPS scale. The dose was increased with each subsequent turn to lateral decubitus until a BPS score of 3-4 was obtained (dose escalation, starting at zero). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BPS, Ramsay score, heart rate and mean arterial pressure were collected before and during each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled over 6 months. The ED90 bolus for sufentanil was 0.15 µg kg, but 40% of the patients subsequently demonstrated increased BPS with this dose. CONCLUSION: The effective dose in 90% was 0.15 µg kg during the first 5 days of sedation. There were no adverse effects. A pre-emptive sufentanil bolus can be used to treat anticipated pain in the ICU. Regular and frequent assessments of acute pain and sedation are essential for adjusting the dose, on a case-by-case basis. This strategy may help clinicians to keep background infusions of sedatives and narcotics as low as possible and may improve clinical outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356732.

Postoperative Delirium is a Risk Factor of Poor Evolution Three Years After Cardiac Surgery: An Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: After cardiac surgery, postoperative delirium (POD) is common and is associated with long-term changes in cognitive function. Impact on health-related quality of life (QOL) and long-term dependence are not well known. This aim of this study is to evaluate the role of POD in poor evolution at three years after surgery including poor QOL and dependence and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled and followed 173 patients 60 years of age or older who were planning to undergo cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary composite outcome was death of any causes, or patients with either a loss of QOL (evaluated with of EuroQuol verbal 5D EQ5D less than 50), or a loss of two points on the instrumental activities of daily living occurring three years after surgery. POD was diagnosed with the use of Confusion Assessment Method. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: At three years, 74 patients (42.8%) had a poor evolution. Independent risk factors in poor patient evolution were sex (female gender; OR: 3.6; 95%CI: 1.45-8.7; p=0.006), metabolic status (diabetic patients; OR: 4; 95%CI: 1.6-10.2; p=0.002), Euroscore 2 (Euroscore 2 >1.5; OR: 5.2; 95%CI: 1.7-15.4; p=0.003) and POD (OR: 3.3; 95%CI 1.4-7.8; p=0.006). Coronary disease was protective (OR: 0.3; 95%CI: 0.14-0.71; p=0.006). CONCLUSION: After cardiac surgery, POD significantly altered patient evolution and increased risk of dependence and loss of QOL.

Stroke output variations calculated by esophageal Doppler is a reliable predictor of fluid response.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal Doppler allows continuous monitoring of stroke volume index (SVI) and corrected flow time (FTc). We hypothesized that variations in stroke output index SOI (SVI/FTc) during volume expansion can predict the hemodynamic response to subsequent fluid loading better than the static values. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-one patients with circulatory failure were monitored by esophageal Doppler. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who responded to a first fluid challenge received a second one. Patients who responded to both were classified as responders-responders, and those who did not respond to the second as responders-nonresponders. In these two groups we compared DeltaSVI, DeltaFTc, and DeltaSOI during each fluid challenge and also static values at the end of each fluid challenge. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: After the first fluid challenge DeltaSOI and DeltaSVI were significantly higher in patients who responded to subsequent volume expansion than in patients who no longer responded. ROC curves showed that DeltaSOI was a better predictor of fluid responsiveness than DeltaSVI. During volume expansion a DeltaSOI value of 11% discriminated between responders and nonresponders to subsequent volume expansion with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 97%. There was no significant difference between the two groups for FTc value at the end of first fluid challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of DeltaSOI during fluid challenge predicts response to subsequent fluid challenge and FTc is not a reliable indicator of cardiac preload.

Oxygen challenge test in septic shock patients: prognostic value and influence of respiratory status.

Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (PtcO2) value in response to an increase of FiO2 or oxygen challenge test (OCT) in ventilated patients has been reported to be related to peripheral perfusion and outcome during septic shock. However, patients with sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome could demonstrate compromised arterial oxygenation with OCT impairment decoupled to circulatory failure. The aims of this study were to confirm the prognostic value of OCT and to explore the influence of respiratory status on OCT results. This was a prospective study set in an intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. Fifty-six mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock criteria were studied. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure was measured at baseline and after OCT, at intensive care unit admittance (T0), and 24 h later (T24). Survival at day 28 and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were analyzed and compared according to outcome and respiratory status. Central hemodynamic parameters or static transcutaneous data did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors at enrollment. The OCT was statistically different at T24 according to outcome (P < 0.001), but sensitivity was low (53%). Moreover, patients with low OCT results at T24 exhibited more severe respiratory failure (P < 0.01). The OCT at T24 is related to outcome but is influenced by the severity of respiratory failure. Our results suggest considering with caution hemodynamic management based on OCT in septic shock patients with altered pulmonary function.