Birtamimab plus standard of care in light-chain amyloidosis: the phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled VITAL trial.

Amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare, typically fatal disease characterized by the accumulation of misfolded immunoglobulin light chains (LCs). Birtamimab is an investigational humanized monoclonal antibody designed to neutralize toxic LC aggregates and deplete insoluble organ-deposited amyloid via macrophage-induced phagocytosis. VITAL was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of birtamimab + standard of care (SOC) in 260 newly diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with AL amyloidosis. Patients received 24 mg/kg IV birtamimab + SOC or placebo + SOC every 28 days. The primary composite end point was the time to all-cause mortality (ACM) or centrally adjudicated cardiac hospitalization ≥91 days after the first study drug infusion. The trial was terminated early after an interim futility analysis; there was no significant difference in the primary composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.826; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.574-1.189; log-rank P = .303). A post hoc analysis of patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis, those at the highest risk of early mortality, showed significant improvement in the time to ACM with birtamimab at month 9 (HR, 0.413; 95% CI, 0.191-0.895; log-rank P = .021). At month 9, 74% of patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis treated with birtamimab and 49% of those given placebo survived. Overall, the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were generally similar between treatment arms. A confirmatory phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of birtamimab in patients with Mayo stage IV AL amyloidosis (AFFIRM-AL; NCT04973137) is currently enrolling. The VITAL trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02312206.

Daratumumab-Based Treatment for Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P<0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.).

Daratumumab in AL amyloidosis.

Light-chain amyloidosis has come far, with the first treatment getting regulatory approval in 2021. Daratumumab-based regimens achieve deep hematologic and organ responses, offering a new therapeutic backbone. Early identification, correct fibril typing, challenges of the very advanced patient, and lack of therapies to remove amyloid deposits remain under study, but are, as yet, elusive. We review the progress of treatment in AL amyloidosis, the impact of daratumumab, and the next steps after treatment.

Quality of life and symptoms among patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib-dexamethasone versus physician's choice.

Patient-reported outcomes in AL amyloidosis have not been well-studied. We analyzed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and AL amyloidosis symptoms data from the phase 3 TOURMALINE-AL1 trial (NCT01659658) (ixazomib-dexamethasone, n = 85; physician's choice of chemotherapy [PC], n = 83). HRQOL and symptom burden were measured with the SF-36v2, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and an amyloidosis symptom questionnaire (ASQ). Score changes during treatment were analyzed descriptively and using repeated-measures linear mixed models; analyses were not adjusted for multiplicity. Least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline were significantly higher (better HRQOL) for ixazomib-dexamethasone at several cycles for SF-36v2 Role Physical and Vitality subscales (p < .05); no subscales demonstrated significant differences favoring PC. For FACT/GOG-Ntx, small but significant differences in LS mean changes favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at multiple cycles for seven items and both summary scores; significant differences favored PC for one item (trouble hearing) at multiple cycles. ASQ total score trended downward (lower burden) in both arms; significant LS mean differences favored ixazomib-dexamethasone over PC at some cycles (p < .05). Patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis treated with ixazomib-dexamethasone experienced HRQOL and symptoms that were similar to or trended better than patients treated with PC despite longer duration of therapy.

Prevalence of plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders among blood relatives of patients with light chain amyloidosis.

With limited existing data on hereditary factors in light chain (AL) amyloidosis, we conducted a study of patients with plasma cell dyscrasias or lymphoproliferative disorders in their family history. Among 1621 patients, we identified 44 probands (2·7%) with 52 relatives affected. The most common disorders in family members were multiple myeloma (48%) and AL amyloidosis (18%). Light chain isotype was 100% congruent in families with known clonal immunoglobulin for both members. Despite matching light chain isotype, organ involvement varied between members in families with multiple cases of AL amyloidosis. These findings help generate hypotheses about familial influences in AL amyloidosis.

Safety, tolerability, and response rates of daratumumab in relapsed AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 2 study.

Daratumumab, a monoclonal CD38 antibody, is approved in the treatment of myeloma, but its efficacy and safety in light-chain (AL) amyloidosis has not been formally studied. This prospective phase 2 trial of daratumumab monotherapy for the treatment of AL amyloidosis was designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and hematologic and clinical response. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg was administered by IV infusion once weekly for weeks 1 to 8, every 2 weeks for weeks 9 to 24, and every 4 weeks thereafter until progression or unacceptable toxicity, for up to 24 months. Twenty-two patients with previously treated AL amyloidosis were enrolled. The majority of the patients had received high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation and/or treatment with a proteasome inhibitor. The median time between prior therapy and trial enrollment was 9 months (range, 1-180 months). No grade 3-4 infusion-related reactions occurred. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events included respiratory infections (n = 4; 18%) and atrial fibrillation (n = 4, 18%). Hematologic complete and very-good-partial response occurred in 86% of patients. The median time to first and best hematologic response was 4 weeks and 3 months, respectively. Renal response occurred in 10 of 15 patients (67%) with renal involvement and cardiac response occurred in 7 of 14 patients (50%) with cardiac involvement. In summary, daratumumab is well tolerated in patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis and leads to rapid and deep hematologic responses and organ responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02841033.

Daratumumab plus CyBorD for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: safety run-in results of ANDROMEDA.

Although no therapies are approved for light chain (AL) amyloidosis, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) is considered standard of care. Based on outcomes of daratumumab in multiple myeloma (MM), the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study (NCT03201965) is evaluating daratumumab-CyBorD vs CyBorD in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. We report results of the 28-patient safety run-in. Patients received subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC) weekly in cycles 1 to 2, every 2 weeks in cycles 3 to 6, and every 4 weeks thereafter for up to 2 years. CyBorD was given weekly for 6 cycles. Patients had a median of 2 involved organs (kidney, 68%; cardiac, 61%). Patients received a median of 16 (range, 1-23) treatment cycles. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with DARA SC in MM and CyBorD. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 1 patient (grade 1). No grade 5 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred; 5 patients died, including 3 after transplant. Overall hematologic response rate was 96%, with a complete hematologic response in 15 (54%) patients; at least partial response occurred in 20, 22, and 17 patients at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. Renal response occurred in 6 of 16, 7 of 15, and 10 of 15 patients, and cardiac response occurred in 6 of 16, 6 of 13, and 8 of 13 patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Hepatic response occurred in 2 of 3 patients at 12 months. Daratumumab-CyBorD was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns versus the intravenous formulation, and demonstrated robust hematologic and organ responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03201965.

Predictors and outcomes of acute kidney injury during autologous stem cell transplantation in AL amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT) in patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, its incidence, predictors and outcomes are not well known. METHODS: This observational study included 223 patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent HDM/SCT. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine to ≥1.5 times the baseline occurring within the first 30 days of HDM/SCT. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years (range: 30-77). Kidney and cardiac involvement were present in 86.1% and 56.8%, respectively. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 83.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 9-213) and proteinuria was 2899 mg/day (range: 0-19 966). AKI occurred in 29.1% of patients. Dialysis was initiated in 15 patients (6.7%) and of these 12 (80%) were able to discontinue dialysis. Most of the episodes of AKI occurred within the first 2 weeks; with a median follow-up of 4.5 years (range: 0.1-16.5), AKI was associated with increased overall mortality [hazard rato (HR) = 4.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-10.23]. The 10-year overall survival was 87.1% without AKI, versus 56.9% with AKI. AKI was also associated with an increased risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (HR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.44-14.38). The risk of developing ESKD at 10 years was 18.9% with AKI, versus 8.1% without AKI. Several risk factors were found and using multivariate logistic regression, a prediction model was developed that included three readily available variables: eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, interventricular septal thickness in diastole >12 mm and albumin <3 g/dL. This model was able to predict AKI development with an area under the curve of 0.8. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is common in the post-HDM/SCT period and it leads to increased risk for ESKD and death. Our prediction model is an easily deployable tool in clinical settings as part of the discussion with patients who are being prepared for HDM/SCT.

Predictive factors of outcomes in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab.

Daratumumab as a single agent (sDARA) or in combination with chemotherapies (cDARA) leads to impressive hematologic and organ responses in AL amyloidosis. However, predictive factors associated with outcomes, and optimal duration of therapy remain unclear. We analyzed 107 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab between 2017 and 2020. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached while the median major organ deterioration progression free survival (MOD-PFS) was 36 months in the sDARA cohort and not reached in the cDARA cohort, respectively. Hematologic response > VGPR was achieved in 81% of patients receiving sDARA and 86% of patients treated with cDARA. Several predictive factors were identified on a univariate analysis, including NTproBNP >8500 pg/mL but only achievement of at least VGPR and presence of 1q21 gain were independently associated with MOD-PFS and OS on a multivariate analysis. Finally, patients receiving > 12 cycles had significantly longer MOD-PFS (30 vs.13 months; (p = .0018) and OS (NR vs. 15 months; p < .0001). NTproBNP > 8500 pg/mL, presence of 1q21 gain and shorter duration of therapy (≤ 12 cycles) are strong negative predictive factors for outcomes with daratumumab therapy in AL amyloidosis.

Predictors of hematologic response and survival with stem cell transplantation in AL amyloidosis: A 25-year longitudinal study.

High-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT) is an effective treatment for selected patients with AL amyloidosis. We report the long-term outcomes of 648 patients with AL amyloidosis treated with HDM/SCT over 25 years. Hematologic CR was achieved by 39% of patients. The median duration of hematologic CR was 12.3 years, and 45% of patients with a hematologic CR had no evidence of a recurrent plasma cell dyscrasia at 15 years after HDM/SCT. With a median follow-up interval of 8 years, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.3 and 7.6 years, respectively. Patients with a hematologic CR had a median OS of 15 years, and 30% of these patients survived >20 years. On multivariable analysis, dFLC >180 mg/L and BM plasma cells >10% were independently associated with shorter EFS, whereas BNP >81 pg/mL, troponin I > 0.1 ng/mL, and serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL were independently associated with shorter OS. We developed a prognostic score for EFS, which incorporated dFLC >180 mg/L and BMPC% >10% as adverse risk factors. Patients with low-risk (0 factors), intermediate-risk (1 factor), and high-risk (2 factors) disease had median EFS estimates of 5.3, 2.8, and 1.0 years, respectively (p < .001). The 100-day treatment-related mortality rate was 3% in the latest treatment period (2012-2021), and the 25-year risk of t-MDS/AML was 3%. We conclude that HDM/SCT induces durable hematologic responses and prolonged survival with improved safety in selected patients with AL amyloidosis.

Health-related quality of life in patients with light chain amyloidosis treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone ± daratumumab: Results from the ANDROMEDA study.

In the phase 3 ANDROMEDA trial, patients treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) had significantly higher rates of organ and hematologic response compared with patients who received VCd alone. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the ANDROMEDA trial. PROs were assessed through cycle 6 using three standardized questionnaires. Treatment effect through cycle 6 was measured by a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model. The magnitude of changes in PROs versus baseline was generally low, but between-group differences favored the D-VCd group. Results were generally consistent irrespective of hematologic, cardiac, or renal responses. More patients in the D-VCd group experienced meaningful improvements in PROs; median time to improvement was more rapid in the D-VCd group versus the VCd group. After cycle 6, patients in the D-VCd group received daratumumab monotherapy and their PRO assessments continued, with improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) reported through cycle 19. PROs of subgroups with renal and cardiac involvement were consistent with those of the intent-to-treat population. These results demonstrate that the previously reported clinical benefits of D-VCd were achieved without decrement to patients' HRQoL and provide support of D-VCd in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Development and validation of a survival staging system incorporating BNP in patients with light chain amyloidosis.

Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is caused by misfolded light chains that form soluble toxic aggregates that deposit in tissues and organs, leading to organ dysfunction. The leading determinant of survival is cardiac involvement. Current staging systems use N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponins T and I (TnT and TnI) for prognostication, but many centers do not offer NT-proBNP. We sought to derive a new staging system using brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) that would correlate with the Mayo 2004 staging system and be predictive for survival in AL amyloidosis. Two cohorts of patients were created: a derivation cohort of 249 consecutive patients who had BNP, NT-proBNP, and TnI drawn simultaneously to create the staging system and a complementary cohort of 592 patients with 10 years of follow-up to determine survival. In the derivation cohort, we found that a BNP threshold of more than 81 pg/mL best associated with Mayo 2004 stage and also best identified cardiac involvement. Three stages were developed based on a BNP higher than 81 pg/mL and a TnI higher than 0.1 ng/mL and compared with Mayo 2004 with high concordance (κ = 0.854). In the complementary cohort, 25% of patients had stage I, 44% had stage II, 15% had stage III, and 16% had stage IIIb disease with a median survival not reached in stage I, 9.4 years in stage II, 4.3 years in stage III, and 1 year in stage IIIb. This new Boston University biomarker scoring system will allow centers without access to NT-proBNP the ability to appropriately stage patients with AL amyloidosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00898235.

A Review of Novel Agents and Clinical Considerations in Patients With ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis.

ABSTRACT: Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a multisystem disease caused by organ deposition of amyloid fibrils derived from the misfolded transthyretin (TTR) protein. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of current treatment regimens and summarize important considerations for each agent. A literature search was performed with the PubMed database for articles published through October 2020. Search criteria included therapies available on the market and investigational therapies used for ATTR amyloidosis treatment. Both prospective clinical trials and retrospective studies have been included in this review. Available therapies discussed in this review article are tafamidis, diflunisal, patisiran, and inotersen. Tafamidis is FDA approved for treatment of wild-type ATTR (ATTRwt) and hereditary ATTR (ATTRv) cardiomyopathy, and patisiran and inotersen are FDA approved for ATTRv polyneuropathy. Diflunisal does not have an FDA-labeled indication for amyloidosis but has been studied in ATTRv polyneuropathy and ATTRwt cardiomyopathy. Investigational therapies include a TTR stabilizer, AG10; 2 antifibril agents, PRX004 and doxycycline/tauroursodeoxycholic acid; and 2 gene silencers, vutrisiran and AKCEA-TTR-LRx; and clinical trials are ongoing. ATTR amyloidosis treatment selection is based on subtype and presence of cardiac or neurological manifestations. Additional considerations such as side effects, monitoring, and administration are outlined in this review.

A pharmacist's review of the treatment of systemic light chain amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is an uncommon hematologic plasma cell dyscrasia that is becoming increasingly recognized. Therapeutic agents used in AL amyloidosis overlap with those used in multiple myeloma; however, differences in disease features change treatment efficacy and tolerance. Pharmacists must be cognizant of these distinctions. Herein, this review article provides an up-to-date guide to treatment considerations for systemic AL amyloidosis in both the front-line and relapsed settings.Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed/Medline database for articles published through (June 2020) regarding treatments for AL amyloidosis. Search criteria included therapies that are FDA approved for multiple myeloma, as well as investigational agents. This review of chemotherapeutic agents reflects the current clinical practice guidelines endorsed by NCCN along with commentary based on the experience of pharmacists from a tertiary-referral center treating many patients with AL amyloidosis. Data consists of randomized controlled trials, observational cohorts, case reports, and ongoing clinical trials.Data summary: Frontline options discussed here include high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation and bortezomib-based regimens. Regarding the relapsed setting, supporting data are compiled and summarized for: bortezomib, ixazomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, venetoclax, NEOD001, and melflufen. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment platform for AL amyloidosis is expanding with novel agents traditionally used in multiple myeloma being adopted and modified for use in AL amyloidosis. The pharmacist's familiarity with the clinical evidence base for these agents and how they fit into standard protocols for AL amyloidosis is critical as dosing and monitoring recommendations are unique from multiple myeloma.

Establishment of brain natriuretic peptide - based criteria for evaluating cardiac response to treatment in light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

Severity of cardiac involvement remains the leading determinant of survival in light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Until recently, cardiac response after treatment relied on reduction of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). In this study, 94 patients with AL amyloidosis (baseline BNP ≥150 pg/ml) had BNP measured at 6 months following treatment. Median overall survival was not reached for cardiac response (≥50 pg/ml and ≥ 30% decrease in BNP), 9·2 years for cardiac stability (<50 pg/ml and <30% change in BNP) and 2·8 years for cardiac progression (≥50 pg/ml or ≥30% increase in BNP) (log-rank P < 0·001). Cardiac response and progression, as measured by BNP values, are significantly associated with survival in AL amyloidosis.

Challenges in the management of patients with systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is primarily manifested as a respiratory tract infection, but may affect and cause complications in multiple organ systems (cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, kidneys, haematopoietic and immune systems), while no proven specific therapy exists. The challenges associated with COVID-19 are even greater for patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis, a rare multisystemic disease affecting the heart, kidneys, liver, gastrointestinal and nervous system. Patients with AL amyloidosis may need to receive chemotherapy, which probably increases infection risk. Management of COVID-19 may be particularly challenging in patients with AL amyloidosis, who often present with cardiac dysfunction, nephrotic syndrome, neuropathy, low blood pressure and gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, patients with AL amyloidosis may be more susceptible to toxicities of drugs used to manage COVID-19. Access to health care may be difficult or limited, diagnosis of AL amyloidosis may be delayed with detrimental consequences and treatment administration may need modification. Both patients and treating physicians need to adapt in a new reality.

Quantitative [18F]florbetapir PET/CT may identify lung involvement in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis.

PURPOSE: The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary involvement in individuals with systemic AL amyloidosis remains challenging. [18F]florbetapir imaging has previously identified AL amyloid deposits in the heart and extra-cardiac organs. The aim of this study is to determine quantitative [18F]florbetapir pulmonary kinetics to identify pulmonary involvement in individuals with systemic AL amyloidosis. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 58 subjects with biopsy-proven AL amyloidosis and 9 control subjects (5 without amyloidosis and 4 with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis). Pulmonary [18F]florbetapir uptake was evaluated visually and quantified as distribution volume of specific binding (Vs) derived from compartmental analysis and simpler semiquantitative metrics of maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), retention index (RI), and target-to-blood ratio (TBR). RESULTS: On visual analysis, pulmonary tracer uptake was absent in most AL subjects (40/58, 69%); 12% (7/58) of AL subjects demonstrated intense bilateral homogeneous tracer uptake. In this group, compared to the control group, Vs (median Vs 30-fold higher, 9.79 vs. 0.26, p < 0.001), TBR (median TBR 12.0 vs. 1.71, p < 0.001), and RI (median RI 0.310 vs. 0.033, p < 0.001) were substantially higher. Notably, the AL group without visually apparent pulmonary [18F]florbetapir uptake also demonstrated a > 3-fold higher Vs compared to the control group (median 0.99 vs. 0.26, p < 0.001). Vs was independently related to left ventricular SUVmax, a marker of cardiac AL deposition, but not to ejection fraction, a marker of cardiac dysfunction. Also, intense [18F]florbetapir lung uptake was not related to [11C]acetate lung uptake, suggesting that intense [18F]florbetapir lung uptake represents AL amyloidosis rather than heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]florbetapir PET/CT offers the potential to noninvasively identify pulmonary AL amyloidosis, and its clinical relevance warrants further study.

Patient outcomes in light chain (AL) amyloidosis: The clock is ticking from symptoms to diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Symptomology of AL amyloidosis can be vague, with a broad range of manifestations and potential etiologies. We sought to determine whether time from initial patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis was associated with survival. METHODS: The Boston University Amyloidosis Patient Database was queried for patients with AL amyloidosis who presented to the Center for initial evaluation from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients with AL amyloidosis were evaluated for initial evaluation. The median time to diagnosis from initial symptom onset was 7.1 months (range, 0-61). At data cutoff, 60.2% (n = 195) of patients were alive; of those, the majority were diagnosed <6 months from initial symptoms (52.3%, n = 102). In contrast, time to diagnosis from symptom onset was >6 months in 63.6% (n = 82) of patients who did not survive at the time of data cutoff (P = .0005). Survival analysis of time from diagnosis to death or data cutoff stratified by time from patient-reported symptom onset to diagnosis (<6, 6-12, and >12 months) showed significant differences among groups (P = .001). Additionally, multivariable regression demonstrated that an increase in time from self-reported symptom onset to diagnosis was significantly associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04, P = .002). CONCLUSION: These results support the importance of early diagnosis for patients with AL amyloidosis.

High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis.

AL amyloidosis is a systemic amyloidosis and is associated with an underlying plasma cell dyscrasia. High-dose intravenous melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation was developed for the treatment of AL amyloidosis in the early 1990s and was prompted by its success in myeloma. This application has evolved significantly over the past three decades. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of eligibility criteria, stem cell collection, and mobilization strategies and regimens, risk-adapted melphalan dosing, role for induction and consolidation therapies as well as long-term outcome with respect to survival, hematologic response and relapse as well as organ responses following stem cell transplantation. Continued efforts to refine patient selection and management, and incorporate novel anti-plasma cell agents in combination or sequentially to further improve outcomes in AL amyloidosis are also discussed.