Clinical impact of recovery room on post-operative walking performance in elderly patients submitted to hip surgery: a real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Strategies aimed at favouring functional recovery after surgery for hip fracture may be of clinical importance. AIMS: To test the clinical utility of a recovery room (RR) in terms of postoperative walking performance in an elderly population submitted to hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Postoperative walking performance at rollator was assessed in 242 consecutive orthogeriatric patients able to follow the institutional physiotherapy protocol starting on day 1 after hip surgery. Group 1 (n = 186, age 86.0 ± 9.3 years, 24.7% male) was admitted to the RR for postoperative monitoring, whereas Group 2 (n = 56, age 85.2 ± 5.7 years, 23.2% male) was directly admitted to the ward. The best performance observed during the first three postoperative days was considered. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a better walking performance than Group 2, with a 50% lower probability of walking < 5 m (relative risk 0.51, p = 0.0005) and a two-fold higher probability of walking > 10 m (relative risk 2.10, p = 0.0005). Multivariable analysis confirmed a favourable independent effect of the RR stay on walking performance (ß = 0.205, p = 0.005). DISCUSSION: Admission to the RR in elderly patients submitted to hip fracture surgery could have an independent beneficial effect on postoperative walking functional recovery. This beneficial effect could probably depend on the possibility of ensuring a more rapid management of postoperative issues CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the clinical utility of a RR implementation in facilities where hip surgery in elderly subjects is routinely performed.

Lifestyle modifications after acute coronary syndromes in a subset of the AMI-Florence 2 Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to recommendations for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Physical examination, a careful medical interview with assessment for lifestyle habits, adherence to pharmacological therapy and blood analyses were performed in 130 patients at the time of the acute event and after 6 months of follow-up. At follow-up examination, 7 patients persisted to smoke (5.4%), 41 (31.5%) continued to have high blood pressure, 34 (26.1%) had high levels of total cholesterol, 38 (29.2%) high levels of triglycerides, 64 (49.2%) high levels of LDL-cholesterol and 46 (35.4%) low levels of HDL-cholesterol. Despite all treatments no significant change occurred. A high percentage of patients (47%) reported a lower daily consumption of fruit and vegetables with respect to the recommended daily portions, nearly the whole population (92.3%) did not reach the recommended portions of legumes per week recommended, and a consistent percentage of patients (81.5%) did not consume fish twice a week, as recommended. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the difficulty of modifying the lifestyle habits in patients with ACS.

Prognostic comparison between creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate formulas for the prediction of 10-year outcome in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND:: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a predictor of outcome among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), but which estimation formula provides the best long-term risk stratification in this setting is still unclear. We compared the prognostic performance of four creatinine-based formulas for the prediction of 10-year outcome in a NSTE-ACS population treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS:: In 222 NSTE-ACS patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention, eGFR was calculated using four formulas: Cockcroft-Gault, re-expressed modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD), chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-Epi), and Mayo-quadratic. Predefined endpoints were all-cause death and a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal reinfarction, clinically driven repeat revascularisation, and heart failure hospitalisation. RESULTS:: The different eGFR values showed poor agreement, with prevalences of renal dysfunction ranging from 14% to 35%. Over a median follow-up of 10.2 years, eGFR calculated by the CKD-Epi and Mayo-quadratic formulas independently predicted outcome, with an increase in the risk of death and events by up to 17% and 11%, respectively, for each decrement of 10 ml/min/1.73 m2. The Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations showed a borderline association with mortality and did not predict events. When compared in terms of goodness of fit, discrimination and calibration, the Mayo-quadratic outperformed the other formulas for the prediction of death and the CKD-Epi showed the best performance for the prediction of events (net reclassification improvement values 0.33-0.35). CONCLUSIONS:: eGFR is an independent predictor of long-term outcome in patients with NSTE-ACS treated by percutaneous coronary intervention. The Mayo-quadratic and CKD-Epi equations might be superior to classic eGFR formulas for risk stratification in these patients.

Relation between plasma brain natriuretic peptide, serum indexes of collagen type I turnover, and left ventricular remodeling after reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

The aim of the study is to investigate the relation between plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), collagen type I turnover, and left ventricular (LV) remodeling after primary angioplasty. Echo-Doppler, BNP, carboxy-terminal telopeptide of procollagen type I (ICTP), C-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I (PICP), and their ratio PICP/ICTP (as an index of coupling between the synthesis and degradation of collagen type I) were evaluated at days 1 and 3 and months 1 and 6 after primary angioplasty in 56 consecutive patients with a first large acute myocardial infarction (AMI). During the 6 months after AMI, a direct relation was shown between BNP and ICTP (day 1, r = 0.54, p = 0.000; day 3, r = 0.64, p = 0.000; month 1, r = 0.64, p = 0.000; month 6, r = 0.41, p = 0.005) and BNP and PICP/ICTP (day 1, r = -0.54, p = 0.003; day 3, r = -0.58, p = 0.000; month 1, r = -0.50, p = 0.000; month 6, r = -0.30, p = 0.043), but not between BNP and PICP. Using analysis of covariance, relations between BNP and ICTP and PICP/ICTP were independent from infarct size. Patients with LV remodeling had significantly higher plasma ICTP and BNP levels and lower PICP/ICTP than patients without LV remodeling. Day-1 ICTP independently predicted 6-month remodeling (exp beta = 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1,120 to 3,550, p = 0.01). In conclusion, a relation exists between plasma BNP collagen type I turnover and LV remodeling after reperfused AMI.

Determinants of discrepancies between two-dimensional echocardiographic methods for assessment of maximal left atrial volume.

AIMS: The determinants of discrepancies among two-dimensional echocardiographic (2D-E) methods for left atrial volume (LAV) assessment are poorly investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Maximal LAV was measured in 613 individuals (282 healthy subjects,180 athletes, and 151 hypertensives; age 45 ± 20 years, 62% male) using the ellipsoid model (LAVEllips), the area-length method (LAVAL), and the Simpson's rule (LAVSimps). On the basis of a mathematical model, two left atrial (LA) geometry indexes were tested as predictors of discrepancies between methods: the ratio between LA medial-lateral diameter (MLD) and LA anteroposterior diameter (APD); and the ratio between LA area in the four-chamber view and that of an ellipse with the same diameters [deviation from ellipse (DE)-coefficient]. Discrepancies among methods were consistently present in the overall population and across all study groups. MLD/APD and the DE-coefficient together predicted 76 and 68% of differences between biplane LAVAL and LAVEllips, and between biplane LAVSimps and LAVEllips, respectively. The DE-coefficient was the only determinant of LAVAL/LAVSimps difference (ß = 0.167, P < 0.0001). Body mass index was the strongest predictor of discrepancies between single-plane and biplane approaches of LAVAL (ß = 0.427, P < 0.0001) and LAVSimps (ß = 0.424, P < 0.0001). In additional analyses, biplane LAVAL showed the best agreement with LAV obtained by three-dimensional echocardiography and the best reproducibility and repeatability. CONCLUSION: LA geometry is the main determinant of inconsistencies between 2D-E methods for measuring maximal LAV. Body mass index is the strongest determinant of differences between single-plane and biplane approaches. Different 2D-E methods cannot be used interchangeably for diagnosis and follow-up. The biplane area-length method should be preferred, particularly in overweight-obese subjects.

Effect of comorbidity on coronary reperfusion strategy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Chronic comorbidity is a prognostic determinant in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study was aimed at determining to what extent this effect is independent or derives from adoption of different therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Seven hundred forty patients with STEMI hospitalized within 12 hours of symptom onset were enrolled in a population-based registry, in a health district comprising 1 teaching hospital with and 5 district hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities. Three categories of increasing chronic comorbidity score (CS-1, n = 259; CS-2, n = 235; CS-3, n = 246) were identified from age-adjusted associations of comorbidities with 1-year survival. RESULTS: Higher CS was associated with lower direct admission or transferal rates to hospital with PCI. Coronary reperfusion therapy (PCI in 91.5% of 470 cases) was adopted less frequently (P < .001) in CS-3 (41.9%) than CS-2 (69.4%) or CS-1 (78.8%). Compared with conservative therapy (n = 270), reperfusion therapy reduced 1-year mortality in the whole series not significantly (P = .816) in CS-1 but significantly in CS-2 (P = .012) and CS-3 (P = .001). This trend persisted after adjusting for age, Killip class, and acute myocardial infarction location (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63 [95% CI 0.14-2.80], HR = 0.62 [95% CI 0.31-1.25], and HR = 0.47 [95% CI 0.26-0.86] in CS-1, CS-2, and CS-3, respectively). By hypothesizing an extension of coronary reperfusion therapy utilization rate in CS-2 and CS-3 to that in CS-1, from 21 (crude analysis) to 20 (adjusted analysis) deaths were classified as potentially avoidable. CONCLUSION: Increased mortality in patients with chronic comorbidity and STEMI derives, at least in part, from underutilization of coronary reperfusion therapy, and might be reduced with a more aggressive therapeutic approach.

Left Atrial Mass Invasion from Pulmonary Neoplasm Extension via the Right Upper Pulmonary Vein Presenting as Ipsilateral Stroke.

Left atrial invasion by lung cancer via haematogenous pathways is a relatively uncommon but potentially life-threatening event. While several cardiac complications of cardiac involvement have been previously described, the evolution towards cerebral stroke has been rarely reported. In this case report, we describe an atypical case of haematogenous metastatic invasion of the left atrium from pulmonary neoplasm extension presenting as an ipsilateral stroke whose ASCO classification changed during the clinical management.

Abciximab-supported infarct artery stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction and long-term survival: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing infarct artery stenting plus abciximab with stenting alone.

BACKGROUND: The impact on survival of routine use of abciximab as adjunctive treatment to routine infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction is not defined. We sought to determine the effect of abciximab on 1-year survival and other major adverse cardiac events of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing routine infarct artery stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Abciximab and Carbostent Evaluation (ACE) Trial is an unblinded, randomized, controlled trial that compared abciximab with placebo in patients undergoing routine infarct artery stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. At 1 year, the survival rate was 95+/-2% in the abciximab group and 88+/-2% in the stent-alone group (P=0.017). The reinfarction rate was 1% in the abciximab group and 6.0% in the stent-alone group, whereas there were no differences between groups in target vessel revascularization rate (16.5% in the abciximab group, 17.5% in the stent-alone group). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab as adjunctive treatment to routine infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction resulted in improved 1-year survival and lower reinfarction rates.

A randomized trial comparing primary infarct artery stenting with or without abciximab in acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of abciximab as adjunctive therapy to routine infarct-related artery (IRA) stenting. BACKGROUND: The impact of abciximab on the efficacy of myocardial reperfusion and the outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing IRA stenting have not yet been defined. METHODS: In a randomized trial, we assigned 400 patients with AMI to undergo IRA stenting alone or stenting plus abciximab. The primary end point was a composite of death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke at one month. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary end point was lower in the abciximab group than in the stent only group (4.5% and 10.5%, respectively; p = 0.023), and randomization to abciximab was independently related to the risk of the primary end point (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.97; p = 0.041). Early ST-segment resolution was more frequent in the abciximab group (85% vs. 68%, p < 0.001). Infarct size, as assessed by one-month technetium-99m sestamibi scintigraphy, revealed smaller infarcts in the abciximab group. At six months, the cumulative difference in mortality between the groups increased (4.5% vs. 8%), and the incidence of the composite of six-month death and reinfarction was lower in the abciximab group than in the stent only group (5.5% and 13.5%, respectively; p = 0.006). Six-month repeat TVR and restenosis rates were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab plus IRA stenting should be considered the routine reperfusion strategy in patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous mechanical revascularization, especially in high-risk patients.

Gated SPECT evaluation of outcome after abciximab-supported primary infarct artery stenting for acute myocardial infarction: the scintigraphic data of the abciximab and carbostent evaluation (ACE) randomized trial.

UNLABELLED: We used gated SPECT to evaluate the impact of abciximab on the efficacy of myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing infarct-related artery stenting. METHODS: The Abciximab and Carbostent Evaluation (ACE) trial randomized 400 infarct patients to stenting alone or stenting plus abciximab. One-month (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated SPECT was planned in a subgroup of consecutive patients to evaluate infarct size, infarct severity, left ventricular volumes, and ejection fraction. RESULTS: The final study population included 182 patients (99 randomized to abciximab and 83 to stenting alone). Gated SPECT revealed smaller infarcts in the abciximab group than in the stenting-alone group (14.3% +/- 11.7% vs. 18.1% +/- 13%, P < 0.02), and lower infarct severity (minimum-to-maximum count ratio = 0.47 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.15, P < 0.02), resulting in a smaller left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (57.8 +/- 20.0 vs. 64.6 +/- 20.8 mL/m(2), P = 0.03) and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (31.7 +/- 17.4 vs. 37.5 +/- 18.6 mL/m(2), P = 0.05) in the abciximab group. One-month left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in patients randomized to abciximab (47.4% +/- 11.3% vs. 43.9% +/- 11.7%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of abciximab therapy as an adjunct to infarct-related artery stenting leads to a reduction in infarct size and severity, resulting in smaller 1-mo left ventricular volumes and better left ventricular function. Gated SPECT appears to be an ideal tool for outcome assessment in infarct patients undergoing different treatment strategies.

Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: treatment strategies and 30-day outcome.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the current care of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with particular regard to the rate of use of antiplatelet drugs and the type of strategy, aggressive or conservative, in a population of consecutive patients admitted to 76 Coronary Care Units in Italy. METHODS: Prospective registry of patients admitted to Coronary Care Units with a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation ACS during a 2-month period. Thirty-day follow-up was available in all patients. RESULTS: Of 1581 patients enrolled in the registry, 564 were 75 years or older. As compared with the 1017 younger patients, elderly patients had a greater prevalence of female sex (42% vs 27%, P <.001), hypertension (70% vs 59%, P <.001), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (41% vs 29%, P <.001), prior angina (18% vs 13%, P <.01), prior use of aspirin (49% vs 39%, P <.001), ST-segment depression (54% vs 43%, P <.001), and troponin positivity (66% vs 59%, P <.05). The higher-risk profile of elderly patients was confirmed by the greater number of patients with a high TIMI risk score (37% vs 22%, P <.001). GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors were less frequently used in elderly patients (P <.05). An aggressive strategy (coronary arteriography within 4 days of admission, followed by revascularization, if feasible) was adopted in 39% elderly patients and in 56% younger patients (P <.001). An interventional procedure within 30 days was performed in 30% of elderly patients and 48% of younger patients (P <.001). Elderly patients had a more unfavorable 30-day outcome compared with younger ones, as shown by the higher rates of death (6.4% vs 1.7%), acute myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5%), and stroke (1.3% vs 0.5%). Multivariate analysis of the elderly group identified a conservative strategy (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.20 to 4.48) and a diagnosis of non-Q-wave MI (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.93) as independent predictors of 30-day events. CONCLUSIONS: The elderly represent a very high-risk subgroup among patients with non-ST-elevation ACS, with a nearly 4-fold as high 30-day death rate as that of younger patients. These data call for a greater attention to such population, both in terms of an improved representation in clinical research and of the assessment of the outcome of different strategies in appropriately designed randomized trials.

Abciximab therapy improves 1-month survival rate in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing routine infarct artery stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of abciximab therapy on mortality in unselected patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing routine primary infarct-related artery (IRA) stent implantation is not yet defined, and previous randomized studies have produced conflicting results. METHODS: A strategy of IRA stenting alone as opposed to IRA stenting plus abciximab was compared in a series of 561 consecutive unselected patients with AMI. Abciximab treatment was strongly encouraged for all patients. The contraindication for abciximab therapy was a high risk of major bleeding as assessed by the operator before mechanical intervention. RESULTS: Of 561 patients, 348 patients underwent abciximab therapy and 213 underwent primary IRA stenting alone. The 1-month overall mortality rate was 2.9% in the abciximab group and 10.8% in the stent alone group (P <.001). The relative reduction in mortality rate was 73% for patients overall, 77% in the subset of patients aged < or =70 years (mortality rate, 1.2% vs 5.2%, P =.020), 57% in patients aged >70 years (7.7% vs 18%, P =.043), 63% in patients with cardiogenic shock (17% vs 46%, P =.022), and 77% in patients without cardiogenic shock (1.3% vs 5.6%, P =.002). Multivariate analyses on the basis of all patients, and on the subset of patients aged < or =70 years, showed that abciximab therapy was independently related to the risk of death at 1 month. No differences were seen between groups in the procedural success rate (99.1% vs 98.1%) or in the incidence rates of nonfatal reinfarction (0.3% vs 1.9%) or repeat target vessel revascularization (1.7% vs 1.9%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly support the use of abciximab therapy in nonselected patients with AMI undergoing routine IRA stent implantation. The mechanism of the clinical benefit of abciximab was not related to the patency of the IRA.

Angiographic findings, time course of regional and global left ventricular function, and clinical outcome in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

There is scarce information available about the outcome of diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). We sought to compare left ventricular (LV) function, and angiographic and clinical outcomes in diabetics versus nondiabetics with AMI treated with primary PTCA. This study examined 720 consecutive patients with AMI treated with primary PTCA, 102 of whom had diabetes. Six-month follow-up coronary angiography was obtained in 560 patients (88% of eligible patients). In a subgroup of 284 patients, LV function was serially determined by 2-dimensional echocardiography. During 6-month follow-up no significant differences were observed between diabetics and nondiabetics with regard to restenosis rates (31.6% vs 28.2%, p = 0.6), recovery of LV function (6-month wall motion score index: 1.8 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.7, p = 0.88; 6-month LV ejection fraction: 48.5 +/- 12% vs 51.2 +/- 13%, p = 0.173), nonfatal re-AMI rates (2.9% vs 1.3%, p = 0.2), and target vessel revascularization rates (21.6% vs 16.8%, p = 0.2). Early and late mortality were higher in diabetics than in nondiabetic patients (8.8% vs 4.2%, p = 0.045 and 11.7% vs 5.5%, p = 0.016, respectively). By Cox analysis, diabetes was an independent predictor of both early (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 5.3, p = 0.03) and late mortality (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.16 to 4.84, p = 0.017) as well as 6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACEs): death, re-AMI, target vessel revascularization (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.18, p = 0.03). Thus, diabetes is an independent predictor of clinical outcome even if PTCA is used as the primary reperfusion strategy.

Comparison of rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting versus direct stenting alone in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

This randomized trial compared rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting with direct infarct artery stenting alone in 100 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The primary end point of the study was early ST-segment elevation resolution, and the secondary end points were corrected Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count, infarct size, and 1-month clinical outcome. The primary end point rates were 90% in the thrombectomy group and 72% in the placebo group (p = 0.022). Randomization to thrombectomy was independently related to the primary end point (odds ratio 3.56, p = 0.032). The corrected Thrombolysis In Myocaridal Infarctions (TIMI) frame count was lower in the thrombectomy group (18.2 +/- 7.7 vs 22.5 +/- 11.0, p = 0.032), and infarct size was smaller in the thrombectomy group (13.0 +/- 11.6% vs 21.2 +/- 18.0%, p = 0.010). At 1 month, there were no major adverse cardiac events. Rheolytic thrombectomy before routine direct infarct-related artery (IRA) stenting is highly feasible and provides more effective myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI.

Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty.

The benefit of thrombolysis is dependent on time to treatment, but there is lack of evidence of this relation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The hypothesis that the relation of time to treatment to mortality is dependent on patient risk was tested in a series of 1,336 patients who underwent successful primary PTCA and were stratified into "low-risk" and "not low-risk" patient groups according to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria. After stratification, 942 patients (71%) were at not low risk, and 394 (29%) were at low risk. The 6-month mortality rate was 9.3% for not low-risk patients and 1.3% for low-risk patients (p <0.001). Among not low-risk patients, longer time to treatment was associated with increased age and a greater incidence of cardiogenic shock. Unadjusted mortality of the not low-risk patients increased from 4.8% to 12.9%, with increasing time to reperfusion up to 6 hours, whereas mortality of the low-risk group was constant, with an increased time to reperfusion. For the not low-risk group, the univariate analysis revealed a relation between time to treatment and mortality (odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.73, p = 0.017). Time to reperfusion was not an independent predictor of mortality at multivariate analysis. Mortality for not low-risk patients who undergo successful primary PTCA is related to the delay from symptom onset to treatment. The effects of other variables associated with a longer time to reperfusion may have a stronger impact on mortality, obscuring the incremental value of time to reperfusion at multivariate analysis.

Impact of insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus on effectiveness of reperfusion and outcome of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

The relation between diabetes mellitus (DM) and outcome was assessed in a series of 1,061 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The efficacy of reperfusion was assessed by ST-segment resolution analysis. Of 1,061 patients, 166 had DM (15.6%), and 84 had insulin-requiring DM (51% of DM patients). The 6-month mortality rate was 26% in insulin-requiring DM patients, 7% in non-DM patients, and 4% in non-insulin-requiring DM patients (p <0.001). The early ST-segment resolution rate was lower in insulin-requiring DM patients (52%) compared with the other DM patients (78%) and non-DM patients (76%; p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed insulin-requiring DM to be independently related to the risk for death (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 3.22, p = 0.009). Insulin-requiring DM is a strong predictor of mortality in patients who undergo PCI for AMI, and this relation may be explained by a less effective myocardial reperfusion despite the mechanical restoration of normal epicardial flow in most patients.

Relation between preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation and clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

It is unknown if collateral circulation (CC) has a beneficial effect on outcomes of patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study analyzes the relation between CC and outcome in patients with AMI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. The analysis was performed in a series of 1,164 consecutive patients. The contribution of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables to the angiographic and clinical outcomes was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model, respectively. Of 1,164 patients, 264 (23%) had angiographic evidence of CC. Patients with CC had a lower incidence of diabetes (11% vs 16%, p = 0.033), anterior AMI (41% vs 55%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9% vs 14%, p = 0.029), anterograde TIMI grade flow >1 (10% vs 21%, p <0.001), and a greater incidence of preinfarction angina (43% vs 32%, p = 0.001), multivessel disease (59% vs 47%, p = 0.001), and total chronic occlusion (20% vs 10%, p <0.001). At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with CC compared with patients without CC (4% vs 9%, p = 0.011), whereas there were no differences in the incidence of reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and angiographic restenosis. After multivariate analysis, CC did not emerge as a significant variable in relation to 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes. CC does not exert a protective effect in patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first 6 hours of AMI onset.

In-hospital and one-year outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the outcomes of high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis in a community setting. METHODS: A prospective study of the in-hospital and 12-month outcomes was conducted in 17 cardiology centers where primary angioplasty was available, and in 30 where it was not. Three thousand seventy-four patients in the first 12 hours of an evolving infarction were recruited; among these, 2227 patients who met one or more pre-defined criteria of increased risk were included in the study. RESULTS: Thrombolysis and primary angioplasty were respectively performed in 1090 and in 721 patients; 416 patients (18.7%) received no reperfusion treatment. The incidence of the primary combined in-hospital endpoint (death, non-fatal reinfarction and stroke) was similar in patients treated with thrombolysis (9.2%) and with primary angioplasty (10.7%) (odds ratio--OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval--CI 0.86-1.63, p = NS), and was higher (22.6%) in patients receiving no reperfusion treatment as compared to thrombolysis (OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.36-4.63, p < 0.0001). The occurrence of the 12-month endpoint (death, reinfarction, congestive heart failure and recurrent angina) was lower after primary angioplasty than after thrombolysis (26.8 vs 35.0%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84, p = 0.0003), due to a lower incidence of angina. At multivariate analysis, older age, anterior infarction, Killip class > 1, high heart rate, and low systolic blood pressure on admission were all significantly associated with a higher incidence of both endpoints. The adjusted analysis confirmed that, despite similar in-hospital results after both reperfusion treatments, primary angioplasty was independently associated with better 1-year outcomes (relative risk 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.79, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this observation in the community setting, a strategy of primary angioplasty in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction was not better than thrombolysis in terms of mortality or recurrent infarction, but was associated with less angina at 1 year.

Should we improve the management of NSTEMI? Results from the population-based "acute myocardial infarction in Florence 2" (AMI-Florence 2) registry.

ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, NSTEMI) have opposite epidemiology, the latter being nowadays more common than the former. Consistently with these epidemiological trends, application of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the management of NSTEMI should be promoted. We compared clinical features, hospital management and prognosis of STEMI/NSTEMI in an unselected cohort of 1,496 prospectively enrolled patients (STEMI, 36.9 % and NSTEMI, 63.1 %), admitted in 1 year to one of the six hospitals in Florence health district (Italy). Vital status was assessed after 1 year. NSTEMI patients were older, more often female, and affected by cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed more often in STEMI (82 %) than in NSTEMI patients (48 %, p < 0.001). Aspirin, clopidogrel, statins, beta-blockers, and ACE-inhibitors were prescribed more frequently in STEMI. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in NSTEMI than in STEMI (4.2 vs. 8.9 %, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for confounders in a multivariable logistic model (OR 0.27, 95 % CI 0.16-0.45). One-year mortality was similar in NSTEMI and STEMI patients in an unadjusted comparison (18.0 vs. 16.7 %, p = 0.51), but it was lower in NSTEMI patients in multivariable Cox analysis (HR 0.56, 95 % CI 0.42-0.75). PCI reduced the risk of 1-year mortality similarly in STEMI (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.28-0.79) and NSTEMI (HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.28-0.60). PCI reduces mortality in both STEMI and NSTEMI, but it is underutilised in patients with NSTEMI. To improve overall prognosis of AMI, efforts should be made at improving the care of NSTEMI patients.

Application of 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Echocardiography appropriateness use criteria in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography in a community setting.

BACKGROUND: A recent American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Society of Echocardiography document updated previous appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography. The aim of this study was to explore the application of the new AUC, and the resulting appropriateness rate, in hospitalized patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a community setting. METHODS: A total of 931 consecutive inpatients referred for TTE were prospectively recruited in five community hospitals. Patients were categorized as having appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate indications for TTE according to the AUC. An additional group of 259 inpatients, discharged without having been referred for TTE, was also considered. RESULTS: In the group referred for TTE, the large majority of indications (98.8%) were classifiable according to the AUC with good interobserver reproducibility. Indications were appropriate in 739 patients (80.3%), of uncertain appropriateness in 46 (5.0%), and inappropriate in 135 (14.7%). Compared with patients with appropriate or uncertain indications, those with inappropriate indications were younger and more often referred by noncardiologists. Most common causes of inappropriate indications were related to the lack of changes in clinical status or to the absence of cardiovascular symptoms and signs. Examinations with appropriate or uncertain indications had an impact on clinical decision making more often than those with inappropriate indications (86.7% vs 14.1%, P < .0001). In the group discharged without having been referred for TTE, TTE might have been appropriate in 16.2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical application of the new AUC was highly feasible in a community setting. Although inpatient referral for TTE was appropriate in most patients, strategies aimed at implementing these criteria in clinical practice are desirable.