Rectosigmoid Mesorectal-Sparing Resection in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of all gynecologic cancers.1 Primary debulking surgery (PDS) with achievement of no residual tumor (RT, 0) still is the recommended treatment, and the one with the greatest prognostic impact.2,3 Given the usual disease spread, several surgical procedures often are needed, and one of the most frequent is rectosigmoid resection.4 Anastomotic leak is the most feared complication. Other common complications are persistent urinary, defecatory, and sexual dysfunction due to autonomic nervous system injuries during surgery.5 Even if mesorectal resection is not deemed part of the treatment paradigm for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), total mesorectal excision (TME) is the most common surgical technique used. However, for selected cases, with detection of no lymphadenopathies at the origin of the of the inferior mesenteric artery and a favorable ratio between the length of the left colon and the extent of the bowel carcinomatosis, a mesorectal-sparing resection with the preservation of the superior rectal artery and the mesorectal tissue should be pursued. This report presents the case of a 54-year-old woman with a diagnosis of FIGO stage 3C AOC who underwent PDS. The video (video 1) provides a step-by-step description of the surgical technique adopted for colorectal resection with mesorectal-sparing technique. Rectosigmoid mesorectal-sparing resection is feasible and could be a viable option for selected cases of AOC, maximizing the blood supply to colorectal anastomosis while minimizing the risk of both anastomotic leak and pelvic autonomic nervous system dysfunction.6.

Prophylactic surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC CO2) versus standard surgery for gastric carcinoma at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis: short and long-term outcomes (GOETH STUDY)-a collaborative randomized controlled trial by ACOI, FONDAZIONE AIOM, SIC, SICE, and SICO.

INTRODUCTION: At the time of diagnosis, 15-20% of gastric carcinomas are in stage T4 or T4b. Furthermore, 5-20% of patients undergoing potentially curative surgery suffer from synchronous or metachronous peritoneal metastases. To date, neither surgery nor systemic chemotherapy successfully controls peritoneal dissemination, offering a limited impact on survival. Peritoneal metastases are in fact responsible for death in around 60% of gastric cancer patients. Several Eastern studies in the past have focused on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as a prophylactic measure in patients with serosal extension, nodal involvement, and positive peritoneal fluid cytology. Therefore, a new multimodal therapeutic strategy based on aggressive surgery plus new locoregional treatment may prolong survival in this particular clinical scenario. METHODS: This study compares the efficacy of prophylactic surgery (radical gastric resection, appendectomy, resection of the round ligament of the liver, and bilateral adnexectomy) plus hybrid CO2 HIPEC system versus standard surgery in patients with T3-T4 N0-N + gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the experimental arm or standard surgery. The primary endpoint is to establish the difference in disease-free survival between the groups. The secondary objective is to compare the safety and tolerability of prophylactic surgery plus HIPEC CO2 versus standard surgery. DISCUSSION: Considering the poor prognosis of patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer, a prophylactic strategy to prevent peritoneal metastases may be beneficial. In patients with gastric cancer at high risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis, we propose aggressive surgical treatment with radical gastrectomy, removal of organs at risk of harbouring tumour cells, and HIPEC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03917173. Registered on 16 April 2019. PROTOCOL VERSION: v1, March 27, 2019. Protocol number: IRFMN-GCC-7813. EudraCT number: 2019-001478-27.