Real-world data on the comprehensive genetic profiling test for Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: comprehensive genomic profiling test has been covered by Japanese health insurance since June 2019. However, no real-world data on the test have been reported with a focus on Japanese patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: we retrospectively reviewed the data of 45 consecutive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, who underwent the comprehensive genomic profiling tests at Kitasato University Hospital between August 2019 and December 2022. Patients' characteristics, prevalence of gene alterations and therapeutic impact of genotype-matched therapy were assessed. RESULTS: genomic data were obtained using a tissue-based test (n = 32) and liquid-based test (n = 13). Actionable genomic alternations were identified in 51.1% of patients, and 22.2% were treated with genotype-matched therapy. The main reason for not receiving genotype-matched therapy was disease progression, accounting for 46.2% (6/13). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly longer overall survival after the comprehensive genomic profiling tests in patients with genotype-matched therapy under public insurance (17.8%, n = 8) than those without it (median: not reached vs. 18.1 months; P = 0.003). Five (62.5%) out of the eight patients with genotype-matched therapy under public insurance had BRCA1 or 2 deleterious alteration. Multivariate analyses showed that BRCA deleterious alteration (17.8%, n = 8) was an independent risk factor for shorter time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (hazard ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.87; P = 0.041), and no patients with the alteration had ≤5 bone metastases. CONCLUSIONS: the results of this study showed the promising survival outcomes in patients with genotype-matched therapy under public insurance, even in the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting. Further detection of promising therapeutic target gene is expected to increase the number of patients who reach genotype-matched therapies.

Oncological outcomes for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine and external-beam radiation therapy followed by adjuvant continuous/intermittent endocrine therapy in an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, research has not determined the optimal procedure for adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated for 6 months with neoadjuvant ADT and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial enrolled 303 patients with locally advanced PCa between 2001 and 2006. Participants were treated with neoadjuvant ADT for 6 months. Then, 280 patients whose prostate-specific antigen levels were less than pretreatment levels and less than 10 ng/mL were randomized. All 280 participants were treated with 72 Gy of EBRT in combination with adjuvant ADT for 8 months. Thereafter, participants were assigned to long-term ADT (5 years in all; arm 1) or intermittent ADT (arm 2). The primary endpoint was modified biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) with respect to nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) progression, clinical relapse, or any cause of death. RESULTS: The median follow-up time after randomization was 8.2 years. Among the 136 and 144 men assigned to trial arms 1 and 2, respectively, 24 and 30 progressed to nmCRPC or clinical relapse, and 5 and 6 died of PCa. The 5-year modified bRFS rates were 84.8% and 82.8% in trial arms 1 and 2, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.132; 95% confidence interval, 0.744-1.722). CONCLUSIONS: Although modified bRFS data did not demonstrate noninferiority for arm 2, intermittent adjuvant ADT after EBRT with 14 months of neoadjuvant and short-term adjuvant ADT is a promising treatment strategy, especially in a population of responders after 6 months of ADT for locally advanced PCa.

Long-term outcomes of combining prostate brachytherapy and metastasis-directed radiotherapy in newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) trial showed the survival benefit for prostate radiotherapy in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients with a low metastatic burden. The result raises the next question whether additional radiotherapy to metastatic sites could improve the survival in those with a low metastatic burden. METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of prostate-directed radiotherapy (PDRT) with or without metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) in newly diagnosed oligometastatic patients who underwent combination of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. Forty patients with bone metastasis and node positive prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 22 (55%), 3 (7%), and 15 (38%) patients had N1M0, M1a, and M1b, respectively. Eighteen patients (45%) received MDRT to all metastatic sites. All patients initially underwent ≧6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Oligometastatic disease was defined as presence of five or fewer metastatic lesions. Median follow-up period was 62.5 months. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, the 5-year castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival rate and cancer-specific survival was 64.4% and 87.9%, respectively. Pre- or post-treatment predictive value including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis ≥20 ng/mL, Gleason grade group 5, positive biopsy core rate ≥51%, PSA nadir level of ≥0.02 ng/mL after the radiotherapy, and no MDRT were significantly associated with progression to CRPC. Patients with MDRT had significantly higher probability of achieving a PSA level of <0.02 ng/mL than those without the therapy (88.8% vs 54.5%, P = 0.0354) and consequently had a better CRPC-free survival than those without the therapy (HR 0.319, 95%CI: 0.116-0.877). Comparing PDRT alone, PDRT with MDRT did not significantly increase the incidences of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: This single-institutional study revealed the feasibility of combining prostate brachytherapy and MDRT for newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer. This combined approach has potential to prolong CRPC-free survival.

Quality of life outcomes after low dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

The present review summarizes data from studies reporting on health-related quality of life after brachytherapy and competing modalities. There are various therapeutic modalities for localized prostate cancer, including radical surgery, external beam radiotherapy and active surveillance. Advances in surgical and radiation treatment have entered clinical practice in the form of robot-assisted surgery or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Brachytherapy remains the main treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer, with 10-year survival data showing favorable outcomes. Because each treatment modality has achieved favorable survival outcomes, focus in determining appropriate treatment has shifted toward health-related quality of life, where each treatment has a different profile and/or adverse symptoms. The development of health-related quality of life assessment tools has allowed the creation of a pool of specific health-related quality of life data across many studies. The present article reviews the impact of brachytherapy and other modalities on quality of life, as well as future directions.

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

BACKGROUND: Investigating oncological outcomes in patients registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) in terms of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) by the Phoenix and the newly developed J-POPS definitions, exploration of predictive factors for bRFS, and preliminary verification of pitfalls of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions. METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2007, 2316 clinically localized patients underwent permanent seed implantation. The primary endpoint was bRFS. One of the secondary endpoints was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median age was 69 and performance status was 0 in 99.1% of participants. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was about 180 Gy2. During a median follow-up of 60.0 months, 8.4 and 5.9% had PSA failure by the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year bRFSs based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions were 89.1 and 91.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 97.3%. According to multivariate analyses, only age affected bRFS based on the Phoenix definition, whereas the risk group and BED independently affected bRFS based on the J-POPS definition. A spontaneous PSA decrease was seen in 91.1% of participants after PSA failure based on the Phoenix definition alone, but in only 22.2% after PSA failure based on the J-POPS definition alone. CONCLUSION: The world's largest registration study, J-POPS, consisted of patients with longevity, and a highly quality-controlled BED resulted in excellent bRFS and OS. The high likelihood of PSA bounce by the Phoenix definition should be taken into account, especially in younger patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT00534196.

Impact of five-tiered Gleason grade groups on prognostic prediction in clinical stage T3 prostate cancer undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a five-tiered Gleason grade groups arising from the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on prognostic prediction in clinical stage T3a (extracapsular invasion) and T3b (seminal vesicle involvement) prostate cancer undergoing high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). METHODS: From November 2003 to December 2012, 283 patients with stage T3 prostate cancer received HDR-BT and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Of these, 203 (72%) and 80 (28%) patients had stage T3a and T3b disease, respectively. The mean dose to 90% of the planning target volume was 7.5 Gy/fraction of HDR-BT. After five fractions, EBRT with 10 fractions of 3 Gy was administered. All patients first underwent ≥6 months of neoadjuvant ADT, and adjuvant ADT continued for 36 months. Median follow-up was 74 months from the start of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The 10-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) -free rate for stage T3a and T3b disease was 79% and 64%, respectively (P = 0.0083). The 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate for stage T3a and T3b was 96% and 91%, respectively (P = 0.0305). Although grade groups ≥4 were independent predictors for BCR in cT3a patients (P = 0.0270), they failed to significantly predict prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) among cT3a patients. Among cT3b patients, grade group 5 was a significant predictor of both BCR (P = 0.0017) and PCSM (P = 0.0233). Among stage T3a patients, no significant difference existed in 10-year CSS between grade groups 5 and 4 (94% vs 97%, P = 0.3960). In contrast, grade group 5 had a significantly worse outcome in 10-year CSS than grade group 4 among stage T3b patients (74% vs 100%, P = 0.0350). CONCLUSIONS: Stage T3a patients with grade groups 4/5 and stage T3b with grade group 4 had fairly low PCSM risk. Approximately one of four patients among stage T3b patients with grade group 5 showed PCSM after combined HDR-BT and EBRT with long-term ADT. Stage T3b patients with grade group 5 may have a greater risk for PCSM.

A phase III multicenter, randomized, controlled study of combined androgen blockade with versus without zoledronic acid in prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: results of the ZAPCA trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the antitumor activity of zoledronic acid (ZA) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with treatment-naive prostate cancer and bone metastasis. METHODS: We enrolled 227 men with treatment-naive prostate cancer and bone metastasis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive combined androgen blockade alone (CAB group) or ZA with combined androgen blockade (CZ group). Time to treatment failure (TTTF), time to the first skeletal-related event (TTfSRE), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Median follow-up duration was 41.5 months. RESULTS: Median TTTFs were 12.4 and 9.7 months for the CZ and CAB groups, respectively (HR 0.75; 95 % CI 0.57-1.00; p = 0.051). For men with baseline prostate-specific antigen levels <200 ng/mL, median TTTFs were 23.7 and 9.8 months for the CZ and CAB groups, respectively (HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.35-0.93; p = 0.023). Median TTfSREs were 64.7 and 45.9 months for the CZ and CAB groups, respectively (HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38-0.88; p = 0.009). OS was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to demonstrate that combined use of ZA and ADT significantly prolonged TTTF in men with treatment-naive prostate cancer and bone metastasis. However, it generates a new hypothesis that the combined therapy could delay the development of castration resistance in a subgroup of patients with low baseline prostate-specific antigen values <200 ng/mL. The treatment also significantly prolonged TTfSRE but did not affect OS.

Perioperative Search for Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients Undergoing Prostate Brachytherapy for Clinically Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.

Despite the absence of local prostate cancer recurrence, some patients develop distant metastases after prostate brachytherapy. We evaluate whether prostate brachytherapy procedures have a potential risk for hematogenous spillage of prostate cancer cells. Fifty-nine patients who were undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) or low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy participated in this prospective study. Thirty patients with high-risk or locally advanced cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Twenty-nine patients with clinically localized cancer were treated with LDR brachytherapy without neoadjuvant ADT. Samples of peripheral blood were drawn in the operating room before insertion of needles (preoperative) and again immediately after the surgical manipulation (intraoperative). Blood samples of 7.5 mL were analyzed for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using the CellSearch System. While no preoperative samples showed CTCs (0%), they were detected in intraoperative samples in 7 of the 59 patients (11.8%; preoperative vs. intraoperative, p = 0.012). Positive CTC status did not correlate with perioperative variables, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, use of neoadjuvant ADT, type of brachytherapy, Gleason score, and biopsy positive core rate. We detected CTCs from samples immediately after the surgical manipulation. Further study is needed to evaluate whether those CTCs actually can survive and proliferate at distant sites.

Current multidisciplinary approaches for metastatic prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer incidences in most Asian populations have rapidly increased, and prostate cancer ranks as the highest incidence of male cancer in Japan since 2015. Androgen depriva- tion therapy (ADT) remains the main first-line treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). However, treatment benefits last for 3-5 years when disease transforms into metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Currently, management paradigms for mPCa are dramatically changing. Two multicenter, randomized trials have redefined first-line treatment, with the demonstration of improved overall survival with the addition of docetaxel chemotherapy to ADT. Several data have re- ported the impact on survival of radiotherapy of the prostate even in patients diagnosed with mPCa. The objective of this review is to summarize an overview of current multidisciplinary approaches for mPCa and mCRPC.

[Current diagnosis and the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer].

Prostate cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Japanese men. In 2015, it is estimated 98,400 new cases are diagnosed. In addition, bone is the most common site for metastasis in prostate cancer, and many patients will develop bone metastases during the natural course of their disease. However, current advances in the diagnosis/treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, lead to change treatment strategy dramatically. In fact, bone metastasis has been changed 'palliative' to 'targeted organ', aimed to extend overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We review the multiple issues involved in current diagnosis and the multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer, and future directions.

A multicenter retrospective analysis of sequential treatment of abiraterone acetate followed by docetaxel in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate and docetaxel are promising treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. However, the optimal sequencing of these agents is unclear, and no previous reports discuss Japanese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. The purpose of this analysis is to reveal the outcomes of Japanese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate followed by docetaxel. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed Japanese Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate until disease progression and subsequently treated with docetaxel. The primary outcome measure was the rates of prostate-specific antigen declines ≧30 and ≧50%, respectively, with docetaxel. Secondary outcome measures included progression-free survival with docetaxel, and overall survival after initiation of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel. We performed correlation analysis between previous prostate-specific antigen response to abiraterone acetate and subsequent prostate-specific antigen response to docetaxel. RESULTS: We identified 15 patients had experienced disease progression with abiraterone acetate and subsequently were treated with docetaxel. Prostate-specific antigen declines ≧30 and ≧50% with docetaxel were observed in five patients (33%) and two patients (13%), respectively. The median progression-free survival with docetaxel was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval: 2.9-4.6). The median overall survival from initiation of docetaxel and abiraterone acetate were 14.4 months (95% confidence interval: 6.3-22.4), and 25.7 months (95% confidence interval: 20.1-30.7), respectively. No significant correlation was observed between these prostate-specific antigen responses (Pearson r = 0.206, P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of docetaxel in Japanese mCRPC patients that was resistant to abiraterone acetate was modest. The prostate-specific antigen response to previous abiraterone acetate could not predict the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel. Larger prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS).

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) for prostate cancer. The nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) has continued since July 2005. This manuscript presents the rationale, J-POPS study design, and the characteristics of initial participants enrolled in this study from July 2005 to June 2007. METHODS: All participants were treated with PI in accordance with the American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. The primary outcome measure was biochemical progression-free survival. Progression-free survival, overall survival, cause-specific survival, longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life, disease-specific quality of life, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the incidence of adverse events were also investigated as secondary outcome measurements. RESULTS: Overall, 6,927 patients were enrolled by the end of 2010, that is approximately 40 % of all cases treated around the country. During the first 2 years, 2,354 participants were enrolled and 2,339 were actually treated with PI. The age range of participants was 45 to 89 years (median 69 years) and their risk classifications were 1,037 (44.3 %) at low risk, 1,126 (48.1 %) at intermediate risk, and 134 (5.7 %) at high risk, in addition to 16 participants whose classification was unknown. Of all patients, 76.6 % were treated with PI without external beam radiation therapy and 49.3 % received neoadjuvant hormone therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The J-POPS, a nationwide prospective cohort study that enrolled approximately 40 % of all PI cases in Japan, will provide highly reliable evidence, including outcomes and quality of life, after long-term follow-up.

[A Case of Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Pneumoderma Treated by Open Surgical Drainage].

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is an acute, severe necrotizing infection of the renal parenchyma and perirenal tissue. A 72-year-old female patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus was admitted to a hospital with loss of consciousness and, fever. Laboratory data suggested acute inflammation and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome. The left EPN was accurately diagnosed after abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed renal parenchymal gas and fluid within the subcutaneous tissue and mediastinum. The patient was transferred to our institution and underwent emergent open surgical drainage. However, a CT scan performed 3 days after the drainage revealed the presence of fluid in the left perinephric space. CT-guided drainage of the left perinephric fluid was performed. The patient was finally discharged after complete recovery from severe inflammation.

A phase 2 trial of abiraterone acetate in Japanese men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and without prior chemotherapy (JPN-201 study).

OBJECTIVE: Abiraterone acetate has been approved in >70 countries for chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/once daily) with prednisolone (5 mg/twice daily) in chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was evaluated. METHODS: Men, ≥20 years, with prostate-specific antigen levels of ≥5 ng/ml and evidence of progression were enrolled in this Phase 2, multicenter, open-label study. Primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving a prostate-specific antigen decline of ≥50% from baseline (prostate-specific antigen response) after 12 week of treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed. RESULTS: A confirmed prostate-specific antigen response was observed in 29/48 (60.4%) patients by week 12; lower limit of two-sided 90% confidence interval was >35% (threshold response rate), demonstrating efficacy of abiraterone acetate. Secondary efficacy endpoints: prostate-specific antigen response rate during treatment period: 62.5%; objective radiographic response, partial response: 4/18 (22.2%) patients; complete response: none; stable disease: 11/18 (61.1%) patients; median percent change in prostate-specific antigen level from baseline at Week 12: -66.62%. Median prostate-specific antigen response duration and progression-free survival were not reached, and median radiographic progression-free survival was 253 days. Of 31/48 (64.6%) patients experienced adverse events of special interest; most common was hepatic function abnormality (37.5%, Grade 3: 10.4%). One Grade 3 hypertension was the only mineralocorticoid adverse event >Grade 1/2. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone was demonstrated by decline in prostate-specific antigen levels with evidence of antitumor activity by radiography in Japanese patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone had an acceptable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT01756638.

A phase 2 study of abiraterone acetate in Japanese men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had received docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: In this Phase 2 multicenter study the efficacy and safety of oral abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/once daily) plus prednisolone (5 mg/twice daily) was evaluated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients from Japan who had previously received docetaxel-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Men (aged ≥20 years) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen levels: ≥5 ng/ml), who had received 1 or 2 cytotoxic chemotherapies (with ≥1 regimen being docetaxel) for prostate cancer, were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm study. Primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% prostate-specific antigen decline from baseline (prostate-specific antigen response rate) after 12-week treatment. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also assessed. RESULTS: Confirmed prostate-specific antigen response rate by Week 12 was 28.3% (90% confidence interval: 17.6%; 41.1%) or 13 out of 46 (full analysis set) treated patients. However, total prostate-specific antigen response rate including confirmed and unconfirmed responses was 34.8% (90% confidence interval: 23.2%; 47.9%). Secondary efficacy endpoints and outcomes were: improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score by ≥1 unit: 7/16 patients (43.8%); objective radiographic response: complete response, partial response and stable disease in 0, 1/22 (4.5%) and 9/22 (40.9%) patients, respectively; pain palliation response: 9/16 (56.3%) patients. The most common adverse events (>20% patients) were upper respiratory tract infection (13/47, 27.7% patients) and hepatic function abnormal (10/47, 21.3% patients, Grade 3: 8.5%). All mineralocorticoid-related toxicities were Grade 1/2. CONCLUSIONS: Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone showed favorable efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Japanese patients who had received chemotherapy. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone had an acceptable safety profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT01795703.

Bone dissemination of prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a case report and a review of the literature.

We report a case of dissemination of prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in an 80-year-old patient. The patient presented at hospital because of nocturia. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was carried out because of high serum prostate-specific antigen (3.55 ng/mL), but it showed no malignancies. Benign prostate hyperplasia was diagnosed, and he was started on an α1-blocker. Although the urinary symptom improved with silodosin, acute urinary retention occurred 3 years after therapy began. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for relief of bladder outlet obstruction enabled discharge of urine. Pathological examination of the resected tissue found adenocarcinoma with a high Gleason score, 4 + 5. Serum alkaline phosphatase increased rapidly after holmium laser enucleation, and bone scintigraphy confirmed multiple bone metastases. Prostate cancer, T1bN0M1b, was diagnosed.

Predictive factors for overall quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined which domains/symptoms from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL), an abbreviated version of the health-related EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire designed for palliative cancer patients, were predictive of overall quality of life (QOL) in advanced cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer from six countries completed the QLQ-C15-PAL at consultation and at one follow-up point. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the predictive value of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL functional/symptom scores for global QOL (question 15). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-nine patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline. In the total patient sample, worse emotional functioning, pain, and appetite loss were the most significant predictive factors for worse QOL. In the subgroup of patients with bone metastases (n = 240), the domains mentioned above were also the most significant predictors, whereas in patients with brain metastases (n = 109), worse physical and emotional functioning most significantly predicted worse QOL. One-month follow-up in 267 patients revealed that the significant predictors changed somewhat over time. For example, in the total patient sample, physical functioning, fatigue, and appetite loss were significant predictors at the follow-up point. A sub-analysis of predictive factors affecting QOL by primary cancer (lung, breast, and prostate) was also conducted for the total patient sample. CONCLUSION: Deterioration of certain EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL functional/symptom scores significantly contributes to worse overall QOL. Special attention should be directed to managing factors most influential on overall QOL to ensure optimal management of advanced cancer patients.

Conceptual assessment of HRQOL among Japanese non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients.

OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to understand how patients view the quality of life in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), including unmet needs and what patients consider most important in treatment outcomes. A gap analysis was conducted on existing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measures versus what is missing from the patient perspective, to guide future development of PRO-based real-world evidence for nmCRPC in Japan. A conceptual model for nmCRPC Japanese patients' HRQOL was also created. METHODS: This non-interventional, qualitative study consisted of a targeted literature review, PRO instrument review, and interviews with 20 nmCRPC patients and five treating physicians. Triangulation of the gap analysis, evidence from the targeted review of the literature, and qualitative interview findings were employed to assess the comprehensiveness of current nmCRPC and HRQOL measures. RESULTS: Symptoms most reported by patients were frequent urination (70%), nocturia (65%), and general pain (65%). Others reported included lack of strength (30%). HRQOL impacts most reported were anxiety (45%) and worry (50%) about their diagnosis. Additional impacts mentioned were weight changes, loss of sleep, difficulty walking, loss of appetite, and difficulty traveling and seeking toilets in public. The gap analysis revealed 31 symptoms and 33 impacts not covered in existing prostate cancer-specific PRO instruments. Patients mentioned musculoskeletal symptoms such as fractures, leg pain, cramps, numbness, and loss of leg bone strength. Impacts not previously discussed in the literature or in outcome measures were feelings of self-consciousness around diagnosis, stigma around illness, and the impact on mobility including traveling. CONCLUSION: Key results reveal pain and urinary symptoms are the most experienced by Japanese nmCRPC patients. The diagnosis and treatment of disease leads to significant impacts in patient lives. Analysis revealed that symptoms and life impacts are missing in the current literature and outcome measures. Testing and debriefing of specific items could further substantiate these dimensions.

Dosimetric Predictors of Toxicity after Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Single-Institutional Experience of 145 Patients.

The indications for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer have increased. However, the relationships between adverse events and risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify associations between adverse events and dose index for prostate SBRT. Participants comprised 145 patients irradiated with 32-36 Gy in 4 fractions. Radiotherapy-related risk factors such as dose-volume histogram parameters and patient-related risk factors such as T stage and Gleason score were evaluated in a competing risk analysis. Median follow-up duration was 42.9 months. A total of 9.7% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 4.8% had acute Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. A total of 11.1% had late Grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities and 7.6% had late Grade ≥ 2 GI toxicities. Two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GU toxicities. Similarly, two (1.4%) patients suffered from late Grade 3 GI toxicities. Acute GU and GI events correlated with prostate volume and dose to the hottest 10 cc volume (D10cc)/volumes receiving a minimum of 30 Gy (V30 Gy) of rectum, respectively. Late GI toxicity, frequency, and rectal hemorrhage correlated with rectal D0.1 cc/D1 cc, maximum dose to the bladder, and rectal D0.1 cc, respectively. Toxicities after prostate SBRT using 32-36 Gy/4 fractions were acceptable. Our analysis showed that acute toxicities correlated with volume receiving a medium dose level, and late toxicities correlated with highest point dose of organs at risk.