Validated programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry assays (E1L3N and SP142) reveal similar immune cell staining patterns in melanoma when using the same sensitive detection system.

AIMS: Tumour cell and/or immune cell programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is considered as a potential biomarker for anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. Currently, different PD-L1 assays are used. This study aims to compare the staining patterns of two PD-L1 antibody clones in melanoma metastases and correlate them with PD-L1 mRNA expression. METHODS AND RESULTS: The immunohistochemistry assays were optimized and validated independently on a Ventana Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) (E1L3N) and XT (SP142), using the same detection system. In total, 46 melanoma metastases were stained with both validated immunohistochemistry assays. Stained slides were digitized for qualitative and semi-quantitative evaluation; done by pathologist and semi-automated software analysis. A subset of 21 melanoma metastases was selected for quantification of the PD-L1 mRNA expression. Accuracy and precision criteria were met for both assays. PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression showed remarkably good Spearman's coefficients of 0.90 (E1L3N) and 0.87 (SP142). Despite the remarkable correlation between both PD-L1 assays in expression patterns and quantification values (ρ > 0.90), E1L3N showed significantly more tumour cell staining than SP142. CONCLUSIONS: E1L3N and SP142 IHC assays were optimized and validated successfully and independently for sensitive and accurate PD-L1 detection. Concordance was best for immune cell scoring, while E1L3N tended to detect more tumour cells. Determination of the clinically relevant cut-off values for immune cell versus tumour cell detection requires further research.

Optimal Evaluation of Programmed Death Ligand-1 on Tumor Cells Versus Immune Cells Requires Different Detection Methods.

CONTEXT: - The benefit of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a method to select patients who may benefit from programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immunotherapies remains uncertain in many tumor indications. OBJECTIVES: - To compare the commercially available, approved PD-L1 IHC assays (22C3, 28-8, SP142, SP263), specifically identifying the changes in staining output created by altering the detection method. DESIGN: - This pilot study investigates the respective PD-L1 kit assay staining patterns and related scoring of tumor cells and immune cells on lung carcinoma and melanoma. Furthermore, the influence of the detection method (platform and related reagents) on PD-L1 antibody performance is studied. RESULTS: - The SP142 kit reveals more immune cell staining but less tumor cell staining than the other PD-L1 kits. Alternatively, the 22C3 and 28-8 kits show good tumor cell sensitivity, but less pronounced immune cell staining, even in tonsil. Tumor cell staining by the SP263 kit is comparable to that of 22C3 and 28-8 kits, while immune cell staining is better. Strikingly, the selection of the detection method has a major impact on the sensitivity of the assay for PD-L1 detection per cell type. Switching the detection method of the kits could largely circumvent the observed staining differences. CONCLUSIONS: - The diverse sensitivities caused by the choice of the detection method should be taken into consideration when selecting PD-L1 kits or developing PD-L1 IHC laboratory-developed tests. When using alternative kits or laboratory-developed tests, it is strongly recommended to reestablish their clinical utility per therapeutic agent or compare them with the original kit.