Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Emphysema Using Dark-Field Chest Radiography.

Background Dark-field chest radiography allows for assessment of lung alveolar structure by exploiting wave optical properties of x-rays. Purpose To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative features of dark-field chest radiography in participants with pulmonary emphysema as compared with those in healthy control subjects. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from October 2018 to October 2020, participants aged at least 18 years who underwent clinically indicated chest CT were screened for participation. Inclusion criteria were an ability to consent to the procedure and stand upright without help. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, serious medical conditions, and any lung condition besides emphysema that was visible on CT images. Participants were examined with a clinical dark-field chest radiography prototype that simultaneously acquired both attenuation-based radiographs and dark-field chest radiographs. Dark-field coefficients were tested for correlation with each participant's CT-based emphysema index using the Spearman correlation test. Dark-field coefficients of adjacent groups in the semiquantitative Fleischner Society emphysema grading system were compared using a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test. The capability of the dark-field coefficient to enable detection of emphysema was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Results A total of 83 participants (mean age, 65 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 52 men) were studied. When compared with images from healthy participants, dark-field chest radiographs in participants with emphysema had a lower and inhomogeneous dark-field signal intensity. The locations of focal signal intensity loss on dark-field images corresponded well with emphysematous areas found on CT images. The dark-field coefficient was negatively correlated with the quantitative CT-based emphysema index (r = -0.54, P < .001). Participants with Fleischner Society grades of mild, moderate, confluent, or advanced destructive emphysema exhibited a lower dark-field coefficient than those without emphysema (eg, 1.3 m-1 ± 0.6 for participants with confluent or advanced destructive emphysema vs 2.6 m-1 ± 0.4 for participants without emphysema; P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of mild emphysema was 0.79. Conclusion Pulmonary emphysema leads to reduced signal intensity on dark-field chest radiographs, showing the technique has potential as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of lung diseases. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hatabu and Madore in this issue.

Correction of Motion Artifacts in Dark-Field Radiography of the Human Chest.

Dark-field radiography of the human chest is a promising novel imaging technique with the potential of becoming a valuable tool for the early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other diseases of the lung. The large field-of-view needed for clinical purposes could recently be achieved by a scanning system. While this approach overcomes the limited availability of large area grating structures, it also results in a prolonged image acquisition time, leading to concomitant motion artifacts caused by intrathoracic movements (e.g. the heartbeat). Here we report on a motion artifact reduction algorithm for a dark-field X-ray scanning system, and its successful evaluation in a simulated chest phantom and human in vivo chest X-ray dark-field data. By partitioning the acquired data into virtual scans with shortened acquisition time, such motion artifacts may be reduced or even fully avoided. Our results demonstrate that motion artifacts (e.g. induced by cardiac motion or diaphragmatic movements) can effectively be reduced, thus significantly improving the image quality of dark-field chest radiographs.

Dark-field chest x-ray imaging: first experience in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Spirometry and conventional chest x-ray have limitations in investigating early emphysema, while computed tomography, the reference imaging method in this context, is not part of routine patient care due to its higher radiation dose. In this work, we investigated a novel low-dose imaging modality, dark-field chest x-ray, for the evaluation of emphysema in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. METHODS: By exploiting wave properties of x-rays for contrast formation, dark-field chest x-ray visualises the structural integrity of the alveoli, represented by a high signal over the lungs in the dark-field image. We investigated four patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency with a novel dark-field x-ray prototype and simultaneous conventional chest x-ray. The extent of pulmonary function impairment was assessed by pulmonary function measurement and regional emphysema distribution was compared with CT in one patient. RESULTS: We show that dark-field chest x-ray visualises the extent of pulmonary emphysema displaying severity and regional differences. Areas with low dark-field signal correlate with emphysematous changes detected by computed tomography using a threshold of -950 Hounsfield units. The airway parameters obtained by whole-body plethysmography and single breath diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide demonstrated typical changes of advanced emphysema. CONCLUSIONS: Dark-field chest x-ray directly visualised the severity and regional distribution of pulmonary emphysema compared to conventional chest x-ray in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Due to the ultra-low radiation dose in comparison to computed tomography, dark-field chest x-ray could be beneficial for long-term follow-up in these patients.