Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 29(8): 1687-1691, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31538270

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: An intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is frequent in the elderly. Patients can be treated with either total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. There is a continuous discussion about the treatment in elderly patients who are still healthy, active and mentally untroubled. A potential consequence of hemiarthroplasty, especially in the relatively young elderly, could be conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The conversion rate must be acceptable, and clinical outcome must be sufficient to justify the treatment with hemiarthroplasty in this group of patients. This study evaluates the conversion rate of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty and clinical outcome in patients under 75 years of age. METHODS: This study identified 248 patients, younger than 75 years at time of operation, with a fracture of the femoral neck treated with hemiarthroplasty. Patient-reported outcome measurements (VAS pain during rest and activity and WOMAC) were assessed by telephone interviews. Furthermore, radiographic evaluation for the presence of acetabular wear was performed. RESULTS: At a follow-up of 5.1 (0.9-9.6) years, the conversion rate was 7.3%. Mean VAS pain in rest was 0.89 (0-10), the mean VAS pain during activity was 2.2 (0-10), and the WOMAC showed a mean of 16.51 (0-64). At time of follow-up, 38.7% of patients had died. Radiographic evaluation of the unrevised group showed in one patient signs of acetabulum wear. CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty in the relatively young elderly after a fracture of the femoral neck demonstrates an acceptable conversion rate. Furthermore, unrevised patients show low complaints of pain. To prevent one conversion to total hip arthroplasty, 13.7 patients should be treated with total hip arthroplasty that will not undergo a conversion at a later stage. Therefore, hemiarthroplasty remains a viable treatment of femoral neck fractures in relatively young patients. There seems to be no space for standardized decision making concerning the choice of treatment. An individual approach is required.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Hemiartroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/patologia , Idoso , Seguimentos , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 29(1): 91-95, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29858665

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is gaining popularity as an important outcome parameter in today's healthcare system and in particular in evaluating the outcome of joint arthroplasty. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful procedure with reports on high patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up. Commonly used clinical outcome parameters remain good at long-term follow-up; however, whether this also accounts for patient satisfaction remains unclear. This study presents a prospective follow-up of patient satisfaction after THA, and a possible correlation with common outcome parameters was established. METHODS: This study entails a concise follow-up of an earlier study on patient satisfaction 2.5 years after THA. Patient satisfaction was repeatedly measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) after a mean follow-up of 13.5 (12.6-14.2) years in a prospective cohort of 147 patients (153 THAs). In addition, VAS pain and common clinical outcome parameters (WOMAC, OHS and SF-36) were also reassessed and were compared with short-term results after a mean follow-up of 2.5 (1.3-3.0) years. RESULTS: At a follow-up of 13.5 (12.6-14.2) years, the median VAS for satisfaction was 95 (26-100) compared to a median VAS satisfaction of 98 (0-100) at earlier follow-up (p = 0.781). Overall, the clinical outcome parameters also remained good at long-term follow-up without significant changes. However, a rather low correlation with VAS satisfaction was encountered. Pain during activity showed the highest correlation (- 0.686) with VAS satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction after THA remains high after prolonged follow-up. Apparently patients do not get used to the successful results of their THA. A rather low correlation with common clinical outcome parameters suggests that patient satisfaction is a separate entity. Since patient satisfaction correlated best with pain during activity, this is probably the most important aspect in patient satisfaction. Measurement of patient satisfaction has additional value and may even replace some of the more commonly used questionnaires.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Satisfação do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Movimento , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Escala Visual Analógica
3.
Injury ; 53(8): 2853-2858, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35236573

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment options for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck (FFN) are primary osteosynthesis as a femoral head-spearing technique or primary (hemi)arthroplasty. The most common complications after primary osteosynthesis, such as avascular necrosis (AVN) or non-union, can result in conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty (cTHA). Data concerning complications and survival rates of cTHA in comparison to primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (pTHA) after FFN are limited due to the absence of well-designed studies. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in three Dutch hospitals comparing the rate of postoperative dislocations, periprosthetic fractures, prosthetic joint infections, blood loss during surgery (>1000 mL), postoperative cardiac- and pulmonary complications after pTHA and cTHA in the first year after surgery. As a secondary outcome implant survival of pTHA and cTHA in terms of revision rates was evaluated. RESULTS: In total 548 patients were included (pTHA n = 264 and cTHA n = 284) with a mean follow-up of 5 years (±3.5 SD). No significant differences were found in postoperative complications rates. The revision rate in the pTHA group was 7.2% in comparison to 7.7% in the cTHA group (p = 0.81). No difference in the short-term implant survival was found between both groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant differences in terms of postoperative complication rates in the first year after pTHA and cTHA in patients with FFN. Also, no significant difference in short-term implant survival of primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty was found.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fraturas do Colo Femoral , Fraturas Periprotéticas , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/complicações , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA