Intensive hands-on microsurgery course provides a solid foundation for performing clinical microvascular surgery.

PURPOSE: Microvascular surgery requires highly specialized and individualized training; most surgical residency training programs are not equipped with microsurgery teaching expertise and/or facilities. The aim of this manuscript was to describe the methodology and clinical effectiveness of an international microsurgery course, currently taught year-round in eight countries. METHODS: In the 5-day microsurgery course trainees perform arterial and venous end-to-end, end-to-side, one-way-up, and continuous suture anastomoses and vein graft techniques in live animals, supported by video demonstrations and hands-on guidance by a full-time instructor. To assess and monitor each trainee's progress, the course's effectiveness is evaluated using "in-course" evaluations, and participant satisfaction and clinical relevance are assessed using a "post-course" survey. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, more than 600 trainees participated in the microsurgery course. "In-course" evaluations of patency rates revealed 80.3% (arterial) and 39% (venous) performed in end-to-end, 82.7% in end-to-side, 72.6% in continuous suture, and 89.5% (arterial) and 62.5% (venous) one-way-up anastomoses, and 58.1% in vein graft technique. "Post-course" survey results indicated that participants considered the most important components of the microcourse to be "practicing on live animals", followed by "the presence of a full-time instructor". In addition, almost all respondents indicated that they were more confident performing clinical microsurgery cases after completing the course. CONCLUSIONS: Microvascular surgery requires highly specialized and individualized training to achieve the competences required to perform and master the delicate fine motor skills necessary to successfully handle and anastomose very small and delicate microvascular structures. The ever-expanding clinical applications of microvascular procedures has led to an increased demand for training opportunities. By teaching time-tested basic motor skills that form the foundation of microsurgical technique this international microsurgery-teaching course is helping to meet this demand.

Forearm Shortening Impact on Pronation and Supination.

Background: Shortening has been described to treat severely mangled extremities, replantations and nonunions. Outcomes after this procedure in the forearm are vaguely described. This study addresses how the forearm rotation is affected by: (1) location of the shortening; (2) the amount of the shortening at different locations. Methods: Nine fresh cadaveric forearms were dissected preserving intact proximal and distal radio ulnar joints and interosseous membrane. The widest point of the interosseous space and its location over the ulna were measured, defining the peak interosseous distance (PID) and the peak interosseous distance level (PIDL). Stabilization and fixation of the specimens were performed by using a platform and external fixators. Consecutive ostectomies were performed within one centimeter intervals at the distal, middle and proximal forearm thirds. A repeated measures mixed-effects (RMME) specific model was designed for the statistical analysis. Results: Before intervention, the average full forearm rotation was 157° (101-185), supination 80° (56-90)/pronation 77° (45-95). The average PID was 15.6 mm in supination and 12.5 mm in pronation. The PIDP were 52.2% and 58.3% of the ulna length in supination and pronation, respectively. The rotation lost were: middle third 5.31°/cm in supination and 6.12°/cm in pronation, distal third 1.62°/cm in supination and 2.20°/cm in pronation, the proximal third was not affected by up to 5 cm of shortening. Conclusions: These data suggest that shortening of the middle and distal third of the forearm might have more significant adverse effect on forearm rotation compared with the proximal third.