RESUMO
As physics introduces more complex and seemingly thorough techniques to evaluate patient symptoms, cross-sectional imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), seems like the modality of choice to best help patients. However, musculoskeletal radiology (MSK) requires not just the excellent soft-tissue contrast provided by MRI but also an evaluation of the aggressiveness of a lesion, a detailed evaluation of osseous anatomy or distribution of disease, and a way to easily identify calcifications and gas in soft tissue in order to make the correct diagnosis. This article will demonstrate, through numerous cases, the importance of radiographs in the full characterization of MSK-related pathology. It will focus on imaging pearls and pitfalls to avoid when radiographs are not available and discuss the findings that can be expected if comparison radiographs were available.
RESUMO
CASE: A 19-year-old female servicemember with history of ischiopubic rami stress fractures was referred to orthopaedic surgery for magnetic resonance imaging findings concerning for a tension-sided femoral neck stress fracture. However, her history and symptoms were discordant with the diagnosis of stress fracture. The patient was managed with protected weight-bearing for 6 weeks with gradual return to physical activity. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic surgical fixation is advocated for the management of tension-sided femoral neck stress fractures. However, surgeons should consider a broader differential diagnosis, to include a synovial inclusion cyst, when the clinical presentation is not consistent with a stress fracture.