Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prostate ; 75(9): 969-75, 2015 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25808739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over one million men undergo prostate biopsies annually in the United States, a majority of whom due to elevated serum PSA. More than half of the biopsies turn out to be negative for prostate cancer (CaP). The limitations of both the PSA test and the biopsy procedure have led to the development for more precise CaP detection assays in urine (e.g., PCA3, TMPRSS2-ERG) or blood (e.g., PHI, 4K). Here, we describe the development and evaluation of the Urine CaP Marker Panel (UCMP) assay for sensitive and reproducible detection of CaP cells in post-digital rectal examination (post-DRE) urine. METHODS: The cellular content of the post-DRE urine was captured on a translucent filter membrane, which is placed on Cytoclear slides for direct evaluation by microscopy and immuno-cytochemistry (ICC). Cells captured on the membrane were assayed for PSA and Prostein expression to identify prostate epithelial cells, and for ERG and AMACR to identify prostate tumor cells. Immunostained cells were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative features and correlated with biopsy positive and negative status for malignancy. RESULTS: The assay was optimized for single cell capture sensitivity and downstream evaluations by spiking a known number of cells from established CaP cell lines, LNCaP and VCaP, into pre-cleared control urine. The cells captured from the post-DRE urine of subjects, obtained prior to biopsy procedure, were co-stained for ERG, AMACR (CaP specific), and Prostein or PSA (prostate epithelium specific) rendering a whole cell based analysis and characterization. A feasibility cohort of 63 post-DRE urine specimens was assessed. Comparison of the UCMP results with blinded biopsy results showed an assay sensitivity of 64% (16 of 25) and a specificity of 68.8% (22 of 32) for CaP detection by biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study assessing a minimally invasive CaP detection assay with single cell sensitivity cell-capture and characterization from the post-DRE urine holds promise for further development of this novel assay platform. Prostate 75: 969-975, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. The Prostate, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/urina , Neoplasias da Próstata/urina , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Calicreínas/urina , Masculino , Proteínas de Membrana/urina , Projetos Piloto , Antígeno Prostático Específico/urina , Racemases e Epimerases/urina , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Transativadores/urina , Regulador Transcricional ERG
2.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 137(12): 1747-52, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23570254

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States and globally. Folate-targeted drugs are among the promising new targeted therapies for lung cancer, provided predictive biomarkers can be identified for optimal patient selection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interobserver agreement and reproducibility of an immunohistochemistry assay for folate receptor α as a potential predictive marker for folate-targeted therapies. DESIGN: Immunohistochemistry using anti-folate receptor α antibody 26B3 was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. The M-score, a semiquantitative measure of staining intensity and proportion of tumor cells staining, was determined for each specimen. Interobserver agreement was assessed using lung adenocarcinoma specimens stained at a single site and evaluated by 3 independent pathologists. Interinstrument reproducibility assessed 20 specimens stained by 3 different automated stainers. Interlaboratory agreement was determined on 5 specimens, repeatedly stained on each of 5 days, at 3 different study sites. RESULTS: Folate receptor α expression was identified in 39 of 54 cases of lung adenocarcinoma (72%) and 4 of 37 cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma (11%). Agreement among 3 pathologists was found in 24 of 26 cases (92%). Interinstrument reproducibility was observed in 19 of 20 cases (95%). Agreement among 3 laboratories was found for 49 of 50 specimens (98%). CONCLUSIONS: Immunostaining of folate receptor α in lung adenocarcinomas is reproducible across staining platforms and among laboratories. Agreement among pathologists is achieved using a semiquantitative scoring method. An accurate and convenient method for determining folate receptor α expression offers a potentially invaluable tool for selecting patients for folate-targeted therapies.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Receptor 1 de Folato/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA