RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by high seizure burden, treatment-resistant epilepsy, and developmental stagnation. Family members rate communication deficits among the most impactful disease manifestations. We evaluated seizure burden and language/communication development in children with DS. METHODS: ENVISION was a prospective, observational study evaluating children with DS associated with SCN1A pathogenic variants (SCN1A+ DS) enrolled at age ≤5 years. Seizure burden and antiseizure medications were assessed every 3 months and communication and language every 6 months with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd edition and the parent-reported Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales 3rd edition. We report data from the first year of observation, including analyses stratified by age at Baseline: 0:6-2:0 years:months (Y:M; youngest), 2:1-3:6 Y:M (middle), and 3:7-5:0 Y:M (oldest). RESULTS: Between December 2020 and March 2023, 58 children with DS enrolled at 16 sites internationally. Median follow-up was 17.5 months (range = .0-24.0), with 54 of 58 (93.1%) followed for at least 6 months and 51 of 58 (87.9%) for 12 months. Monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) increased with age (median [minimum-maximum] = 1.0 in the youngest [1.0-70.0] and middle [1.0-242.0] age groups and 4.5 [.0-2647.0] in the oldest age group), and remained high, despite use of currently approved antiseizure medications. Language/communication delays were observed early, and developmental stagnation occurred after age 2 years with both instruments. In predictive modeling, chronologic age was the only significant covariate of seizure frequency (effect size = .52, p = .024). MCSF, number of antiseizure medications, age at first seizure, and convulsive status epilepticus were not predictors of language/communication raw scores. SIGNIFICANCE: In infants and young children with SCN1A+ DS, language/communication delay and stagnation were independent of seizure burden. Our findings emphasize that the optimal therapeutic window to prevent language/communication delay is before 3 years of age.
Assuntos
Epilepsias Mioclônicas , Lactente , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Prospectivos , Mutação , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/genética , Epilepsias Mioclônicas/complicações , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/genética , Convulsões/complicações , Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem NAV1.1/genética , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
The cannabidiol (CBD) Expanded Access Program (EAP), initiated in 2014, provided CBD (Epidiolex) to patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE). In the final pooled analysis of 892 patients treated through January 2019 (median exposure = 694 days), CBD treatment was associated with a 46%-66% reduction in median monthly total (convulsive plus nonconvulsive) seizure frequency. CBD was well tolerated, and adverse events were consistent with previous findings. We used pooled EAP data to investigate the effectiveness of add-on CBD therapy for individual convulsive seizure types (clonic, tonic, tonic-clonic, atonic, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic), nonconvulsive seizure types (focal with and without impaired consciousness, absence [typical and atypical], myoclonic, myoclonic absence), and epileptic spasms. CBD treatment was associated with a reduction in the frequency of convulsive seizure types (median percentage reduction = 47%-100%), and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms (median percentage reduction = 50%-100%) across visit intervals through 144 weeks of treatment. Approximately 50% of patients had ≥50% reduction in convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types and epileptic spasms at nearly all intervals. These results show a favorable effect of long-term CBD use in patients with TRE, who may experience various convulsive and nonconvulsive seizure types. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Canabidiol , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Epilepsia , Convulsões , Convulsões/classificação , Convulsões/complicações , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Canabidiol/efeitos adversos , Canabidiol/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/complicações , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
People with epilepsy may experience episodes of frequent seizure activity (seizure clusters, acute repetitive seizures), and benzodiazepines are the cornerstone of rescue treatment. Cannabidiol (CBD) can be used as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy, and it may interact with other antiseizure drugs, such as benzodiazepines. Here, we examined the safety and effectiveness of intermittent use of diazepam nasal spray in patients with seizure clusters who also received CBD treatment. This analysis included data from patients aged 6 to 65 years enrolled in a phase 3, long-term safety study of diazepam nasal spray. Age- and weight-based dosing of diazepam nasal spray were administered during a 12-month treatment period. Concomitant CBD use was recorded, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected. Of 163 treated patients, 119 (73.0%) did not receive CBD, 23 (14.1%) received the US Food and Drug Administration-approved highly purified CBD and 21 (12.9%) received another form of CBD. On average, patients receiving highly purified CBD were younger and more likely to have epileptic encephalopathies, including Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, than patients who received another CBD preparation or no CBD. Rates of TEAEs and serious TEAEs were greater in patients who received any form of CBD (90.9% and 45.5%, respectively) compared with no CBD (79.0% and 26.1%, respectively). However, the lowest rates of TEAEs attributed to diazepam nasal spray were reported in patients who received highly purified CBD (13.0%), and this result was maintained in those who received concomitant clobazam. Use of second doses of diazepam nasal spray, a proxy for effectiveness, was lowest in the highly purified-CBD group (8.2%) compared with the no-CBD (11.6%) and other-CBD groups (20.3%). These results suggest that CBD does not alter the safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray and supports concomitant use in appropriate patients.
Assuntos
Canabidiol , Epilepsia , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Canabidiol/efeitos adversos , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Sprays Nasais , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated in everyday clinical practice for focal and generalized seizures, both in the total cohort and by age group. METHODS: The PERMIT Extension study was a pooled analysis of data from PWE included in two large previous clinical practice studies (PERMIT and PROVE). Retention was assessed over 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed based on total seizures and by seizure type (focal and generalized) after 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment and at final follow-up (last observation carried forward; "last visit"); assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the previous visit). Safety/tolerability was assessed throughout PER treatment by evaluating adverse events (AEs). All assessments were conducted for the total population and by age category (<12, ≥12 to <18, ≥18 to <65, and ≥65 years at baseline). RESULTS: Full Analysis Set included 6,822 PWE (51.1% female; mean age, 36.9 years; mean duration of epilepsy 21.4 years) with 6,433, 4,648, and 6,233 PWE assessed for retention, effectiveness, and safety/tolerability, respectively. The majority of PWE (81.1%) were aged 18-64 at baseline, with 4.5% aged <12 years, 8.4% aged 12-17 years, and 5.9% aged ≥65 years. In the overall population, retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 88.0%, 77.6%, and 61.4%, respectively; responder rates at 12 months were 58.5% for total seizures, 54.6% for focal seizures, and 77.7% for generalized seizures, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.6%, 19.0%, and 51.3%, respectively. PER was effective regardless of age category, although effectiveness was greatest in PWE aged ≥65 years, for both focal and generalized seizures. In the overall population, the incidence of AEs was 49.2% and the most frequent AEs (≥5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (13.4%), somnolence (8.8%), irritability (7.3%), and behavioral disorders (5.3%); AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 18.3% of PWE over 12 months. The incidence of AEs and the discontinuation rate due to AEs increased with increasing age (55.0% and 23.9%, respectively, in PWE aged ≥65 years). CONCLUSION: In this study, the largest pooled analysis of PER clinical practice data conducted to date, PER was shown to be effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice, regardless of age category. No new or unexpected side effects emerged following long-term use in the real-world setting.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco), indicated for acute treatment of frequent seizure activity (seizure clusters) in patients with epilepsy ≥6 years of age, is designed to be a rapid, noninvasive, socially acceptable route of administration. This interim analysis evaluated the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray in patients with and without concomitant use of benzodiazepines, with use of a second dose for a seizure cluster as a proxy for effectiveness. METHODS: A long-term, phase 3, open-label safety study enrolled patients with epilepsy who had seizures despite a stable antiseizure medication regimen. RESULTS: Among 175 patients enrolled by October 31, 2019, a total of 158 were treated with diazepam nasal spray (aged 6-65 years; 53.8% female). Of those, 119 (75.3%) received concomitant benzodiazepines (60, chronic; 59, intermittent); 39 (24.7%) did not. Use of a second dose was similar in patients using chronic concomitant benzodiazepines (second dose in 11.1% [144/1299]) and those with no concomitant benzodiazepines (second dose in 10.3% [41/398]). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred for 80.0% with chronic use of concomitant benzodiazepines and 61.5% without. Cardiorespiratory depression was not reported, and no serious TEAEs were treatment related. Study retention was high: 83.3% in the chronic benzodiazepine group and 76.9% in the no-benzodiazepine group. Findings were similar in a sub-analysis of patients who were (n = 44) or were not (n = 75) taking clobazam. SIGNIFICANCE: This analysis of patients from a long-term study shows a similar safety profile of diazepam nasal spray in patients with and without concomitant benzodiazepines, and consistent with the established profile for diazepam. Use of a single dose of diazepam nasal spray and high study retention rates suggest the effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray in patients irrespective of chronic daily benzodiazepine use. Results were similar in the clobazam sub-analysis. These results support the safety and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray in patients with concomitant benzodiazepine use.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Diazepam/administração & dosagem , Diazepam/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Pré-Escolar , Clobazam/uso terapêutico , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sprays Nasais , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A Phase 3 open-label safety study (NCT02721069) evaluated long-term safety of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) in patients with epilepsy and frequent seizure clusters. METHODS: Patients were 6-65 years old with diagnosed epilepsy and seizure clusters despite stable antiseizure medications. The treatment period was 12 months, with study visits at Day 30 and every 60 days thereafter, after which patients could elect to continue. Doses were based on age and weight. Seizure and treatment information was recorded in diaries. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), nasal irritation, and olfactory changes were recorded. RESULTS: Of 163 patients in the safety population, 117 (71.8%) completed the study. Duration of exposure was ≥12 months for 81.6% of patients. There was one death (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy) and one withdrawal owing to a TEAE (major depression), both considered unlikely to be related to treatment. Diazepam nasal spray was administered 4390 times for 3853 seizure clusters, with 485 clusters treated with a second dose within 24 h; 53.4% of patients had monthly average usage of one to two doses, 41.7% two to five doses, and 4.9% more than five doses. No serious TEAEs were considered to be treatment related. TEAEs possibly or probably related to treatment (n = 30) were most commonly nasal discomfort (6.1%); headache (2.5%); and dysgeusia, epistaxis, and somnolence (1.8% each). Only 13 patients (7.9%) showed nasal irritation, and there were no relevant olfactory changes. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was generally similar across subgroups based on age, monthly usage, concomitant benzodiazepine therapy, or seasonal allergy/rhinitis. SIGNIFICANCE: In this large open-label safety study, the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was consistent with the established profile of rectal diazepam, and the high retention rate supports effectiveness in this population. A second dose was used in only 12.6% of seizure clusters.
Assuntos
Epilepsia Generalizada , Epilepsia , Transtornos do Olfato , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Dano Encefálico Crônico , Criança , Morte Súbita , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/induzido quimicamente , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sprays Nasais , Convulsões/induzido quimicamente , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess pharmacokinetics and safety of diazepam nasal spray (NRL-1; VALTOCO®) in pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy in seizure and nonseizure states. METHODS: A single dose of diazepam nasal spray (5, 10, 15, or 20 mg based on weight) was administered during each of two conditions (ictal/peri-ictal and interictal condition) to patients 6-65 years old with partial or generalized epilepsy with motor seizures or seizures with clear alteration of awareness; a second dose was permitted if needed for persistent seizures. Dosing could be interictal or ictal/peri-ictal first, with a washout of ≥14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken at prespecified time points. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), sedation, nasal irritation, nasal mucosal pain, and olfactory changes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 57 patients in the study (mean age = 28.1 years [range = 6-59], 54.4% female, 80.7% white), 49 were included in the primary pharmacokinetic analyses. Diazepam pharmacokinetic profiles were similar under both conditions, with approximately 2-hour median time to mean (SD) maximum plasma concentrations of 164 (88) and 189 (110) ng/mL for ictal/peri-ictal and interictal conditions, respectively; drug exposure during the first 6 hours postdosing was 532 (313) and 615 (368) hâ¢ng/mL, respectively. Seventeen patients (29.8%) reported TEAEs, of whom eight (14%) had treatment-related TEAEs, with those reported in ≥2 patients being dysgeusia (n = 3, 5.3%) and nasal discomfort (n = 2, 3.5%). One patient had serious TEAEs (recurrent seizures, metabolic encephalopathy), which were deemed unrelated to study treatment. No changes in respiratory rate were observed, nor were there clinically relevant changes in sedation, olfaction, nasal irritation, or acute nasal mucosal pain. SIGNIFICANCE: The epileptic conditions (ictal/peri-ictal, interictal) had minimal impact on diazepam nasal spray pharmacokinetics in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, diazepam nasal spray can be administered ictally and interictally. Diazepam nasal spray safety was consistent with the profile of diazepam.
Assuntos
Diazepam/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Diazepam/administração & dosagem , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Diazepam/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sprays Nasais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Use of cannabinoid therapies is on the rise in the United States, but responses of healthcare professionals and their knowledge of these therapies have been mixed. More information is needed about factors associated with healthcare professionals' attitudes and knowledge about medical cannabis. We conducted an online survey of US-based neurologists, nurse practitioners (NPs)/nurses, and pharmacists in August-September of 2018 (nâ¯=â¯451). We constructed perceived knowledge and attitudes scales and a knowledge index from multiple items and assessed state cannabis laws, participant's sociodemographics, workplace type and policies, and patient population. We used ordinary least-squares regression to examine associations among study variables. Over 80% of participants supported use and legalization of medical cannabis, especially cannabidiol (CBD) for epilepsy and when prescribed by a medical provider, but 40-50% (depending on item) felt unfamiliar with cannabinoid pharmacology and clinical applications. A total of 43% favored legal recreational cannabis. Pharmacists scored higher on the knowledge test than neurologists and NPs/nurses, but NPs/nurses had more favorable attitudes than neurologists and higher perceived knowledge than pharmacists. Both knowledge indicators predicted attitudes. State cannabis access and favorable workplace policies were associated with higher knowledge and more favorable attitudes. Healthcare professionals see potential in cannabis therapies but report significant knowledge gaps. Professional cannabinoid education is needed to address growing patient and provider demand for knowledge about cannabinoid therapies.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Neurologistas/normas , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Farmacêuticos/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/psicologia , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurologistas/psicologia , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donors (RDs) and allogeneic HCT using HLA-matched unrelated donors (URDs) produce similar outcomes for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia, whereas the donor source has been reported to be a predictor of outcomes in myelodysplastic syndrome. METHODS: Post-HCT outcomes for 1458 acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients from 2000 to 2011 were analyzed, and RD and URD transplants were compared. RESULTS: The median age was 37 years (range, 18-69 years). In the multivariate analysis, HLA 8/8 allele-matched URD recipients had similar transplant-related mortality (TRM) and all-cause mortality in comparison with RD recipients (hazard ratios [HRs], 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.48] and 1.01 [95% CI, 0.85-1.19], respectively); 7/8 URD recipients had a greater risk of TRM and all-cause mortality in comparison with RD recipients (HRs, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.47-2.52] and 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.58], respectively). The risk of TRM and all-cause mortality was also greater for 7/8 URD recipients versus 8/8 URD recipients. Compared with RD recipients, both 8/8 and 7/8 URD recipients had a lower risk of relapse (HRs, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.97] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56-1.00], respectively). Both 8/8 and 7/8 URD recipients had a greater risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; HRs, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.76-2.70] and 2.65 [95% CI, 2.06-3.42], respectively) and chronic GVHD (HRs, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.55] and 1.46 [95% CI, 1.14-1.88], respectively) in comparison with RD recipients. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of RD transplantation, 8/8 URD transplantation is a viable alternative with similar survival outcomes, whereas 7/8 URD transplantation is associated with poorer overall survival. Cancer 2017;123:3346-55. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Teste de Histocompatibilidade/métodos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/diagnóstico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Transplante Homólogo/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doadores não Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged <4 years and 4-<12 years. METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (<4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4-<12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1-3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [<4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4-<12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [<4 years] versus 52.4% [4-<12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (<4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4-<12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was generally well tolerated with <21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and >35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Nitrilas , Piridonas , Humanos , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lactente , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Marijuana-based therapies (MBTs) have been shown to reduce seizure frequency in patients with severe and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Pharmaceutical-grade CBD (Epidiolexâ) was approved by the FDA in 2018 for the treatments of Dravet Syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) and subsequently in 2020 for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). It is unclear what the utility would be in prescribing one type of MBT if a previous, alternative type failed. We conducted a retrospective study to determine if an alternative formulation of MBT reduces seizure frequency if the patient has not had a meaningful response from an initial MBT. We also investigated the clinical impact that a second MBT has on side effect profile. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of patients with DRE who were at least 2 years old and who took at least 2 different formulations of MBT, including a pharmacologic formulation of CBD (Epidiolexâ), artisanal marijuana, and/or a hemp-based formulation. We reviewed medical records in patients 2 years of age and older; however, subjects' historical data, such as age of first seizure onset, may be prior to the age of 2 years. We extracted data on demographics, type of epilepsy, history of epilepsy, medication history, seizure count, and drug side effects. Seizure frequency, side effect profiles, and predictors of responder status were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified as taking more than 1 type of MBT. Our findings suggest that seizure frequencies do not change significantly from baseline to after the first MBT and to after the second MBT (p = .4). However, we did find that patients with greater baseline seizure frequency were significantly more likely to respond to treatment after the second MBT (p = .03). To our second endpoint of side effect profile, we found that patients who experienced side effects after a second MBT had significantly greater seizure frequency compared to those who did not (p = .04). CONCLUSION: We found no significant seizure frequency reduction from baseline to after a second MBT in patients who tried at least 2 different formulations of MBT. This suggests a low probability of seizure frequency reduction with a second MBT therapy in patients with epilepsy who tried at least two different MBTs. While these findings need to be replicated in a larger sample, they suggest that clinicians should not delay care by trying alternative MBT formulations after a patient has already tried one. Instead, it may be more prudent to attempt an alternative class of therapy.
Assuntos
Canabidiol , Cannabis , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Epilepsia , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Canabidiol/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Convulsões/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
ABSTRACT: We report a case of biopsy-proven prostate cancer metastasis to the rectum and presumed metastasis to a mesorectal lymph node, identified as radiotracer-avid lesions on prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT during workup for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. This case adds to a growing number of atypical sites of metastatic prostate cancer being reported since the approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT for staging of prostate cancer.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Reto , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathies are often refractory to treatment despite stable antiseizure therapy. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) as rescue therapy for seizure clusters was described in a long-term safety study. This post hoc analysis assessed safety and effectiveness within a subpopulation of patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies. Of 163 treated patients, 64 were diagnosed with ≥1 pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Among the most common developmental epileptic encephalopathies were Rett syndrome (n = 16), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 9), and Dravet syndrome (n = 7). In the broad pediatric developmental epileptic encephalopathy group, 10.6% of seizure clusters were treated with a second dose, with similar proportions in the 3 individual encephalopathies. Across groups, treatment-emergent adverse event rates ranged from 66.7% to 100%. Only epistaxis (n = 2) was treatment-related and reported in >1 patient. In this long-term safety analysis in patients with developmental epileptic encephalopathies, diazepam nasal spray demonstrated a consistent safety profile, supporting its use in these hard-to-treat patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02721069).
Assuntos
Encefalopatias , Epilepsia Generalizada , Epilepsia , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut , Criança , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut/tratamento farmacológico , Sprays Nasais , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PROVE is a retrospective, phase IV study assessing retention, dosing, efficacy, and safety of perampanel when administered to patients during routine clinical care. We report an interim analysis of preadolescent (1 to <12 years) and adolescent (12 to <18 years) patients. Data were obtained from medical records of patients with epilepsy initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014; cut-off date for this analysis was October 10, 2018. Overall, 151 preadolescent and 183 adolescent patients were included. Retention rates following 24 months on perampanel were 42.5% (preadolescent subgroup; n = 31/73) and 55.7% (adolescent subgroup; n = 54/97). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 53 (35.1%) preadolescent (most common: aggression, irritability, and somnolence) and 78 (42.6%) adolescent patients (most common: somnolence, aggression, and dizziness). These data indicate that daily oral doses of perampanel are generally well tolerated during routine clinical care, with favorable retention rates for ≤2 years, in patients aged 1 to <18 years.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactente , Nitrilas , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sonolência , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Report final data from adolescent (12-<18 years) and adult (≥18 years) patients from PROVE (NCT03208660), a multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional, Phase IV study to assess retention, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the US initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinicians' recommendation. Retention rate was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator's impression of seizure effect, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 294 adolescents and 1157 adults (median maximum perampanel dose, 6.0 mg/day). In patients eligible for inclusion in the retention rate analysis, 24-month retention rates were 53.5% (n=91/170) in adolescents and 47.8% (n=354/741) in adults. In patients with available efficacy data during Months 10-12, median percent seizure frequency reductions were 79.3% (n=20) in adolescents and 70.8% (n=92) in adults. Most patients in the SAS with seizure-effect data experienced an improvement in seizures at the last follow-up time point (adolescents, 51.4% [n=128/249]; adults, 52.3% [n=506/967]). TEAEs occurred in 113 adolescents (38.4%; most common, aggression [6.5%]) and 512 adults (44.3%; most common, dizziness [9.2%]). CONCLUSION: Perampanel demonstrated favorable retention rates and sustained efficacy (up to 2 years) in adolescent and adult patients during routine clinical care; no new safety signals were observed. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03208660 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03208660).
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/induzido quimicamente , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Nitrilas , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess retention, dosing, efficacy, and safety of perampanel in a large cohort of patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. METHODS: PROVE was a retrospective, non-interventional Phase IV study (NCT03208660). Data were obtained retrospectively from the medical records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinicians' recommendation. Retention rate was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline, seizure-freedom rate, and overall investigator impression of seizure effect. Safety endpoints included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy and safety were also assessed according to baseline use of enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs). RESULTS: Overall, 1703 patients were enrolled and included in the Safety Analysis Set (SAS; ≥1 baseline EIASMs, n = 358 [21.0%]; no baseline EIASMs, n = 1345 [79.0%]). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) cumulative duration of exposure to perampanel was 17.4 (15.7) months; mean (SD) daily perampanel dose was 5.6 (2.7) mg. The most frequent perampanel titration intervals were weekly (23.4%) and every 2 weeks (24.7%). Across the SAS, 24-month retention rate was 48.1% (n = 501/1042). Based on overall investigator impression at the end of treatment, 51.9%, 35.8%, and 12.3% of patients in the SAS experienced improvement, no change, or worsening of seizures, respectively. TEAEs occurred in 704 (41.3%) patients; 79 (4.6%) had serious TEAEs. The most common TEAE was dizziness (7.3%). There was some variation in efficacy according to EIASM use, while retention rates and safety were generally consistent. SIGNIFICANCE: In this final analysis of >1700 patients with epilepsy receiving perampanel in routine clinical care, favorable retention and sustained efficacy were demonstrated for ≥12 months.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Nitrilas , Piridonas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Epidemiologic and laboratory data suggesting that metformin has antineoplastic activity have led to ongoing clinical trials. However, pharmacokinetic issues that may influence metformin activity have not been studied in detail. The organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) is known to play an important role in cellular uptake of metformin in the liver. We show that siRNA knockdown of OCT1 reduced sensitivity of epithelial ovarian cancer cells to metformin, but interestingly not to another biguanide, phenformin, with respect to both activation of AMP kinase and inhibition of proliferation. We observed that there is heterogeneity between primary human tumors with respect to OCT1 expression. These results suggest that there may be settings where drug uptake limits direct action of metformin on neoplastic cells, raising the possibility that metformin may not be the optimal biguanide for clinical investigation.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Biguanidas/farmacologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Transportador 1 de Cátions Orgânicos/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/metabolismo , Adenilato Quinase/metabolismo , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Feminino , Humanos , Metformina/farmacologia , Fenformin/farmacologia , RNA Interferente Pequeno/genéticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to evaluate the ability of metformin to induce apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines and to identify the pathways involved in this effect. METHODS: After treatment with metformin and/or cisplatin, OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-4 cellular apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry and caspase 3/7 activity. Cell cycle analysis was also performed by flow cytometry as well. Modulation of protein expression of the Bcl-2 family after treatment with metformin and/or cisplatin was determined by Western blotting. RESULTS: Metformin induced apoptosis in OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-4 cell lines in an AMPK-independent manner and provoked a cell cycle arrest in the S and G2/M phase. Moreover, we established that metformin can induce apoptosis in OVCAR-3 and OVCAR-4 cells by activating caspases 3/7, down-regulating Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expression, and up-regulating Bax and Bad expression. The induction of apoptosis by metformin was also enhanced by cisplatin and combination of these drugs did not modulate the expression of Bcl-2 family proteins in OVCAR-3 cell line, whereas the effect was enhanced in OVCAR-4 cell line. CONCLUSION: Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 targeted strategies were suggested to constitute an effective therapeutic tool for the treatment of chemoresistant ovarian carcinoma, in conjunction with conventional chemotherapy. These data are relevant to ongoing translational research efforts and clinical trials exploring a possible protective effect of metformin against ovarian cancer, including Bcl-2 inhibition.
Assuntos
Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Metformina/farmacologia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-bcl-2/metabolismo , Quinases Proteína-Quinases Ativadas por AMP , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Proteínas Quinases/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Need for rescue therapy differs among patients with seizure clusters. Diazepam nasal spray is approved to treat seizure clusters in patients with epilepsy ≥6 years of age. This analysis used interim data from a phase 3 safety study to assess safety profile and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray using average number of doses/month as a proxy measurement. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose, safety study of diazepam nasal spray enrolled patients (6-65 years) with epilepsy and need of benzodiazepine rescue. Patients were stratified by average number of doses/month (<2, moderate frequency; 2-5, high frequency; >5, very-high frequency). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed nasal irritation, and olfaction. The proportion of treatments given as a second dose was used as an exploratory proxy for effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 175 enrolled patients (data cutoff, October 31, 2019), 158 received ≥1 dose of diazepam nasal spray. Frequency of use was moderate in 43.7% of patients, high in 50.6% of patients, and very high in 5.7% of patients. Patients treated 3397 seizure episodes (moderate frequency, 14.2%; high frequency, 59.9%; very high frequency, 25.8%). Nasal discomfort was the most common treatment-related TEAE in all groups. No notable changes in nasal irritation or olfaction were observed. Second doses represented only 2.5%, 7.5%, and 17.2% of all doses in the moderate-, high-, and very-high-frequency groups, respectively. Overall retention rate was 82.9%, without an observed relationship to frequency of use. SIGNIFICANCE: Frequency of dosing diazepam nasal spray had little impact on the safety/tolerability profile across a range of <2 to >5 doses/month. Effectiveness was suggested for all dosing frequencies by the high proportion of seizure clusters not treated with a second dose. These results support the utility, safety profile, and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray across frequencies of seizure cluster burden.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Sprays Nasais , Administração Intranasal , Diazepam/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a sporadic, neurocutaneous syndrome involving the skin, brain, and eyes. Because of the variability of the clinical manifestations and the lack of prospective studies, consensus recommendations for management and treatment of SWS have not been published. OBJECTIVE: This article consolidates the current literature with expert opinion to make recommendations to guide the neuroimaging evaluation and the management of the neurological and ophthalmologic features of SWS. METHODS: Thirteen national peer-recognized experts in neurology, radiology, and ophthalmology with experience treating patients with SWS were assembled. Key topics and questions were formulated for each group and included (1) risk stratification, (2) indications for referral, and (3) optimum treatment strategies. An extensive PubMed search was performed of English language articles published in 2008 to 2018, as well as recent studies identified by the expert panel. The panel made clinical practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Children with a high-risk facial port-wine birthmark (PWB) should be referred to a pediatric neurologist and a pediatric ophthalmologist for baseline evaluation and periodic follow-up. In newborns and infants with a high-risk PWB and no history of seizures or neurological symptoms, routine screening for brain involvement is not recommended, but brain imaging can be performed in select cases. Routine follow-up neuroimaging is not recommended in children with SWS and stable neurocognitive symptoms. The treatment of ophthalmologic complications, such as glaucoma, differs based on the age and clinical presentation of the patient. These recommendations will help facilitate coordinated care for patients with SWS and may improve patient outcomes.