National trends in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy in the United States.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of diabetic nephropathy continues to rise and it remains a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. Patients diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy are actively excluded from most trials involving diabetic medications and it is important to understand the prescription patterns in this subset of patients with diabetes. METHODS: Using the IMS Health's National Disease and Therapeutic Index, we analysed the medication prescription patterns for six classes of medications from 2010 to 2014 among patients, 35 years or older, with diabetic nephropathy. RESULTS: Annual office visits increased from 772 860 (95% confidence interval (CI), 755, 470-790, 249) in 2010 to 1 868 618 (95% CI, 1 834 422-1 902 814) in 2013 and declined to 830 596 (95% CI, 809 167-852 025) in 2014. Sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors) were the most frequently used of the four classes of diabetic medications included in this study. DPP-4 inhibitors use increased gradually and was used in 54% (95% CI 49-58) of treatment visits by the last quarter of 2014. Across these years, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs and ARBs) were prescribed in the majority of treatment visits with peaks above 90%. However, there were some periods when utilization of these antihypertensives was low. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Significant increases occurred in the uptake of new diabetic medications; DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors and in the utilization of ACEIs and ARBs compared to the findings reported in other studies with increased complexity in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy. Improved and continued used of these medications may be beneficial in improving patient outcomes.

WITHDRAWN: Anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy for non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and flutter.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) carries a high risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Appropriate use of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in patients with AF involves comparing the patient's risk of stroke to the risk of hemorrhage from medication use. OBJECTIVES: To quantify risk of stroke, major hemorrhage and death from using medications that have been rigorously evaluated for prevention of thromboembolism in AF. SEARCH STRATEGY: Articles were identified through the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL database and MEDLINE until December 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included Randomized controlled trials of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in adults with non-postoperative AF. Excluded RCTS of patients with rheumatic valvular disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were abstracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios from all qualitatively similar studies were combined, with weighting by study size, to yield aggregate odds ratios for stroke, major hemorrhage, and death for each drug. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included in this review. Warfarin was more efficacious than placebo for primary stroke prevention {aggregate odds ratio (OR) of stroke=0.30 [95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 0.19,0.48]}, with moderate evidence of more major bleeding { OR= 1.90 [95% C.I. 0.89,4.04].}. Aspirin was inconclusively more efficacious than placebo for stroke prevention {OR=0.68 [95% C.I. 0.29,1.57]}, with inconclusive evidence regarding more major bleeds {OR=0.81[95% C.I. 0.37,1.78]}. For primary prevention, assuming a baseline risk of 45 strokes per 1000 patient-years, warfarin could prevent 30 strokes at the expense of only 6 additional major bleeds. Aspirin could prevent 17 strokes, without increasing major hemorrhage. In direct comparison, there was moderate evidence for fewer strokes among patients on warfarin than on aspirin {aggregate OR=0.64[95% C.I. 0.43,0.96]}, with only suggestive evidence for more major hemorrhage {OR =1.58 [95% C.I. 0.76,3.27]}. However, in younger patients, with a mean age of 65 years, the absolute reduction in stroke rate with warfarin compared to aspirin was low (5.5 per 1000 person-years) compared to an older group (15 per 1000 person-years). Low-dose warfarin or low-dose warfarin with aspirin was less efficacious for stroke prevention than adjusted-dose warfarin. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly supports warfarin in AF for patients at average or greater risk of stroke, although clearly there is a risk of hemorrhage. Although not definitively supported by the evidence, aspirin may prove to be useful for stroke prevention in sub-groups with a low risk of stroke, with less risk of hemorrhage than with warfarin. Further studies are needed of low- molecular weight heparin and aspirin in lower risk patients.

Prevalence of immune thrombocytopenia: analyses of administrative data.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in the USA is unknown. The paucity of data makes clinical trial design and resource allocation challenging. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify the prevalence of ITP in one state and to report on utilization of resources. METHODS: The Maryland Health Care Commission supplied utilization data on all privately insured Maryland residents in 2002. We identified patients having two claims, separated by at least 30 days, for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 287.3 (expected to be predominantly ITP). We excluded patients with concurrent diagnoses that made ITP unlikely. In sensitivity analyses, we varied the required visit interval between 14 and 180 days. We quantified ITP prevalence, resource utilization, and prevalence of concurrent autoimmune illnesses. RESULTS: The age-adjusted prevalence of ITP was 9.5 per 100,000 persons (10.5 per 100,000 when requiring a minimum 14-day interval and 4.5 per 100,000 with a 180-day interval). There was a predominance of males in childhood and of females in the middle-adult years, with an overall prevalence rate ratio of 1.9 for females to males. Twenty per cent of these patients were hospitalized, but emergency department use was rare, as was splenectomy. A concurrent diagnosis of multiple sclerosis was 25 times more prevalent than anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of ITP in one populous state in the USA is comparable with that which has been reported in Europe. The suggested co-occurrence of ITP and multiple sclerosis in children merits further investigation.

Coagulation markers predicting cardiac transplant rejection.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection in cardiac allografts is a major cause of graft loss, and is associated with activation of the coagulation system. We investigated whether plasma markers of coagulation predict the presence of allograft rejection. METHODS: A total of 132 blood specimens and endomyocardial biopsies were collected from 35 patients, between February of 1997 and May of 1998. We measured plasma prothrombin fragment 1.2 (PF1.2) and p-selectin, fibrinogen, thrombomodulin, and d-dimer. Biopsies were graded according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation system, with a range of 0 to 4. Grades 0 and 1A were grouped as "no rejection," and the higher grades as "rejection." Linear and logistic regression, accounting for longitudinal data, were the principal analytic tools. RESULTS: p-Selectin level increased progressively with increasing rejection grade (P<0.001). With multivariate analysis, both p-selectin and prothrombin fragment levels significantly predicted rejection. p-Selectin levels were predictive of prothrombin fragment levels (P<0.0001) but not of d-dimer, fibrinogen, or thrombomodulin levels. This model allowed correct prediction of rejection, based on p-selectin and prothrombin fragment values, up to 85% of the time. Dichotomizing patients by a p-selectin level of 65 ng/ml resulted in an odds of rejection of 21.4 [95% C.I. 7.1-64.7] for the patients in the high- compared with the lower risk group. CONCLUSIONS: In heart transplant recipients, p-selectin levels and PF 1.2 levels are highly predictive of organ rejection. The elevation of PF 1.2 suggests that there is systemic generation of thrombin generation. These markers may be useful for noninvasively monitoring patients for organ rejection or for after response to treatment.

Diagnosis of crystal-induced arthritis by synovial fluid examination for crystals: lessons from an imperfect test.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of the crystal-induced arthritides is primarily based on microscopic identification of crystals in synovial fluid. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the operating characteristics of this test and demonstrate its clinical use. METHODS: Medline was searched for relevant studies. Sensitivity and specificity of identification of crystals were calculated, as were measures of interobserver agreement. Likelihood ratios were calculated and curves constructed using the solutions to the Bayesian equations. RESULTS: Four studies were identified. The rates of interobserver agreement were low; the false-negative rates in identifying calcium pyrophosphate crystals were particularly high. Only one study allowed calculation of the test operating characteristics, and this was a study that used synthetic crystals and therefore may not be directly useful in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of data about the accuracy of crystal identification. As it is clearly not a perfectly sensitive and specific test, the most prudent diagnostic strategy, as with essentially all diagnostic tests, is to establish a posterior probability of disease from a prior probability, based on the clinical features of the patient. Determining the operating characteristics of this test in conventional and reference laboratories should be a research priority for high quality clinical research on crystal arthropathies.

Cardiac troponin T and C-reactive protein as markers of acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Due to myocyte damage and an associated inflammatory response, it is possible that cardiac troponin T and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations may correlate with the histologic grade of rejection in endomyocardial biopsy samples obtained from patients who have received a heart transplant. In this study, 704 blood samples were obtained from 145 different heart transplant recipients just prior to endomyocardial biopsy. Plasma specimens were assayed for troponin T and CRP concentration and the results compared with the assigned International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) histologic grade. Rejection was defined as an ISHLT grade of 3A or higher. The negative predictive values were near 80% in all cases, and a statistically significant increase in median troponin T concentration was observed across ISHLT grades. After the first month posttransplantation, the specificity of the troponin T test (cutoff 0.1 ng/ml) was 95% and increased to 98% when false positives seen in renal disease patients were excluded. Both tests demonstrated poor sensitivity and positive predictive value for rejection. Neither CRP nor troponin T had sufficient sensitivity to serve as an alternative to endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of acute cardiac allograft rejection. However, the troponin T test had a high specificity, especially when patients with renal insufficiency were excluded, and could serve as an adjunct test in this setting. When combined with a normal serum creatinine, a troponin T > or =0.1 ng/ml prior to endomyocardial biopsy correlated with graft rejection in almost all cases, making biopsy unnecessary.

Treatment of venous thromboembolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a synthesis of the evidence published in systematic literature reviews.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methodology and cumulative evidence presented in systematic reviews of clinical trials comparing low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We reviewed all systematic reviews of clinical trials published until March 2002. Fourteen systematic literature reviews were published between 1994 and 2000. Deficiencies in methodological quality were common, particularly in the description of search strategies, assessment of clinical trial quality, and methods used to combine results. RESULTS: Results of reviews indicate that LMWH is superior to UFH for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, particularly in reducing mortality. Patients with isolated deep venous thrombosis or deep venous thrombosis with concomitant pulmonary embolism seemed to have similar benefit. However, the benefits of LMWH over UFH were smaller in magnitude in reviews that included more recent clinical trials.

Anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy for non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and flutter.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) carries a high risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Appropriate use of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in patients with AF involves comparing the patient's risk of stroke to the risk of hemorrhage from medication use. OBJECTIVES: To quantify risk of stroke, major hemorrhage and death from using medications that have been rigorously evaluated for prevention of thromboembolism in AF. SEARCH STRATEGY: Articles were identified through the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL database and MEDLINE until December 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Included Randomized controlled trials of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in adults with non-postoperative AF. Excluded RCTS of patients with rheumatic valvular disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were abstracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios from all qualitatively similar studies were combined, with weighting by study size, to yield aggregate odds ratios for stroke, major hemorrhage, and death for each drug. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included in this review. Warfarin was more efficacious than placebo for primary stroke prevention [aggregate odds ratio (OR) of stroke=0.30 [95% Confidence Interval (C.I.) 0.19,0.48]], with moderate evidence of more major bleeding [ OR= 1.90 [95% C.I. 0.89,4.04].]. Aspirin was inconclusively more efficacious than placebo for stroke prevention [OR=0.68 [95% C.I. 0.29,1.57]], with inconclusive evidence regarding more major bleeds [OR=0.81[95% C.I. 0.37,1.78]]. For primary prevention, assuming a baseline risk of 45 strokes per 1000 patient-years, warfarin could prevent 30 strokes at the expense of only 6 additional major bleeds. Aspirin could prevent 17 strokes, without increasing major hemorrhage. In direct comparison, there was moderate evidence for fewer strokes among patients on warfarin than on aspirin [aggregate OR=0.64[95% C.I. 0.43,0.96]], with only suggestive evidence for more major hemorrhage [OR =1.58 [95% C.I. 0.76,3.27]]. However, in younger patients, with a mean age of 65 years, the absolute reduction in stroke rate with warfarin compared to aspirin was low (5.5 per 1000 person-years) compared to an older group (15 per 1000 person-years). Low-dose warfarin or low-dose warfarin with aspirin was less efficacious for stroke prevention than adjusted-dose warfarin. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence strongly supports warfarin in AF for patients at average or greater risk of stroke, although clearly there is a risk of hemorrhage. Although not definitively supported by the evidence, aspirin may prove to be useful for stroke prevention in sub-groups with a low risk of stroke, with less risk of hemorrhage than with warfarin. Further studies are needed of low- molecular weight heparin and aspirin in lower risk patients.

Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

CONTEXT: Physicians have little evidentiary guidance for pharmacologic agent selection for atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To assess antiarrhythmic agent efficacy for AF conversion and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm (MSR). DATA SOURCE: We searched the clinical trial database of the Cochrane Collaboration and MEDLINE encompassing literature from 1948 to May 1998. STUDY SELECTION: We selected 36 (28%) articles eligible as randomized trials of nonpostoperative AF conversion or MSR in adults. DATA EXTRACTION: Study quality; rates of conversion, MSR, and adverse events were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with control treatment (placebo, verapamil, diltiazem, or digoxin), the odds ratio (OR) for conversion was greatest for ibutilide/dofetilide (OR=29.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-86.1) and flecainide (OR=24.7; 95% CI, 9.0-68.3). Less strong but conclusive evidence existed for propafenone (OR=4.6; 95% CI, 2.6-8.2). Quinidine (OR=2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.0) had moderate evidence of efficacy for conversion. Disopyramide (OR=7.0; 95% CI, 0.3-153.0) and amiodarone (OR=5.7; 95% CI, 1.0-33.4) had suggestive evidence of efficacy. Sotalol (OR=0.4; 95% CI, 0.0-3.0) had suggestive evidence of negative efficacy. For MSR, strong evidence of efficacy existed for quinidine (OR=4.1; 95% CI, 2.5-6.7), disopyramide (OR=3.4; CI, 1.6-7.1), flecainide (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.2), propafenone (OR=3.7; 95% CI, 2.4-5.7), and sotalol (OR=7.1; 95% CI, 3.8-13.4). The only amiodarone data, from comparison with disopyramide, provided moderate evidence of efficacy for MSR. No trial evaluated procainamide. Direct agent comparisons and adverse event data were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple antiarrhythmic agents had strong evidence of efficacy compared with control treatment for MSR, ibutilide/dofetilide and flecainide had particularly strong evidence of efficacy compared with control treatment for AF conversion. There is sparse and inconclusive evidence on direct agent comparisons and adverse event rates. Obtaining information regarding these relative efficacies should be a research priority.

The evidence regarding the drugs used for ventricular rate control.

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine what drugs are most efficacious for controlling the ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted a systematic review of the literature published before May 1998, beginning with searches of The Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL database and MEDLINE. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included English-language articles describing randomized controlled trials of drugs used for heart rate control in adults with atrial fibrillation. DATA COLLECTION/ANALYSIS: Abstracts of trials were reviewed independently by 2 members of the study team. We reviewed English-language abstracts of non-English-language publications to assess qualitative consistency with our results. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-five articles evaluating 17 drugs met our criteria for review. In the 5 trials of verapamil and 5 of diltiazem, heart rate was reduced significantly (P <.05), both at rest and with exercise, compared with placebo, with equivalent or improved exercise tolerance in 6 of 7 comparisons. In 7 of 12 comparisons of a beta-blocker with placebo, the beta-blocker was efficacious for control of resting heart rate, with evidence that the effect is drug specific, as nadolol and atenolol proved to be most efficacious. All 9 comparisons demonstrated good heart rate control with beta-blockers during exercise, although exercise tolerance was compromised in 3 of 9 comparisons. In 7 of 8 trials, digoxin administered alone slowed the resting heart rate more than placebo, but it did not significantly slow the rate during exercise in 4 studies. The trials evaluating other drugs yielded insufficient evidence to support their use, but those drugs may yet be promising. CONCLUSIONS: The calcium-channel blockers verapamil or diltiazem, or select beta-blockers are efficacious for heart rate control at rest and during exercise for patients with atrial fibrillation without a clinically important decrease in exercise tolerance. Digoxin is useful when rate control during exercise is less a concern.

Venous thromboembolism incidence in the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been recently recognized as a complication of sickle cell disease (SCD); however, the incidence of VTE in SCD is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of first VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), among SCD patients age ≥ 15 years. We also evaluated genotypic differences in VTE risk and determined the relationship between VTE and mortality. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease (CSSCD) to calculate incidence rates for first VTE. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to VTE by genotype and time to death by VTE status. RESULTS: We included 1523 SCD patients aged ≥ 15 years with 8862 years of follow-up in this analysis. The incidence rate for first VTE was 5.2 events/1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-6.9) with a cumulative incidence of 11.3% (95% CI 8.3-15.3) by age 40 years. Individuals with the SS/Sß(0) -thalassemia genotype had the highest rate of VTE (7.6 events/1000 person-years [95% CI 5.3-10.6]). The incidence of PE exceeded that of isolated DVT (3.6 [95% CI 2.5-5.1] events/1000 person-years vs. 1.6 [95% CI 0.9-2.7] events/1000 person-years), although this difference was not statistically significant. SCD patients with VTE had a higher mortality rate (adjusted HR 2.32 [95% CI 1.20-4.46]) than those without VTE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCD are at substantial risk for VTE, and individuals with VTE are at higher risk of death than those without VTE.

Effect of anti-platelet factor-4/heparin antibody induction on early saphenous vein graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies to complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) are capable of causing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Recent evidence suggests that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies may be prothrombogenic even in the absence of thrombocytopenia and clinically-recognized HIT. OBJECTIVES: To determine if induction of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies is an independent risk factor for early saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion or adverse clinical outcome after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. PATIENTS/METHODS: Anti-PF4/heparin antibody titers were measured in 368 patients prior to and then 4 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after CABG surgery. Serotonin release assay (SRA) and antibody isotype analysis were also performed on 6-week samples. SVG patency was determined in 297 patients 6 months after surgery by multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. RESULTS: Six weeks after surgery, 52% of patients were anti-PF4/heparin seropositive and 9% were SRA positive. Six months after surgery, neither the percentage of occluded SVG (19% vs. 20%, P = NS), the percentage of patients with an occluded SVG (33% vs. 33%, P = NS) nor the incidence of adverse clinical events (21% vs. 24%, P = NS) differed between seropositive and seronegative groups. Neither IgG isotype nor SRA positivity was additionally predictive of SVG occlusion or adverse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Induction of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies, even those capable of heparin-dependent platelet activation, is not independently associated with early SVG occlusion or adverse clinical outcomes after CABG surgery.

Autologous blood transfusion in the United States: clinical and nonclinical determinants of use.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative donation of blood lowers the risk of allogeneic RBC transfusion. The use of autologous blood is not well quantified. This study aimed at identifying the frequency and determinants of use of autologous transfusion in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This national cross-sectional study, using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, included all patients admitted to 900 hospitals in 19 states in 1996. Logistic regression with weighting yielded nationally representative results for the independent effects of clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics on autologous blood use. RESULTS: Autologous transfusion was used in 19 of 1000 hospitalizations. The procedures using autologous blood most frequently were knee arthroplasty, hip replacement, prostatectomy, spinal fusion, and hysterectomy. Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to receive autologous transfusion than were whites (OR, 0. 64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.83); patients with Medicaid were less likely than the privately insured to receive autologous transfusions (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.20-0.43), with racial differences greatest among the privately insured. Women received autologous blood for cardiovascular surgeries much less often than men (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49). CONCLUSION: Ethnic minorities, women, and patients with Medicaid appear to receive fewer autologous blood transfusions than the rest of the population. Although this could reflect either better or worse quality of care, nonclinical determinants of transfusion practice warrant attention and further investigation.

Validating billing data for RBC transfusions: a brief report.

BACKGROUND: Administrative data are used often for research, but without validation of their accuracy. The validity of the billing for blood transfusion was assessed in one tertiary-care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient discharge data were retrieved from a database containing demographics, diagnoses, and charges. There was random selection of 358 patients who were billed for RBC transfusion and 358 who were not, within a 2-month period. The blood bank's transfusion records were reviewed. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of transfused patients who were billed, and specificity as the proportion of nontransfused patients who were not billed. Patient characteristics were compared by using Wilcoxon's rank sum test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Sixty-one transfused patients were not billed for the transfusion. No patient was billed without transfusion. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity were 83 percent (95% CI, 79-87%) and 100 percent, respectively. Nine patients who were not issued RBCs were appropriately not billed for RBCs, although the billing record suggests they had a procedure involving transfusion. These patients were called true-negative. The patients not billed were older (58 years vs. 55 years; p = 0.046) and less likely to have commercial insurance (5% vs. 15%; p = 0.035) than billed patients. CONCLUSIONS: The billing for RBC transfusion in one large institution is reassuringly valid. The specificity is excellent, and the sensitivity is higher than that seen in other studies of coding validity.

Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context.

Recent neuropsychological and imaging data have implicated different brain networks in the processing of different word classes, nouns being linked primarily to posterior, visual object-processing regions and verbs to frontal, motor-processing areas. However, as most of these studies have examined words in isolation, the consequences of such anatomically based representational differences, if any, for the processing of these items in sentences remains unclear. Additionally, in some languages many words (e.g. 'drink') are class-ambiguous, i.e. they can play either role depending on context, and it is not yet known how the brain stores and uses information associated with such lexical items in context. We examined these issues by recording event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to unambiguous nouns (e.g. 'beer'), unambiguous verbs (e. g. 'eat'), class-ambiguous words and pseudowords used as nouns or verbs within two types of minimally contrastive sentence contexts: noun-predicting (e.g. 'John wanted THE [target] but.') and verb-predicting ('John wanted TO [target] but.'). Our results indicate that the nature of neural processing for nouns and verbs is a function of both the type of stimulus and the role it is playing. Even when the context completely specifies their role, word class-ambiguous items differ from unambiguous ones over frontal regions by approximately 150 ms. Moreover, whereas pseudowords elicit larger N400s when used as verbs than when used as nouns, unambiguous nouns and ambiguous words used as nouns elicit more frontocentral negativity than unambiguous verbs and ambiguous words used as verbs, respectively. Additionally, unambiguous verbs elicit a left-lateralized, anterior positivity (approximately 200 ms) not observed for any other stimulus type, though only when these items are used appropriately as verbs (i.e. in verb-predicting contexts). In summary, the pattern of neural activity observed in response to lexical items depends on their general probability of being a verb or a noun and on the particular role they are playing in any given sentence. This implicates more than a simple two-way distinction of the brain networks involved in their storage and processing. Experience, as well as context during on-line language processing, clearly shapes the neural representations of nouns and verbs, such that there is no single neural marker of word class. Our results further suggest that the presence and nature of the word class-based dissociations observed after brain damage are similarly likely to be a function of both the type of stimulus and the context in which it occurs, and thus must be assessed accordingly.

Prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation. A meta-analysis of trials of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Appropriate use of drugs to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) involves comparing the patient's risk of stroke and risk of hemorrhage. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the efficacy of these medications. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of drugs used to prevent thromboembolism in adults with nonpostoperative AF. Articles were identified through the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL database and MEDLINE until May 1998. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven articles met criteria for inclusion in this review. Warfarin was more efficacious than placebo for primary stroke prevention (aggregate odds ratio [OR] of stroke = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19, 0.48), with moderate evidence of more major bleeding (OR 1.90; 95% CI 0.89, 4.04). Aspirin was inconclusively more efficacious than placebo for stroke prevention (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.19, 1.65), with inconclusive evidence regarding more major bleeds (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.37, 1.77). For primary prevention, assuming a baseline risk of 45 strokes per 1,000 patient-years, warfarin could prevent 30 strokes at the expense of only 6 additional major bleeds. Aspirin could prevent 17 strokes, without increasing major hemorrhage. In direct comparison, there was evidence suggesting fewer strokes among patients on warfarin than among patients on aspirin (aggregate OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43, 0.96), with only suggestive evidence for more major hemorrhage (OR 1.60, 95% CI 0.77,3.35). However, in younger patients, with a mean age of 65 years, the absolute reduction in stroke rate with warfarin compared with aspirin was low (5.5 per 1,000 person-years) compared with an older group (15 per 1,000 person-years). CONCLUSION: In general, the evidence strongly supports warfarin for patients with AF at average or greater risk of stroke. Aspirin may prove to be useful in subgroups with a low risk of stroke, although this is not definitively supported by the evidence.