Predictive factors associated with pemetrexed acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed has shown efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with platinum salts in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma. However, severe hematological toxicities induced by pemetrexed-based chemotherapy have been observed. Some studies have suggested that drug interactions may be associated with pemetrexed toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine predictive factors, including drug interactions, associated with pemetrexed toxicity. METHODS: This retrospective open monocentric study included patients consecutively treated with pemetrexed after a multidisciplinary risk assessment. Patients who experienced toxicity of grade 3 or 4 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, or a grade 2 leading to a change in management, during the first four courses of pemetrexed, were assigned to the early limiting toxicities (ELT) group. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the association variables with the occurrence of ELT. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included in this study (median age: 67 years, with non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma (88%), mesothelioma (7%), or others (5%). Thirty-six patients (49%) were assigned to the ELT group (27 grades 3 and 4; 9 grade 2 with management modification). Three baseline factors were associated with pemetrexed ELT in univariate and multivariate analysis: cystatin clearance (p = 0.0135), albumin level (p = 0.0333), and proton pump inhibitors use (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: To conclude, ELT induced by pemetrexed-based treatments occur frequently in cancer patients in a real-world setting. A pretherapeutic assessment before pemetrexed initiation should include three major checkpoints: use of proton pump inhibitors, sarcopenia, and denutrition evaluation.

Elimination of three doses of gentamicin over three consecutive days using a polyacrylonitrile-derived filter: An in vitro assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Adsorption of gentamicin in a polyacrylonitrile filter was previously evidenced in a session lasting 6 h using the NeckEpur model. We extended the study over three consecutive days to mimic the 72-h life span of a filter. METHODS: Prismaflex® monitor and ST150® filter were used in the continuous diafiltration (CDF) mode at a 2.5 L/h flowrate. The daily session started with a 6-h session of CDF. Thereafter, the 5-L central compartment was changed using a bag free of gentamicin to assess gentamicin release over the following 18 h. Experiments were repeated on Day 2 and stopped at the end of the 6-h session of CDF on Day 3. The experiment was performed in duplicate. RESULTS: At a 2.5 L/h diafiltration flowrate, the mean daily clearances of gentamicin were 5.5, 4.0, and 3.3 L/h, respectively. The mean diafiltration and adsorption ratios in the daily elimination of gentamicin were 32/68%, 58/42%, and 88/12%, respectively. During days 1 and 2, the mean amount of gentamicin released from the ST150® filter were 14 and 34 mg, respectively. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin over 3 days is strongly altered by adsorption in the same filter with a progressive decrease of elimination by adsorption, suggesting saturation of the filter. One limitation of our study results from the mode of administration using a bolus dose instead of an infusion over 30 min. Adsorption adds a clearance to those of diafiltration. The time-dependency of gentamicin clearance precludes using a constant dosage regimen over the filter's life span.