Epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France in 2017-2018: the 11th GERAP survey.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaphylaxis is rare but is associated with significant morbidity. This complication has been well described in France by the GERAP (Groupe d'Etude des Réactions Anaphylactiques Périopératoires), a network focused on its study. The epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis is evolving, influenced by environmental factors and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to update the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective study was performed in 26 allergy clinics of the GERAP network in 2017-8. RESULTS: There were 765 patients with perioperative anaphylaxis included. Most cases were severe, with 428 (56%) reactions graded as 3 or 4 according to the Ring and Messmer classification. Skin test results were available for 676 patients, with a culprit agent identified in 471 cases (70%). Neuromuscular blocking agents were the main cause of perioperative anaphylaxis (n=281; 60%), followed by antibiotics (n=118; 25%) and patent blue dye (n=11; 2%). Cefazolin was the main antibiotic responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis (52% of antibiotic-related reactions). Suxamethonium and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blocking agents responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis with 7.1 (6.1-8.4) and 5.6 (4.2-7.4) reactions per 100,000 vials sold, respectively, whereas cefazolin-related cases were estimated at 0.7 (0.5-0.9) reactions per 100,000 vials sold. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that most commonly identified triggering agents remain neuromuscular blocking agents. Reactions to antibiotics, particularly cefazolin, are becoming increasingly frequent. The origin of sensitisation to cefazolin is unknown, as no cross-sensitisation has been described, and it should be the subject of further study. Perioperative anaphylaxis should be followed over the years and understood given the changing triggers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04654923).

Validation of an anti-α-Gal IgE fluoroenzyme-immunoassay for the screening of patients at risk of severe anaphylaxis to cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: The link between immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) following the first cetuximab infusion and the IgE sensitization against anti-galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) is now well-established. An automated Fluoroenzyme-Immunoassay (FEIA) is available and may facilitate the screening of patients with anti-α-Gal IgE before treatment. METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate its performances as compared to a previously validated anti-cetuximab IgE ELISA, using 185 samples from two previously studied cohorts. RESULTS: Despite 21.1% of discrepancies between the two techniques, FEIA discriminated better positive patients and similarly negative ones with a ≥ 0.525 kUA/L threshold. Sensitivity was 87.5% for both tests, specificity was better for FEIA (96.3% vs ELISA: 82.1%). FEIA had a higher positive likelihood ratio (23.9 vs ELISA: 4.89) and a similar negative likelihood ratio (0.13 vs ELISA: 0.15). In our population, the risk of severe HSR following a positive test was higher with FEIA (56.7% vs ELISA: 19.6%) and similar following a negative test (0.7% vs ELISA: 0.8%). CONCLUSION: Although the predictive value of the IgE screening before cetuximab infusion remains discussed, this automated commercial test can identify high-risk patients and is suitable for routine use in laboratories. It could help avoiding cetuximab-induced HSR by a systematic anti-α-Gal IgE screening before treatment.

[The detection of antithyroid antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid using fluorescent enzyme immuno assay (FEIA) is suitable for biological diagnosis of Hashimoto's encephalopathy]. / Détection des auto-anticorps antithyroïdiens dans le LCR par technique d'immunofluorométrie (FEIA) : application au diagnostic biologique de l'encéphalopathie d'Hashimoto.

Hashimoto encephalopathy (HE) is a rare condition often underdiagnosed. The clinical picture is heterogeneous with numerous neurological signs and is associated with the presence of high levels of anti-thyroperoxidase (TPO) and / or anti-thyroglobulin (TG) antibodies in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The determination of anti-TPO and anti-TG antibodies in CSF is performed in only few laboratories. The aim of our study was to adapt the EliATM fluoroenzymatic immuno assay (FEIA) to the detection of these autoantibodies in the CSF, and to compare the results with our previously published ELISA test (Blanchin S. 2007). For the FEIA technique, the detection threshold, and the quantification threshold have been determined for anti-TPO and anti-TG antibodies. FEIA results were concordant with ELISA at 75% and 100% for anti-TPO and anti-TG antibodies, respectively. Coefficients of variation (CV) of the intra-assay and inter-assay results were calculated as well as the uncertainties of measurement. The anti-TPO and anti-TG antibodies detection in CSF using FEIA technique correlate with the previously published ELISA and show good analytical performances. The availability of PhadiaTM 250 analyzer in a large number of laboratories will allow an easier biological detection. We hope that this test will respond to physician needs and help for HE diagnosis.