Squamous cell carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct cyst: A case report with review of the literature.

Carcinoma arising within a thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) is exceedingly uncommon, occurring in about 1% of TGDC (Chrisoulidou et al., 2013 [1]). Since the first description of TGDC carcinoma in 1911 by Brentano, approximately 200 cases have been reported in the world literature, mostly as single case reports making its true incidence difficult to determine (Hanna, 1996 [2]). There are numerous reports in the literature of papillary and follicular TGDC carcinoma, but only limited reports of squamous cell carcinoma. In order for a lesion to qualify as squamous cell carcinoma of a TGDC, the lesion must arise from the epithelial lining. Recognition and understanding of this entity are important in staging and planning of treatment. Exclusion of primary squamous cell carcinoma arising from an adjacent structure or metastatic central compartment nodal disease is important in the evaluation for diagnosis to be confirmed. A thorough work up should be undertaken to exclude other primary malignancies that may have metastasized. We present a unique case of squamous cell carcinoma, along with supporting pathology and radiology imaging. We then review this rare entity and provide some insight into the diagnosis and management.

Use of Perioperative Virtual Reality Experiences on Anxiety and Pain: A Randomized Comparative Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different virtual reality (VR) experiences on perioperative anxiety and pain among patients undergoing head and neck surgery. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative trial among patients undergoing outpatient head and neck surgery from December 2021 to April 2022 at a single academic institution. Group 1 utilized a preoperative VR gaming experience and a postoperative VR mindfulness experience, while Group 2 utilized the same interventions in the reverse order. Anxiety and pain were measured using visual analog scales (VAS). Primary outcomes were changes in post-intervention anxiety and pain. Secondary outcomes included vital sign changes and subjective patient experiences using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: There were 32 patients randomized for inclusion, with 16 patients per group. The majority of patients were female (65.6%) and mean (standard deviation) age was 47.3 (16.7) years. After outlier exclusion, there were no differences in post-intervention preoperative anxiety reduction (Group 1 vs. Group 2, median [IQR]: -12.0 [15] vs. -10.5 [13], p = 0.62). There were minor differences in vital sign changes (p < 0.05). Among the 10 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2 who completed postoperative VR use, there were no differences in post-intervention pain reduction (-8.5 [22.3] vs. -7.5 [19.3], p = 0.95) or vital sign changes (p > 0.05). There were no differences in questionnaire responses, with high satisfaction in both groups (p > 0.05). No adverse events encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Use of different VR experiences among patients undergoing outpatient head and neck surgery appears associated with similar reductions in perioperative anxiety and pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1197-1202, 2024.

Financial Considerations II: Loans, Debt Management, Saving, and Investing.

The financial considerations of becoming a physician are often not fully understood or appreciated until after residency and fellowship training. Once training is complete, physicians face a combination of increased financial rewards mixed with significant, and seemingly overwhelming, financial responsibilities, often with limited financial knowledge or understanding. Appropriately managing debt obligations, living expenses, saving for retirement, children's education, and establishing financial safety nets through savings, investments, and insurance are critical. This article is a starting point to provide the new physician with an introduction into some of those financial considerations, to both encourage further learning and promote successful financial decisions.

Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain Management and Opioid Use Among Hospitalized Patients After Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Optimal postoperative pain management is challenging. Virtual reality (VR) provides immersive, 3-dimensional experiences that may improve pain control and reduce reliance on pharmacologic pain management. Objective: To evaluate use of VR on postoperative pain management after head and neck surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted at Oregon Health & Science University from July 2020 to October 2021 and included patients hospitalized after major head and neck surgery. Interventions: Similar 15-minute interactive gaming experiences (Angry Birds) using an Oculus Quest VR headset (VR intervention) or a handheld smartphone device (control). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was postintervention pain reduction. Pain scores were obtained preintervention, immediately after intervention, and then hourly for 4 hours. Secondary outcomes included changes in opioid use, measured as milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs), and patient experiences with their intervention using 5-point Likert scales. Results: Of the 30 patients randomized for inclusion, the final population included 14 patients in the VR cohort and 15 patients in the control cohort; the majority of patients were male (26 of 29 [90%]), and the mean (SD) age was 58.3 (13.8) years. After outlier removal, there were clinically meaningful reductions in postintervention pain among patients in the VR group immediately after intervention (mean difference, -1.42; 95% CI, -2.15 to -0.70; d = 1.50), at 1 hour (mean difference, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.90 to 0.14; d = 0.67), 2 hours (mean difference, -1.07; 95% CI, -2.30 to 0.14; d = 0.69), and 3 hours (mean difference, -1.36; 95% CI, -2.80 to 0.13; d = 0.71) compared with patients in the control group. Patients in the VR group also demonstrated reductions in 4-hour postintervention opioid use compared with 4-hour preintervention opioid use (mean difference, -9.10 MME; 95% CI, -15.00 to -1.27 MME; d = 0.90) and 8-hour postintervention opioid use compared with 8-hour preintervention opioid use (mean difference, -14.00 MME; 95% CI, -25.60 to -2.40 MME; d = 0.94). There were no meaningful differences in subjective patient experiences with their respective interventions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, VR reduced pain scores and opioid use compared with a control intervention. Virtual reality may be a useful adjunct for postoperative pain management after head and neck surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04464304.

Monitoring postoperative ambulation and sleep after head and neck surgery: Feasibility and utility study using wearable devices.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate use of wearable activity devices to monitor trends in ambulation and sleep after head and neck surgery. METHODS: Patients utilized Fitbit devices after surgery. Daily activity and sleep scores, step counts, and total sleep time (TST) were obtained. RESULTS: There were 30 patients within the final cohort. Trends in step counts after specific procedures were identified, and higher subjective activity level correlated with step counts (r = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.07-0.41). Among patients with complete step data (n = 24), POD1 steps ≥200 were associated with reduced length of stay (4.5 ± 1.7 days vs. 7.2 ± 4.0 days, 95% CI = 0.33-5.0). Mean TST was 5.4 ± 2.5 h, TST correlated with subjective sleep scores (r = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.03-0.044), and clinical events associated with sleep-wake transitions on Fitbit devices were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable activity devices appear feasible for monitoring trends in postoperative ambulation and sleep. Use of these devices may facilitate postoperative recovery.

Surgical exposures of the radius and ulna.

The forearm contains many muscles, nerves, and vascular structures that change position on forearm rotation. Exposure of the radial shaft is best achieved with the Henry (volar) or Thompson (dorsal) approach. The volar flexor carpi radialis approaches are used increasingly for exposure of the distal radius. Although the dorsal approach is a safe utilitarian option with many applications, its use for managing fracture of the distal radius has waned. Potential complications associated with radial exposure include injury to the superficial branch of the radial nerve, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, and the cephalic vein. Dorsal and ulnar proximal radial exposures are associated with increased risk of injury to the posterior interosseous nerve. With surgical exposure of the ulna, care is required to avoid injuring the dorsal cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve.

Medical Liability in Sinus Surgery: A Westlaw Database Analysis From 2000 to 2017.

BACKGROUND: Medical malpractice occurs when a hospital or health-care provider through negligent act or omission results in an injury to a patient. More than 50% of otolaryngologists have faced at least 1 claim, with rhinology being the most litigated subspecialty. This study aims to analyze medical litigation trends in Rhinology from 2000 to 2017 in the United States. METHODS: The Westlaw database was reviewed from 2000 to 2017. Data were compiled on the demographics of the plaintiffs, procedures, nature of damages, legal allegations, and the use of expert witnesses, physician demographics/practice characteristics, verdicts, indemnities, and county/state of case. RESULTS: There were 75 cases that met inclusion criteria after review of 125 cases. Majority of cases went to trial over settlement (80%) and were found in the Northeast region of the United States (36%). Most common cited legal allegations were improper performance and failure to follow standard of care. The most common nature of injuries were eye injury (29%) and intracranial complications (27%). The highest payouts were for progression of disease followed by intracranial injury. Of the 75 total cases analyzed, 37 (49.3%) used expert witnesses. When an expert witness was used at trial, the verdict statistically favored the defendant (62.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis reveals the importance of meticulous surgical techniques and thorough preoperative evaluations.