Colonic Anastomotic Leak Model in Swine.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are serious postoperative complications. Current experimental studies designed to investigate leaks are based on acute intraoperative dehiscence of the anastomosis. Clinically, however, AL usually happens later in the postoperative course. Presented here is a clinically relevant colonic AL model in swine. METHODS: Seventeen Yorkshire pigs were divided into 2 groups: the control group (n = 6) and the experimental group (n = 11). An enterotomy was performed on the descending colon and an end-to-end handsewn anastomosis was created in the groups. The proximal and distal ends of the suture were exteriorized and tied to a plastic tube. Subsequently, the suture was cut and pulled to induce breakdown of the anastomosis in the experimental group 3-4 h postoperatively. Study endpoints included behavioral changes, clinical assessment, laboratory indicators, and macroscopic indicators of leakage. RESULTS: Leaks were successfully created in 8/11 of the experimental group animals and confirmed through exploratory relaparotomy. Seven of the experimental pigs showed complete anastomotic breakdown and one showed partial rupture. Fecal peritonitis and enteric spillage were observed macroscopically within the abdomen of the experimental pigs, confirming the presence of a leak. The remaining (3/11) experimental pigs did not experience those findings due to either a tamponade/containment by the abdominal wall or surrounding organs. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was achieved between the experimental and control cohorts for laboratory and clinical indicators including fever, leukocytosis, and decreased blood potassium. CONCLUSION: This animal model generated postoperative induced leak in approximately three-quarters (8/11) of experimental pigs, allowing control over the time of leak onset to simulate clinical settings.

Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks.

Background: Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication. Methods: A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included. Results: A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others. Conclusions: Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.

Hepatobiliary anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks.

Background and Objective: Hepatobiliary diseases are a longstanding and significant medical challenge which, despite advances in surgical techniques, still carry risks for postoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks (ALs), which can include both postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and bile leaks (BL). These complications incur significant human and economic costs on all those involved, including the patient, healthcare providers, and hospital systems. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs in the context of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) procedures, and consequences of POPF and BL. Methods: A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following search criteria: (((((((anastomosis) OR (anastomotic leak*)) OR (postoperative pancreatic fistula)) OR (bile leak*)) OR (pancreaticoduodenectomy)) OR (whipple)) AND ((hepatobiliary) OR (hepato-pancreato-biliary)) AND ((definition) OR (grading system*) OR (consequences) OR (outcomes) OR (risk factor*) OR (morbidity) OR (mortality))). Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included. Key Content and Findings: A universally accepted definition and grading system for POPF and BL continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading POPF and BL, with the International Study Group in Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) and International Study Group for Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definitions the current most recommended definitions for POPF and BL, respectively. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others. Conclusions: AL remains a significant challenge in HPB surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.