Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 24(8): 1066-1075, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30610008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Using data from four tertiary referral centers in the U.S., we assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung NETs treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was histologically confirmed typical/atypical carcinoid tumor diagnosis date. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and lung NET-related health care resource use from index date through last contact/death. Time to treatment discontinuation and first progression, time from first to second progression, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: We identified 83 patients; 19 (23%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone (56%) or in combination with other therapies (6%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (9%), liver-directed therapy (LDT) (4%), and everolimus/other (5%). Sixty patients had second-line therapy including SSA alone (18%) or in combination (40%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (17%), everolimus (12%), LDT (7%), EBRT (3%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation were as follows: SSAs, 43.3; cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3.6. Overall median time (months) to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 12.4. Median OS (months) following treatment initiation was 66.4 for all patients and 81.5 for patients receiving SSAs. CONCLUSION: SSAs, alone and in combination, are common treatments for advanced lung NETs. Patients have additional treatment options and relatively long survival compared with patients with other advanced cancers. Treatment pattern assessment following approval of newer treatments is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, EBRT, liver-directed therapy, and targeted therapies are common treatments for locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SSAs alone or in combination with other treatment modalities were the most common first- and second-line therapy, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients continued treatment with SSAs long-term with median treatment duration of 43 months. Median overall survival was 66 months following initiation of first-line therapy for all patients. Treatment pattern assessment beyond the time period of this study is needed given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for lung NETs that will likely be incorporated in the treatment landscape.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Tumor Carcinoide/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Tumor Carcinoide/mortalidade , Tumor Carcinoide/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Progressão da Doença , Embolização Terapêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Everolimo/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados , Somatostatina/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Brain Inj ; 33(9): 1151-1157, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31241427

RESUMO

Objective: To characterize mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) patients in the USA, describing location of diagnosis, timing, and modality of imaging procedures, health-care resource utilization (HRU) and costs in the 12-month period post-diagnosis. Research Design: Retrospective claims analysis Methods: Anonymized data from the OptumHealth Care Solutions claims database (2006-2016). The index date was the first date with an mTBI diagnosis. HRU and costs (2016 USD) were assessed in the 12-month post-index period. Results: A total of 80,004 patients with mTBI were included: 60% were under 26 years and 54% were male. Mild TBI was most frequently diagnosed in an emergency department (ED) for all age groups, except patients aged 11-17 years, for whom the outpatient setting was the most frequent place of diagnosis. Almost half (47%) received brain imaging on the index date, with 98% of which receiving computed tomography. Mean follow-up health-care costs were $13,564 (SD = $41,071), primarily from inpatient ($4,675, SD = $29,982) and non-ED outpatient/physician office visits ($4,207, SD = $12,697). Older patients had greater HRU and higher health-care costs. Conclusions: The findings of this claims-based study show substantial HRU and costs associated with mTBI diagnosis during a 12-month follow-up period.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Concussão Encefálica/economia , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroimagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA