Cross-sectional imaging: current status and future potential in adult celiac disease.

Celiac disease (CD), triggered by exposure to gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, is an immune-mediated small bowel disease affecting about 1% of the population worldwide. But the prevalence of CD varies with age, sex, and location. A strict gluten-free diet remains the primary treatment for CD, currently. Most of patients with CD respond well to gluten-free diet with good prognosis, while some patients fail to get symptomatic relief or histological remission (e.g., nonresponsive or refractory CD). Because of heterogeneous clinical appearance, the diagnosis of CD is difficult. Moreover, malignant complications and poor outcomes accompanied with refractory CD present great challenges in disease management. Over the past three decades, cross-sectional imaging techniques (computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) play an important role in small bowel inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Compared with endoscopic techniques, cross-sectional imaging permits clearly presentation of both intraluminal and extraluminal abnormalities. It provides vascular and functional information, thus improving the possibility as diagnostic and follow-up tool. The value of cross-sectional imaging for patients with suspected or confirmed CD has been gradually demonstrated. Studies revealed that certain features suggested by cross-sectional imaging could help to establish the early diagnosis of CD. Besides, the potential contributions of cross-sectional imaging may lie in the evaluation of disease activity and severity, which helps guiding management strategies. The purpose of this review is to provide current overviews and future directions of cross-sectional imaging in adult CD, thus facilitating the understanding and application in clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: In this review, we systematically summarized the existing knowledge of cross-sectional imaging in adult CD and analyzed their possible roles in clinical practice, including disease diagnosis, complication identification, treatment evaluation, and prognostic prediction. KEY POINTS: • Regarding a condition described as "celiac iceberg", celiac disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. • Cross-sectional imaging is helpful in clinical management of celiac disease, including disease diagnosis, complication identification, treatment evaluation, and prognostic prediction. • Cross-sectional imaging should be considered as the valuable examination in patients suspected from celiac disease.

Clinical outcome is distinct between radiological stricture and endoscopic stricture in ileal Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Differences in clinical adverse outcomes (CAO) based on different intestinal stricturing definitions in Crohn's disease (CD) are poorly documented. This study aims to compare CAO between radiological strictures (RS) and endoscopic strictures (ES) in ileal CD and explore the significance of upstream dilatation in RS. METHODS: This retrospective double-center study included 199 patients (derivation cohort, n = 157; validation cohort, n = 42) with bowel strictures who simultaneously underwent endoscopic and radiologic examinations. RS was defined as a luminal narrowing with wall thickening relative to the normal gut on cross-sectional imaging (group 1 (G1)), which further divided into G1a (without upstream dilatation) and G1b (with upstream dilatation). ES was defined as an endoscopic non-passable stricture (group 2 (G2)). Strictures met the definitions of RS (with or without upstream dilatation) and ES were categorized as group 3 (G3). CAO referred to stricture-related surgery or penetrating disease. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, G1b (93.3%) had the highest CAO occurrence rate, followed by G3 (32.6%), G1a (3.2%), and G2 (0%) (p < 0.0001); the same order was found in the validation cohort. The CAO-free survival time was significantly different among the four groups (p < 0.0001). Upstream dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.126) was a risk factor for predicting CAO in RS. Furthermore, when upstream dilatation was added to diagnose RS, 17.6% of high-risk strictures were neglected. CONCLUSIONS: CAO differs significantly between RS and ES, and clinicians should pay more attention to strictures in G1b and G3. Upstream dilatation has an important impact on the clinical outcome of RS but may not be an essential factor for RS diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study explored the definition of intestinal stricture with the greatest significance for the clinical diagnosis and prognosis of patients with CD, and consequently provided effective auxiliary information for clinicians to formulate strategies for the treatment of CD intestinal strictures. KEY POINTS: • The retrospective double-center study showed that clinical adverse outcome is different between radiological strictures and endoscopic strictures in CD. • Upstream dilatation has an important impact on the clinical outcome of radiological strictures but may not be an essential factor for diagnosis of radiological strictures. • Radiological stricture with upstream dilatation and simultaneous radiological and endoscopic stricture were at increased risk for clinical adverse outcomes; thus, closer monitoring should be considered.

Preoperative computed tomography enterography-based radiomics signature: A potential predictor of postoperative anastomotic recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: More than half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require at least one surgery for symptom management; however, approximately half of the patients may experience postoperative anastomotic recurrence (PAR). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to develop and validate a preoperative computed tomography enterography (CTE)-based radiomics signature to predict early PAR in CD. DESIGN: A total of 186 patients with CD (training cohort, n = 134; test cohort, n = 52) who underwent preoperative CTE and surgery between January 2014 and June 2020 were included in this retrospective multi-centre study. METHODS: 106 radiomic features were initially extracted from intestinal lesions and peri-intestinal mesenteric fat, respectively; significant radiomic features were selected from them and then used to develop intestinal or mesenteric radiomics signatures, using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and a Cox regression model. A radiomics-based nomogram incorporating these signatures with clinical-radiological factors was created for comparison with a model based on clinical-radiological features alone. RESULTS: 68 of 134 patients in training cohort and 16 of 52 patients in test cohort suffered from PAR. The intestinal radiomic signature (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-3.58; P = 0.002) and mesenteric radiomic signature (HR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.14-4.19; P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for PAR in the training cohort as per a multivariate analysis. The radiomics-based nomogram (C-index: 0.710; 95% CI: 0.672-0.748) yielded superior predictive performance than the clinical-radiological model (C-index, 0.607; 95% CI: 0.582-0.632) in the test cohort. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the radiomics-based nomogram outperformed the clinical-radiological model in terms of clinical usefulness. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative mesenteric and intestinal CTE radiomics signatures are potential non-invasive predictors of PAR in postoperative patients with CD.