An appraisal of oral retinoids in the treatment of pachyonychia congenita.

BACKGROUND: Pachyonychia congenita (PC), a rare autosomal-dominant keratin disorder caused by mutations in keratin genes KRT6A/B, KRT16, or KRT17, is characterized by painful plantar keratoderma and hypertrophic nail dystrophy. Available studies assessing oral retinoid treatment for PC are limited to a few case reports. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess overall effectiveness, adverse effects, and patient perspective in patients with PC receiving oral retinoids. METHODS: In a questionnaire-based retrospective cross-sectional survey of 30 patient with PC assessing oral retinoids (10-50 mg/d for 1-240 months), we determined the clinical score, satisfaction score, visual analog pain scale, and adverse effects. RESULTS: In 50% of patients there was thinning of hyperkeratoses (average improvement 1.6 on a scale from -3 to +3) (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.9, P < .001). In all, 14% observed amelioration of their pachyonychia; 79% did not experience any nail change. The self-reported overall satisfaction score with oral retinoid treatment was 2 or greater in 50% of the patients (mean 4.5 on a scale of 1-10). Although 33% reported decreased and 27% increased plantar pain with treatment, 40% did not notice any pain change. All patients experienced adverse effects, and 83% reported to have discontinued medication. Risk/benefit analysis favored lower retinoid doses (≤25 mg/d) over a longer time period (>5 months), compared with higher doses (>25 mg/d) for a shorter time (≤5 months). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective, cross-sectional study design is prone to a recall bias. CONCLUSION: Oral retinoids are effective in some patients with PC. However, many patients discontinued medication because adverse effects outweighed the benefits. Careful dose titration is warranted in patients informed about potential adverse effects.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by amifostine during head and neck radiotherapy.

Amifostine is an organic thiophosphate prodrug used for cytoprotection against toxic effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In a European prospective study of SJS/TEN, six patients were suspected to have SJS/TEN associated with amifostine. Our findings suggest that the risk of life-threatening cutaneous adverse reactions to amifostine could be significantly increased.

Allopurinol is the most common cause of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Europe and Israel.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare severe cutaneous adverse reactions. OBJECTIVES: We sought to update knowledge on the causes of SJS or TEN with a focus on the rate of allopurinol-associated cases and to identify risk factors for allopurinol-associated SJS or TEN. METHODS: We conducted a multinational case-control study. RESULTS: In all, 379 patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions validated as SJS or TEN and 1505 matched hospitalized control subjects were enrolled. Allopurinol was the drug most frequently associated with SJS or TEN, with 66 exposed patients (17.4%) and 28 exposed control subjects (1.9%) (adjusted odds ratio = 18, 95% confidence interval: 11-32). Allopurinol use was greater than in a previous case-control European study. Daily doses equal to or greater than 200 mg were associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio = 36, 95% confidence interval: 17-76) than lower doses (adjusted odds ratio = 3.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.4). The risk was restricted to short-term use (

Influence of Vitamins on Secondary Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Sera of Patients with Resectable NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Singlet oxygen (¹O2) oxidizes targets through the production of secondary reactive oxygen species (SOS). Cancers induce oxidative stress changing with progression, the resulting antioxidant status differing from one patient to the other. The aim of this study was to determine the oxidative status of patients with resectable Non-Small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and the potential influence of antioxidants, compared to sera from healthy donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples from 10 women and 28 men, 19 adenocarcinomas (ADK), 15 patients N1 or M1 were submitted to a photoreaction producing ¹O2. Then, samples were supplemented with vitamins (Vit C, Vit E), or glutathione (GSH). RESULTS: Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and metastatic SCCs induced a lower SOS rate. While Vit C increased SOS in controls as in patients with metastases, Vit E or the combination of Vit E and C strongly reduced SOS. GSH alone lightly decreased SOS in controls but had no effect in patients either alone or combined with Vit C. CONCLUSION: In "early" lung cancers, SOS are comparable or lower than for healthy persons. The role of Vitamins varies with gender, cancer type, and metastases. This suggests that an eventual supplementation should be performed on a per-patient basis to evidence any effect.

European Dermatology Forum Guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy.

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely approved therapy for actinic keratoses, squamous cell carcinoma in-situ, superficial and certain thin basal cell carcinomas. Recurrence rates are typically equivalent to existing therapies, although inferior to surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. PDT can be used both as a lesional or as a field therapy and has the potential to delay/reduce the development of new lesions. PDT has also been studied for its place in the treatment of, as well as its potential to prevent, superficial skin cancers in immune-suppressed patients, although sustained clearance rates are lower than for immunocompetent individuals. Many additional indications have been evaluated, including photo-rejuvenation and inflammatory and infective dermatoses. This S2 guideline considers all current and emerging indications for the use of topical photodynamic therapy in Dermatology, prepared by the PDT subgroup of the European Dermatology Forum guidelines committee. It presents consensual expert recommendations reflecting current published evidence. An unabridged version of this guideline is available online at: http://www.euroderm.org/edf/index.php/edf-guidelines.

Black tattoos entail substantial uptake of genotoxicpolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in human skin and regional lymph nodes.

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide have tattoos, which predominantly contain black inks consisting of soot products like Carbon Black or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). We recently found up to 200 µg/g of PAH in commercial black inks. After skin tattooing, a substantial part of the ink and PAH should be transported to other anatomical sites like the regional lymph nodes. To allow a first estimation of health risk, we aimed to extract and quantify the amount of PAH in black tattooed skin and the regional lymph nodes of pre-existing tattoos. Firstly, we established an extraction method by using HPLC-DAD technology that enables the quantification of PAH concentrations in human tissue. After that, 16 specimens of human tattooed skin and corresponding regional lymph nodes were included in the study. All skin specimen and lymph nodes appeared deep black. The specimens were digested and tested for 20 different PAH at the same time.PAH were found in twelve of the 16 tattooed skin specimens and in eleven regional lymph nodes. The PAH concentration ranged from 0.1-0.6 µg/cm2 in the tattooed skin and 0.1-11.8 µg/g in the lymph nodes. Two major conclusions can be drawn from the present results. Firstly, PAH in black inks stay partially in skin or can be found in the regional lymph nodes. Secondly, the major part of tattooed PAH had disappeared from skin or might be found in other organs than skin and lymph nodes. Thus, beside inhalation and ingestion, tattooing has proven to be an additional, direct and effective route of PAH uptake into the human body.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: are drug dictionaries correctly informing physicians regarding the risk?

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are severe drug reactions associated with high mortality and multiple incapacitating sequelae. In the past 20 years, two large multinational case control studies, published in 1995 and 2008, had identified different degrees of drug association with SJS/TEN: 'strongly associated', 'associated', 'suspected' and 'not suspected' medications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to check the adequacy of mention of risk of SJS/TEN in the drug dictionaries most widely used by physicians in five European countries. STUDY DESIGN: In each country one expert investigator looked at the most widely used drug dictionary (2009 edition) for mentions of risk of SJS/TEN. This was done for a predefined list of medications with a different degree of risk. The presence and clarity or absence of warning was compared with available evidence provided by published results from case-control studies. SETTING: The five countries participating in the RegiSCAR group: Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands and the UK. RESULTS: A total of 3,268 drug descriptions of medications for systemic use were analysed, including all brands of 14 'strongly associated' drugs, 5 'associated' drugs and 12 widely used drugs with no established association. Discrepancies were found by country, and between descriptions for different brands of the same generic. Among 522 descriptions of 14 'strongly associated' drugs, only 5 did not mention the risk. For the 1,013 descriptions of 'associated' drugs, 3 % did not mention the risk. One-third of 'not suspected' drugs contained a specific or less specific warning (e.g. bullous cutaneous eruption). Warnings for 'strongly associated' medications were often as imprecise as those for 'not suspected' drugs. CONCLUSION: Information on the risk of SJS/TEN in drug dictionaries needs improvement to enhance the quality of advice given by general physicians and to raise the understanding of risk by patients.

Comprehensive survival analysis of a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe cutaneous adverse reactions that are of major concern because of high mortality rates. On the basis of data collected in the RegiSCAR study, the aim was to assess risk factors (including modalities of patient management) for mortality, regardless of the cause, up to 1 year after the reaction. Within this cohort, the mortality rate was 23% (95% confidence interval (CI) 19-27%) at 6 weeks and 34% (95% CI 30-39%) at 1 year. Severity of reaction was a risk factor for mortality only in the first 90 days after onset, whereas serious comorbidities and age influenced mortality beyond 90 days and up to 1 year after onset of reaction. The risk of death for patients with identified drug cause was borderline lower than for patients with a reaction of unknown cause (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.96). The study could not provide conclusive evidence regarding patient management. This large-scale population-based follow-up study of such patients confirmed high in-hospital mortality and revealed a remarkable number of deaths after discharge, which could mainly be attributed to severe comorbidities and older age, whereas the impact of severity of reaction on the risk of death was limited to the first few weeks.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.

The key clinical features of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) are the acute occurrence of numerous pinhead-sized nonfollicular sterile pustules on an edematous erythema accompanied by fever and leukocytosis. Histology shows mainly spongiform subcorneal and/or intraepidermal pustules, frequently a marked edema of the papillary dermis, neutrophils, and often eosinophils. AGEP is a reaction pattern mostly caused by drugs, the ones with the highest risk being antibacterial agents like ampicillin/amoxicillin, and quinolones, pristinamycin, anti-infective sulfonamides, the antimycotic drug terbinafine, (hydroxy)chloroquine, and diltiazem. In addition, a large number of other drugs as well as infections have been reported as triggers. AGEP is an acute and sometimes severe reaction. When the causative agent is withdrawn, it usually resolves quickly without specific treatment.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) related to a variety of medications. They have a significant public health impact because of high mortality and morbidity. A multinational case-control study conducted in Europe between 1997 and 2001 evaluated the risk of medications to induce SCAR. Cases were actively detected through a hospital network covering more than 100 million inhabitants. Three hospitalized patients per case matched on age, gender, and date of interview were enrolled as controls. After validation by an expert committee blinded to exposures, 379 SCAR cases and 1,505 controls were included. Among drugs recently introduced into the market, strong associations were documented for nevirapine (relative risk (RR)>22) and lamotrigine (RR>14), and weaker associations for sertraline (RR=11 [2.7-46]), pantoprazole (RR=18 [3.9-85]), and tramadol (RR=20 [4.4-93]). Strong associations were confirmed for anti-infective sulfonamides, allopurinol, carbamazapine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and oxicam-NSAIDs , with some changes in relative numbers of exposed cases. Thus, many cases were still related to a few "old" drugs with a known high risk. Risk was restricted to the first few weeks of drug intake. The use of such drugs as first-line therapies should be considered carefully, especially when safer alternative treatments exist. A number of widely used drugs did not show any risk for SJS and TEN.

A European study of HLA-B in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis related to five high-risk drugs.

BACKGROUND: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and its severe form, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), are rare but life-threatening cutaneous adverse reactions to drugs, especially to allopurinol, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoine, sulfamethoxazole, oxicam and nevirapine. Recently, a strong association between carbamazepine and allopurinol induced SJS or TEN has been described with respectively, HLA-B*1502 and HLA-B*5801 in a Han Chinese population from Taiwan and other Asian countries. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to further investigate the relationship between SJS/TEN and HLA-B in a large number of patients in a European population. METHODS: HLA-B genotyping was performed on 150 patients included in a European study (RegiSCAR) of SJS and TEN. We focused on patients related to 'high-risk' drugs including: 31 cases related to allopurinol, 28 to sulfamethoxazole, 19 to lamotrigine and 14 to oxicam. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of 31 allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN patients carried the HLA-B*5801 allele and the figure was 55% for 27 patients of European ancestry [odds ratio=80 (34-187)], (P<10(-6)) as previously observed in Han Chinese. For other drugs, two rare alleles showed a weaker association with SJS/TEN in a limited number of patients: B*38 for sulfamethoxazole or lamotrigine-related patients, and B*73 for oxicam. CONCLUSION: At variance with prior results in Asia, this study shows that even when HLA-B alleles behave as strong risk factors, as for allopurinol, they are neither sufficient nor necessary to explain the disease. Further investigations are necessary to delineate the exact role of the HLA region in SJS/TEN, and to look for other associations in other regions of the genome.

Photodynamic therapy for non-melanoma skin cancer.

Photodynamic therapy is a treatment modality that has been shown to be effective mainly for the dermato-oncologic conditions: actinic keratosis, Bowen's disease, in situ squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. Recent work has focused on the development and evaluation of topical photosensitizers like the haem precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid or its methyl ester, both inducing photosensitizing porphyrins. These drugs do not induce strong generalized cutaneous photosensitization, unlike the systemically applied porphyrins or their derivatives. For dermatological purposes incoherent lamps or light-emitting diode arrays can be used for light activation. Cure rates reported for very superficial lesions (tumour thickness <2-3 mm) are comparable to those achieved by other therapeutic modalities. Photodynamic therapy is a minimally invasive therapy associated with excellent cosmetic results. For actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma, methyl aminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy is already approved in Europe, Australia and New Zealand, and is now also approved for actinic keratosis in the US.

Photodynamic therapy in dermatology--an update.

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-established treatment modality which has mainly shown to be effective for dermatooncologic conditions like actinic keratoses (AK), Bowen's disease, in situ squamous cell carcinoma and superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, a therapeutical benefit of PDT is also evident for inflammatory dermatoses like localized scleroderma, acne vulgaris and granuloma annulare. Recent work has been focused on the development and evaluation of topical photosensitizers like the heme precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) or its methyl ester (methyl aminolevulinate) inducing photosensitizing porphyrins. These drugs do not induce strong generalized cutaneous photosensitization like the systemically applied porphyrins or their derivatives. For dermatological purposes, incoherent lamps or light-emitting diode arrays can be used for light activation. Depending on the applied light dose and the concentration of the photosensitizer either cytotoxic effects resulting in tumor destruction or immunomodulatory effects improving the inflammatory conditions occur. Treating superficial oncologic lesions (tumor thickness <2-3 mm) cure rates achieved by PDT are equal to the cure rates of the respective standard therapeutic procedure. The benefits of PDT are the low level of invasiveness and the excellent cosmetic results after treatment.