Patterns of post-operative irradiation in breast cancer patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) is associated with improvement in loco-regional control and survival rates in early breast cancer. However, the evidence of benefit in patients after treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is poor. We aimed to assess the impact of the type of surgery in the PORT plan and the role of the PORT fields in clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients who had undergone NAC followed by surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated between 2008 and 2014 at our institution who had received NAC and PORT. RESULTS: A total of 528 women were included of whom 396 were submitted to mastectomy or nipple-sparing/skin-sparing mastectomy. Most (92.8%) of the patients had locally advanced disease (clinical stage IIB to IIIC). All patients underwent irradiation for breast or chest wall. Most patients received PORT to the supraclavicular and axillary (levels II and III) nodes (87.1% and 86.4% for breast-conserving surgery and 95.1% and 93.8% for mastectomy and nipple-sparing/skin-sparing mastectomy, respectively). Irradiation of level I axillary and internal mammary nodes was uncommon. The disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 3 years were 72% and 85%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes according to the use of nodal irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: After NAC, most patients received irradiation of the breast/chest wall and axillary and supraclavicular nodes. In this setting, PORT to breast/chest wall with or without regional nodal irradiation was safe and effective, with acceptable disease-free and overall survival rates reported in this high-risk population.

Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases Near the End of Life: Characterizing Patients and Tumor Features.

PURPOSE: Patients with brain metastases are often referred for brain radiotherapy (BrRT) when exclusive palliative management would be more appropriate. To assess the indication of BrRT during end-of-life (EOL) care and evaluate the characteristics of the patients who underwent the treatment. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised patients from four independent oncology centers who had undergone BrRT for metastases. The variables included were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor site, metastatic status, neurologic symptomatic status, the number and size of metastases, posterior fossa or meningeal involvement, type of BrRT, having undergone brain metastasectomy, and the availability of systemic therapies after BrRT. Patients were allocated into three subgroups with ≤30, 31-60, and 61-90 days of survival, and a control group of patients who survived >90 days. RESULTS: A total of 546 patients were included in the study. A KPS of <70 (P = .021), the number of brain metastases (P = .001), the lack of brain metastasectomy (P = .006), and the lack of systemic therapies after BrRT (P = .047) were significantly associated with the EOL subgroups. Multivariate analysis showed that a KPS of <70 (P < .001), the lack of brain metastasectomy (P = .015), and the lack of systemic therapies after BrRT (P = .027) were significantly associated with worse survival. In all, 241 (44.1%) patients died within 90 days-120 (22.0%) within 30 days, 75 (13.7%) within 31-60 days, and 46 (8.4%) within 61-90 days of BrRT. Patients with colorectal cancer were significantly more likely to die within 90 days of BrRT than >90 days. CONCLUSION: Considering patients' performance status and whether they are candidates for brain metastasectomy or systemic therapies after BrRT is critical to improving BrRT benefits in scenarios of EOL.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Tumors Harboring Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Challenges in Attaining Efficacy.

Cancer cells harbor genomic instability due to accumulated DNA damage, one of the cancer hallmarks. At least five major DNA Damage Repair (DDR) pathways are recognized to repair DNA damages during different stages of the cell cycle, comprehending base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination (HR), and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The unprecedented benefits achieved with immunological checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) have prompted efforts to extend this efficacy to tumors with HR deficiency (HRD), which are greatly sensitive to chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors, and also considered highly immunogenic. However, an in-depth understanding of HRD's molecular underpinnings has pointed to essential singularities that might impact ICIs sensitivity. Here we address the main molecular aspects of HRD that underlie a differential profile of efficacy and resistance to the treatment with ICIs compared to other DDR deficiencies.

Tumor glycolytic profiling through 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in advanced NSCLC.

Background: A significant proportion of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Since metabolic reprogramming with increased glycolysis is a hallmark of cancer and is involved in immune evasion, we used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to evaluate the baseline glycolytic parameters of patients with advanced NSCLC submitted to ICIs, and assessed their predictive value. Methods: 18F-FDG PET/CT results in the 3 months before ICIs treatment were included. Maximum standardized uptake values, whole metabolic tumor volume (wMTV), and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (wTLG) were evaluated. Cutoff values for high or low glycolytic categories were determined using receiver-operating characteristic curves. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Patients with a complete response and a matching group with resistance to ICIs underwent immunohistochemistry analysis. An unsupervised k-means clustering model integrating programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, glycolytic parameters, and ICIs therapy was performed. Results: In all, 98 patients were included. Lower baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters were associated with responses to ICIs. Patients with low wMTV or wTLG had improved PFS and OS. High wTLG, strong tumor expression of glucose transporter-1, and lack of responses were significantly associated. Patients with low glycolytic parameters benefited from ICIs, regardless of chemotherapy. Conversely, those with high parameters benefited from the addition of chemotherapy. Patients with higher wTLG and lower PD-L1 were associated with progression and worse survival to ICIs monotherapy. Conclusions: Glycolytic metabolic profiles established through baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT are useful biomarkers for evaluating ICI therapy in advanced NSCLC.

Clinical impact of adjuvant radiation therapy delay after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: and Purpose: Post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) is usually indicated for patients with breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. However, the optimal timing to initiation of PORT is currently unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from patients with BC who received PORT after NAC and surgery at our institution from 2008 to 2014. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the time between surgery and PORT: <8 weeks, 8-16 weeks and >16 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 581 patients were included; 74% had clinical stage III. Forty-three patients started PORT within 8 weeks, 354 between 8 and 16 weeks and 184 beyond 16 weeks from surgery. With a median follow-up of 32 months, initiation of PORT up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) (<8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.81; p = 0.02; <8 weeks versus >16 weeks: HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04) and better overall survival (OS) (<8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.90; p = 0.036; <8 weeks versus >16 weeks: HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: PORT started up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better DFS and OS in locally-advanced BC patients submitted to NAC. Our findings suggest that early initiation of PORT is critically important for these patients. However, the low numbers of patients and events in this study prevent us from drawing firm conclusions.