Renal effects of levosimendan: a consensus report.

Renal dysfunction is common in clinical settings in which cardiac function is compromised such as heart failure, cardiac surgery or sepsis, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Levosimendan is a calcium sensitizer and potassium channel opener used in the treatment of acute heart failure. This review describes the effects of the inodilator levosimendan on renal function. A panel of 25 scientists and clinicians from 15 European countries (Austria, Finland, France, Hungary, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine) convened and reached a consensus on the current interpretation of the renal effects of levosimendan described both in non-clinical research and in clinical study reports. Most reports on the effect of levosimendan indicate an improvement of renal function in heart failure, sepsis and cardiac surgery settings. However, caution should be applied as study designs differed from randomized, controlled studies to uncontrolled ones. Importantly, in the largest HF study (REVIVE I and II) no significant changes in the renal function were detected. As it regards the mechanism of action, the opening of mitochondrial KATP channels by levosimendan is involved through a preconditioning effect. There is a strong rationale for randomized controlled trials seeking beneficial renal effects of levosimendan. As an example, a study is shortly to commence to assess the role of levosimendan for the prevention of acute organ dysfunction in sepsis (LeoPARDS).

Acute left ventricle diastolic function improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: Data regarding the effects of TAVI on LV after are scarce and conflicting results have been reported immediately after aortic valvuloplasty. This study aimed to determine the acute haemodynamic effects of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in left ventricle (LV) diastolic performance, immediately after aortic valvuloplasty and prosthesis deployment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, and preserved LV systolic function submitted to successful TAVI, were included. All procedures were guided through transoesophageal echocardiography, and parameters of diastolic function were evaluated before and minutes after TAVI. The mean age was 83.5±6 years and mean log EuroSCORE was 18.2±9.4. Before the procedure, all patients presented LV diastolic dysfunction. Immediately after TAVI, fewer patients presented a restrictive pattern [27 (44.3%), before the procedure, vs. 20 (34.4%), after TAVI (P=0.047)], and an increase in E wave deceleration time (211.2±75.5 vs. 252.7±102.3 cm/s, P=0.001), in E wave velocity (109.5±41.2 vs. 120.3±43.6 cm/s, P=0.025), and in isovolumetric relaxation time (83±36.5 vs. 97.1±36.0 ms, P=0.013) was observed. On multivariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting to LV systolic function, heart rate, blood pressure, and haematocrit values, the results remained significant. Patients referred to percutaneous approach had invasive haemodynamic data collected, showing a decrease in LV end-diastolic pressure after valve implantation [18.8±5.7 vs. 14.7±4.7, mean difference -4.1 (95% CI: -5.9; -2.9)]. Patients with a restrictive pattern immediately after TAVI presented a smaller decrease in LV end diastolic pressure (-3.3±4.7) than those with diastolic dysfunction grade I or II (-9.5±4.7; P=0.017). CONCLUSION: This is the first study describing LV diastolic performance during TAVI. Our results show improvement in diastolic function parameters in patients with preserved LV systolic function, immediately after successful TAVI.