COVID-19 vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its effectiveness, immunogenicity, flares and acceptance.

OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 infection is associated with significant morbidity in systemic lupus erythematosus but is potentially preventable by vaccination, although the impact of the myriad vaccines among SLE patients is not established. We aimed to assess the effectiveness, efficacy, acceptance and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in SLE. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus publications until 8 June 2022 without language, publication year or publication status restrictions. Reports with fewer than 5 patients or incomplete information on study outcomes were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed, and results reported according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 32 studies (34 reports) comprising 8269 individuals with SLE. Post-vaccine COVID-19 infections ranged from 0 to 17% in 6 studies (5065 patients), while humoral and cellular immunogenicity was evaluated in 17 studies (976 patients) and 5 studies (112 patients), respectively. The pooled seropositivity rate was 81.1% (95% CI: 72.6, 88.5%, I2 = 85%, P < 0.01), with significant heterogeneity and higher rates for mRNA vaccines compared with non-mRNA vaccines. Adverse events and specifically lupus flares were examined in 20 studies (3853 patients) and 13 studies (2989 patients), respectively. Severe adverse events and moderate to severe lupus flares were infrequent. The pooled vaccine acceptance rate was 67.0% (95% CI: 45.2, 85.6%, I2=98%, P < 0.01) from 8 studies (1348 patients), with greater acceptance in older patients. CONCLUSION: Among SLE patients, post-vaccine COVID-19 infections, severe flares, and adverse events were infrequent, while pooled seropositivity and acceptance were high, with significant heterogeneity. These results may inform shared decision-making on vaccination during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42021233366.

Complete Horizontal Gaze Paresis Due to Medial Pontine Haemorrhage.

We report a case of bilateral horizontal conjugate gaze palsy due to a dorsal median pontine haemorrhage. The development of horizontal gaze palsy has been attributed to lesions in the pontine tegmentum, and in this case, has occurred in conjunction with other features as part of Foville's syndrome. Complete horizontal gaze palsy is a rare clinical manifestation as bilateral involvement is unusual. Our case provides further insight into the intricacies of the brainstem neuroanatomy through a description of the involved neural pathways and nuclei accounting for complex neurological manifestations in one patient.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with hematologic malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hematological malignancies (HM) have been, until recently, viewed as contraindications to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to bleeding and infectious complications. However, conflicting literature regarding whether ECMO should be used for patients with HM still exists. We conducted a random effects meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of patients with HM on ECMO. We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane through 10 October 2021. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the JBI checklists and GRADE approach respectively. Thirteen observational studies (422 patients with HM, 9778 controls without HM) were included. The pooled in-hospital mortality for patients with HM and those with hematopoietic stem cell transplants for HM indications needing ECMO were 79.1% (95%CI: 70.2-86.9%) and 87.7% (95%CI: 80.4-93.8%), respectively. Subgroup analyses found that mortality was higher in adults than children (85.1% vs 67.9%, pinteraction = 0.003), and in Asia compared to North America and Europe (93.8% vs 69.6%, pinteraction < 0.001). Pooled ECMO duration was 10.0 days (95%CI: 7.5-12.5); pooled ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 19.8 days (95%CI: 12.4-27.3) and 43.9 days (95%CI: 29.4-58.4) respectively. Age (regression coefficient [B]: 0.008, 95%CI: 0.003-0.014), proportion of males (B: 1.799, 95%CI: 0.079-3.519), and ECMO duration (B: - 0.022, 95%CI: - 0.043 to - 0.001) were significantly associated with higher mortality. In-hospital mortality of patients with HM who needed ECMO was 79.1%, with better outcomes in children, and in North America and Europe. ECMO should not be regarded as routine support therapy in these patients but can be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis.

Evolving outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used extensively for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Reports early in the pandemic suggested that mortality in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO was comparable to non-COVID-19-related ARDS. However, subsequent reports suggested that mortality appeared to be increasing over time. Therefore, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, to characterise changes in mortality over time and elucidate risk factors for poor outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis (CRD42021271202), searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, from 1 December 2019 to 26 January 2022, for studies reporting on mortality among adults with COVID-19 receiving ECMO. We also captured hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and ECMO, as well as complications of ECMO. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, assessed risk of bias of included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and evaluated certainty of pooled estimates using GRADE methodology. RESULTS: Of 4522 citations, we included 52 studies comprising 18,211 patients in the meta-analysis. The pooled mortality rate among patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO was 48.8% (95% confidence interval 44.8-52.9%, high certainty). Mortality was higher among studies which enrolled patients later in the pandemic as opposed to earlier (1st half 2020: 41.2%, 2nd half 2020: 46.4%, 1st half 2021: 62.0%, 2nd half 2021: 46.5%, interaction p value = 0.0014). Predictors of increased mortality included age, the time of final patient enrolment from 1 January 2020, and the proportion of patients receiving corticosteroids, and reduced duration of ECMO run. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate for patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19-related ARDS has increased as the pandemic has progressed. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial; however, as outcomes for these patients evolve, the decision to initiate ECMO should include the best contextual estimate of mortality at the time of ECMO initiation.

Oral Ibuprofen is Associated With Reduced Likelihood of Early Bleb Failure After Trabeculectomy in High-Risk Glaucoma Patients.

PRCIS: Individuals prescribed ibuprofen after trabeculectomy have better postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) control and a higher chance of bleb survival despite being at a higher risk of scarring. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of early adjunctive oral ibuprofen treatment on IOP and bleb failure in eyes at high risk of scarring. METHODS: In these retrospective analyses, 288 eyes of 273 patients (mean ± SD age: 68.56 ± 10.47 y; 32.60% females) with primary glaucoma who underwent trabeculectomy/phacotrabeculectomy at the Singapore National Eye Centre between April 2020 and April 2021 with a follow-up duration ≥1 year were included. Of these, 77 (26.7%) eyes deemed to be at high risk of scarring were administered oral ibuprofen ≥3 months postoperatively (mean ± SD ibuprofen administration duration: 4.08 ± 2.28 wk). Participant's IOPs at baseline and at postoperative weeks 1, 2-3; and months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 were recorded. Bleb failure was defined as 2 consecutive IOP readings of >21, >18, and >15 mm Hg, and/or requiring remedial postoperative laser or surgery. RESULTS: The ibuprofen group experienced significantly greater postoperative IOP reductions at week 1 [mean difference, 95%CI: -2.89 (-5.22, -0.56) mm Hg] and month 1 [-2.29 (-4.53, -0.05) mm Hg]; and substantially lower odds of bleb failure at the >18 mm Hg [odds ratio, 95% CI: 0.39 (0.20-0.79)] and >15 mm Hg [0.52 (0.29-0.94)] thresholds, compared with the non-ibuprofen group. No differences in adverse ocular hypotony events were observed. CONCLUSION: Early adjunctive oral ibuprofen administered to individuals at high risk of posttrabeculectomy scarring is associated with greater IOP reductions and reduced likelihood of bleb failure. Our results suggest that oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be a safe way of improving trabeculectomy survival in high-risk eyes.

Influenza Vaccination in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Efficacy, Effectiveness, Safety, Utilization, and Barriers.

Influenza increases morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis but is preventable through vaccination. This systematic review of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, WHO Clinical Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov publications until August 2021 identified 45 reports (16,596 patients), including 8.5% with renal involvement or lupus nephritis: 9 studies (10,446 patients) on clinical effectiveness, 20 studies (1327 patients) on vaccine efficacy, 22 studies (1116 patients) on vaccine safety, 14 studies (4619 patients) on utilization rates, and 5 studies (3220 patients) on barriers. Pooled seroconversion rates ranged between 46% and 56%, while seroprotection rates ranged from 68% to 73% and were significantly associated with age and disease duration. Influenza infection was lower in vaccinated patients with systemic lupus erythematosus compared with unvaccinated patients. Disease activity scores did not change significantly after vaccination and reported flares were mild to moderate. Pooled current vaccination rate was 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.7%-46.5%) with significant heterogeneity and associated with the gross domestic product (P = .002) and disease duration (P = .001). Barriers to vaccination were the lack of doctor recommendation (57.4%) and concerns over the safety or efficacy of the vaccine (12.7%).

Convalescent Plasma for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on the utility of convalescent plasma (CP) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggests a lack of benefit. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of RCTs with trial sequential analysis to investigate whether convalescent plasma is futile in reducing mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We searched 6 databases from December 1, 2019 to August 1, 2021 for RCTs comparing the use of CP with standard of care or transfusion of non-CP standard plasma in patients with COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool. Random effects (DerSimonian and Laird) meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the aggregate risk for in-hospital mortality between both arms. We conducted a trial sequential analysis (TSA) based on the pooled relative risks (RRs) for in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the pooled RR for receipt of mechanical ventilation and mean difference in hospital length of stay. We included 18 RCTs (8702 CP, 7906 control). CP was not associated with a significant mortality benefit (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.86-1.04, P = .27, high certainty). Subgroup analysis did not find any significant differences (pinteraction = 0.30) between patients who received CP within 8 days of symptom onset (RR: 0.97, 95%-CI: 0.79-1.19, P = .80), or after 8 days (RR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.57-1.10, P = .16). TSA based on a RR reduction of 10% from a baseline mortality of 20% found that CP was not effective, with the pooled effect within the boundary for futility. CP did not significantly reduce the requirement for mechanical ventilation (RR: 1.00, 95%-CI: 0.91-1.10, P = .99, moderate certainty) or hospital length of stay (+1.32, 95%-CI: -1.86 to +4.52, P = .42, low certainty). CP does not improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, especially in severe disease. The pooled effect of mortality was within the boundary of futility, suggesting the lack of benefit of CP in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis).

This study sought to investigate the impact of pre-existing cognitive impairment on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI has been increasingly used in seniors, and evidence suggests better outcomes than surgical aortic valve replacement. Although frailty has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes after TAVI, the effect of pre-existing cognitive impairment on patient outcomes after TAVI remains unclear. We searched the Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases until May 14, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The primary outcome was short-term (6 months to 1 year) mortality, and secondary outcomes included long-term (1 year to 3 years) mortality, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative delirium. A total of 14 studies with 32,746 patients (5,098 patients with cognitive impairment at baseline, 27,648 without) were included in our meta-analysis. Among studies that reported the raw proportion of patients with mortality of postoperative delirium, cognitive impairment significantly increased mortality (risk ratio 2.10, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.43 to 3.08, p = 0.0002) and postoperative delirium (risk ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.93, p <0.0001). Studies which reported the hazards for mortality (pooled hazards ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.60, p <0.0001) and odds of postoperative delirium (pooled odds ratio 2.40, 95% CI: 1.51 to 3.80, p = 0.0002) yielded results consistent with the primary meta-analysis. In conclusion, pre-existing cognitive impairment is a significant risk factor for poorer outcomes after TAVI and should be carefully considered in this group of patients. Guidelines and future studies should take cognitive impairment into consideration for preoperative risk stratification.