Olanzapine improves deficient sensory inhibition in DBA/2 mice.

Most schizophrenia patients do not inhibit their P50 auditory evoked potential to the second of duplicate auditory stimuli, reflecting a failure to inhibit responses to irrelevant sensory input. Typical antipsychotic drugs do not improve this deficit while some atypical antipsychotics do. A previous study using an animal model, deficient P20-N40 (which corresponds to the human P50) inhibitory processing in DBA/2 mice found that sensory inhibition was improved by clozapine, the prototypical atypical antipsychotic, but not by haloperidol, a typical antipsychotic. The improvement after clozapine was mediated by alpha7 nicotinic receptors. The present study addresses whether another atypical antipsychotic, olanzapine, will also improve sensory inhibition deficits in the mouse model. In vivo electrophysiological recordings of the P20-N40 auditory evoked potential in anesthetized DBA/2 mice, which spontaneously exhibit a schizophrenia-like inhibitory processing deficit, were obtained after olanzapine alone (0.01, 0.033, 0.1, 0.33 mg/kg, IP) and the efficacious dose of olanzapine (0.033 mg/kg, IP) in combination with either the alpha7 nicotinic receptor antagonist alpha-bungarotoxin or the alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor antagonist di-hydro-beta-erythroidine. All doses of olanzapine produced improved P20-N40 inhibitory processing in DBA/2 mice. The normalization observed after the 0.033 mg/kg dose of olanzapine was due to a selective decrease in response to the second auditory stimulus indicating an increase in inhibitory processing. This improvement was blocked by pre-administration of alpha-bungarotoxin but not di-hydro-beta-erythroidine. Like clozapine, olanzapine acts via alpha7 nicotinic receptors to elicit improved inhibitory processing of auditory stimuli.

Clozapine improves deficient inhibitory auditory processing in DBA/2 mice, via a nicotinic cholinergic mechanism.

RATIONALE: Insufficient inhibitory processing of the P50 auditory evoked potential (AEP) is observed in most schizophrenia patients and is not improved by typical antipsychotic drugs, such as haloperidol. This inhibitory processing deficit is associated with a subnormal level of hippocampal alpha7 nicotinic receptors (nAChRs), and drugs that activate these receptors normalize the deficit. The atypical antipsychotic clozapine also normalizes this deficit in schizophrenia patients, but by an unknown mechanism. OBJECTIVE: Similar to schizophrenia patients, DBA/2 mice spontaneously exhibit a deficit in inhibitory processing of the P20-N40 AEP, which is a rodent analogue of the human P50 AEP. The present study determined whether clozapine improved this deficit in DBA/2 mice, and by what mechanism. METHOD: Using a conditioning-testing paradigm with paired auditory stimuli to assess inhibitory P20-N40 AEP processing in DBA/2 mice, the effects of clozapine (0.1, 1, 3.33, or 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.p.) were assessed. The effect of clozapine (1 mg/kg) was assessed alone and after pre-administration of either alpha-bungarotoxin, an alpha7 nAChR antagonist, or dihydro-beta-erythroidine, an alpha4beta2 nAChR antagonist. RESULTS: In a dose-dependent manner, clozapine improved the deficient inhibitory processing of the P20-N40 AEP normally exhibited by DBA/2 mice. Like alpha7 agonists, 1 mg/kg clozapine selectively increased the inhibition of the P20-N40 response to the second of paired auditory stimuli. The normalizing effect of 1 mg/kg clozapine was blocked by alpha-bungarotoxin, but not by dihydro-beta-erythroidine. Haloperidol did not improve DBA/2's deficient P20-N40 AEP processing. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine improved the deficient inhibitory processing of the P20-N40 AEP in DBA/2 mice, apparently through stimulation of alpha7 nicotinic receptors. This effect was not shared by the typical antipsychotic haloperidol.