Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: survival patterns to 38 years.

We studied survival to 38 years after Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. We used revision as an end-point, while adopting a policy of regular follow-up and early revision for radiological changes alone if indicated. Between November 1962 and June 2005, 22,066 primary low-friction arthroplasties (17,409 patients) had been performed at Wrightington Hospital by more than 330 surgeons. By June 2006, 1001 (4.5%) hips had been revised and 1490 patients (2662 hips, 12%) had died. At 31 years, where a minimum of 40 hips were still attending follow-up, survival with revision for infection as an endpoint was 95%, for dislocation 98%, for a fractured stem 88.6%, for a loose stem 72.5% and for a loose acetabular component 53.7%. Wear and loosening of the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular component were the main long-term problems. We conclude that regular follow-up after hip replacement is essential and that all operative findings should be recorded at revision.

Increasing patients' body mass. Are the criteria for testing stemmed femoral components in total hip arthroplasty still valid?

The increasing incidence of obesity in the population is a topic of current interest. This trend is reflected in patients undergoing primary Charnley hip replacement. Over a 21 year period from January 1986 to October 2006, during which 6910 primary operations were performed, the body mass of patients increased at a mean rate of 0.48 kg/year. The findings suggest that the test criteria for the endurance of stemmed femoral components be modified. The maximum load should be increased from 2.3 kN to 2.5 kN to reflect patients' increasing weight. The duration of the test should be increased from 5 x 10(6) cycles during which the 'femoral component shall not fracture' to 10 x 10(6) cycles in order to reflect not only the patients' activity level but also the 4-11 year period at risk for stem fracture, and so 'reflect developing clinical experience'.

A 28-year clinical and radiological follow-up of alumina ceramic-on-crosslinked polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up report and analysis of the oxidation of a shelf-aged acetabular component.

AIMS: Our aim in this study was to describe a continuing review of 11 total hip arthroplasties using 22.225 mm Alumina ceramic femoral heads on a Charnley flanged femoral component, articulating against a silane crosslinked polyethylene. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (11 THAs) were reviewed at a mean of 27.5 years (26 to 28) post-operatively. Outcome was assessed using the d'Aubigne and Postel, and Charnley scores and penetration was recorded on radiographs. In addition, the oxidation of a 29-year-old shelf-aged acetabular component was analysed. RESULTS: The mean clinical outcome scores remained excellent at final follow-up. The mean total penetration remained 0.41 mm (0.40 to 0.41). There was no radiographic evidence of acetabular or femoral loosening or osteolysis. There was negligible oxidation in the shelf-aged sample despite gamma irradiation and storage in air. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the long-term stability and durability of this type of crosslinked, antioxidant containing polyethylene when used in combination with a small diameter alumina ceramic femoral head. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1286-9.

The angle-bore acetabular component and dislocation after revision of a failed total hip replacement.

We reviewed 1039 revision total hip replacements where an angle-bore acetabular component was used. After a mean follow-up of nine years (0 to 20.6), the incidence of revision for dislocation was 2.1% (22 revisions), a success rate of 97.9%. In 974 revisions, where the indication was other than dislocation, the success rate was 98.5%. Of the 65 revisions for dislocation, 58 (89.2%) were successful after the first revision and a further five after the second revision, an overall success of 96.9%. Two patients elected to have their implants removed. Dislocation after revision of failed total hip replacement is a complex issue. There is often no single cause and no simple solution. The angle-bore acetabular component, in combination with a 22.225-mm diameter femoral head, offers a high level of success.

The Charnley hip replacement -- 43 years of clinical success.

The Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip with 22.225 mm diameter head and thick ultra high molecular weigh polyethylene cup, both components grouted with cold curing acrylic cement, has reached 43 years of clinical success. Follow-up past 30 years is now available. Over 96% of patients are satisfied with the result. Post operative activity level is a reflection of patient selection. The neuropathic nature of the new joint does not reflect the mechanical state of the arthroplasty: regular follow-up with good quality radiographs is essential. Revisions may have to be undertaken for asymptomatic radiographic changes: a principle that must be understood and accepted before the primary procedure. The long-term problems are wear and cup loosening and strain shielding of the proximal femur. Long-term success will be further extended by understanding and practical application of the principles at the primary procedure and use of low wear materials for the articulation. The operation of total hip arthroplasty marks the beginning and not the end of treatment.

Low-friction arthroplasty of the hip using alumina ceramic and cross-linked polyethylene. A 17-year follow-up report.

We report the results of our continued review of 11 total hip arthroplasties using 22.225 mm alumina ceramic femoral heads on a Charnley flanged stem, articulating with chemically cross-linked polyethylene. There was an initial bedding-in of up to 0.41 mm at the articular surface in the first two years. This had not progressed further, at a minimum follow-up of 15 years. Radiographically no femoral or acetabular component showed loosening or osteolysis.

Fate of the unrevised cemented stem following cup only revision: 227 hips at an average of 6 years follow-up.

BACKGROUND: After primary total hip replacement, aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup is more common than loosening of the femoral stem. Removal of a well-fixed stem adds to operative time, blood loss, risk of bone loss and fracture. There is limited evidence that isolated cup revision can be a safe option in revision hip arthroplasty. We question the following regarding the unrevised cemented stem after isolated cup revision: 1) Does the unrevised stem require revision after isolated cup revision? 2) When is the stem subsequently revised? 3) Why is the stem subsequently revised? 4) Do unrevised stems exhibit radiographic loosening? HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that after isolated cup revision most unrevised stems do not need subsequent revision, and that most do not exhibit evidence of radiographic loosening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent revision of the acetabular component only during revision hip arthroplasty between March 1970 and July 2013 was carried out. We assessed survival of the unrevised stem, reasons for subsequent revision, plus radiographic analysis for stem loosening. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-seven hips were included [215 patients with an average age at the time of primary surgery was 47 (13-70) years]. The Charnley stem was used in 161 cases; C-stem 65, Howse 1. Average time between primary surgery and cup revision was 15.9 (1.6-33.4) years. Average follow-up for all stems post-isolated cup revision was 6.1 (0.1-30.7) years. Twenty-eight stems (12.3%) were subsequently revised 5.1 (0.1-12.6) years after the isolated cup revision. Reasons for subsequent revision were: aseptic loosening (10); infection (8); dislocation (6); unreconstructable joint post-loose cup removal (2); fracture (2). Radiographic review was possible on 140 cases. Five femoral stems were revised and 2 others showed evidence of possible radiological loosening but were not revised. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the largest series showing that isolated cup revision in the place of a well-fixed cemented stem is safe and is associated with ongoing good long-term survival of the stem. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with cement in young patients without rheumatoid arthritis.

The results for eighty-two young patients without rheumatoid arthritis who had had eighty-seven revisions of the acetabular component because of aseptic loosening were studied. The mean duration of follow-up was approximately six years (range, 1.9 to 18.1 years). The clinical result was excellent or satisfactory for seventy-nine hips (91 per cent). However, at the latest radiographic assessment, twenty-six sockets were loose. Of the fifty hips that had had good bone stock (only slight enlargement of the acetabulum or local defects involving only one wall) before the revision, seven (14 per cent) had loosening of the socket, compared with nineteen (51 per cent) of the thirty-seven that had had poor bone stock (massive or global collapse of the acetabulum and defects involving at least two walls). The relationship between loosening and the quality of the bone stock before the revision was highly significant (p = 0.0002, chi-square test). The results of revision of the socket with use of cement and without use of any bone grafts in young patients who have poor acetabular bone stock are not very encouraging. The need for regular follow-up of all patients who have had an arthroplasty cannot be overemphasized.

Multiple revision for failed Charnley low-friction arthroplasty.

We reviewed 54 patients at a mean follow-up of 4 years 4 months after rerevisions for failure of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Rerevision for aseptic loosening in 26 hips was satisfactory; there were no clinical failures and at the latest radiological assessment only one stem and three sockets showed signs of loosening. By contrast, nine of 20 multiple revisions for recurrent dislocation failed, as did five of eight multiple revisions for deep infection. There was radiological evidence of loosening in one stem and nine sockets in the former group and in three stems and five sockets in the latter.

Cemented revision for aseptic acetabular loosening. A review of 387 hips.

We reviewed the records and radiographs of 387 cemented revisions of aseptic loose sockets after total hip replacement at a mean follow-up of 5.5 years. The clinical results were satisfactory, but at the last radiological assessment 38 sockets (9.8%) had a continuous zone of demarcation greater than 1 mm thick and another 35 (9%) showed migration. Poor acetabular bone stock had a profound influence on the outcome of revision surgery, but the results of cemented revision were comparable to those reported for cementless revision at similar mean follow-up.

Cemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for severe femoral osteolysis.

We reviewed prospectively cemented stem revision in 106 patients with severe femoral endosteal bone lysis without infection. Bone grafts were not used in any of the patients. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 6 years 4 months). At the last review 76.4% of the patients were free of pain and 17.9% had only mild or occasional discomfort; radiographs showed well-fixed stable stems in 101 (95.3%). An intramedullary cement plug was used at revision to improve stability in 97.7%. There was new endosteal osteolysis after revision in 17 patients; only two had severe changes. Seven hips (6.6%) required a second revision; only four of these (3.8%) were for stem loosening. Survivorship of the revised stem, using radiological evidence of stem loosening as the end point, was 95.8% at seven years. The results of stem revision arthroplasty using cement in the presence of massive endosteal cavitation are satisfactory.

Wear of enhanced ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene (Hylamer) in combination with a 22.225 mm diameter zirconia femoral head.

We have prospectively studied the wear of enhanced ultra-high molecular-weight polyethylene (Hylamer) in combination with a zirconia femoral head of 22.225 mm diameter on a cemented, triple-tapered, collarless, polished stem, the C Stem. The 71 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty had a mean follow-up of six years (3 to 8). No patient died or was lost to follow-up. The clinical results were excellent with 96% of patients satisfied. There were no revisions. Two cups were considered to be loose radiologically. One was avulsed from the cement in a skiing accident, with a periprosthetic fracture of the femur, but has remained stable for more than seven years. One femur shows radiological appearances which are compatible with a healing infection. One femoral component is at risk of loosening. The mean rate of penetration of the cup was 0.22 mm/year (0.06 to 0.55). Our results appear to be within the guidelines set by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence. We have discontinued the use of Hylamer despite excellent clinical results and no revisions to date because the high initial rates of penetration did not settle to the expected low levels within the anticipated time.

Prospective clinical and joint simulator studies of a new total hip arthroplasty using alumina ceramic heads and cross-linked polyethylene cups.

We report the findings from independent prospective clinical and laboratory-based joint-simulator studies of the performance of ceramic femoral heads of 22.225 mm diameter in cross-linked polyethylene (XLP) acetabular cups. We found remarkable qualitative and quantitative agreement between the clinical and simulator results for the wear characteristics with time, and confirmed that ceramic femoral heads penetrate the XLP cups at only about half the rate of otherwise comparable metal heads. In the clinical study, 19 hips in 17 patients were followed for an average of 77 months. In the hip-joint simulator a similar prosthesis was tested for 7.3 million cycles. Both clinical and simulator results showed relatively high rates of penetration over the first 18 months or 1.5 million cycles, followed by a very much lower wear thereafter. Once an initial bedding-in of 0.2 mm to 0.4 mm had taken place the subsequent rates of penetration were very small. The initial clinical wear during bedding-in averaged 0.29 mm/year; subsequent progression was an order of magnitude lower at about 0.022 mm/year, lower than the 0.07 mm/year in metal-to-UHMWP Charnley LFAs. Our results show the excellent tribological features of alumina-ceramic-to-XLP implants, and also confirm the value of well-designed joint simulators for the evaluation of total joint replacements.

One-stage revision of infected total hip replacements with discharging sinuses.

We report a prospective study of 57 one-stage cemented revisions of total hip replacement for deep infection with an actively discharging sinus. The average follow-up was 7 years 4 months. Seven patients had required rerevisions, but at latest follow-up, infection was under control in 49 (86%). A discharging sinus is not, in itself, a contraindication to one-stage revision of a hip replacement.

Wear of the cup in the Charnley LFA in the young patient.

Since wear and loosening of the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene cup are factors which limit the life of an arthroplasty we have attempted to identify factors associated with either low wear (0.02 mm/year or less) or high wear (0.2 mm/year or more). In a series of 1434 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties (1092 patients) 190 (13.2%) showed low wear while 149 (10.4%) showed high wear. We used chi-squared test to assess the significance of various factors. The significant factors of the low-wear group were female gender (p = 0.042), rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.014), Charnley grade C (p = 0.03) and varus position of the stem (p = 0.003). The use of acetabular cement pressurisation (p = 0.07) and medialisation of the cup (p = 0.07) approached significance. In the high-wear group there was a predominance of men (p = 0.042) with osteoarthritis (p = 0.006) as the underlying hip pathology, and the stem in a valgus position (p = 0.023). Support of the cup by the rim of the acetabulum approached significance (p = 0.07). There was no statistical significance between the two groups for revision for aseptic loosening of the stem or fracture of the stem (p = 0.49). There was a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two groups for revision for wear and aseptic loosening of the cup, 5.3% compared with 39%. Changes in the cup geometry are probably sufficient to explain the increasing incidence of loosening and revisions with the increasing depth of penetration of the cup. There is much to be gained from the use of a low-wearing ceramic-ultra-high-molecular-weight combination. Tissue reaction to the polyethylene particles cannot be the cause of aseptic loosening of the stem.

Cemented revision Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

We assessed 41 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (47 hips) who had had revision hip arthroplasty, at an average follow-up of 7 years 4 months (2 to 19). The clinical results were excellent or satisfactory in 43 hips. Radiologically, 45 stems were secure. Fifteen sockets (36.6%) were radiologically loose. Three hips required rerevision. Socket failure is the predominant problem in rheumatoid patients after cemented revision arthroplasty.

Polyethylene wear in the Charnley offset bore acetabular cup. A radiological analysis.

We studied wear in the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene offset bore socket in 54 hips which had had Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. At an average follow-up of 8.1 years, the mean penetration rate was 0.04 mm per year. Correlation between the depth of socket penetration and the incidence of socket migration was confirmed, but socket migration occurred with lower penetration than had been previously reported.

Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty with a proximal femoral modular cemented stem.

We have designed a modular cemented femoral component for revision of failed total hip arthroplasty in which deficiency of the proximal femur is such as to require a variable extrafemoral portion of the stem. We present the results of the first 74 operations in 72 patients; 56 of the patients had grade-3 or grade-4 femoral deficiency as defined by Gustilo and Pasternak and 24 had fractures of the proximal femur, of which 22 were periprosthetic. There was or had been infection in 19 hips. At a mean follow-up of 5 years 9 months (1 to 12 years) nine stems were radiologically loose of which three had been revised. There were no failures in 45 cases in which there was fixation of the distal stem of 10 cm or more. Dislocation occurred in nine patients and there were four cases of infection in the 19 which were, or had been, infected previously. There were no neurovascular complications and no intraoperative femoral fractures. The femoral bone stock improved radiologically in 45 hips of which 29 showed considerable reformation of the proximal femur; 27 remained unchanged and two showed increasing osteoporosis.

The calcar femorale in cemented stem fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

The calcar femorale is a vertical plate of bone lying deep to the lesser trochanter and is formed as a result of traction of the iliopsoas which separates the femoral cortex into two distinct layers, the calcar femorale and the medial femoral cortex. They fuse together proximally to form the medial femoral neck. A stem placed centrally will abut against the calcar femorale with little or no space for cement. Clearing of the calcar will offer space for a cement layer, which will support the stem proximally on the posterior aspect. We compared two consecutive groups of Charnley low-friction arthroplasties, with and without clearing of the calcar. In 330 patients who had an arthroplasty without clearing the calcar, there were ten revisions for aseptic loosening of the stem and six other stems were considered 'definitely loose', giving a rate of failure of 4.8%. In 111 patients in whom the calcar was cleared there was only one revision for aseptic loosening and no stems were classed as 'definitely loose', giving a rate of failure of 0.9%. Survivorship analysis has again shown the need for long-term follow-up; the differences became clear after ten years but because of the relatively small numbers, statistical analysis is not yet applicable. We now clear the calcar femorale routinely and advocate optimal access to the medullary canal and insertion of the stem in the area of the piriform fossa.

Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.

We reviewed 351 cemented revisions of femoral stems performed for aseptic loosening. At a mean of six years after the revision operation 72.1% of the patients were pain-free and 21.4% had only mild or occasional discomfort. The latest radiographs showed definite stem loosening in 10 (2.8%) and 20 hips (5.7%) had required rerevision, only nine (2.6%) of which were for mechanical failure of the stem. Survivorship analysis, taking the end point as rerevision of the stem, gave 97.0% survival at eight years and 91.6% at 11 years. Excellent results both clinically and radiologically can be achieved by cemented revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening.