Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Reprod ; 23(5): 1101-6, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18325883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We wanted to test the hypothesis that using abdominal ultrasound at the time of embryo transfer to guide replacement, improved pregnancy rates by at least 5%. METHODS: An RCT in a large assisted conception unit. A pilot study and power calculation suggested that at least 2000 embryo transfers were required to demonstrate a difference of 5%, for a test with 80% power and Type 1 error 0.05. Randomization, data entry and analysis were arranged independently. Randomization was stratified for age and fresh/frozen embryo transfer. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: There was no difference in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was 22% and for non-ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was 23% (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: We set out to determine whether ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improved clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in assisted conception. We used an appropriately powered RCT design. We did not demonstrate a difference. This outcome is at odds with the UKs National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommendations for fertility treatment (Fertility Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. London, UK: RCOG Press, 2004, 112.) which used a meta-analysis of four smaller trials (range 362-800 patients, totalling 2051 embryo transfers) to conclude that ultrasound should be offered. We suggest that the current Cochrane review should be updated with data from our trial and recommend that consideration is given to accounting for heterogeneity between the included trials.


Assuntos
Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Transferência Embrionária/métodos , Adulto , Transferência Embrionária/instrumentação , Feminino , Congelamento , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Taxa de Gravidez , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
2.
Fertil Steril ; 80(3): 641-2, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12969714

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe a potential new use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Assisted conception unit at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): A 37-year-old woman undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) who accidentally stopped using GnRH agonists after starting ovarian stimulation. INTERVENTION(S): A GnRH antagonist was used to avoid a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and hence "rescue" the cycle. RESULT(S): Successful oocyte retrieval was carried out, two embryos transferred, and a viable twin pregnancy ensued. CONCLUSION(S): This may be a new indication for the use of GnRH antagonists.


Assuntos
Busserrelina/administração & dosagem , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Acidentes , Adulto , Transferência Embrionária , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Hormônio Luteinizante/antagonistas & inibidores , Masculino , Oócitos , Cooperação do Paciente , Gravidez , Gravidez Múltipla , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos , Gêmeos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA