RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) are standard monotherapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Given the different targets and payloads, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SG + EV in a phase I trial in mUC (NCT04724018). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mUC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 who had progressed on platinum and/or immunotherapy were enrolled. SG + EV were administered on days 1 + 8 of a 21-day cycle until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities during cycle 1. The number of patients treated at each of four pre-specified dose levels (DLs) and the maximum tolerated doses in combination (MTD) were determined using a Bayesian Optimal Interval design. Objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Between May 2021 and April 2023, 24 patients were enrolled; 1 patient never started therapy and was excluded from the analysis. Median age was 70 years (range 41-88 years); 11 patients received ≥3 lines of therapy. Seventy-eight percent (18/23) of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) regardless of attribution at any DL, with one grade 5 AE (pneumonitis possibly related to EV). The recommended phase II doses are SG 8 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support; MTDs are SG 10 mg/kg with EV 1.25 mg/kg. The objective response rate was 70% (16/23, 95% confidence interval 47% to 87%) with three complete responses; three patients had progressive disease as best response. With a median follow-up of 14 months, 9/23 patients have ongoing response including 6 responses lasting over 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SG + EV was assessed at different DLs and a safe dose for phase II was identified. The combination had encouraging activity in patients with mUC with high response rates, including clinically significant complete responses. Additional study of this combination is warranted.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Imunoconjugados , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoconjugados/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This exploratory analysis evaluated efficacy and safety data for enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy over a median follow-up of â¼2 years from EV-301. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma with prior platinum-containing chemotherapy and disease progression during/after programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitor treatment were randomized to enfortumab vedotin or chemotherapy (docetaxel, paclitaxel, vinflunine). Endpoints were overall survival (primary), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response, and safety. RESULTS: In total, 608 patients were included (enfortumab vedotin, n = 301; chemotherapy, n = 307). With a median follow-up of 23.75 months, 444 deaths had occurred (enfortumab vedotin, n = 207; chemotherapy, n = 237). Risk of death was reduced by 30% with enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.85); one-sided, log-rank P = 0.00015]; PFS improved with enfortumab vedotin [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.53-0.76); one-sided, log-rank P < 0.00001]. Treatment-related adverse event rates were 93.9% for enfortumab vedotin and 91.8% for chemotherapy; grade ≥ 3 event rates were 52.4% and 50.5%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related decreased neutrophil count (14.1% versus 6.1%), decreased white blood cell count (7.2% versus 1.4%), and anemia (7.9% versus 2.7%) were more common with chemotherapy versus enfortumab vedotin; maculopapular rash (7.4% versus 0%), fatigue (6.8% versus 4.5%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (5.1% versus 2.1%) were more common with enfortumab vedotin. Of special interest adverse events, treatment-related skin reactions occurred in 47.3% of patients receiving enfortumab vedotin and 15.8% of patients receiving chemotherapy; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 48.0% versus 31.6%, respectively, and hyperglycemia in 6.8% versus 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: After a median follow-up of â¼2 years, enfortumab vedotin maintained clinically meaningful overall survival benefit versus chemotherapy, consistent with findings from the EV-301 primary analysis; PFS and overall response benefit remained consistent. Adverse events were manageable; no new safety signals were observed.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , DocetaxelAssuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/genética , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/genética , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/patologia , Medicina de Precisão , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/genética , OncologiaRESUMO
Background: Prognostic models are needed that reflect contemporary practice for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We sought to identify predictive and prognostic variables for overall survival (OS) in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide. Patients and methods: Patients from the PREVAIL trial database (enzalutamide versus placebo) were randomly split 2 : 1 into training (n = 1159) and testing (n = 550) sets. Using the training set, 23 predefined variables were analyzed and a multivariable model predicting OS was developed and validated in an independent testing set. Results: Patient characteristics and outcomes were well balanced between training and testing sets; median OS was 32.7 months in each. The final validated multivariable model included 11 independent prognostic variables. Median OS for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups (testing set) defined by prognostic risk tertiles were not yet reached (NYR) (95% CI NYR-NYR), 34.2 months (31.5-NYR), and 21.1 months (17.5-25.0), respectively. Hazard ratios (95% CI) for OS in the low- and intermediate-risk groups versus high-risk group were 0.20 (0.14-0.29) and 0.40 (0.30-0.53), respectively. Secondary outcomes of response and progression differed widely in model-defined risk groups. Enzalutamide improved outcomes in all prognostic risk groups. Conclusions: Our validated prognostic model incorporates variables routinely collected in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide, identifying subsets of patients with widely differing survival outcomes that provide useful information for external validation, patient care, and clinical trial design. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01212991.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Modelos Biológicos , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Benzamidas , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Nitrilas , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the management of metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) including recent advances in targeted and immune therapies as an update to the 2014 joint international consultation on UTUC, co-sponsored by the Société Internationale d'Urologie and International Consultation on Urological Diseases. METHODS: A PubMed database search was performed between January 2013 and May 2016 related to the treatment of metastatic UTUC, and 54 studies were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: The management of patients with metastatic UTUC is primarily an extrapolation from evidence guiding the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The first-line therapy for metastatic UTUC is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Standard second-line therapies are limited and ineffective. Patients with UTUC who progress following platinum-based chemotherapy are encouraged to participate in clinical trials. Recent advances in genomic profiling present exciting opportunities to guide the use of targeted therapy. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated extremely promising results. Retrospective studies provide support for post-chemotherapy surgery in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: The management of metastatic UTUC requires a multi-disciplinary approach. New insights from genomic profiling using targeted therapies, novel immunotherapies, and surgery represent promising avenues for further therapeutic exploration.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Ureterais/patologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/secundário , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Pelve Renal , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sorafenibe , Sunitinibe , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , GencitabinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of a combination of chemotherapeutic agent compared with single-agent chemotherapy in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are unclear. We aimed to study the survival impact of single-agent compared with doublet chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy of advanced UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Literature was searched for studies including single-agent or doublet chemotherapy in the second-line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Random-effects models were used to pool trial-level data according to treatment arm, including median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) probability, and grade 3-4 toxicity. Univariable and multivariable analyses, including sensitivity analyses, were carried out, adjusting for the percent of patients with ECOG performance status ≥1 and hepatic metastases. RESULTS: Forty-six arms of trials including 1910 patients were selected: 22 arms with single agent (n = 1202) and 24 arms with doublets (n = 708). The pooled ORR with single agents was 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1-17.9] versus 31.9% [95% CI 27.3-36.9] with doublet chemotherapy. Pooled median PFS was 2.69 and 4.05 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 6.98 and 8.50 months, respectively. Multivariably, the odds ratio for ORR and the pooled median difference of PFS were statistically significant (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002) whereas the median difference in OS was not (P = 0.284). When including single-agent vinflunine or taxanes only, differences were significant only for ORR (P < 0.001) favoring doublet chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity were seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant improvements in ORR and PFS, doublet regimens did not extend OS compared with single agents for the second-line chemotherapy of UC. Prospective trials are necessary to elucidate the role of combination chemotherapy, with or without targeted agents, in the salvage setting. Currently, improvements in this field should be pursued considering single-agent chemotherapy as the foundation for new more active combinations.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/secundário , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Terapia de Salvação , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multi-targeted vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are known to cause cardiac toxicity, but the relative risk (RR) of QTc interval prolongation and serious arrhythmias associated with them are not reported. METHODS: We conducted a trial-level meta-analysis of randomised phase II and III trials comparing arms with and without a US Food and Drug Administration-approved VEGFR TKI (sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, ponatinib and regorafenib). A total of 6548 patients from 18 trials were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, RR and 95% CIs. RESULTS: The RR for all-grade and high-grade QTc prolongation for the TKI vs no TKI arms was 8.66 (95% CI 4.92-15.2, P<0.001) and 2.69 (95% CI 1.33-5.44, P=0.006), respectively, with most of the events being asymptomatic QTc prolongation. Respectively, 4.4% and 0.83% of patients exposed to VEGFR TKI had all-grade and high-grade QTc prolongation. On subgroup analysis, only sunitinib and vandetanib were associated with a statistically significant risk of QTc prolongation, with higher doses of vandetanib associated with a greater risk. The rate of serious arrhythmias including torsades de pointes did not seem to be higher with high-grade QTc prolongation. The risk of QTc prolongation was independent of the duration of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to date, we show that VEGFR TKI can be associated with QTc prolongation. Although most cases were of low clinical significance, it is unclear whether the same applies to patients treated off clinical trials.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Contração Miocárdica/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of host inflammation, has been associated with poor outcome in several solid tumors. Here, we investigated associations of the derived NLR (dNLR) and duration of initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the multinational randomized phase III studies VENICE and TAX327 included a total of 2230 men with mCRPC randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy, and were used as training and validation sets, respectively. Associations of dNLR and duration of initial ADT with overall survival (OS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression analysis in the training set stratified for performance status and treatment arm. The model was then tested in the validation set. Subsequently, we investigated the treatment effect of docetaxel on OS in subgroups according to dNLR and duration of initial ADT. RESULTS: In the training set, both dNLR ≥median (2) and duration of initial ADT Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia
, Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico
, Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário
, Linfócitos/patologia
, Neutrófilos/patologia
, Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia
, Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico
, Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade
, Adulto
, Idoso
, Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
, Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico
, Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade
, Docetaxel
, Seguimentos
, Humanos
, Agências Internacionais
, Masculino
, Pessoa de Meia-Idade
, Invasividade Neoplásica
, Estadiamento de Neoplasias
, Prednisona/administração & dosagem
, Prognóstico
, Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico
, Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade
, Taxa de Sobrevida
, Taxoides/administração & dosagem
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) compared with chemotherapy (CT) remain poorly defined for clinical stage (CS) IIA and IIB seminoma. We aimed to evaluate the current role of the two treatment modalities in this setting of testicular seminoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was carried out to identify all evaluable studies. Search was limited to studies published after 1990 and included the Medline, Embase databases, and abstracts from ASCO (GU), ESMO, AUA, and ASTRO meetings up to April 2014. Sensitivity analyses were applied including the following: CSIIA and CSIIB, paraortic + iliac RT only in both stages, RT dose (≥30 versus <30 Gy), and PEB/EP regimens only. RESULTS: Thirteen studies have been selected for MA on relapse outcome. No randomized trials compared RT and CT. There were 4 prospective and 9 retrospective studies, with a total of 607 patients receiving RT and 283 patients CT. The pooled relapse rate (RR) was similar between the RT [0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.14, P for heterogeneity = 0.096, I(2) = 38%] and CT groups (0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.15, P for heterogeneity <0.001, I(2) = 82.5%). However, in the sensitivity analysis, the pooled RR for RT in CSIIB was 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.17) while it was 0.05 (95% CI 0-0.11) for CT. Long-term side-effects and incidence of second cancers were more frequently reported following RT. The overall incidence of nontesticular second malignancies was 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.02) in the RT group and 0.02 (95% CI 0.003-0.04) in the CT group. CONCLUSIONS: Although RT and CT appeared to be equal options in CSIIA and IIB seminoma, a trend in favor of CT for a lower incidence of side-effects and RR in CSIIB was found. This evidence is limited by the retrospective quality of studies and their small sample size.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Radioterapia , Seminoma/tratamento farmacológico , Seminoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Seminoma/patologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologiaRESUMO
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has been revolutionized by the arrival of multiple novel agents in the past 2 years. Immunotherapy in the form of sipuleucel-T, androgen axis inhibitors, including abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, a chemotherapeutic agent, cabazitaxel, and a radiopharmaceutical, radium-223, have all yielded incremental extensions of survival and have been recently approved. A number of other agents appear promising in early studies, suggesting that the armamentarium against castrate-resistant prostate cancer is likely to continue to expand. Emerging androgen pathway inhibitors include androgen synthesis inhibitors (TAK700), androgen receptor inhibitors (ARN-509, ODM-201), AR DNA binding domain inhibitors (EPI-001), selective AR downregulators or SARDs (AZD-3514), and agents that inhibit both androgen synthesis and receptor binding (TOK-001/galeterone). Promising immunotherapeutic agents include poxvirus vaccines and CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). Biologic agents targeting the molecular drivers of disease are also being investigated as single agents, including cabozantinib (Met and VEGFR2 inhibitor) and tasquinimod (angiogenesis and immune modulatory agent). Despite the disappointing results seen from studies evaluating docetaxel in combination with other agents, including GVAX, anti-angiogentic agents (bevacizumab, aflibercept, lenalinomide), a SRC kinase inhibitor (dasatinib), endothelin receptor antagonists (atrasentan, zibotentan), and high-dose calcitriol (DN-101), the results from the trial evaluating docetaxel in combination with the clusterin antagonist, custirsen, are eagerly awaited. New therapeutic hurdles consist of discovering new targets, understanding resistance mechanisms, the optimal sequencing and combinations of available agents, as well as biomarkers predictive for benefit. Novel agents targeting bone metastases are being developed following the success of zoledronic acid and denosumab. Finally, all of these modalities do not appear curative, suggesting that clinical trial enrollment and a better understanding of biology remain of paramount importance.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Descoberta de Drogas , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Inibidores da Síntese de Esteroides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used in a variety of malignancies. Infections have been reported with these drugs. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterise the risk of infections in cancer patients treated with these agents. METHODS: Pubmed and oncology conferences' proceedings were searched for studies from January 1966 to June 2012. Studies were limited to phase II and III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of everolimus or temsirolimus reporting on cancer patients with adequate safety profiles. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 3180 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 33.1% (95% CI, 24.5-43.0%) and 5.6% (95% CI, 3.8-8.3%), respectively. Compared with controls, the RR of all-grade and high-grade infections due to mTOR inhibitors was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.76-2.28, P<0.001) and 2.60 (95% CI, 1.54-4.41, P<0.001), respectively. Subgroup analysis found no difference in incidences or risks between everolimus and temsirolimus or between different tumour types (renal cell carcinoma (RCC) vs non-RCC). Infections included respiratory tract (61.7%), genitourinary (29.4%), skin/soft tissue (4.2%), and others (4.9%). CONCLUSION: Treatment with mTOR inhibitors is associated with a significant increase in risk of infections. Close monitoring for any signs of infections is warranted.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções/induzido quimicamente , Infecções/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infecções/etiologia , Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Background Penile cancer (PC) is a rare cancer in western countries, but is more common in parts of the developing world. Due to its rarity and the consequent lack of randomized trials, current therapy is based on retrospective studies and small prospective trials. Design Studies of PC therapy were searched in PubMed and abstracts at major conferences. Results PC is generally an aggressive malignancy characterized by early locoregional lymph node (LN) spread and later metastases in distant sites. Given the strong predictive value of LN involvement for overall survival, evaluating regional LNs is critical. Advanced LN involvement is increasingly being treated with multimodality therapy incorporating chemotherapy and/or radiation. A single superior cisplatin-based regimen has not been defined. Further advances may occur with a better collaboration on an international scale and comprehensive understanding of tumor biology. To this end, the preventive role of circumcision and understanding of the oncogenic roles of Human Papilloma Virus-16, and smoking may yield advances. Preliminary data suggest a role for agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and angiogenesis. Conclusion Advances in therapy for PC will require efficient trial designs, synergistic collaboration, incentives to industry and the efforts of patient advocacy groups and venture philanthropists.
Assuntos
Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Neoplasias Penianas/terapia , Circuncisão Masculina , Terapia Combinada , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inibidores , Papillomavirus Humano 16/patogenicidade , Humanos , Masculino , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Neoplasias Penianas/virologia , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an established treatment for multiple malignancies. We carried out an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in cancer patients treated with mTOR inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PubMed, conferences and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for articles reported from January 1966 to June 2012. Eligible studies were limited to approved mTOR inhibitors (everolimus and temsirolimus) and reported on patients with cancer, randomized design and adequate safety profiles. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: In all, 3193 patients from eight randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were included, 2236 from everolimus trials and 957 from temsirolimus trials. The relative risk (RR) of FAEs related to mTOR inhibitors use was 2.20 (95% CI, 1.25-3.90; P = 0.006) compared with control patients. On subgroup analysis, no difference in the rate of FAEs was found between everolimus and temsirolimus or between tumor types [renal cell carcinoma (RCC) versus non-RCC]. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of mTOR inhibitors is associated with a small but higher risk of FAEs compared to control patients. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of these drugs remains justified in their approved indications.
Assuntos
Sirolimo/análogos & derivados , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Everolimo , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Risco , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Sirolimo/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Despite recent advances, metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains largely an incurable disease. Vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have provided improvements in clinical outcomes. High-dose interleukin 2 remains an option for highly selected patients and is associated with durable remissions in a small minority of patients. The toxicity profiles of specific agents and patient characteristics and comorbidities and costs have an important role in the current choice of therapy. Major challenges encountered in developing molecular biomarkers to guide therapy are tumour heterogeneity and standardisation of tissue collection and analysis. Although biomarkers are in their infancy of development, they should be a priority in early preclinical and clinical development in order to guide rational tailored development of emerging agents.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), though carboplatin-based chemotherapy is frequently substituted due to improved tolerability. Because comparative effectiveness in clinical outcomes of cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy is lacking, a meta-analysis was carried out. METHODS: PubMed was searched for articles published from 1966 to 2010. Eligible studies included prospective randomized trials evaluating cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based regimens in patients with metastatic UC. Individual patient data were not available and survival data were inconsistently reported. Therefore, the analysis focused on overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used for combining trials and calculating pooled risk ratios (RRs). RESULTS: A total of 286 patients with metastatic UC from four randomized trials were included. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of achieving a CR [RR = 3.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-8.49; P = 0.005] and OR (RR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.04-1.71; P = 0.02). Survival end points could not be adequately assessed due to inconsistent reporting among trials. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based, as compared with carboplatin-based, chemotherapy significantly increases the likelihood of both OR and CR in patients with metastatic UC. The impact of improved response proportions on survival end points could not be assessed.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/secundário , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias Urológicas/secundárioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment options remain limited for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We evaluated eribulin mesylate (E7389), a nontaxane halichondrin B analog microtubule inhibitor, in patients with metastatic CRPC with or without previous taxane exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with histologically proven CRPC, with or without prior taxane exposure, were enrolled in an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Patients received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m(2) as a 2- to 5-min i.v. bolus infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary efficacy end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were assessable for safety (50 were taxane-pretreated) and 105 for efficacy in the per-protocol population. The median age of patients was 71 years and median number of cycles was 4. PSA decreases of ≥ 50% were achieved in 22.4% and 8.5% of taxane-naive and taxane-pretreated patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, seen in 22.4% of chemo-naive and 40% of taxane-pretreated men. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in none of the taxane-naive patients and 6.0% of taxane-pretreated patients. CONCLUSION: Eribulin mesylate demonstrated activity and a relatively favorable toxicity profile in metastatic CRPC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Furanos/uso terapêutico , Cetonas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Furanos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Cetonas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Orquiectomia , Seleção de Pacientes , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: AT-101 (A), a small molecule oral inhibitor of the Bcl-2 family, has activity alone and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere) and prednisone (DP) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial compared DP combined with either AT-101 (A) or placebo in chemonaive mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with progressive mCRPC despite androgen deprivation were eligible and randomized 1:1. Patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2 day 1) and prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily every 21 days with either AT-101 (40 mg) or placebo twice daily orally on days 1-3. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients were randomly assigned. Median OS for AT-101 plus docetaxel-prednisone (ADP) and placebo-DP was 18.1 versus 17.8 months [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.55, P=0.63]. Secondary end points were also not statistically different. Grade 3/4 toxic effects for ADP versus placebo-DP were cardiac events (5% versus 2%), lymphopenia (23% versus 16%), neutropenia (47% versus 40%), ileus (2% versus 0%) and pulmonary embolism (6% versus 2%). In a subgroup of high-risk mCRPC (n=34), outcomes appeared to favor ADP (median OS 19 versus 14 months). CONCLUSIONS: AT-101 was tolerable but did not extend OS when combined with DP in mCRPC; a potential benefit was observed in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Docetaxel , Gossipol/administração & dosagem , Gossipol/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Orquiectomia , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-bcl-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (ddMVAC) and gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: Patient treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2010 to 2019 were identified. HRU data on chemotherapy administered, supportive medications, patient monitoring, clinic, infusion, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization were collected retrospectively. Unit costs for HRU components were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Website and HRU was compared between groups using quantile regression analysis. RESULTS: 137 patients were included; 51 received ddMVAC and 86 GC. Baseline characteristics were similar, except lower mean age (P < 0.001) and higher proportion of ECOG-PSâ¯=â¯0 (P < 0.001) for ddMVAC. ddMVAC required more granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support (P < 0.001), central line placement (Pâ¯=â¯0.017), cardiac imaging (P < 0.001), and infusion visits (P < 0.001), whereas GC required more clinic visits. ED visits were higher for ddMVAC (Pâ¯=â¯0.048), while chemotherapy cycle delays and hospitalization days were higher for GC (Pâ¯=â¯0.008). After adjusting for ECOG-PS and age, the cost per patient was approximately 41% lower (95%CI: 28% to 52%; P < 0.001) for GC vs. ddMVAC, which translated to a median adjusted cost savings of $7,410 (95%CI: $5,474-$9,347) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Although excess HRU did not clearly favor one regimen, adjusting for PS and age indicated lower costs with GC vs. ddMVAC. Given the similar cumulative cisplatin delivery with both regimens, the associated values and costs supports the preferential selection of GC in the neoadjuvant setting of MIBC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/economia , Vimblastina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Desoxicitidina/farmacologia , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vimblastina/farmacologia , GencitabinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy options are limited for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients who progress following docetaxel (Taxotere). This phase II trial evaluated sunitinib malate in patients with progressing metastatic CRPC following prior docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic CRPC progressing following one to two chemotherapy regimens including docetaxel were included. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per radiographic and clinical evaluations. Oral sunitinib was administered 50 mg/day 4-weeks on followed by 2-weeks off per cycle up to a maximum of eight cycles or until clinical progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a median age of 69.5 years were accrued. The median PFS was 19.4 weeks with a 12-week PFS of 75.8%. Four patients (12.1%) had a > or =50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline and seven (21.2%) had a > or =30% PSA decline. Two of 18 patients (11.1%) with measurable disease demonstrated 30% declines by RECIST and eight (44.4%) displayed some shrinkage. A decline in pain score > or =2 points occurred in 13.6% of 22 assessable patients. Drug discontinuation due to toxic effects occurred in 52.8% of patients. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib malate demonstrated promising activity in metastatic CRPC progressing after prior docetaxel.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Castração , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Humanos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Sunitinibe , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Bladder cancer is the second most common genitourinary malignancy in the United States, and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Despite aggressive treatment, survival for patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder remains poor. Cancer stage, grade, and other clinical and pathological characteristics provide only limited prognostic information, and there is significant heterogeneity in patient outcomes using current risk stratification. Recent research into the profiling of bladder cancer at the molecular level has begun to shed light on important mechanisms of pathogenesis, as well as providing a number of potential tissue markers. These may provide useful prognostic information and guide patient selection for therapeutic strategies. This review explores recent advances in tissue-based molecular markers in bladder cancer and their potential utility. We also discuss design and statistical consideration for development and validation of molecular markers. A combination of complementary and yet independent molecular markers will likely better capture the biologic potential of each individual bladder tumor resulting in improved clinical decision-making.