HSP110 T17 simplifies and improves the microsatellite instability testing in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Every colorectal cancer (CRC) patient should be tested for microsatellite instability (MSI, a marker for defective DNA mismatch repair) as a first screen for Lynch syndrome (LS). In this study, we investigated whether it may be possible to improve the detection of MSI in CRC. We examined whether the HT17 DNA repeat (critical for correct splicing of the chaperone HSP110) might constitute a superior marker for diagnosis of the MSI phenotype in patients with CRC compared with the standard panel of markers (pentaplex). METHODS: The HT17 polymorphism was analysed in germline DNA from 1037 multi-ethnic individuals. We assessed its sensitivity and specificity for detecting MSI in a multicentre, population-based cohort of 685 patients with CRC and an additional series of 70 patients with CRC considered to be at-risk of LS. All cases were screened earlier for MSI using pentaplex markers. Cases showing discordant HT17/pentaplex results were further examined for the expression of mismatch repair proteins. RESULTS: HT17 status was analysed independently and blinded to previous results from pentaplex genotyping. HT17 showed no germline allelic variation outside a very narrow range. Compared with the pentaplex panel, HT17 showed better sensitivity (0.984 (95% CI 0.968 to 0.995) vs 0.951 (95% CI 0.925 to 0.972)) and similar specificity (0.997 (95% CI 0.989 to 1.000) for both) for the detection of MSI. Furthermore, HT17 alone correctly classified samples judged to be uncertain with the pentaplex panel and showed excellent ability to detect MSI in patients with LS. CONCLUSIONS: HT17 simplifies and improves the current standard molecular methods for detecting MSI in CRC.

Postoperative Outcome of Surgery with Pancreatic Resection for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Results of a Retrospective Bicentric Analysis on 50 Consecutive Patients.

BACKGROUNDS: Multivisceral resection is the standard treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) during which pancreas resection may be necessary. METHODS: All consecutive patients operated for RPS with pancreatectomy in 2 expert centers between 1993 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age: 57 years, IQR: [46-65]) with a primary (n = 33) or recurrent (n = 17) RPS underwent surgery requiring pancreas resection (distal pancreatectomy (DP) (n = 43), pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (n = 5), central pancreatectomy (n = 1), and atypical resection (n = 1)). Severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) was observed in 14 patients (28%), and 7 of them (14%) required reoperation for anastomotic bowel leakage (n = 5), gastric volvulus (n = 1), or hemorrhage (n = 1). Pancreas-related complications occurred in 25 patients (50%): 10 postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) (grade A (n = 12), grade B (n = 6), grade C (n = 1)), 13 delayed gastric emptying (grade A (n = 8), grade B (n = 4), grade C (n = 1)), 1 hemorrhage (grade C). Postoperative mortality was 4% (n = 2), all following PD, caused by a massive intraoperative air embolism and by a multiple organ failure after anastomotic leakage. Pathological analysis confirmed pancreatic involvement in 17 (34%) specimens. Microscopically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 22 (44%) patients. After a follow-up of 60 months, 36 patients (75%) were still alive, among whom 27 without recurrence (56%). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic resection during RPS surgery is associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. PD should be avoided whenever possible while other procedures seemed achievable without excessive morbidity and with long-term survival.

Peritoneal and extraperitoneal relapse after previous curative treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: What survival can we expect?

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 20 years, complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) dramatically increased the survival of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). However, despite better knowledge of the disease, around 70% of patients relapse after CRS with HIPEC. This study was designed to analyse the pattern of recurrence and the outcomes of different treatment modalities. METHODS: Patients relapsing after CRS plus HIPEC for CRPM were selected from a prospective database. The impact of iterative curative-intent treatments was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Between April 1993 and December 2014, 190 of 274 (69%) patients previously treated by CRS plus HIPEC developed relapse, as an isolated peritoneal recurrence (31%), isolated distant recurrence (35%), or multisite recurrence (34%). The curative-intent treatment rate was 48% for isolated peritoneal recurrences, 49% for isolated distant recurrences and 22% for multisite recurrences (p = 0.002). From the diagnosis of relapse, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 77% and 46% after curative-intent treatment and 14% and 4.7% after non-curative treatment, with median survival of 59.7 and 18.3 months (log-rank p < 0.0001), respectively. Regression analysis identified the initial extent of CRPM (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.25; p < 0.0001), iterative curative-intent treatment (HR: 0.22; p < 0.0001) and disease-free interval (HR: 1.77; p = 0.01) as independent predictors of prolonged survival. CONCLUSIONS: Iterative curative-intent treatment can be performed in up to 40% of patients with relapse after CRS and HIPEC for CRPM, and is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients.

Day Surgery for Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Prospective Series of 102 Patients.

AIM: To report the results of a consecutive series of day surgery appendectomy (DSA) for acute appendicitis. METHODS: Selection criteria for DSA were as follows: body mass index<28 kg/m, white cell count <15,000/mL, C-reactive protein<30 mg/L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter ≤10 mm. All patients with radiologically proven appendicitis and 4 or 5 criteria were proposed for DSA and prospectively included. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (female=39.2%) were operated between January 1, 2013 and January 5, 2015 with a median age of 29.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 23 to 37 y]. Diagnosis was mainly supported by computed tomographic scan (75.5%). About 60 patients (59%) were reconvened on the next morning for surgery with oral antibiotics. The median operative time was 40 minutes (IQR, 30 to 52 min), and 92 (90%) patients were discharged on day 0 after a postoperative period of 5h:12min (IQR, 4h:14min to 6h:33min). The overall median hospital length of stay was 8h:04min (IQR, 6h:46min to 10h:23min). Surgical morbidity was 6.9% (n=7), with 1.9% (n=2) major complications. CONCLUSIONS: DSA is a safe procedure for selected patients; it reduces the hospital length of stay without increasing morbidity.