Trough:peak ratio of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and nifedipine retard in essential hypertensive patients: an Italian multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard in terms of trough:peak ratio efficacy. METHODS: According to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design, 58 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, after 1 month placebo washout, received 30 mg/day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system, 20 mg nifedipine retard twice a day and the corresponding placebos for 1 month. At the end of each treatment period, blood pressure was measured by using a mercury sphygmomanometer at trough and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the last dosing. The peak effect was identified as the maximum decrement induced by the three randomized treatments with respect to the value at the end of the placebo washout period during the 4 h interval. The trough:peak ratios of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated as group ratios and individual ratios from decrements induced by nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard, corrected for those induced by randomized placebo. Patients were defined as responders to each randomized treatment if their diastolic blood pressure at trough time was reduced by at least 10 mmHg relative to that at the corresponding time at the end of placebo washout. RESULTS: Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and retard significantly reduced blood pressure to a similar extent both at trough and at peak. Systolic and diastolic group trough:peak ratios in responders to nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (n = 41) were 0.80 and 0.88, respectively, and those in responders to nifedipine retard (n = 30) 0.84 and 0.93, respectively. The percentage of patients with trough:peak ratios > 0.50 was > 80% (systolic trough:peak ratios) and above 90% (diastolic trough: peak ratios) for both nifedipine formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that 30 mg/day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system and 20 mg nifedipine retard twice a day have a favourable trough:peak ratios efficacy when given as monotherapy to essential hypertensive patients.

Aspirin does not affect exercise performance.

A single-blind, cross-over study was carried out to evaluate the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on cardiorespiratory performance during exercise. Eighteen young men, 9 athletes and 9 untrained but active subjects, performed a progressive maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer (30 watt, 3 min steps, starting at 60 watt) on three different occasions, after a single administration of plain aspirin (1000mg of ASA), chewable buffered aspirin (1000mg of ASA and 600 mg of calcium carbonate) and placebo. Continuous measurement of breath-by-breath ventilation, oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide output, respiratory frequency and heart rate was carried-out at rest and during the exercise test. Blood lactate concentration was measured just before the start of exercise and at the third minute of each step in order to detect the anaerobic threshold. The pharmacokinetics of aspirin during exercise was also investigated in ten of the eighteen participants. The analysis of all investigated variables did not show any statistically significant difference between treatments, suggesting that a single dose of 1000mg of aspirin does not affect physical performance during submaximal and maximal exercise.