Incidence, clinical presentation and imaging findings of cavernous malformations of the CNS. A twenty-year experience.

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: Up to 88% of cavernous malformations (CMs) of the central nervous system can become symptomatic and cause long-term disability. The aim of this study was to document the characteristics of CMs in the catchment area of our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed newly discovered CMs over a 20-year observation period, as well as the frequency of familial forms in the catchment area. RESULTS: In the period from 1985-2004, a total of 347 patients were investigated. The cohort included about 75% symptomatic CM cases. A total of 1.31 and 0.55 symptomatic and asymptomatic cases, respectively, were newly diagnosed per annum per 100'000 inhabitants. Symptomatic CMs were diagnosed on average at the age of 36 years (range: newborn to 79 years old). There were slightly more patients who presented with evidence of acute bleeding (28%) than those with seizures (26%). Most intracranial lesions were supratentorial in location (54%). Lesion size was predominately below 3 cm (range: 0.2 to 8 cm). Symptomatic CMs (average: 1.75 cm) were significantly larger (p <.0001) than asymptomatic ones (average 0.91 cm). When compared to medical literature, there was a relatively high frequency of multiple CMs (18.9%), which were more common in the familial form (62%). CONCLUSIONS: The observed frequency of CM, including multiple lesions in a single individual and the familial form of this pathological entity appears relatively high compared to medical literature.

Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of in situ postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of primary traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty forensic neurotrauma cases and 10 nontraumatic controls who underwent both in situ postmortem cranial MSCT and MR imaging before autopsy were retrospectively reviewed. Both imaging modalities were analyzed in view of their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity concerning the detection of extra-axial hemorrhage. Statistical significance was calculated using the McNemar test. kappa values for interobserver agreement were calculated for extra-axial hemorrhage types and to quantify the agreement between both modalities as well as MRI, CT, and forensics, respectively. RESULTS: Analysis of the detection of hemorrhagic localizations showed an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 89%, 82%, and 92% using CT, and 90%, 83%, and 94% using MRI, respectively. MRI was more sensitive than CT in the detection of subarachnoid hemorrhagic localizations (P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference resulted from the detection of epidural and subdural hemorrhagic findings (P = 0.248 and P = 0.104, respectively). Interobserver agreement for all extra-axial hemorrhage types was substantial (CT kappa = 0.76; MRI kappa = 0.77). The agreement of both modalitites was almost perfect (readers 1 and 2 kappa = 0.88). CONCLUSION: CT and MRI are of comparable potential as forensic diagnostic tools for traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage. Not only of forensic, but also of clinical interest is the observation that most thin blood layers escape the radiological evaluation.

Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography.

To compare the clinical importance of extracolonic findings at intravenous (IV) contrast-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. IV contrast medium-enhanced (n=72) and non-enhanced (n=30) multidetector CT colonography was performed in 102 symptomatic patients followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The impact of extracolonic findings on further work up and treatment was assessed by a review of patient records. Extracolonic findings were divided into two groups: either leading to further work up respectively having an impact on therapy or not. A total of 303 extracolonic findings were detected. Of those, 71% (215/303) were found on IV contrast-enhanced CT, and 29% (88/303) were found on non-enhanced CT colonography. The extracolonic findings in 25% (26/102) of all patients led to further work up or had an impact on therapy. Twenty-two of these patients underwent CT colonography with IV contrast enhancement, and four without. The percentage of extracolonic findings leading to further work up or having an impact on therapy was higher for IV contrast-enhanced (31%; 22/72) than for non-enhanced (13%; 4/30) CT scans (P=0.12). IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography produced more extracolonic findings than non-enhanced CT colonography. A substantially greater proportion of findings on IV contrast-enhanced CT colonography led to further work up and treatment than did non-enhanced CT colonography.

Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in Western countries. Early detection by colorectal cancer screening can effectively cut its mortality rate. CT colonography represents a promising, minimally invasive alternative to conventional methods of colorectal carcinoma screening. AIMS: The purpose of this prospective single institutional study was to compare the abilities of routine clinical CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy to detect colorectal neoplasms using second-look colonoscopy to clarify discrepant results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CT colonography was performed in 100 symptomatic patients using contrast enhanced multidetector CT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. If results were discrepant, a second-look colonoscopy was performed after unblinding. CT colonographic findings were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy found 122 colorectal neoplasms in 49 patients. The overall sensitivity of CT colonography at detecting patients with at least one polyp 6 mm or larger was 76% and its specificity was 88%. Its by-patient sensitivity for polyps 10 mm or larger was 95% and its specificity was 98%. By-polyp sensitivities were 71% for polyps 10 mm or larger, and 61% for polyps 6 mm or larger. A second-look colonoscopy was performed in 19 patients and two initial false-positive findings of CT colonography were reclassified as true-positive. For conventional colonoscopy, this produced a by-polyp sensitivity of 94% for detection of lesions 6 mm and larger. CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography had both a high by-patient sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically important colorectal neoplasms 10 mm or larger. This suggests that CT colonography has the potential to become a valuable clinical screening method for colorectal neoplasms.

Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new virtual colon dissection 3D visualization technique for CT colonography has a shorter analysis time and better sensitivity for detection of colonic polyps than interpretation of axial CT images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT colonography was performed in 22 patients using 4-MDCT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The CT colonography data sets were analyzed by virtual colon dissection, which virtually bisects and unfolds the colon along its longitudinal axis to inspect the inner colonic surface for polyps. The same CT data sets were independently evaluated using axial interpretation. All data sets were independently interpreted by two radiologists in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed 31 colonic lesions in 20 patients. Twenty two of the lesions were smaller than 10 mm; nine were 10 mm or larger. Two of the original 22 patients were excluded, one because of residual stool and fluid and the other because of an impassable stenosing rectal wall cancer. For virtual colon dissection, the per-lesion sensitivity was 42% for observer 1 and 68% for observer 2; for axial interpretation, the respective sensitivities were 48% and 61%. For polyps 10 mm or larger, the respective sensitivities were 67% and 89% for virtual colon dissection and 89% and 100% for axial interpretation. The average time for reconstruction and analysis of virtual colon dissection was 36.8 min versus 29.2 min for axial images. Virtual colon dissection was feasible in both the supine and the prone positions in 45.5% of colonic segments, in either the supine or the prone position in 24.5%, and in neither position in 30% of segments. CONCLUSION: Although virtual colon dissection may facilitate detection of colonic polyps in isolated cases, its detection rate is not superior to axial interpretation, which is mainly attributable to failed rendering of insufficiently distended colonic segments or regions with residual feces. Virtual colon dissection is also the more time-consuming of the two procedures. With further improvement of path-finding and image segmentation, however, virtual colon dissection has the potential to be a useful interpretation tool for CT colonography.