Relative Bioavailability of Sotorasib Following Administration as a Water Dispersion to Healthy Subjects and Compatibility With Enteral Administration.

Sotorasib is approved to be taken as 960 mg orally once daily (8 × 120-mg tablets) for the treatment of KRAS G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer. Dispersion of tablets in water could be an alternative method for patients who require a liquid formulation due to dysphagia and enteral administration. A clinical study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics of 960 mg of sotorasib administered as tablets and as tablets dispersed in water in healthy volunteers. Each subject received 960 mg of sotorasib by mouth, as tablets and as tablets dispersed in water on Days 1 and 4. Sotorasib median time to maximum observed plasma concentration was similar when administered as tablets and as tablets predispersed in water. The geometric least squares mean ratios (water dispersion/tablets) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity and maximum observed plasma concentration were 1.049 and 1.080, respectively. Sotorasib 960 mg was well tolerated. Administration of 960 mg of sotorasib as tablets predispersed in water achieved similar systemic exposures to that of sotorasib administered as oral tablets. In vitro evaluations were performed to assess the feasibility of administering sotorasib through an enteral feeding tube. Approximately 98% of sotorasib was recovered, with no new impurities, from enteral feeding tubes. Collectively, these results support that sotorasib can be administered by mouth and via enteral feeding tubes as tablets predispersed in water.

Evaluation of drug-drug interaction potential between omecamtiv mecarbil and rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, with a clinical study in healthy subjects and using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model.

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure. In vitro, OM is an inhibitor of BCRP. Rosuvastatin, a BCRP substrate, is one of the most commonly prescribed medications in patients with heart failure. The potential for a pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction (DDI) was investigated, specifically to determine whether a single 50 mg dose of OM would impact the PKs of a single 10 mg dose of rosuvastatin in an open-label study in 14 healthy subjects. The ratios of the geometric least-square means (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of rosuvastatin co-administered with OM compared to rosuvastatin alone were 127.1% (90% CI 113.8-141.9), 132.8% (90% CI 120.7-146.1), and 154.2% (90% CI 132.8-179.1) for area under the plasma-concentration time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf ), area under the plasma-concentration time curve from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ), and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ), respectively. Whereas the DDI study with rosuvastatin was conducted with the co-administration of a single dose of OM, in the clinical setting, patients receive OM at doses of 25, 37.5, or 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Hence, to extrapolate the results of the DDI study to a clinically relevant scenario of continuous b.i.d. dosing with OM, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was performed to explore the potential of BCRP inhibition following continuous b.i.d. dosing of OM at the highest 50 mg dose. Modeling results indicated that following 50 mg b.i.d. dosing of OM, the predicted ratios of the geometric means (90% CIs) for rosuvastatin AUCinf and Cmax were 1.18 (90% CI 1.16-1.20) and 2.04 (90% CI 1.99-2.10), respectively. Therefore, these results suggest that OM, following multiple dose administration, is a weak inhibitor of BCRP substrates and is in accordance with that observed in the single dose OM DDI clinical study.

Effect of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on the Pharmacokinetics of Metformin, a Probe Substrate for MATE1/MATE2-K, in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential for OM to affect the pharmacokinetics of metformin. METHODS: This was an open-label, fixed-sequence study in 14 healthy subjects. On Day 1, subjects received an 850 mg oral dose of metformin. From Days 4 to 9, subjects received twice-daily 25 mg oral doses of OM tablets. On Day 10, subjects received an 850 mg oral dose of metformin and a single 25 mg tablet of OM. Blood and urine samples were collected up to 36 h post-dose following administration of metformin on Days 1 and 10 to characterize concentrations of metformin in plasma and urine. RESULTS: The ratios of the geometric least square means of metformin coadministered with OM compared to metformin alone were 98.7%, 99.3%, and 110.2% for AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax, respectively. The mean renal clearance of metformin was similar following metformin administered alone (34.2 L/h) compared to metformin coadministered with OM (32.9 L/h). All adverse events were mild in severity and resolved prior to the end of the study. No serious adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation from the study. CONCLUSIONS: There was no clinically relevant effect of OM on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in healthy subjects.