Whole Genome Sequencing, Focused Assays and Functional Studies Increasing Understanding in Cryptic Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.

The inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically complex group of disorders primarily affecting the rod and cone photoreceptors or other retinal neuronal layers, with emerging therapies heralding the need for accurate molecular diagnosis. Targeted capture and panel-based strategies examining the partial or full exome deliver molecular diagnoses in many IRD families tested. However, approximately one in three families remain unsolved and unable to obtain personalised recurrence risk or access to new clinical trials or therapy. In this study, we investigated whole genome sequencing (WGS), focused assays and functional studies to assist with unsolved IRD cases and facilitate integration of these approaches to a broad molecular diagnostic clinical service. The WGS approach identified variants not covered or underinvestigated by targeted capture panel-based clinical testing strategies in six families. This included structural variants, with notable benefit of the WGS approach in repetitive regions demonstrated by a family with a hybrid gene and hemizygous missense variant involving the opsin genes, OPN1LW and OPN1MW. There was also benefit in investigation of the repetitive GC-rich ORF15 region of RPGR. Further molecular investigations were facilitated by focused assays in these regions. Deep intronic variants were identified in IQCB1 and ABCA4, with functional RNA based studies of the IQCB1 variant revealing activation of a cryptic splice acceptor site. While targeted capture panel-based methods are successful in achieving an efficient molecular diagnosis in a proportion of cases, this study highlights the additional benefit and clinical value that may be derived from WGS, focused assays and functional genomics in the highly heterogeneous IRDs.

A Paediatric Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia Patient Harbouring a Cryptic PML-RARA Insertion due to a Complex Structural Chromosome 17 Rearrangement.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia with PML-RARA fusion is usually associated with the t(15;17)(q24.1;q21.1) translocation but may also arise from complex or cryptic rearrangements. The fusion usually resides on chromosome 15 but occasionally on others. We describe a cryptic PML-RARA fusion within a novel chromosome 17 rearrangement. We performed interphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using a dual-fusion PML-RARA probe, followed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for PML-RARA, karyotyping, and metaphase FISH using RARA break-apart, locus-specific, and subtelomere probes for chromosome 17. An 850K SNP microarray was also employed. Interphase and metaphase FISH showed atypical results involving a single PML-RARA fusion, no second fusion, but instead separate diminished PML and RARA signals. RT-PCR confirmed PML-RARA fusion; however, karyotyping detected only an altered chromosome 17. Metaphase FISH showed the single fusion and diminished 5' RARA signals located unexpectedly in the subtelomeric short-arm and long-arm regions of the rearranged chromosome 17, respectively. SNP microarray revealed no copy number abnormality. This paediatric patient with PML-RARA fusion reflects a cryptic insertion that resides within a complex and novel chromosome 17 rearrangement. This rearrangement likely arose via 7 chromosome breaks with the insertion occurring first followed by sequential paracentric and then pericentric inversions.

SNP chromosome microarray genotyping for detection of uniparental disomy in the clinical diagnostic laboratory.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosome microarray is well established for investigation of children with intellectual deficit/development delay and prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation but has also emerged for uniparental disomy (UPD) genotyping. Despite published guidelines on clinical indications for testing there are no laboratory guidelines published for performing SNP microarray UPD genotyping. We evaluated SNP microarray UPD genotyping using Illumina beadchips on family trios/duos within a clinical cohort (n=98) and then explored our findings in a post-study audit (n=123). UPD occurred in 18.6% and 19.5% cases, respectively, with chromosome 15 most frequent (62.5% and 25.0%). UPD was predominantly maternal in origin (87.5% and 79.2%), highest in suspected genomic imprinting disorder cases (56.3% and 41.7%) but absent amongst children of translocation carriers. We assessed regions of homozygosity among UPD cases. The smallest interstitial and terminal regions were 2.5 Mb and 9.3 Mb, respectively. We found regions of homozygosity confounded genotyping in a consanguineous case with UPD15 and another with segmental UPD due to non-informative probes. In a unique case with chromosome 15q UPD mosaicism, we established the detection limit of mosaicism as ∼5%. From the benefits and pitfalls identified in this study, we propose a testing model and recommendations for UPD genotyping by SNP microarray.

FISH analysis of brain smears obtained at intraoperative diagnosis - An accurate and fast method to detect 1p/19q-codeletion in gliomas.

The importance of molecular testing of gliomas is highlighted in the 2016 revised 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, which applies an integrated diagnosis of histological and molecular features. In this classification system, oligodendrogliomas (ODG) are defined as IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a standard method of determining 1p/19q-codeletion. However, it has several disadvantages, including requiring lengthy pretreatment, truncation artefact and lack of on-site access in many centers. In an effort to address these issues, we analysed FISH performed on smears obtained at intraoperative frozen section on 51 gliomas and compared this to FISH performed on subsequent FFPE sections. Four cases were excluded due to uninterpretable FISH results. Of the remaining 47 cases, 17 were concordant for 1p/19q-codeletion, 29 were concordant for lack of 1p/19q-codeletion, and 1 was discordant with 1p/19q-codeletion found on FFPE tissue but not on intraoperative smears. The discordant case was most likely due to sampling error, as the frozen section had not shown definite tumor. The FISH results on intraoperative smears were received within 24-48 h after the sample was collected, compared with 3-4 days for FFPE tissue. FISH on smears obtained at intraoperative frozen section is an accurate and fast method for determining 1p/19q-codeletion.

Paternally inherited submicroscopic duplication at 11p15.5 implicates insulin-like growth factor II in overgrowth and Wilms' tumorigenesis.

Loss of imprinting at insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII), in association with H19 silencing, has been described previously in a subgroup of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) patients who have an elevated risk for Wilms' tumor. An equivalent somatic mutation occurs in sporadic Wilms' tumor. We describe a family with overgrowth in three generations and Wilms' tumor in two generations, with paternal inheritance of a cis-duplication at 11p15.5 spanning the BWS IC1 region and including H19, IGFII, INS, and TH. The duplicated region was below the limit of detection by high-resolution karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization, has a predicted minimum size of 400 kb, and was confirmed by genotyping and gene-dosage analysis on a CytoChip comparative genomic hybridization bacterial artificial chromosome array. IGFII is the only known paternally expressed oncogene mapping within the duplicated region and our findings directly implicate IGFII in Wilms' tumorigenesis and add to the mutation spectrum that increases the effective dose of IGFII. Furthermore, this study raises the possibility that sporadic cases of overgrowth and Wilms' tumor, presenting with apparent gain of methylation at IC1, may be explained by submicroscopic paternal duplications. This finding has important implications for determining the transmission risk in these disorders.

Chromosomal rearrangements and novel genes in disorders of eye development, cataract and glaucoma.

Disorders of eye development such as microphthalmia and anophthalmia (small and absent eyes respectively), anterior segment dysgenesis where there may be pupillary and iris anomalies, and associated cataract and glaucoma, often lead to visual impairment or blindness. Currently treatment options are limited, as much is unknown about the molecular pathways that control normal eye development and induce the aberrant processes that lead to ocular defects. Mutation detection rates in most of the known genes are generally low, emphasizing the genetic heterogeneity of developmental ocular defects. Identification of the disease genes in these conditions improves the clinical information available for affected individuals and families, and provides new insights into the underlying biological processes for facilitation of better treatment options. Investigation of chromosomal rearrangements associated with an ocular phenotype has been especially powerful for disease gene identification. Molecular characterization of such rearrangements, which pinpoints the region by physically disrupting the causative gene or its regulatory sequences, allows for rapid elucidation of underlying genetic factors that contribute to the phenotype. Genes including PAX6, PITX2, FOXC1, MAF, TMEM114, SOX2, OTX2 and BMP4 have been identified in this way to be associated with developmental eye disorders. More recently, new methods in chromosomal analysis such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarray, have also enhanced our ability in disease gene identification.

Apparently unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities among 462 probands referred for the detection of del(22q) by FISH.

Laboratory-based reports of the cytogenetic abnormalities detected during the course of testing for deletion del(22q) are scant. We report our findings from the testing with FISH of 462 patients suspected to have del(22q) between 1994 and 2000. Of these, 447 had a normal karyotype. An apparently unrelated cytogenetic abnormality was detected in 15 (3.2%). Two of these abnormalities involved reciprocal translocation with chromosome 22q and one of these showed del(22q) with FISH. The other abnormalities included sex chromosome aneuploidies and unbalanced rearrangements of various chromosomal segments. There was no commonality among these abnormalities and no correlation with other reported cases. Among those with a normal karyotype, an unexpected deletion of the control arylsulphatase A (ARSA) probe was found, providing a definite frequency of 1/262 for ARSA deletions among patients suspected to have del(22q). Of the 462 referrals, 48 (10%) had one or more additional diagnoses, and in this group, 4 (8%) had del(22q) and 2 (4%) had an apparently unrelated cytogenetic abnormality. The data highlight the importance of initial cytogenetic analysis in patients suspected of del(22q) and negates the use of interphase FISH screening by itself for del(22q). The finding of 3.2% unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities is noteworthy. FISH should be used in any structural rearrangement to ascertain if the relevant locus is deleted or not. The continued reporting of patients diagnosed with del(22q) found to have an unrelated cytogenetic abnormality will expand the phenotypic spectrum and possible gene mapping may refine phenotypic specificity.

Two mosaic terminal inverted duplications arising post-zygotically: Evidence for possible formation of neo-telomeres.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the structure of terminal inverted duplications and to investigate potential mechanisms of formation in two cases where there was mosaicism with cells of apparently normal karyotype. RESULTS: A karyotype [46,XY,inv dup(4)(p16.3p15.1)/46,XY] performed on blood lymphocytes from a patient referred for developmental delay (case 1) demonstrated a normal karyotype in 60% of cells with a terminal inverted duplication 4p in the remainder. In case 2, referred for multiple fetal anomalies on an ultrasound scan, 33% of amniocyte colonies were karyotypically normal, with a terminal inv dup 10p in the remainder [46,XX,inv dup(10)(p15.3p11)/46,XX]. Duplicated FISH signals for GATA3 and NEBL loci (in case 2), and for the Wolf-Hirschhorn locus (case 1) confirmed the inverted structure of both duplications. In the GTL banded normal cells from both cases, there was a cryptic deletion detected by FISH of one copy of the subtelomere 4p (case 1, probe GS-36P21), and subtelomere 10p (case 2, probe GS-306F7). At pter on both inv dup chromosomes there was no FISH signal present for the specific subtelomere probe. However, a positive pantelomeric probe signal was detected at 4 pter and 10 pter in both the cryptically-deleted chromosomes and the inv dup chromosomes in the respective cell lines of both cases. CONCLUSION: An inv dup structure was evident for both cases on GTL bands, and confirmed by the various FISH studies. The presence of telomere (TTAGGG repeat) sequences at pter on the inv dup chromosomes (where more proximal chromosome specific subtelomeric probes were negative) was indicated by the pantelomeric probe signals in both cases. We conclude the most likely mechanism of origin in both cases was by sub-telomeric breakage in the zygote at pter, and delayed repair/rearrangement until after one or more subsequent mitotic divisions. In these divisions, at least one breakage-fusion-bridge cycle occurred, to produce inverted duplications. It is proposed then that two differently "repaired" daughter cells proliferated in parallel. In one daughter cell line (with an overtly normal karyotype) there was deletion of the subtelomere and presumed repair through capping by a neo-telomere (i.e. "healing", as initially proposed by McClintock). This occurred in both cases presented. In the other daughter cell of each case, it is proposed that chromosome stabilization was achieved (after replication) by sister chromatid reunion to form a dicentric, which broke at a subsequent anaphase, to form an inverted duplication (with loss of the reciprocal product, and the other daughter cell line). One inv dup was repaired without an interstitial specific subtelomere (case 1) and one was repaired with a duplicated specific interstitial subtelomere (case 2). After repair TTAGGG repeats were detected by FISH at each respective new pter.

Deletion at 14q22-23 indicates a contiguous gene syndrome comprising anophthalmia, pituitary hypoplasia, and ear anomalies.

Anophthalmia and pituitary gland hypoplasia are both debilitating conditions where the underlying genetic defect is unknown in the majority of cases. We identified a patient with bilateral anophthalmia and absence of the optic nerves, chiasm and tracts, as well as pituitary gland hypoplasia and ear anomalies with a de novo apparently balanced chromosomal translocation, 46,XY,t(3;14)(q28;q23.2). Translocation breakpoint analysis using FISH and high-resolution microarray comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has identified a 9.66 Mb deleted region on the long arm of chromosome 14 which includes the genes BMP4, OTX2, RTN1, SIX6, SIX1, and SIX4. Three other patients with interstitial deletions involving 14q22-23 have been described, all with bilateral anophthalmia, pituitary abnormalities, ear anomalies, and a facial phenotype similar to our patient. OTX2 is involved in ocular developmental defects, and the severity of the ocular phenotype in our patient and the other 14q22-23 deletion patients, suggests this genomic region harbors other gene/s involved in ocular development. BMP4 haploinsufficiency is predicted to contribute to the ocular phenotype on the basis of its expression pattern and observed murine mutant phenotypes. In addition, deletion of BMP4 and SIX6 is likely to contribute to the abnormal pituitary development, and SIX1 deletion may contribute to the ear and other craniofacial features. This indicates that contiguous gene deletion may contribute to the phenotypic features in the 14q22-23 deletion patients.

Axenfeld-Rieger malformation and distinctive facial features: Clues to a recognizable 6p25 microdeletion syndrome.

Deletion of distal 6p is associated with a distinctive clinical phenotype including Axenfeld-Rieger malformation, hearing loss, congenital heart disease, dental anomalies, developmental delay, and a characteristic facial appearance. We report the case of a child where recognition of the specific ocular and facial phenotype, led to identification of a 6p microdeletion arising from a de novo 6:18 translocation. Detailed analysis confirmed deletion of the FOXC1 forkhead gene cluster at 6p25. CNS anomalies included hydrocephalus and hypoplasia of the cerebellum, brainstem, and corpus callosum with mild to moderate developmental delay. Unlike previous reports, hearing was normal.

Three patients with terminal deletions within the subtelomeric region of chromosome 9q.

We report on three male infants with de novo terminal deletions of chromosome 9q34.3. The clinical features are compared to the nine cases described in the literature. Case 1 and 3 were ascertained following the use of subtelomeric FISH to screen for a chromosomal anomaly, case 2 was confirmed by FISH probe following detection of a 9q deletion on standard karyotyping. Deletions in this region result in severe developmental delay, a distinct facial phenotype, cardiac anomalies, obesity, and respiratory failure, which may result in premature death. The delineation of the 9q deletion phenotype will aid diagnosis and genetic counseling as subtelomere FISH screening becomes more widely available.

Tumor protein D52 (TPD52) is overexpressed and a gene amplification target in ovarian cancer.

Recurrent chromosome 8q gain in ovarian carcinoma is likely to reflect the existence of multiple target loci, as the separate gain of chromosome bands 8q21 and 8q24 has been reported in independent studies. Since tumor protein D52 (TPD52) has been identified as a chromosome 8q21 amplification target in breast and prostate carcinoma, we compared TPD52 expression in normal ovarian epithelium (n = 9), benign serous adenomas (n = 11), serous borderline tumors (n = 6) and invasive carcinomas of the major histologic subtypes (n = 57) using immunohistochemistry. These analyses revealed that all normal ovarian epithelium samples and benign serous tumors were predominantly TPD52-negative, whereas TPD52 was overexpressed in most (44/57; 77%) ovarian carcinomas regardless of histologic subtype. TPD52 subcellular localization was predominantly cytoplasmic, although nuclear localization was also frequently observed in mucinous and clear cell carcinomas. In an independent cohort of stage III serous carcinomas (n = 18), we also directly compared in situ TPD52 expression using immunohistochemistry and TPD52 copy number using interphase FISH analyses. This revealed that TPD52 dosage and TPD52 expression were significantly positively correlated. TPD52 therefore represents a novel molecular marker in ovarian cancer, which is broadly expressed across the different histologic subtypes and whose upregulation frequently reflects increased TPD52 copy number.

Chromosome loops arising from intrachromosomal tethering of telomeres occur at high frequency in G1 (non-cycling) mitotic cells: Implications for telomere capture.

BACKGROUND: To investigate potential mechanisms for telomere capture the spatial arrangement of telomeres and chromosomes was examined in G1 (non-cycling) mitotic cells with diploid or triploid genomes. This was examined firstly by directly labelling the respective short arm (p) and long arm subtelomeres (q) with different fluorophores and probing cell preparations using a number of subtelomere probe pairs, those for chromosomes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 17, 18, and 20. In addition some interstitial probes (CEN15, PML and SNRPN on chromosome 15) and whole chromosome paint probes (e.g. WCP12) were jointly hybridised to investigate the co-localization of interphase chromosome domains and tethered subtelomeres. Cells were prepared by omitting exposure to colcemid and hypotonic treatments. RESULTS: In these cells a specific interphase chromosome topology was detected. It was shown that the p and q telomeres of the each chromosome associate frequently (80% pairing) in an intrachromosomal manner, i.e. looped chromosomes with homologues usually widely spaced within the nucleus. This p-q tethering of the telomeres from the one chromosome was observed with large (chromosomes 3, 4, 5), medium sized (6, 7, 9, 10, 12), or small chromosomes (17, 18, 20). When triploid nuclei were probed there were three tetherings of p-q subtelomere signals representing the three widely separated looped chromosome homologues. The separate subtelomere pairings were shown to coincide with separate chromosome domains as defined by the WCP and interstitial probes. The 20% of apparently unpaired subtelomeric signals in diploid nuclei were partially documented to be pairings with the telomeres of other chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS: A topology for telomeres was detected where looped chromosome homologues were present at G1 interphase. These homologues were spatially arranged with respect to one-another independently of other chromosomes, i.e. there was no chromosome order on different sides of the cell nuclei and no segregation into haploid sets was detected. The normal function of this high frequency of intrachromosomal loops is unknown but a potential role is likely in the genesis of telomere captures whether of the intrachromosomal type or between non-homologues. This intrachromosomal tethering of telomeres cannot be related to telomeric or subtelomeric sequences since these are shared in varying degree with other chromosomes. In our view, these intrachromosomal telomeric tetherings with the resulting looped chromosomes arranged in a regular topology must be important to normal cell function since non-cycling cells in G1 are far from quiescent, are in fact metabolically active, and these cells represent the majority status since only a small proportion of cells are normally dividing.

Use of two FISH probes provides a cost-effective, simple protocol to exclude an imprinting centre defect in routine laboratory testing for suspected Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome.

From among the many suspected patients with Prader-Willi (PWS) or Angelman (AS) syndromes received for diagnosis in a routine genetics laboratory, we present our protocol for the exclusion of a possible, rare imprinting centre (IC) defect. Deletion detection utilising two FISH probes-SNRPN within the IC, and another probe outside the IC, on the same suspension remaining from the cytogenetic harvest, provides a simple, quick and cost-effective system for exclusion of an IC defect, for patients with an abnormal methylation analysis.