[SUDEP in brief - knowledge and practice recommendations on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy]. / SUDEP kompakt ­ praxisrelevante Erkenntnisse und Empfehlungen zum plötzlichen, unerwarteten Tod bei Epilepsie.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the sudden and unexpected death of an epilepsy patient, which occurs under benign circumstances without evidence of typical causes of death. SUDEP concerns all epilepsy patients. The individual risk depends on the characteristics of the epilepsy and seizures as well as on living conditions. Focal to bilateral and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), nocturnal seizures and lack of nocturnal supervision increase the risk. Most SUDEP cases are due to a fatal cascade of apnea, hypoxemia and asystole in the aftermath of a TCS. Two thirds of SUDEP cases in unsupervised epilepsy patients with TCS could probably be prevented. Wearables can detect TCS and alert caregivers. SUDEP information is desired by most patients and relatives, has a favorable impact on treatment adherence and behavior and has no negative effects on mood and quality of life.Recommendations of the committee on patient safety of the German Society of Epileptology: the ultimate treatment goal is seizure freedom. If this cannot be achieved, control of TCS should be sought. All epilepsy patients and their relatives should be informed about SUDEP and risk factors. Patients and relatives should be informed about measures to counteract the elevated risk and imminent SUDEP. The counselling should be performed during a face-to-face discussion, at the time of first diagnosis or during follow-up visits. The counselling should be documented. Wearables for TCS detection can be recommended. If TCS persist, therapeutic efforts should be continued. The bereaved should be contacted after a SUDEP.

Visual illustration supporting patient-physician communication in epilepsy: A validation and reliability study of seizure images.

Seizure manifestations may be difficult to describe in words alone. Thus, initially, 24 seizure images were developed to support communication and gain assistance during obtaining the patient's history. Before being used in clinical practice, these seizure images must be investigated for validity and reliability. We tested the images with untrained participants including patients with epilepsy, persons who had witnessed seizures, and participants who had neither had nor witnessed epileptic seizures. The participants filled in a questionnaire evaluating the images twice within 3 days. The participants were asked to choose one of the 2 written descriptions that best matched each seizure image. The validity was assessed using one-proportion z-test. The reliability was assessed by Gwet's AC1. The first analysis showed that the proportion of correctly identified seizure images was higher than 70%, except for 2 images representing dystonia and myoclonus. The dystonia image was modified, and the myoclonus image was removed. In the final evaluation, the seizure images were identified with an overall correctness ratio of 96%. The final AC1 of the seizure images was classified as very high. The final 23 seizure images are proved to be valid and have a high agreement that can be used in clinical practice.

Is there a place for surgical treatment of nonpharmacoresistant epilepsy?

Epilepsy surgery has been shown to be the best possible treatment in well-defined and difficult-to-treat epilepsy syndromes, such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis, even early in the course of the disease if pharmacoresistance is proven. This review addresses the question if epilepsy surgery may be justified today even in nonpharmacoresistant cases. There are two possible groups of patients: first, there are epilepsy syndromes with a benign spontaneous course or with a potentially good treatment prognosis under appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment. Second, there are epilepsies with potentially worse AED treatment prognosis in which appropriate AED treatment has not yet been applied because of the short course of the disease, tolerability problems that prevented usually effective dosing, or adherence issues. In group one, the good spontaneous prognosis or the usually satisfying course under AED treatment in line with the commonly generalized underlying epileptogenesis does not suggest that epilepsy surgery is a realistic alternative, not even in cases with distinct focal clinical and/or electroencephalography (EEG) patterns like in Rolandic epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. In the second group, the recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) definition should allow assessment of individual pharmacoresistance early after the onset of the disease in order to avoid any delay. Concerns about a potential disease-specific or drug-specific cognitive decline that could be avoided in early surgery are speculative, a matter of controversial discussion, and certainly not relevant, if pharmacoresistance is consequently addressed in time according to the ILAE recommendations. One should also not forget that even in typically pharmacoresistant epilepsy syndromes that are suitable for surgical procedures, satisfying courses do exist that would not require early or any epilepsy surgery. Therefore, in almost any instance, epilepsy surgery as initial treatment or immediately after a first AED is still not recommended although, especially in cases with nonadherence to AEDs, it may be occasionally considered in order to outweigh the risks of ongoing seizures and epilepsy if surgery is not performed.

Randomized controlled antiepileptic drug trials miss almost all patients with ongoing seizures.

In spite of the marketing of numerous new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), their real-life effectiveness has often been disappointing. We therefore retrospectively investigated how many adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy would have been potential candidates for the last five phase II and III trials that have been performed at our center. Out of a group of 216 consecutively collected patients, only 18 (8.3%) would have been acceptable for recruitment. Treatment with enzyme-inducing AEDs or concomitant medications (47.2%), too few seizures during a baseline period (41.7%), and EEGs showing a pattern not consistent with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy (e.g. generalized spike-wave) (31.5%) were the leading exclusion criteria. If only one criterion prevented recruitment, too few seizures during the baseline period and treatment with enzyme-inducing medications were the most frequent limitations for potential recruitment. Due to the limiting inclusion and exclusion factors of clinical AED trials, only a small fraction of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy is suitable. When new AEDs have passed such trials and are introduced, we have no information about the potential efficacy and tolerability in >90% of our patients with AED-resistant epilepsies. This may be one reason for the disappointing efficacy of many new AEDs after launch.

Current use of imaging and electromagnetic source localization procedures in epilepsy surgery centers across Europe.

OBJECTIVE: In 2014 the European Union-funded E-PILEPSY project was launched to improve awareness of, and accessibility to, epilepsy surgery across Europe. We aimed to investigate the current use of neuroimaging, electromagnetic source localization, and imaging postprocessing procedures in participating centers. METHODS: A survey on the clinical use of imaging, electromagnetic source localization, and postprocessing methods in epilepsy surgery candidates was distributed among the 25 centers of the consortium. A descriptive analysis was performed, and results were compared to existing guidelines and recommendations. RESULTS: Response rate was 96%. Standard epilepsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols are acquired at 3 Tesla by 15 centers and at 1.5 Tesla by 9 centers. Three centers perform 3T MRI only if indicated. Twenty-six different MRI sequences were reported. Six centers follow all guideline-recommended MRI sequences with the proposed slice orientation and slice thickness or voxel size. Additional sequences are used by 22 centers. MRI postprocessing methods are used in 16 centers. Interictal positron emission tomography (PET) is available in 22 centers; all using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Seventeen centers perform PET postprocessing. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is used by 19 centers, of which 15 perform postprocessing. Four centers perform neither PET nor SPECT in children. Seven centers apply magnetoencephalography (MEG) source localization, and nine apply electroencephalography (EEG) source localization. Fourteen combinations of inverse methods and volume conduction models are used. SIGNIFICANCE: We report a large variation in the presurgical diagnostic workup among epilepsy surgery centers across Europe. This diversity underscores the need for high-quality systematic reviews, evidence-based recommendations, and harmonization of available diagnostic presurgical methods.

First clinical experiences with perampanel--the Kork experience in 74 patients.

Perampanel (PER) has been approved for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients age 12 years and older. In Germany, PER was licensed and marketed in September of 2012. At our tertiary referral epilepsy center, a couple of difficult-to-treat patients were awaiting this introduction of PER; therefore, we were able to initiate treatment in many patients within a short period of time. For this report we collected and analyzed the data of the first patients who had been started on add-on PER between September and December of 2012, so that we were able to evaluate at least 6 months of treatment when we made this analysis. At cutoff in June of 2013, 74 patients could be analyzed. Mean age was 38.4 years (range 15-71 years). PER doses ranged from 4 to 14 mg (mean 8.8 mg). All patients took PER once daily at bedtime. Seventy-one patients had focal epileptic seizures; the remaining four patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Considering the last 3 months of observation compared with baseline, 34 patients (46%) were responders with a reduction of seizure frequency of at least 50%. Ten patients of these (14% of all) were seizure-free. Adverse events were reported in 40 patients (54%). Leading side effects were somnolence (n = 31, 42%) and dizziness (n = 13, 18%), followed by ataxia, irritability, falls, cognitive slowing, and depression in single cases. Six-month retention rate was 70%. Our first clinical experiences with add-on PER in a highly selected group of difficult-to-treat epilepsies are promising.

Psychiatric assessment prior to and after switch from levetiracetam to brivaracetam.

PURPOSE: Brivaracetam is often used as an alternative to levetiracetam in patients with epilepsy (PWE) encountering efficacy issues or adverse events with levetiracetam. This study evaluated the psychological status of PWE who were switched from levetiracetam to brivaracetam due to psychiatric tolerability concerns in comparison to those who remained on levetiracetam. METHODS: We used various psychological assessments including the Symptom Checklist SCL-90-R, the Beck Depression Inventory-II, and the adverse event profile. Eligible participants completed the questionnaires at baseline and again 8 days later. Psychological changes were assessed using standard statistical methods to show differences between a group that immediately switched from levetiracetam to brivaracetam and another group with unchanged levetiracetam. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and May 2021, 63 patients participated in the study, of whom 34 switched from levetiracetam to brivaracetam. At baseline, participants who switched to brivaracetam had fewer antiseizure medications but experienced more monthly seizures. Baseline scores for anxiety (p = 0.020) and psychoticism (p = 0.046) on SCL-90-R in PWE switched to brivaracetam were higher than in the remaining group. In the subsequent assessment, all psychological scores were reduced and were no longer significantly different between both groups. Using multiple regression, initial treatment with a single antiseizure medication and male gender emerged as predictors of psychological improvement. CONCLUSION: Our study found no increased risk of adverse events or psychiatric symptoms after switching from levetiracetam to brivaracetam. Though statistically non-significant, a trend towards improved psychiatric outcomes in the switch group warrants further investigation in future trials with stronger designs for enhanced statistical power.

Hypothalamic hamartoma: is the epileptogenic zone always hypothalamic? Arguments for independent (third stage) secondary epileptogenesis.

Gelastic seizures associated with hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are a clinicoradiologic syndrome presenting with a variety of symptoms, including pharmacoresistant epilepsy with multiple seizure types, electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities, precocious puberty, behavioral disturbances, and progressive cognitive deterioration. Surgery in adults provides seizure freedom in only one third of patients. The poor results of epilepsy surgery could be explained by an extrahypothalamic epileptogenic zone. The existence of an independent, secondary epileptogenic area with persistent seizures after resection of the presumably primary lesion supports the concept of a "hypothalamic plus" epilepsy. "Hypothalamic plus" epilepsy could be related to either an extrahypothalamic structural lesion (visible on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or on neuropathology) or if the former is absent, to a functional alteration with enhanced epileptogenic properties due to a process termed secondary epileptogenesis. We report two patients with gelastic seizures with HH (gelastic seizures isolated or associated with dyscognitive seizures of temporal origin). Both patients underwent two-step surgery: first an endoscopic resection of the HH, followed at a later time by temporal lobectomy. Both patients became seizure-free only after the temporal lobectomy. In both cases, neuropathology failed to demonstrate a significant structural lesion in the temporal lobe. To our knowledge, for the first time, these two cases suggest the existence of independent secondary epileptogenesis in humans.

Diagnostic Value of Intermittent Photic Stimulation Among Adult Patients in a Tertiary Referral Epilepsy Center: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Photosensitivity is a phenomenon that may be elicited by standardized intermittent photic stimulation during EEG recording and is detected more frequently in children and adolescents. Nevertheless, at our Epilepsy Center, we routinely assess photosensitivity in all newly referred adult patients. In this investigation, we sought to address the diagnostic yield under the prerequisites described. METHODS: We reanalyzed all routine EEG recordings among referrals to the department of adults during the first six months of 2019, including a simultaneous video that is always coregistered in our center. The prevalence of abnormal findings during photic stimulation was assessed. RESULTS: Intermittent photic stimulation was performed on 344 patients. Photoparoxysmal response were detected in five subjects (1.5%). All patients were female. Four patients were diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and one with Doose syndrome. Photomyogenic responses were recorded in 1.1% and only in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. In two subjects with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, the typical seizure was provoked by intermittent photic stimulation (8.7% of all subjects with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in this cohort). Photoparoxysmal response was not detected in any subject with focal epilepsy, syncope, or other nonepileptic paroxysmal events. In every case of photoparoxysmal responses, increased photosensitivity had already been reported before recording. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, photoparoxysmal responses was a rare phenomenon among adults with a preponderance of females and idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Intermittent photic stimulation may be helpful in provoking typical psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and thus abbreviate the diagnostic process. Provided a careful history, routine intermittent photic stimulation in adults with epilepsy does not appear to be mandatory.

Visuoperceptual and visuospatial abilities prior to and after anterior temporal lobectomy: a case study.

We describe a patient who presented with temporal lobe epilepsy and a seizure onset pattern in the right temporo-occipital area. Structural MRI revealed sclerosis in the right hippocampus. A comprehensive presurgical neuropsychological assessment allowed us to disentangle deficits in visual object recognition and visual imagery from well-preserved spatial capacities. Following a right temporal lobectomy, the patient remained seizure free, and 1 year postsurgery, the patient's scores on object recognition and imagery were in the normal range. Our findings suggest that visual object recognition and visual imagery are sustained by cortical areas located in proximity to the temporo-occipital ventral pathway and that perceptual and imagery spatial processing is subserved as well by anatomically close mechanisms. Furthermore, the results seem to indicate that nonlesional paroxysmal activity in the posterior temporal lobe can cause chronic dysfunctions of the visual system and that it may be reversible with effective seizure control.

Hyperkinetic seizures in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical features and outcome after temporal lobe resection.

PURPOSE: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is usually associated with automatisms. Hyperkinetic seizures are supposed to be unusual. Because we witnessed several patients with TLE and ictal hyperkinetic symptoms, we retrospectively assessed the number, clinical findings, and seizure outcome in such patients who had undergone temporal lobe resection. METHODS: We reviewed medical history, video-electroencephalography (EEG) recording and neuroimaging of adult patients who underwent epilepsy surgery for TLE at the Kork Epilepsy Center over the last 20 years with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months. KEY FINDINGS: Among 294 patients who were resected exclusively in the temporal region, we identified 17 (6%) who presented with hyperkinetic semiology such as violent vocalization, complex movements of the proximal segments of the limbs, rotation of the trunk, pelvic thrusting, or early tonic or dystonic posturing. Most of the patients had a preceding aura. Ictal EEG activity was located in the corresponding temporal region, usually with a wide distribution over temporal electrodes with fast spread to unilateral frontal electrodes and to the contralateral side. Neuroimaging revealed extended lesions in the temporal lobe involving mesial and neocortical structures. Most of the patients underwent classical anterior temporal lobe resection including amygdalo-hippocampectomy. Fourteen patients (82%) became completely seizure-free (Engel class Ia). Histopathology showed mainly focal cortical dysplasia plus hippocampal sclerosis. SIGNIFICANCE: Hyperkinetic seizure semiology may occasionally occur in patients with TLE and is, therefore, no contradiction to the hypothesis of TLE if scalp EEG patterns and neuroimaging findings correspond. The postoperative seizure outcome is favorable in such patients and not different from outcome data in classical TLE.

Clinical experience of abrupt discontinuation of perampanel: a case series.

With an elimination half-life of 105 hours, perampanel (PER) allows a once-daily dosing regimen. In pivotal trials, when PER was tapered, it was therefore usually discontinued abruptly. Thus, in our hospital we have always practiced abrupt cessation. In this case series, we investigated how long PER serum concentrations still remain measurable after abrupt discontinuation of PER and whether withdrawal symptoms, such as an increase in seizures or status epilepticus, occur. PER serum levels and the clinical course of 15 adult in-patients were monitored for three weeks based on a retrospective study design following abrupt discontinuation of PER. After one week, PER was still detected in 13 of 15 patients, after two weeks in 10, and after three weeks in three. Neither a severe increase in seizure frequency nor status epilepticus occurred. However, modifications of the concomitant antiseizure drugs were necessary. The abrupt discontinuation of PER leads to a slow decrease in plasma concentration, thus resembling self-evident gradual discontinuation of PER. In some cases, PER may still be measurable and thus clinically active even weeks after its discontinuation. Efficacy and safety of other antiseizure drugs can be estimated appropriately only thereafter.

Is brivaracetam-induced elevation of carbamazepine-epoxide levels common and clinically relevant? - A case series.

Brivaracetam (BRV) was recently introduced for the treatment of patients with focal epilepsy. BRV undergoes relatively few interactions, but one of them leads to the elevation of carbamazepine (CBZ)-10,11-CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E) if BRV is co-administered with CBZ. This interaction has been considered to be clinically negligible. We present a case series of nine patients. In eight of them, levetiracetam (LEV) was switched to BRV. In the remaining case, oxcarbazepine was replaced by CBZ and added to a stable BRV dose. A marked increase of CBZ-E occurred in every case and was associated with clinically relevant symptoms including blurred vision, diplopia, dizziness, or fatigue in three of them. However, in the remaining six, the elevated CBZ-E levels were not associated with any tolerability problems. The importance of CBZ-E for adverse events under CBZ may have been overemphasized in the past and is not clinically impairing in most cases treated with the combination of BRV and CBZ.

Levetiracetam and brivaracetam: a review of evidence from clinical trials and clinical experience.

Until the early 1990s, a limited number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were available. Since then, a large variety of new AEDs have been developed and introduced, several of them offering new modes of action. One of these new AED families is described and reviewed in this article. Levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV) are pyrrolidone derivate compounds binding at the presynaptic SV2A receptor site and are thus representative of AEDs with a unique mode of action. LEV was extensively investigated in randomized controlled trials and has a very promising efficacy both in focal and generalized epilepsies. Its pharmacokinetic profile is favorable and LEV does not undergo clinically relevant interactions. Adverse reactions comprise mainly asthenia, somnolence, and behavioral symptoms. It has now been established as a first-line antiepileptic drug. BRV has been recently introduced as an adjunct antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy with a similarly promising pharmacokinetic profile and possibly increased tolerability concerning psychiatric adverse events. This review summarizes the essential preclinical and clinical data of LEV and BRV that is currently available and includes the experiences at a large tertiary referral epilepsy center.

Can histologically normal epileptogenic zone share common electrophysiological phenotypes with focal cortical dysplasia? SEEG-based study in MRI-negative epileptic patients.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) seizure-onset and interictal patterns associated with MRI-negative epilepsy and investigate their possible links with histology, extent of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and surgical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 59 consecutive MRI-negative surgical candidates, who underwent SEEG recordings followed by cortectomy between 2000 and 2016. RESULTS: Most of the eight distinct seizure-onset patterns could be encountered both in confirmed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) and in histologically non-specific or normal cases. We found strong correlation (p = 0.008) between seizure-onset pattern and histology for: (1) slow-wave/DC-shift prior to low voltage fast activity (LVFA), associated with normal/non-specific histology, and (2) bursts of polyspikes prior to LVFA, exclusively observed in FCD. Three interictal patterns were identified: periodic slow-wave/gamma burst, sub-continuous rhythmic spiking and irregular spikes. Both "periodic" patterns were more frequent in but not specific to FCD. Surgical outcome depended on the EZ complete removal, regardless electrophysiological features. CONCLUSIONS: Histologically normal and FCD-associated epileptogenic zones share distinct interictal and ictal electrophysiological phenotypes, with common patterns between FCD subtypes and between dysplastic and apparently normal brain. SIGNIFICANCE: Some specific seizure-onset patterns seem to be predictive of the underlying histology and may help to detect an MRI-invisible FCD.

Antiepileptic drugs-induced hyponatremia: Review and analysis of 560 hospitalized patients.

Recent evidence suggests that eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) might be an appropriate alternative to carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) due to its better safety profile. Hyponatremia may be one of the limiting safety problems in CBZ and OXC whereas it has been indicated that ESL is less sensitive for the adverse event. Since our clinical experience is different we investigated the incidence of hyponatremia in 560 consecutive adult inpatients treated at our center in 2015 by reviewing their medical records. Only CBZ, OXC and ESL were associated with hyponatremia. The incidence of hyponatremia induced by ESL was not statistically different from that induced by OXC (43% of patients with OXC and 33% with ESL, p > 0.05). Both were associated with hyponatremia more often than CBZ (16%). OXC-induced hyponatremia was dose-related, ESL-induced hyponatremia was not. Furthermore, both OXC- and ESL-induced hyponatremia occurred particularly often in elderly epilepsy patients. Thus, for elderly patients, both OXC and ESL should be considered with caution.

Real-life experience with brivaracetam in 101 patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy-A monocenter survey.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficiency of brivaracetam under real-world conditions in a tertiary referral epilepsy center. METHODS: We consecutively collected patients treated at our center with brivaracetam (BRV). After a minimum observation period of six months we retrospectively analyzed the efficiency of BRV. RESULTS: Data of 101 patients (mean age 42 years, range 18-81 years, 54 females,) were analyzed. The median number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used prior to BRV was 10 (range 2-18). The initial dose of BRV was at least 50mg per day, the mean maintenance dose at cut-off was 168.6mg (median 200mg, range 50-400mg). Efficacy data were assessed for the last three months or at the time of the last observation carried forward if BRV had been discontinued prematurely. Responder rate was 27.8% (n=28) with 7% seizure-free patients. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 37 patients (37%). Most frequent AEs were dizziness (16%) and somnolence (11%). Psychiatric adverse events comprised irritability, aggression, depression and psychosis in single cases. Retention rate after six months was 51.5%. Main reason for discontinuation was a lack of efficacy. In 43 cases LEV and BRV were switched. The switch was performed abruptly without complications. In 26 cases (60%) BRV was discontinued and re-switched to LEV within weeks, mainly due to a lack of better efficacy. After the switch from LEV to BRV we even saw an aggravation both of seizure frequency and severity in 5 cases. Retention rate in patients who had not been on LEV was 57%. CONCLUSION: In our hands BRV appeared to be well tolerated and easy to handle. The retention rate was influenced by patients who were switched from LEV and re-switched because BRV was not more efficient. Switching from and re-switching to LEV was easy.

Add-on perampanel in Lance-Adams syndrome.

Perampanel (PER) is the first-in-class selective, noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist that has been licensed and marketed as antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for patients with partial-onset and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. A positive effect was reported in some patients with epileptic myoclonic jerks in idiopathic generalized epilepsy and in progressive myoclonic epilepsy. We treated a male patient with posthypoxic nonepileptic myoclonus (Lance-Adams syndrome) with add-on PER and achieved an almost complete cessation of jerks. This effect was reproducible and, therefore, we suggest that it might be worth trying PER in comparable cases.

Selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus standard temporal lobectomy in patients with mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis: post-operative facial emotion recognition abilities.

Surgical treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) patients involves the removal either of the left or the right hippocampus. Since the mesial temporal lobe is responsible for emotion recognition abilities, we aimed to assess facial emotion recognition (FER) in two homogeneous patient cohorts that differed only in the administered surgery design since anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) or selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) were performed independently of the underlying electroclinical conditions. The patient selection for the two respective surgical procedures was carried out retrospectively between 2000 and 2009 by two independent epilepsy centres, the Kork Epilepsy Centre, Germany and the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. All included patients had presented with unilateral hippocampus sclerosis (HS) without associated dysplasia or white matter blurring and had become seizure-free postoperatively. Psychometric evaluation was carried out with the Ekman 60 Faces Test and screened for depression and psychosomatic symptoms with the SCL-90 R and the BDI. Thirty healthy volunteers participated as control subjects. Sixty patients were included, 27 had undergone SAH and 33 ATL. Patients and controls obtained comparable scores in FER for surprise, happiness, anger and sadness. Concerning fear and disgust the patient group scored significantly worse. Left-sided operations led to the the most pronounced impairment. The ATL group scored significantly worse for recognition of fear compared with SAH patients. Inversely, after SAH scores for disgust were significantly lower than after ATL, independently of the side of resection. Unilateral temporal damage impairs FER. Different neurosurgical procedures may affect FER differently.

Selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus standard temporal lobectomy in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis.

Several studies have demonstrated the positive effect of resective epilepsy surgery in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). However, it is still a matter of debate whether selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) or standard temporal lobectomy (STL) are the most effective approaches concerning seizure outcome, quality of life and memory. In each of the two centers participating in this study either SAH or STL was the neurosurgical standard procedure irrespective of contextual aspects. Thus, with this postoperative assessment of resected patients we sought to avoid any selection bias that usually impaired comparative trials of both surgical approaches. We finally identified and studied 95 adult patients who had undergone either SAH (n=46) or STL (n=49) between 1999 and 2009 and fulfilled the inclusion criteria, namely drug-resistant unilateral mesial TLE with hippocampal sclerosis without any further structural lesions. We assessed the postoperative seizure outcome according to the ILAE criteria and postoperative quality of life by means of standardized questionnaires. Finally, we compared postoperative neuropsychological performance in 60 completely seizure-free patients (n=27 after SAH, n=33 after STL) prior to, one year after surgery and at a long-term follow-up with a mean of seven years. 78.2% of SAH and 85.7% of STL were seizure-free at the last observation. Quality of life had improved in 95.6% of the SAH patients and 89.8% of the STL patients. These differences were not statistically significant. Left-sided TLE patients had a significantly worse verbal memory outcome irrespective of the surgical method. However, SAH patients had a significantly better outcome concerning visual encoding, verbal and visual short-term memory and visual working memory. In this study, seizure outcome and quality of life did not differ depending on the surgical approach. However, a more selective resection led to better neuropsychological performances.