Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Nonobstructing Renal Calculi: A CoRE Initiative.

PURPOSE: Flank pain associated with stone disease is typically caused by a stone that obstructs urine flow. However, it is plausible that nonobstructing kidney stones may still cause pain. We performed a multicenter, observational trial to evaluate whether treatment of small nonobstructing calyceal stones improves pain and kidney stone-specific health-related quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older with nonobstructing renal stone(s) up to 10 mm in longest diameter and moderate to severe pain were recruited. All participants completed 3 questionnaires: the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference form 6a, and the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire. Thereafter, all participants underwent ureteroscopy for renal stone treatment. All 3 questionnaires were repeated at 2, 6 to 8, and at 12 weeks postprocedure. The primary outcomes were change in preoperative to 12-week postoperative mean BPI score and worst BPI pain score. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with nonobstructing kidney stones and associated flank pain were recruited. All stones were removed. Preoperatively, BPI scores for mean pain and worst pain were 5.5 and 7.2, respectively which decreased to 1.8 and 2.8 respectively at 12 weeks postoperatively. Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire mean score increased from 70.4 to 115.3 at 12 weeks postoperatively. A total of 86% and 69% of patients had at least a 20% and 50% reduction in their mean pain scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that patients benefit significantly from the removal of calyceal nonobstructing kidney stones for at least 12 weeks with a reduction in pain and an increase in quality of life. Therefore, surgical removal of these stones in this patient population should be offered as a treatment option.

Effect of Cannabidiol Oil on Post-ureteroscopy Pain for Urinary Calculi: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Post-ureteroscopy stent placement carries significant morbidity which can interfere with daily life. This discomfort unfortunately leads to high utilization of opioid pain medications, which have a known risk of addiction. Cannabidiol oil represents an alternative analgesic that has proven anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of a Food and Drug Administration-approved cannabidiol oil (Epidiolex) on pain control and opioid usage in the post-ureteroscopy setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a tertiary care center. Ninety patients undergoing ureteroscopy with stent placement for urinary stone disease were randomized 1:1 to placebo or 20 mg cannabidiol oil daily for 3 days postoperatively. Both groups were prescribed a rescue narcotic, tamsulosin, oxybutynin, and phenazopyridine. Daily pain scores, medication usage, and ureteral stent symptoms using the validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS: Both the placebo and cannabidiol oil groups were not different in pre- and perioperative characteristics. There was no difference in pain scores or opioid usage between groups postoperatively. The level of discomfort with ureteral stents was also not different between groups when comparing physical activity, sleep, urination, and activities of daily life. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial showed that cannabidiol oil is safe but ineffective when compared to placebo in reducing post-ureteroscopic stent discomfort or opioid usage. Despite the availability of numerous analgesic agents, stent symptoms continue to be a dissatisfier for most patients, suggesting additional work needs to focus on novel interventions and pain control.

The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP-tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope- and user-related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two-step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories. CONCLUSION: This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS - The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.

Percutaneous management of upper tract stones: from mini to maxi percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) continues as the gold standard for the surgical management of large renal stones. This short review is intended to highlight recent publications on PCNL of all tract sizes, from mini to standard. RECENT FINDINGS: Literature on PCNL in the last 2 years has focused on several main themes - decreasing complications, improving postoperative pain control, and new technology to improve outcomes. Mini-PCNL continues to prove effective and safe, with a new vacuum sheath showing promise of improving stone-free rates and decreasing infections. In terms of infections, preoperative midstream urine culture continues to be a poor indicator of postoperative infection. One of the biggest changes to PCNL practice is the reintroduction of tranexamic acid, which has shown to significantly decrease bleeding and improve outcomes. In terms of postoperative pain control, local blocks are effective and low risk. SUMMARY: There are many options for surgeons when it comes to PCNL from sheath size to pain management to preoperative medication to decrease bleeding. Future research will continue to highlight, which advances are the most beneficial.

Ultrasound-Guided PCNL - Why Are We Still Performing Exclusively Fluoroscopic Access?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While urologists are traditionally taught to perform percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) utilizing exclusively fluoroscopy, ultrasound has emerged as a safe alternative. This article showcases the major reasons why ultrasound-guided access should be considered the first-line approach for performing access for PCNL. RECENT FINDINGS: There continues to be a need to further reduce radiation exposure in the management of kidney stone patients. This review showcases how performing ultrasound-guided PCNL has been associated with a shorter learning curve, increased patient safety, and the ability to perform x-ray free PCNL. Ultrasound-guided PCNL is not only an achievable skill for urologists to learn but provides multiple advantages over traditional fluoroscopic access. As every effort should be given to help reduce radiation exposure for kidney stone patients as well as performing surgeons and operating theater personnel, endourologists should strive to add this technique to their armamentarium.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population: A Report from the EDGE Consortium.

PURPOSE: Postoperative infectious related complications are not uncommon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Previously, we noted that 7 days of antibiotics did not decrease sepsis rates compared to just perioperative antibiotics in a low risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy population. This study aimed to compare the same regimens in individuals at moderate to high risk for sepsis undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized in this multi-institutional study to either 2 days or 7 days of preoperative antibiotics. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had either a positive preoperative urine culture or existing indwelling urinary drainage tube. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients at 7 institutions were analyzed. There was no difference in sepsis rates between groups on univariate analysis. Similarly, there were no differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. On multivariate analysis, 2 days of antibiotics increased the risk of sepsis compared to 7 days of antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.9, p=0.031). Patients receiving antibiotics for 2 days had higher rates of staghorn calculus than the 7-day group (58% vs 32%, p=0.006) but post hoc subanalysis did not demonstrate increased sepsis in the staghorn only group. CONCLUSIONS: Giving 7 days of preoperative antibiotics vs 2 days decreases the risk of sepsis in moderate to high risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients. Future guidelines should consider infectious risk stratification for percutaneous nephrolithotomy antibiotic recommendations.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using Moses 2.0 vs non-Moses: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the enucleation efficiency of Moses 2.0 with non-Moses technology in patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blinded, randomised study of patients undergoing HoLEP at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, using the Lumenis Pulse™ 120H laser system. Patients were randomised to either right lobe enucleation using Moses 2.0 and left lobe enucleation using non-Moses, or the opposite. The primary outcome was individual lobe enucleation efficiency. Secondary outcomes included individual lobe laser time, laser energy, individual enucleation and haemostasis laser energies, and fibre burn back. Two independent reviewers watched videos of the procedures and provided a subjective evaluation of the technologies. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included in the study. For the entire cohort, Moses 2.0 had less fibre degradation (3.5 vs 16.8 mm, P < 0.01) compared to non-Moses. When HoLEP procedures were performed by an expert, Moses 2.0 resulted in shorter enucleation time (21 vs 36.7 min, P = 0.016) and higher enucleation efficiency (1.75 vs 1.05 g/min, P = 0.05) compared to non-Moses. When HoLEP was performed by trainees, the Moses 2.0 cohort had a shorter haemostasis laser time (4.1 vs 9 min, P = 0.035) compared to the non-Moses. Fibre degradation was lower with Moses 2.0 compared to non-Moses for both experts and trainees. Moses 2.0 received a higher score than the standard technology for the incision sharpness, fibre control, tissue separation, tissue damage, haemostasis, visibility, and charring. The overall inter-observer correlation coefficient was 0.63. CONCLUSION: Moses 2.0 has higher enucleation efficiency compared to non-Moses when used by experts. The subjective evaluation favoured Moses 2.0.

The impact of phone counseling on urinary stone prevention.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the effect of standard office-based consultation (OC) and phone correspondences (PC) on dietary 24-h urinary parameters. METHODS: The medical record of all patients treated between January and April 2019 was reviewed. Only patients who had at least two consecutive 24-h urine collections were included. Linear and logistic regressions were used to investigate the difference between the changes in urinary parameters after OC and PC. RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent 135 OC and 34 PC. Twenty-one received OC and PC, and 22 had only OC. Gender, age, the distance to stone clinic, the number of previous stone episodes, and baseline urinary parameters were similar between the groups. Patients who had both OC and PC had a longer follow-up time (51.7 vs 18.5 months, p < 0.0001) as well as more consults (Median 5.4 vs 2.5, p < 0.0001). Six (27%) patients who had only OC, and eight (38%) patients who had both OC and PC, experienced stone recurrence during the study period (p = 0.52). Following PC, there was a greater improvement in urine volume in comparison to OC (0.27 l/day vs -0.06 l/day, p = 0.034), but there was no difference in the absolute values after the consults between the groups. CONCLUSION: In established stone-clinic patients, PC was associated with a better adherence with follow-up. The 24-h urine results were similar between PC and OC. PC may be an effective alternative for urinary stone management.

Does bladder stone composition predict kidney stone composition?

INTRODUCTION Bladder stones have historically been associated with urinary stasis secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Recent studies indicate that the role of BOO in bladder stone formation is minor. We evaluate the role of urinary lithogenic factors in bladder stone formation by comparing the compositions of bladder stones and kidney stones in patients with multi-site urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who were treated for concomitant bladder stones and kidney stones between 2008-2019, and had both stone compositions available. Patients with bladder stone size < 10 mm, urinary foreign bodies, encrusted stents or tumors were excluded. Data regarding urinary symptoms, residual volumes, stone composition and 24-hours urine data were collected. RESULTS: We identified 40 males with a median age of 72 years (IQR 6-14), median residual volume of 76 mL (IQR 41-200), and a median prostate volume of 52 mL (IQR 32-102). Bladder outlet procedures were performed concomitantly with cystolitholapaxy in 21 (53%) patients. The most common bladder stone and kidney stone compositions were CaOx (47.5% and 65%), uric acid (32.5% and 22.5%), calcium phosphate (15% and 10%), and struvite (5% and 2.5%), respectively. Bladder stone and kidney stone compositions were identical in 70% of patients. Bladder stone composition was predictive of kidney stone composition, regardless of the PVR, bladder stone size, or whether an outlet procedure was performed. CONCLUSION: We found a high concordance between bladder stone and kidney stone composition, suggesting that metabolic abnormalities have a significant role in bladder stone formation. Bladder stone composition can be used to guide surgical and medical treatment for kidney stones in metabolically active stone patients.

Association of Patient Age and Gender with Kidney Stone Related Quality of Life.

PURPOSE: Kidney stone formers have lower health related quality of life than nonstone formers. The North American Stone Quality of Life Consortium is a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study of health related quality of life in patients with kidney stones using the WISQOL (Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire) with data on 2,052 patients from a total of 11 centers. This study is a subanalysis of cross-sectional data looking at the association of age, gender and race on health related quality of life of stone formers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed multivariable analyses of ordinal logistic regression analyses to determine the impact of age, gender and race on health related quality of life, adjusting for other baseline covariates. The proportional odds assumption of ordinal logistic regression was checked. Total score and scores on 4 subdomains (social functioning, emotional functioning, stone related impact and vitality) were included. RESULTS: Median total score for all patients was 80.4. On multivariable analysis older patients had a significantly higher total health related quality of life score than younger patients (per 10-year increase OR 1.25, p <0.0001). Male patients had higher scores than females (OR 1.56, p = 0.0003) and nonCaucasian patients had lower health related quality of life than nonLatino Caucasian patients (OR 0.63, p = 0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: Younger and female patients with kidney stones have lower health related quality of life than older and male patients, respectively. NonCaucasian patients with stones also have lower health related quality of life. The clinical impact of these findings might include future implications for patient counseling, including dietary and medical management of stone disease, and potential changes to the paradigm of the surgical management of stones.

The safety wire with a ureteral access sheath - does it hurt more than it helps?

INTRODUCTION: Studies indicate that with a safety wire in the ureter, an increased amount of force is necessary to advance ureteral access sheaths up to the proximal ureter. Theoretically, the compression of the ureter with the wire could lead to an increase in number and severity of ureteral injuries secondary to placement of a sheath. This prospective study aims to evaluate if there is a correlation between the use of a safety wire and ureteral injury from sheath placement by evaluating the location of the wire in relation to the injury after ureteroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent ureteroscopy for upper tract urinary stone disease. A 12/14 French ureteral access sheath was used with a safety wire in place. Ureteroscopy during withdrawal of the sheath was video recorded and reviewed by a blinded observer. Visible ureteral injuries were graded per the Traxer ureteral injury scale and the proximity of the wire to the injury was noted. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 59 patients (52.4%) had a ureteral injury secondary to access sheath placement. Eighteen (30.5%) injuries were low-grade, 13 (22.0%) were high-grade (grade 2 and 3) and there were no grade 4 injuries. A total of 10 (32.3%) injuries occurred on the same side as the wire while 67.7% were on the contralateral side of the ureter. Of the injuries that occurred on the same side as the wire, 80% were grade 1 injuries and 2 (20%) were grade 3. Statistical analysis did not show a significant relationship between high/low injury grade and side of injury (p value = 0.088). This suggests that there is no association of between the safety wire and development of high injury. CONCLUSION: There is no association between the location of the safety wire and ureteral injury if injury occurs during the placement of a ureteral access sheath. This suggests that the use of a safety wire does not add significant morbidity to the procedure.

The Moses holmium system - time is money.

INTRODUCTION: The Moses technology of the holmium laser has been shown to decrease retropulsion in the ureter and procedural time in kidney stones during laser lithotripsy. Theoretically, these improvements could lead to cost savings for the patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with total laser energy data recorded who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy by a single surgeon at a tertiary care center were included. Total lasing time was calculated from the total laser energy. Sub-analyses were done on stone size and stone composition. The procedure time using Moses technology was projected to be approximately 35% less than procedure time without the Moses technology based on prior in vitro studies. The projected cost savings was then utilized to predict cost-effectiveness of the Moses technology. RESULTS: Forty patients underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. Mean stones size was 10.2 mm and mean lasing time was 3.02 minutes. Linear regression showed a positive association between stone size and laser time, p = 0.01. There was no significant correlation between stone composition or stone Hounsfield units and lasing time. On cost analyses, for stones of all sizes the Moses system has a price differential of an increase in $292.36 when compared to the standard Holmium TracTip system. Specifically for stones larger than 10 mm, the price differential is an increase in $253.16 for the Moses technology. CONCLUSION: The decrease in lasing time achieved by the Moses system does not translate into sufficient cost savings to off-set the higher cost of the laser fiber and software.

The impact of training on the perioperative and intermediate functional outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

INTRODUCTION: To systemically measure the impact of trainees' participation on the perioperative and functional outcomes after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients who underwent HoLEP at our department between January 2007 and January 2013 were classified based on trainee's level. Perioperative outcomes and complications were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and International Continence Society-Short Form (ICSmaleSF) questionnaires. Voiding and incontinence domains of ICSmaleSF were assessed separately. Patients were divided into group 1 if no trainee participated in the operation, group 2 if a senior trainee performed the operation, and group 3 if a junior trainee participated in the operation. The patient's baseline characteristics, complications, and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in the baseline characteristics. There were significant differences in overall operative and enucleation time (p = 0.0186, p = 0.0047, respectively) with shorter times noticed with more experienced operators. There were no differences in resected tissue weight, hemoglobin change, and transfusion rates. Postoperatively, all patients had a similar length of stay and catheterization. Complications (graded by Clavien grading system) were not different. All patients were followed up at regular intervals starting at 6 weeks, 3 months , 6 months, 1 year, and every year after that and there were no differences in flow rates or post void residual volumes at any time point. There were no differences in SHIM, IPSS, and ICSmale voiding scale among the groups. However, ICSmale continence scale was significantly different where the highest score seen in group 2. CONCLUSION: Trainee participation in HoLEP in a controlled training environment does not compromise the safety of the procedure.

Trends in Patient Complexity, Practice Setting, and Surgeon Reimbursement for Urolithiasis: Do Rural Urologists Pay the Price?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between patient complexity, practice setting, and surgeon reimbursement for ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: The "2021 Medicare Physician and Other Provider" file was used to collect Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes and hierarchical condition category (HCC) scores of urologists. Higher HCC score corresponds to higher medical complexity and higher RUCA code corresponds to a more rural area. Medicare reimbursement for ureteroscopy and PCNL were collected. Linear regressions were performed to predict change in reimbursement based on RUCA and HCC scores. RESULTS: In 2021, 52,816 procedures under Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 52356 (ureteroscopy) and 1649 procedures under 50080 or 50081 (PCNL) were billed to Medicare. Mean reimbursement was $338.24 for ureteroscopy and $957.89 for PCNL. For ureteroscopy, higher HCC score predicted lower reimbursement (P <.001). Higher HCC score predicted higher reimbursement for PCNL (P <.01). Average RUCA for ureteroscopy was higher than for PCNL (P = .02). Rural location predicted lower reimbursement for ureteroscopy (P <.001), however, there was no association for PCNL. CONCLUSION: For ureteroscopy, higher-risk patients are associated with lower reimbursement while the opposite holds true for PCNL. Rural practices were associated with lower reimbursement for ureteroscopy, but there was no association between location and PCNL reimbursement. Together, these findings suggest practice pattern variation between ureteroscopy and PCNL and highlight gaps in reimbursement policy. Risk-adjusted reimbursement should be considered to incentivize urologists to treat complex patients within their practice scope.

The Use of Genetic Testing in Nephrolithiasis Evaluation: A Retrospective Review From a Multidisciplinary Kidney Stone Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To describe genetic and clinical characteristics for patients undergoing genetic testing at our multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients evaluated in our stone clinic and referred to genetics between 2018 and 2022. Patient demographic, clinical, stone, and genetic data were included. We assessed the specific variants identified in our cohort, both those with a pathogenic association and variants of unknown significance. RESULTS: Of 825 patients seen in our stone clinic from 2018-2022, 50 patients were referred to genetics. Among these patients, 33/50 (66%) underwent genetic testing and were included in the analysis. Of those who underwent genetic testing, a variant was identified in 19/33 (58%) patients, and 9/33 (27%) of these were a known pathogenic variant. Among patients with a pathogenic variant identified, the majority had a family history of stones (55.6%), calcium-based stones (77.8%), had their first stone prior to age 18 (66.7%), were recurrent stone formers (100%), and had been managed medically (88.9%) or surgically (88.9%) prior to testing. When comparing patients with a pathogenic variant, variants of unknown significance, and no variant, there were no significant differences in demographic or clinical parameters. CONCLUSION: In our stone practice, more than half of patients who underwent genetic testing were found to have a variant. However, the majority of these variants were of unknown significance. Further evaluation regarding how genetic testing can impact nephrolithiasis management is needed.