A multi-site phase I trial of Veliparib with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

PURPOSE: A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%). CONCLUSIONS: Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.

18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS: Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS: Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.

Cognitive function after concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy in low-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy on neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG). MATERIALS/METHODS: We included adult patients with LGG who were treated postoperatively with radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Patients were evaluated with comprehensive psychometric tests at baseline (prior to RT + TMZ) and at various time intervals following RT + TMZ. Baseline cognitive performance was analyzed by sex, age, education history, history of seizures, IDH mutation status, and 1p/19q codeletion status. Changes in neurocognitive performance were evaluated over time. RESULTS: Thirty-seven LGG patients (mean age 43.6, 59.5% male) had baseline neurocognitive evaluation. Patients with an age > 40 years old at diagnosis and those with an education > 16 years demonstrated superior baseline verbal memory as assessed by HVLT. No other cognitive domains showed differences when stratified by the variables mentioned above. A total of 22 LGG patients had baseline and post RT + TMZ neurocognitive evaluation. Overall, patients showed no statistical difference between group mean test scores prior to and following RT + TMZ on all psychometric measures (with the exception of HVLT Discrimination). CONCLUSION: Cognitive function remained stable following RT + TMZ in LGG patients evaluated prospectively up to 2 years. The anticipated analysis of RTOG 0424 will provide valuable neurocognitive outcomes specifically for high risk LGG patients treated with RT + TMZ.

Quality of life following concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy or observation in low-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: Low-grade glioma (LGG) exhibits longer median survival than high-grade brain tumors, and thus impact of our therapies on patient quality of life remains a crucial consideration. This study evaluated the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation (RT + TMZ) or observation on quality of life (QOL) in patients with low-grade glioma. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults with LGG who underwent surgery with known molecular classification from 1980 to 2018. Postoperatively, patients were either observed or received adjuvant concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation. EQ-5D and PHQ-9 depression screen were completed before outpatient visits every 2-3 months. Baseline score was defined as ± 30 days within initial operation. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients (mean age 44 ± 17 years, 51% female) with baseline EQ-5D or PHQ-9 depression screen data and at least one follow-up measure, 30 (48%) were observed and 33 (52%) received RT + TMZ. No significant decline was seen in EQ-5D or PHQ-9 scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline scores for all patients. At each time point, there was no significant difference between those who were observed or received adjuvant therapy. The linear mixed model estimating PHQ-9 value or EQ-5D index demonstrated that there was no significant difference in PHQ-9 or EQ-5D index between treatment groups (p = 0.42 and p = 0.54, respectively) or time points (p = 0.24 and p = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant decline in patient QOL or depression scores as assessed by patient- reported outcome measures for patients with low-grade glioma up to 2 years following surgery. We found no difference between RT + TMZ compared to observation during this time frame. Additional follow-up can help identify the longer-term impact of treatment strategy on patient experience.

Phase II study of Dovitinib in recurrent glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Dovitinib is an oral, potent inhibitor of FGFR and VEGFR, and can be a promising strategy in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: This was an open label phase II study of two arms: Arm 1 included anti-angiogenic naïve patients with recurrent GBM and Arm 2 included patients with recurrent GBM that had progressed on prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in Arm 1 and 14 subjects in Arm 2. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) in Arm 1 and time to progression (TTP) in Arm 2. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival. RESULTS: Patients in Arm 2 (compared to Arm 1) tended to have longer intervals from diagnosis to study entry (median 26.9 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.002), experienced more recurrences (64%, had 3-4 prior recurrences compared to 0, p < 0.0001) and tended to be heavily pretreated (71% vs. 26-32% p = 0.04 or 0.02). 6-month PFS was 12% ± 6% for the Arm 1 and 0% for Arm 2. TTP was similar in both treatment arms (median 1.8 months Arm 1 and 0.7-1.8 months Arm 2, p = 0.36). Five patients (15%) had grade 4 toxicities and 22 patients (67%) had grade 3 toxicities. There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to the amount of change in the levels of biomarkers from baseline. CONCLUSION: Dovitinib was not efficacious in prolonging the PFS in patients with recurrent GBM irrespective of prior treatment with anti-angiogenic therapy (including bevacizumab).

A cure is possible: a study of 10-year survivors of brain metastases.

Little is known on the natural history, recurrence patterns, neurocognitive outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival in long-term survivors (≥10 years) from brain metastasis (BM). In this study, the records of 1953 patients who underwent treatment for BM with a potential for ≥10 years of follow-up were reviewed. Cox regression analysis identified factors predictive for overall survival (OS). The median age at brain metastasis diagnosis was 60 years and the median OS was 6.4 months. The 1-year OS rate was 29.9, 12.1 % at 2 years, 3.0 % at 5 years, and 1.3 % at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS included gender (males, HR 1.2), multiple brain metastases (HR 1.3), no surgery (HR 1.8), and no stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 1.8) (p < 0.0001 each). Fifty-six patients (2.9 %) survived ≥5 years; 23 patients (1.2 %) survived ≥10 years and the median survival for ≥10 year survivors was 18.5 years. Six of the 10-year survivors had an intracranial recurrence, five occurred within 11 years from the first treatment. Presence of a solitary lesion or single lesion at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis was associated with improved survival. Eight of the ≥10 year survivors (34.8 %) had no neurological symptoms at last follow-up; none of the 10-year survivors were documented to have a neurologic death. Our study demonstrates that patients with favorable prognostic features should undergo multimodality treatment. Albeit rare, patients who are alive 10 years after treatment for their brain metastases may be considered cured from their intracranial disease.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: ASCO Guideline Endorsement of ASTRO Guideline.

PURPOSE: American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS: "Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline"2 was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS: The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published May 6, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses "Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline."2. RECOMMENDATIONS: Within the guideline, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and up to four intact brain metastases, and conditionally recommended for patients with up to 10 intact brain metastases. The guideline provides detailed dosing and fractionation recommendations on the basis of the size of the metastases. For patients with resected brain metastases, radiation therapy (SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT]) is recommended to improve intracranial disease control; if there are limited additional brain metastases, SRS is recommended over WBRT. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases ineligible for surgery and/or SRS, WBRT is recommended with hippocampal avoidance where possible and the addition of memantine is recommended. For patients with brain metastases, limiting the single-fraction V12Gy to brain tissue to ≤ 10 cm3 is conditionally recommended.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Sex-Specific Differences in Low-Grade Glioma Presentation and Outcome.

PURPOSE: In addition to established prognostic factors in low-grade glioma (LGG), studies suggest a sexual dimorphism with male sex portending worse prognosis. Our objective was to identify the effect of sex on presentation and outcomes in LGG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with LGG (World Health Organization 2016 grade 2 glioma). Patients with IDH wild-type tumors were excluded. Patients were matched between male and female sex by age, treatment, and surgery via propensity score matching. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed by sex. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), next intervention-free survival (NIFS), progression-free survival, and malignant transformation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis with backward elimination were completed. RESULTS: Of the 532 patients identified, 258 (48%) were men. Men were more likely to present with seizure (69.38% vs 56.57%, P = .002), but no other statistically significant differences between sexes at presentation were identified. Five-year OS was higher in women at 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-91%) versus 78% (95% CI, 73%-84%) in men (P = .0045). NIFS was significantly higher in female patients at 68% (95% CI, 62%-74%) versus 57% (95% CI, 51%-64%) in men (P = .009). On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.05; P = .002), NIFS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.42; P = .004), and malignant transformation-free survival (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.24-2.12; P = .0004). In patients with molecularly defined LGG (IDH and 1p19q status; n = 291), female sex remained independently associated with improved OS (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.77; P = .008) and NIFS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.96; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, female sex was independently associated with improved outcomes. These findings support intrinsic sex-specific differences in LGG behavior, justifying further studies to optimize management and therapeutics based on sex.

SNO and EANO practice guideline update: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2000 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. METHODS: Following the 2017 AAN methodologies, a systematic literature review utilizing PubMed, EMBASE Library, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. The studies were rated based on the AAN therapeutic or causation classification of evidence (class I-IV). RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were selected for final analysis. There were limited high-level, class I studies and mostly class II and III studies. The AAN affirmed the value of these guidelines. RECOMMENDATIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not had a seizure, clinicians should not prescribe antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to reduce the risk of seizures (level A). In brain tumor patients undergoing surgery, there is insufficient evidence to recommend prescribing AEDs to reduce the risk of seizures in the peri- or postoperative period (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support prescribing valproic acid or levetiracetam with the intent to prolong progression-free or overall survival (level C). Physicians may consider the use of levetiracetam over older AEDs to reduce side effects (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support using tumor location, histology, grade, molecular/imaging features when deciding whether or not to prescribe prophylactic AEDs (level U).

Phase II trial of erlotinib with temozolomide and radiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

Approximately 40-50% of glioblastomas (GBM) overexpress epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Erlotinib is a specific and potent EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor active against refractory GBM. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and > or =grade 2 erlotinib-induced rash have improved survival. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide with pharmacodynamic dose escalation of erlotinib in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients received RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions with concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m(2)/day x 42 days, followed in four weeks by temozolomide 150-200 mg/m(2)/day x 5, every 28 days for 12 cycles. Patients received erlotinib, 50 mg/day and increased by 50 mg/day every 2 weeks until the occurrence of grade 2 rash or to a maximum dose of 150 mg/day, from day 1 until disease progression. Twenty-seven patients were treated in this study. Twenty-two (81%) patients came off study for progressive disease (18 [67%]) or adverse events (4 [15%]). Eighteen patients (67%) have died. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival was 8.6 months. Five patients remain on study with a median follow-up of 16 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia, anemia, lymphopenia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. There were four deaths on study, three definitely treatment-related; therefore, the trial was terminated after accrual of 27 of 30 planned patients. Erlotinib co administered with RT and temozolomide was not efficacious and had an unacceptable toxicity.

Malignant Transformation of Molecularly Classified Adult Low-Grade Glioma.

PURPOSE: Malignant transformation (MT) of adult grade 2 glioma (low-grade glioma [LGG]) is associated with adverse survival. We sought to describe the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for MT of molecularly classified LGG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed a single-institutional database of adults who received a diagnosis of LGG with data allowing for molecular classification from 1980 to 2018 to evaluate time to MT and its associated risk factors. MT was defined as pathologic confirmation of grade 3-4 glioma and/or imaging characteristics consistent with MT by multidisciplinary consensus. RESULTS: Among the included 486 adults with molecularly classified LGG, median age was 39 years (range, 18-78), median tumor size was 3.9 cm (range, 0.3-13.0), and 262 (54%) were male. Molecular classification was IDHmut1p/19qcodel in 169 (35%), IDHmut1p/19qintact in 125 (26%), and IDHwt in 192 (40%) patients. Adjuvant management was observation in 246 (51%) patients, temozolomide alone in 82 (16%), radiation therapy alone in 63 (13%), and radiation therapy concurrent with temozolomide in 81 (17%). Temozolomide monotherapy was more likely to be given to IDHmut1p/19qcodel patients (P < .001). Median follow-up was 5.3 years. MT occurred in 84 (17%) patients, with a 5-year freedom from MT of 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-90%). Median overall survival after MT was 2.4 years (95% CI, 1.5-3.3) and was associated with molecular classification (P = .03) and grade at MT (P < .001). Factors associated with MT were male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.6; P = .009), tumor size ≥5 cm (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.0-6.2; P < .001), IDHmut1p/19qintact (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6; P = .009) or IDHwt classification (HR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.5-11.8; P < .001), and adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy (HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.4-10.3; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: MT of LGG has a poor prognosis associated with unfavorable molecular groups. Analysis of our large cohort identified adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy as the only modifiable risk factor for MT and provides the first clinical evidence of temozolomide-associated MT among molecularly classified adult LGG. This novel finding supplements our understanding of temozolomide-induced hypermutation and informs precision management of LGG.

Risk Factors for Progression Among Low-Grade Gliomas After Gross Total Resection and Initial Observation in the Molecular Era.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) in the molecular era among patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) who undergo gross total resection (GTR) followed by initial observation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed patients with World Health Organization grade 2 LGG treated at a single institution. We included only those who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed GTR followed by initial observation. Molecular classification was obtained at either the time of diagnosis or pathology review. Cox proportional hazards regression, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test were used. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We included 144 patients who underwent MRI-confirmed GTR between 1994 and 2014 followed by initial observation. Median age was 29 years (interquartile range [IQR], 18-41), median tumor size was 2.7 cm (IQR, 1.8-4.0), and median follow-up was 81 months (IQR, 36-132). Molecular classification was 13% IDH-mutant 1p19q-codeleted; 21% IDH-mutant 1p19q-intact; 39% IDH1-R132H-wildtype; and 28% undetermined. For the entire cohort, 5- and 10-year PFS and overall survival were 71% and 53%, and 98% and 90%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with worse PFS included increasing age at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P = .03), increasing preoperative tumor size (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; P < .0001), and IDH-mutant 1p19q-intact classification (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.15-8.74, P = .025). Median PFS for patients with IDH-mutant 1p19q-codeleted, IDH-mutant 1p19q-intact, and IDH1-R132H-wildtype tumors were 113 months, 56 months, and not reached, respectively. Molecular classification was significantly associated with PFS (P < .0001) but not overall survival (P = .20). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with LGG who undergo MRI-confirmed GTR and initial observation in the molecular era, increasing age, increasing tumor size, and IDH-mutant 1p19q-intact classification are associated with worse PFS. Because tumor progression is associated with adverse health-related quality of life, these factors may aid clinicians and patients in the shared decision-making process regarding goals of surgery and timing of postoperative therapy. Further study is required to elucidate why IDH-mutant 1p19q-intact LGGs are at higher risk for early progression.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Early Mortality After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: a Single Institutional Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS. METHODS: A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable. CONCLUSION: Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.

Outcomes and prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant form of astrocytoma. The average survival is 6-10 months in patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). In this study, the authors evaluated the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with rGBMs. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of their brain tumor database (1997-2016). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after salvage SRS were the primary endpoints evaluated. Response to SRS was assessed using volumetric MR images. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients with rGBM underwent salvage SRS targeting 75 lesions. The median tumor diameter and volume were 2.55 cm and 3.80 cm3, respectively. The median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range 12-24 Gy) and the homogeneity index was 1.90 (range 1.11-2.02). The median OS after salvage SRS was estimated to be 11.0 months (95% CI 7.1-12.2) and the median PFS after salvage SRS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.7-5.0). A Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 80 was independently associated with longer OS, while small tumor volume (< 15 cm3) and less homogeneous treatment plans (homogeneity index > 1.75) were both independently associated with longer OS (p = 0.007 and 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Based on these factors, 2 prognostic groups were identified for PFS (5.4 vs 3.2 months), while 3 were identified for OS (median OS of 15.2 vs 10.5 vs 5.2 months). CONCLUSIONS: SRS is associated with longer OS and/or PFS in patients with good performance status, small-volume tumor recurrences, and heterogeneous treatment plans. The authors propose a prognostic model to identify a cohort of rGBM patients who may benefit from SRS.

Risk Factors for Malignant Transformation of Low-Grade Glioma.

PURPOSE: The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of low-grade glioma patients who undergo malignant transformation (MT) in the era of temozolomide are not well known. This study evaluates these factors in a large group of World Health Organization grade 2 glioma patients treated at a tertiary-care institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were analyzed using an institutional review board-approved low-grade glioma database. Characteristics were compared using χ2 and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Time to event was summarized using proportional hazards models. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of a total of 599 patients, 124 underwent MT; 76 (61.3%) had biopsy-proven MT. The MT incidence was 21%, and the median time to MT was 56.4 months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 30.6% ± 4.2% and 4.8% ± 1.9%, respectively, for MT patients and 60% ± 2.4% and 38% ± 2.7%, respectively, for non-MT patients. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 75% ± 4.0% and 46% ± 5.0%, respectively, for MT patients and 87% ± 1.7% and 78% ± 2.3%, respectively, for non-MT patients. On multivariate analysis, older age (P = .001), male sex (P = .004), multiple tumor locations (P = .004), chemotherapy alone (P = .012), and extent of resection (P = .045) remained significant predictors of MT. CONCLUSIONS: MT affects survival. Risk factors include older age, male sex, multiple tumor locations, use of chemotherapy alone, and presence of residual disease. Our finding that initial interventions could affect the rate of MT is provocative, but these data should be validated using data from prospective trials. In addition to improving survival, future therapeutic efforts should focus on preventing MT.

Validation of the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification for small-cell lung cancer-only brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) developed a prognostic classification based on a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of patient pretreatment characteristics from three completed brain metastases randomized trials. Clinical trials for patients with brain metastases generally exclude small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases. We hypothesize that the RPA classes are valid in the setting of SCLC brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 154 SCLC patients with brain metastases treated between April 1983 and May 2005 was performed. RPA criteria used for class assignment were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), primary tumor status (PT), presence of extracranial metastases (ED), and age. RESULTS: Median survival was 4.9 months, with 4 patients (2.6%) alive at analysis. Median follow-up was 4.7 months (range, 0.3-40.3 months). Median age was 65 (range, 42-85 years). Median KPS was 70 (range, 40-100). Number of patients with controlled PT and no ED was 20 (13%) and with ED, 27 (18%); without controlled PT and ED, 34 (22%) and with ED, 73 (47%). RPA class distribution was: Class I: 8 (5%); Class II: 96 (62%); Class III: 51 (33%). Median survivals (in months) by RPA class were: Class I: 8.6; Class II: 4.2; Class III: 2.3 (p = 0.0023). CONCLUSIONS: Survivals for SCLC-only brain metastases replicate the results from the RTOG RPA classification. These classes are therefore valid for brain metastases from SCLC, support the inclusion of SCLC patients in future brain metastases trials, and may also serve as a basis for historical comparisons.

Maculopathy as a complication of blood-brain barrier disruption in patients with central nervous system lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To report on the development of visually significant maculopathy associated with blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) therapy for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Chart review of 20 patients undergoing BBBD therapy for treatment of CNS lymphoma at the Cleveland Clinic. Patients with documented maculopathy were included in analysis. RESULTS: Seven (54%) of 13 patients were identified with new macular retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes after BBBD treatment. The RPE changes consisted of fine clumps of hyperpigmentation in the foveal region associated with variable degrees of RPE loss. These changes were bilateral but often asymmetric. Two patients had decreased visual acuity resulting from maculopathy. One patient had documented progression of maculopathy after completion of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Maculopathy is a frequent finding after BBBD therapy for CNS lymphoma.

The Prognostic Role of Tumor Volume in the Outcome of Patients with Single Brain Metastasis After Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with single brain metastasis (SBM) have better outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). We analyzed our SRS database to evaluate possible prognostic factors in patients with SBM. METHODS: A total of 584 patients with SBM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). Study end points were overall survival (OS), and distant and local intracranial progression-free survival (DPFS and LPFS, respectively). Multivariable analysis was performed to develop prognostic models. RESULTS: Median OS was 10.8 months. A total of 196 patients (36.7%) had distant progression and 102 patients (19.2%) had local progression. New SBM prognostic indices (SPIs) were devised for OS, DPFS, and LPFS. Graded prognostic assessment, neurologic symptoms (P = 0.01), and tumor volume (P = 0.02) were independently associated with OS. The SPI for OS was defined: unfavorable (OS, 7.3 months), intermediate (OS, 10.6 months), and favorable (OS, 19.8 months). For DPFS, age (P = 0.0029), tumor volume (P = 0.0002), and previous whole-brain radiotherapy (P = 0.027) were prognostic and were used to define SPI for DPFS: favorable (6-month cumulative incidence failure [CIF], 10.9%), intermediate (6-month CIF, 16.7%), and unfavorable (6-month CIF, 26.0%) (P < 0.001). For LPFS, graded prognostic assessment (P = 0.0012) and tumor volume (P = 0.0004) were significant, and defined 2 groups in the LPFS SPI: unfavorable (6-month CIF, 12.3%) and favorable (6-month CIF, 6%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series of patients with SBM treated with SRS analyzed for OS, LPFS, and DPFS. SPI was devised for end points. Tumor volume had a significant association with all 3 end points. Neurologic symptoms, age, and previous whole-brain radiotherapy were also found to be prognostic.

New frontiers in translational research in neuro-oncology and the blood-brain barrier: report of the tenth annual Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium Meeting.

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents a major obstacle to the treatment of malignant brain tumors and other central nervous system (CNS) diseases. For this reason, a meeting partially funded by an NIH R13 grant was convened to discuss recent advances and future directions in translational research in neuro-oncology and the BBB. Cell biology and transport across the BBB, delivery of agents to the CNS, neuroimaging, angiogenesis, immunotherapy, and gene therapy, as well as glioma, primary CNS lymphoma, and metastases to the CNS were discussed. Transport across the BBB relates to the neurovascular unit, which consists not only of endothelial cells but also of pericyte, glia, and neuronal elements.

Epidermal growth factor receptor amplification does not have prognostic significance in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: There have been conflicting reports in the literature regarding the prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The purpose of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of EGFR amplification in patients with GBM treated at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of GBM patients treated with surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation was performed. Amplification of EGFR was evaluated with fluorescence in situ hybridization in a total of 107 patients diagnosed between December 1995 and May 2003. In addition to EGFR status, various prognostic factors were evaluated to determine the factors that influenced survival and radiographic response rate. The median follow-up was 9 months. RESULTS: The overall median survival was 9.8 months, with a 1-year survival of 40%. Of the 107 patients in whom EGFR status was evaluated, 36 (33.6%) were found to have EGFR amplification. On multivariate analysis, median survival was found to be significantly improved for patients with age < 60 (12.6 months vs. 8 months, p = 0.0061), patients with Karnofsky Performance Status > or = 70 (12.1 months vs. 4.4 months, p < 0.0001), patients who had undergone subtotal resection or gross total resection (11.1 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.002), and patients who received a radiation dose > or = 60 Gy compared with no radiation (12.7 months vs. 3 months, p < 0.0001). There was no association of EGFR amplification with survival. When stratified by age (< 60 vs. > or = 60), EGFR status still did not reach statistical significance in predicting for survival. For the 81 patients who had radiographic follow-up, the 1-year overall local control was 14%. On univariate analysis, only treatment with radiation (< 60 Gy vs. > or = 60 Gy vs. no radiation, p = 0.03) was found to predict for improved local control. Treatment with radiation did not remain statistically significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Epidermal growth factor receptor amplification was not found to be a significant prognostic indicator of overall survival or radiographic local control in patients with GBM treated with surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Further studies are needed to fully delineate the significance of this molecular marker in patients with GBM.