Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(12): 1687-1692, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600034

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct recovery trajectories of acute flares of knee pain and associated participant characteristics. METHODS: Data were from the FLARE randomized controlled trial, a multicenter trial in 27 primary care centers in the UK and Netherlands of 3 regimes of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory therapy for acute flares of knee pain. Individuals with a history of inflammatory/crystal arthritis, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain syndrome were excluded. Latent class growth analysis was applied to measures of pain intensity repeated over 5 days to identify distinct recovery trajectories. The concurrent courses of interference with activity, stiffness, and swelling for each trajectory group were modelled using generalized estimating equations. Participant age, sex, obesity, and osteoarthritis diagnosis were described for each trajectory group. RESULTS: A total of 449 participants were included (median age 55 years, 41% female, 35% obese, and 42% diagnosed with osteoarthritis). A 6-group cubic model was deemed optimal, with trajectories distinguished by rate of pain reduction and absolute level at final measurement. At the extremes were rapid and near-complete resolution (n = 41, 9%) and persistent, high pain (n = 25, 6%), but most participants showed a reduction and plateau in pain severity within 3-5 days. Within each pain trajectory group, interference with activity, stiffness, and swelling followed the same course as pain. Baseline characteristics did not differ substantially between trajectory groups. CONCLUSION: Even under a well-adhered to regime of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication, recovery following acute flares of knee pain is heterogeneous. Our observations that favorable trajectories are apparent within 3-5 days can help to inform treatment decision-making in the patient-health care professional consultation.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Artralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Dor Aguda/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
2.
Bone ; 51(3): 383-8, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22750403

RESUMO

A 2-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in men with osteoporosis demonstrated that treatment with risedronate 35mg once a week significantly decreased bone turnover markers (BTMs) and increased bone mineral density (BMD). This study was extended to include a 2-year, open-label extension to continue to assess the safety and efficacy of risedronate in men with osteoporosis. In the open-label extension, all patients received risedronate 35mg once a week, and 1000mg elemental calcium and 400 to 500IU vitamin D daily for up to 2 years. The safety of risedronate was evaluated based on adverse events, laboratory data, vital signs, and physical examination results. BMD, BTMs, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures were also assessed. A total of 218 (of 284) patients enrolled in the open-label extension. Risedronate continued to produce significant increases in lumbar spine BMD from baseline (7.87%) in the group of patients who took it for 4 years. Risedronate produced significant increases in lumbar spine BMD from baseline (6.27%) in the former placebo group who took it for 2 years during the open-label extension. Few new vertebral and clinical fractures occurred during the study. There were no significant differences in BTMs between the two groups at months 36 and 48. Incidences of any upper GI adverse events during the extension were low and similar in the two groups; however, the percent of moderate to severe events were higher (8% versus 2%) in the group that received placebo prior to the extension. Safety results continued to show that risedronate was well-tolerated in men with osteoporosis. Patients who received risedronate 35mg once a week for 2years in the open-label extension study showed similar safety and efficacy results compared with those who received risedronate treatment in the first 2 double-blind years of the study. Patients who received risedronate for 4 years in total showed similar safety and efficacy to that observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with risedronate for 4 years. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number: NCT00619957).


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Ácido Etidrônico/análogos & derivados , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Demografia , Método Duplo-Cego , Ácido Etidrônico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Etidrônico/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Vértebras Lombares/efeitos dos fármacos , Vértebras Lombares/patologia , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/fisiopatologia , Placebos , Ácido Risedrônico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Bone Miner Res ; 24(4): 719-25, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19049326
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA