Spectrum and Outcome of Patients Who Have Undergone Implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator After Aborted-Sudden Cardiac Arrest.

Most of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) secondary prevention studies have been published 2 decades ago. We aimed to describe a contemporary cohort of patients who have undergone implantation of an ICD after an aborted-sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients referred to our centers between 2005 and 2013. Predictors of overall mortality or heart transplant were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 250 patients (76.4% male, 48.7 ± 16.7 years) were included (mean follow-up = 49.6 ± 35 months). The presence of a structural heart disease (SHD) was considered as the primary cause of the aborted-SCA in 160 patients (64%). In 90 patients (36%), no SHD was observed, with patients much younger (40.9 ± 16.2 years vs 53.0 ± 15.5 years in the SHD group, p < 0.0001). The 5-year estimated rates of death or heart transplant were 14.3% and 5.2% in the group with and without SHD, respectively (hazard ratio = 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.40 to 15.6, p = 0.014). The 5-year estimated rates of appropriate ICD therapy in the ventricular fibrillation zone were 16.7% and 25.1% in patients without and with SHD (p = 0.24), respectively. Only left ventricular ejection fraction remained independently associated with mortality or heart transplant (hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.97, p = 0.0004). Overall, 69 patients (27.6%) experienced at least 1 ICD-related complication. In conclusion, compared with secondary prevention pivotal studies, the current patients who have undergone implantation of an ICD after aborted-SCA are younger, with a high proportion of structurally normal hearts. Compared with patients without SHD, who depicted a relatively favorable outcome, patients with SHD present a fourfold higher risk of death during follow-up. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction remains the major influencing factor.

Left ventricular longitudinal strain impairment predicts cardiovascular events in asymptomatic type 1 myotonic dystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) patients' prognosis is very poor. Up until now, only a few prognostic factors for cardiovascular events have been identified, and they are predictive of end-stage disease. The aim was to assess the prognostic value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) for cardiovascular events in asymptomatic DM1 patients. METHODS: DM1 patients were included between 2011 and 2015 and followed up until January 2016. Patients underwent a transthoracic echocardiography at inclusion. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, type 2 Mobitz 2 and type 3 atrioventricular block, symptomatic sino-atrial block, HV interval≥70ms at invasive electrophysiology exploration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% and newly developed atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (25 males, mean age 40years old) were included. The primary outcome was reached in 14 patients with a mean follow-up of 38months. GLS of patients who reached the primary endpoint was significantly impaired as compared to those who did not (-15.1 [-16.7; -12.7] vs. -18.2 [-19.2; -16.7] respectively; P=0.001). According to ROC curve analysis, probability of primary outcome occurrence was significantly greater in patients with GLS values≥-17.2% (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, PR electrocardiogram interval and GLS remained significantly and independently associated with the primary endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.04, P=0.006 for PR interval; HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7, P=0.002 for GLS] while LVEF alone was not. CONCLUSION: Left ventricular GLS is a powerful marker to predict cardiovascular events in asymptomatic DM1 patients, independently of LVEF.