Correlation between a novel calpastatin biosensor and traditional calpastatin assay techniques.

An optical fiber biosensor to detect calpastatin has been investigated as a preliminary step in developing tenderness detection instrumentation. Longissimus dorsi samples were taken from beef carcasses (n=21) at 0, 24, 36 and 48h postmortem. Muscle homogenates were assayed for calpastatin activity using traditional methods and an optical fiber biosensor. Warner-Bratzler shear force was also performed on a steak from each carcass at 14d postmortem. Results demonstrated that the measurements with highest correlation between traditional calpastatin assays and optical biosensor readings were taken at 48h postmortem (r=0.597, P< or =0.01), suggesting that this is the best time for use of this biosensor in an on-line grading system. This research further advances the development of a calpastatin biosensor and would be useful in laboratory determination of the presence of biologically active calpastatin concentrations.

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement in orthostasis: pulse contour analysis compared with acetylene rebreathing.

We tested the reliability of noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measurement in different body positions by pulse contour analysis (CO(pc)) by using a transmission line model (K. H. Wesseling, B. De Wit, J. A. P. Weber, and N. T. Smith. Adv. Cardiol. Phys. 5, Suppl. II: 16-52, 1983). Acetylene rebreathing (CO(rebr)) was used as a reference method. Twelve subjects (age 21-34 yr) were studied: 1) six in whom CO(rebr) and CO(pc) were measured in the standing and 6 degrees head-down tilt (HDT) postures and 2) six in whom CO was measured in the 30 degrees HDT, supine, 30 degrees head up-tilt (HUT), and 70 degrees HUT postures on a tilt table. The CO(rebr)-to-CO(pc) ratio in (near) the supine position during rebreathing was used as the calibration factor for CO(pc) measurements. Calibrated CO(pc) (CO(cal sup)) consistently overestimated CO in the upright posture. The drop in CO with upright posture was underestimated by approximately 50%. CO(cal sup) and CO(rebr) values did not differ in the 30 degrees HDT position. Changes in the CO(rebr)-to-CO(pc) ratio are highly variable among subjects in response to a change in posture. Therefore, CO(pc) must be recalibrated for each subject in each posture.