Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Abaloparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized Study.

Anabolic therapies, recommended for patients at very high fracture risk, are administered subcutaneously (SC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the abaloparatide microstructured transdermal system (abaloparatide-sMTS) as an alternative to the SC formulation. This phase 3, noninferiority study (NCT04064411) randomly assigned postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N = 511) 1:1 to open-label abaloparatide administered daily via abaloparatide-sMTS or SC injection for 12 months. The primary comparison between treatment groups was the percentage change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months, with a noninferiority margin of 2.0%. Secondary endpoints included percentage change in total hip and femoral neck BMD, bone turnover markers, dermatologic safety, and new clinical fracture incidence. At 12 months, percentage increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was 7.14% (SE: 0.46%) for abaloparatide-sMTS and 10.86% (SE: 0.48%) for abaloparatide-SC (treatment difference: -3.72% [95% confidence interval: -5.01%, -2.43%]). Percentage change in total hip BMD was 1.97% for abaloparatide-sMTS and 3.70% for abaloparatide-SC. Median changes from baseline at 12 months in serum procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP) were 52.6% for abaloparatide-sMTS and 74.5% for abaloparatide-SC. Administration site reactions were the most frequently reported adverse events (abaloparatide-sMTS, 94.4%; abaloparatide-SC, 70.5%). Incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups. Mild or moderate skin reactions occurred with abaloparatide-sMTS with no identifiable risk factors for sensitization reactions. Few new clinical fractures occurred in either group. Noninferiority of abaloparatide-sMTS to abaloparatide-SC for percentage change in spine BMD at 12 months was not demonstrated; however, clinically meaningful increases from baseline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD were observed in both treatment groups. © 2023 Radius Health, Inc and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Biomarkers for Detecting Kidney Dysfunction in Type-2 Diabetics and Diabetic Nephropathy Subjects: A Case-Control Study to Identify Potential Biomarkers of DN to Stratify Risk of Progression in T2D Patients.

Introduction: Currently there are no biomarkers that are predictive of when patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D) will progress to more serious kidney disease i.e., diabetic nephropathy (DN). Biomarkers that could identify patients at risk of progression would allow earlier, more aggressive treatment intervention and management, reducing patient morbidity and mortality. Materials and Methods: Study participants (N=88; control n=26; T2D n=32; DN n=30) were recruited from the renal unit at Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK; Whiteabbey Hospital Diabetic Clinic, Newtownabbey, UK; Ulster University (UU), Belfast, UK; and the University of the Third Age (U3A), Belfast, UK; between 2019 and 2020. Venous blood and urine were collected with a detailed clinical history for each study participant. Results: In total, 13/25 (52.0%) biomarkers measured in urine and 25/34 (73.5%) biomarkers measured in serum were identified as significantly different between control, T2D and DN participants. DN patients, were older, smoked more, had higher systolic blood pressure and higher serum creatinine levels and lower eGFR function. Serum biomarkers significantly inversely correlated with eGFR. Conclusion: This pilot-study identified several serum biomarkers that could be used to predict progression of T2D to more serious kidney disease: namely, midkine, sTNFR1 and 2, H-FABP and Cystatin C. Our results warrant confirmation in a longitudinal study using a larger patient cohort.

Analysis of reactive aldehydes in urine and plasma of type-2 diabetes mellitus patients through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: Reactive aldehydes as potential markers of diabetic nephropathy.

Introduction: Diabetes is a major public health issue that is approaching epidemic proportions globally. Diabetes mortality is increasing in all ethnic groups, irrespective of socio-economic class. Obesity is often seen as the main contributor to an increasing prevalence of diabetes. Oxidative stress has been shown to trigger obesity by stimulating the deposition of white adipose tissue. In this study, we measured reactive aldehydes by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), in the urine and plasma of type-2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients, as potential surrogates of oxidative stress. Our hypothesis was that reactive aldehydes play a significant role in the pathophysiology of diabetes, and these reactive species, may present potential drug targets for patient treatment. Materials and methods: Study participants [N = 86; control n = 26; T2DM n = 32, and diabetic nephropathy (DN) n = 28] were recruited between 2019 and 2020. Urine and blood samples were collected from all participants, including a detailed clinical history, to include patient behaviours, medications, and co-morbidities. Reactive aldehyde concentrations in urine and plasma were measured using pre-column derivatisation and LC-MS, for control, T2DM and DN patients. Results: Reactive aldehydes were measured in the urine and plasma of control subjects and patients with T2DM and DN. In all cases, the reactive aldehydes under investigation; 4-HNE, 4-ONE, 4-HHE, pentanal, methylglyoxal, and glyoxal, were significantly elevated in the urine and serum of the patients with T2DM and DN, compared to controls (p < 0.001) (Kruskal-Wallis). Urine and serum reactive aldehydes were significantly correlated (≥0.7) (p < 0.001) (Spearman rho). The concentrations of the reactive aldehydes were significantly higher in plasma samples, when compared to urine, suggesting that plasma is the optimal matrix for screening T2DM and DN patients for oxidative stress. Conclusion: Reactive aldehydes are elevated in the urine and plasma of T2DM and DN patients. Reactive aldehydes have been implicated in the pathobiology of T2DM. Therefore, if reactive aldehydes are surrogates of oxidative stress, these reactive aldehyde species could be therapeutic targets for potential drug development.