Global post­marketing safety surveillance of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in over 25,000 patients with CNS malignancies treated between 2011-2022.

BACKGROUND: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields that disrupt cancer cell processes. TTFields therapy is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), and newly-diagnosed (nd) GBM (with concomitant temozolomide for ndGBM; US), and for grade IV glioma (EU). We present an updated global, post-marketing surveillance safety analysis of patients with CNS malignancies treated with TTFields therapy. METHODS: Safety data were collected from routine post-marketing activities for patients in North America, Europe, Israel, and Japan (October 2011-October 2022). Adverse events (AEs) were stratified by age, sex, and diagnosis. RESULTS: Overall, 25,898 patients were included (diagnoses: ndGBM [68%], rGBM [26%], anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma [4%], other CNS malignancies [2%]). Median (range) age was 59 (3-103) years; 66% patients were male. Most (69%) patients were 18-65 years; 0.4% were < 18 years; 30% were > 65 years. All-cause and TTFields-related AEs occurred in 18,798 (73%) and 14,599 (56%) patients, respectively. Most common treatment-related AEs were beneath-array skin reactions (43%), electric sensation (tingling; 14%), and heat sensation (warmth; 12%). Treatment-related skin reactions were comparable in pediatric (39%), adult (42%), and elderly (45%) groups, and in males (41%) and females (46%); and similar across diagnostic subgroups (ndGBM, 46%; rGBM, 34%; anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, 42%; other, 40%). No TTFields-related systemic AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term, real-world analysis of > 25,000 patients demonstrated good tolerability of TTFields in patients with CNS malignancies. Most therapy-related AEs were manageable localized, non-serious skin events. The TTFields therapy safety profile remained consistent across subgroups (age, sex, and diagnosis), indicative of its broad applicability.

Using standardized workflows and quantitative data-driven management to reduce time interval from simulation to treatment initiation.

PURPOSE: External beam radiotherapy is a complex process, involving timely coordination among multiple teams. The aim of this study is to report our experience of establishing a standardized workflow and using quantitative data and metrics to manage the time-to-treatment initiation (TTI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Starting in 2014, we established a standard process in a radiation oncology-specific electronic medical record system (RO-EMR) for patients receiving external beam radiation therapy in our department, aiming to measure the time interval from simulation to treatment initiation, defined as TTI, for radiation oncology. TTI data were stratified according to the following treatment techniques: three-dimensional (3D) conformal therapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney test for the respective metrics of aggregate data for the initial period 2012- 2015 (PI) and the later period 2016-2019 (PII). RESULT: Over 8 years, the average annual number of treatments for PI and PII were 1760 and 2357 respectively, with 3D, IMRT, and SBRT treatments accounting for 53, 29, 18% and 44, 34, 22%, respectively, of the treatment techniques. The median TTI for 3D, IMRT, and SBRT for PI and PII were 1, 6, 7, and 1, 5, 7 days, respectively, while the 90th percentile TTI for the three techniques in both periods were 5, 9, 11 and 4, 9, 10 days, respectively. From the aggregate data, the TTI was significantly reduced (p = 0.0004, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) from PI to PII for the three treatment techniques. CONCLUSION: Establishing a standardized workflow and frequently measuring TTI resulted in shortening the TTI during the early years (in PI) and maintaining the established TTI in the subsequent years (in PII).

Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis.

PURPOSE: Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS: We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.

Single-fraction radiosurgery outcomes for large vestibular schwannomas in the upfront or post-surgical setting: a systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and/or classified as Koos Grade IV, and to present consensus recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). METHODS: The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. We considered eligible prospective and retrospective studies, written in the English language, reporting treatment outcomes for large VS; SRS for large post-operative tumors were analyzed in aggregate and separately. RESULTS: 19 of the 229 studies initially identified met the final inclusion criteria. Overall crude rate of tumor control was 89% (93.7% with no prior surgery vs 87.7% with prior surgery). Rates of salvage microsurgical resection, need for shunt, and additional SRS in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 9.6% vs 3.3%, 4.7% vs 6.4% and 1% vs 0.9%, respectively. Rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 1.3% vs 3.4% and 34.2% vs 40.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront SRS resulted in high rates of tumor control with acceptable rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation as compared to the results in those series including patients with prior surgery (level C evidence). Therefore, although large VS are considered classic indication for microsurgical resection, upfront SRS can be considered in selected patients and we recommend a prescribed marginal dose from 11 to 13 Gy (level C evidence).

18F-fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS: Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS: Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.

Cognitive function after concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy in low-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy on neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG). MATERIALS/METHODS: We included adult patients with LGG who were treated postoperatively with radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Patients were evaluated with comprehensive psychometric tests at baseline (prior to RT + TMZ) and at various time intervals following RT + TMZ. Baseline cognitive performance was analyzed by sex, age, education history, history of seizures, IDH mutation status, and 1p/19q codeletion status. Changes in neurocognitive performance were evaluated over time. RESULTS: Thirty-seven LGG patients (mean age 43.6, 59.5% male) had baseline neurocognitive evaluation. Patients with an age > 40 years old at diagnosis and those with an education > 16 years demonstrated superior baseline verbal memory as assessed by HVLT. No other cognitive domains showed differences when stratified by the variables mentioned above. A total of 22 LGG patients had baseline and post RT + TMZ neurocognitive evaluation. Overall, patients showed no statistical difference between group mean test scores prior to and following RT + TMZ on all psychometric measures (with the exception of HVLT Discrimination). CONCLUSION: Cognitive function remained stable following RT + TMZ in LGG patients evaluated prospectively up to 2 years. The anticipated analysis of RTOG 0424 will provide valuable neurocognitive outcomes specifically for high risk LGG patients treated with RT + TMZ.

Quality of life following concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy or observation in low-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: Low-grade glioma (LGG) exhibits longer median survival than high-grade brain tumors, and thus impact of our therapies on patient quality of life remains a crucial consideration. This study evaluated the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation (RT + TMZ) or observation on quality of life (QOL) in patients with low-grade glioma. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults with LGG who underwent surgery with known molecular classification from 1980 to 2018. Postoperatively, patients were either observed or received adjuvant concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation. EQ-5D and PHQ-9 depression screen were completed before outpatient visits every 2-3 months. Baseline score was defined as ± 30 days within initial operation. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients (mean age 44 ± 17 years, 51% female) with baseline EQ-5D or PHQ-9 depression screen data and at least one follow-up measure, 30 (48%) were observed and 33 (52%) received RT + TMZ. No significant decline was seen in EQ-5D or PHQ-9 scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline scores for all patients. At each time point, there was no significant difference between those who were observed or received adjuvant therapy. The linear mixed model estimating PHQ-9 value or EQ-5D index demonstrated that there was no significant difference in PHQ-9 or EQ-5D index between treatment groups (p = 0.42 and p = 0.54, respectively) or time points (p = 0.24 and p = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant decline in patient QOL or depression scores as assessed by patient- reported outcome measures for patients with low-grade glioma up to 2 years following surgery. We found no difference between RT + TMZ compared to observation during this time frame. Additional follow-up can help identify the longer-term impact of treatment strategy on patient experience.

A quantitative and comparative evaluation of stereotactic spine radiosurgery local control: proposing a consistent measurement methodology.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal treatment modality used in the management of metastatic spine tumors. Multiple studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy for pain and tumor control. However, no uniform quantitative imaging methodology exists to evaluate response to treatment in these patients. This study presents radiographic local control rates post-SBRT, systematically compares measurements acquired according to WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, and explores the relationship to patient outcome. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively obtained data from a cohort of 59 consecutive patients (81 metastatic isocenters) treated with SBRT and followed with serial MRI scans. Measurements were performed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the patients' clinical course. Local control status was determined according to both WHO and RECIST measurements, and agreement between the measuring methodologies was calculated and reported. RESULTS: Eighty-one isocenters (111 vertebral bodies) were treated with SBRT. The mean treatment dose was 13.96 Gy and the median follow-up duration was 10.8 months, during which 408 MRI scans were evaluated with both WHO and RECIST criteria for each scan point. Imaging demonstrated a mean unidimensional size decrease of 0.2 cm (p = 0.14) and a mean area size decrease of 0.99 cm2 (p = 0.03). Although 88% of the case classifications were concordant and the agreement was significant, WHO criteria were found to be more sensitive to tumor size change. The local control rates according to WHO and RECIST were 95% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although WHO volumetric measurements are admittedly superior for tumor size measurement, RECIST is simpler, reproducible, and for the first time is shown here to be comparable to WHO criteria. Thus, the application of RECIST methodology appears to be a suitable standard for evaluating post-SBRT treatment response. Moreover, using comprehensive and consistent measuring approaches, this study substantiates the efficacy of SBRT in the treatment of spine metastases.

Using a daily monitoring system to reduce treatment position override rates in external beam radiation therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To report our 7-year experience with a daily monitoring system to significantly reduce couch position overrides and errors in patient treatment positioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment couch position override data were extracted from a radiation oncology-specific electronic medical record system from 2012 to 2018. During this period, we took several actions to reduce couch position overrides, including reducing the number of tolerance tables from 18 to 6, tightening tolerance limits, enforcing time outs, documenting reasons for overrides, and timely reviewing of overrides made from previous treatment day. The tolerance tables included treatment categories for head and neck (HN) (with/without cone beam CT [CBCT]), body (with/without CBCT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and clinical setup for electron beams. For the same time period, we also reported treatment positioning-related incidents that were recorded in our departmental incident report system. To verify our tolerance limits, we further examined couch shifts after daily kilovoltage CBCT (kV-CBCT) for the patients treated from 2018 to 2021. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018, the override rate decreased from 11.2% to 1.6%/year, whereas the number of fractions treated in the department increased by 23%. The annual patient positioning error rate was also reduced from 0.019% in 2012, to 0.004% in 2017 and 0% in 2018. For patients treated under daily kV-CBCT guidance from 2018 to 2021, the applied couch shifts after imaging registration that exceeded the tolerance limits were low, <1% for HN, <1.2% for body, and <2.6% for SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: The daily monitoring system, which enables a timely review of overrides, significantly reduced the number of treatment couch position overrides and ultimately resulted in a decrease in treatment positioning errors. For patients treated with daily kV-CBCT guidance, couch position shifts after CBCT image guidance demonstrated a low rate of exceeding the set tolerance.

Outcomes of salvage radiation for recurrent world health organization grade II meningiomas: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The optimal modality of radiation-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-in patients with recurrent WHO grade II meningiomas is not well-established. The purpose of this study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing salvage IMRT vs SRS. We compared PFS in those with and without history of prior radiation. METHODS: Forty-two patients with 71 tumor recurrences treated with IMRT or SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors never treated with prior radiation ('radiation-naïve' cohort), whereas 39 salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors previously treated with radiation ('re-treatment cohort'). RESULTS: In the 'radiation-naïve' cohort, 3-year PFS for IMRT and SRS was 68.8% and 60.7%, respectively (p = 0.61). The median tumor volume for patients treated with IMRT was significantly larger than for patients treated with SRS (5.7 vs 2.2 cm3; p = 0.04). The 3-year PFS for salvage IMRT or SRS in the 're-treatment' cohort was 45.4% vs 65.8% in the 'radiation-naïve' cohort (p = 0.008). When analyzing the outcome of multiple re-treatments, median PFS was 47 months for 1st or 2nd salvage radiation (IMRT or SRS) compared to 16 months for the 3rd or greater salvage radiation treatment (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: For salvage radiation of recurrent grade II tumors that are 'radiation-naïve', comparable 3-year PFS rates were found between IMRT and SRS, despite the IMRT group having significantly larger tumors. Salvage radiation overall was less successful in the 're-treatment' cohort compared with the 'radiation-naïve' cohort. Additionally, the effectiveness of radiation significantly declines with successive salvage radiation treatments.

Radiation Necrosis from Stereotactic Radiosurgery-How Do We Mitigate?

OPINION STATEMENT: Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and convenient treatment for many brain conditions. Data regarding safety come mostly from retrospective single institutional studies and a small number of prospective studies. Variations in target delineation, treatment delivery, imaging follow-up protocols and dose prescription limit the interpretation of this data. There has been much clinical focus on radiation necrosis (RN) in particular, as it is being increasingly recognized on follow-up imaging. Symptomatic RN may be treated with medical therapy (such as corticosteroids and bevacizumab) with surgical resection being reserved for refractory patients. Nevertheless, RN remains a challenging condition to manage, and therefore upfront patient selection for SRS remains critical to provide complication-free control. Mitigation strategies need to be considered in situations where the baseline risk of RN is expected to be high-such as large target volume or re-irradiation. These may involve reduction in the prescribed dose or hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT). Recently published guidelines and international meta-analysis report the benefit of HSRT in larger lesions, without compromising control rates. However, careful attention to planning parameters and SRS techniques still need to be adhered, even with HSRT. In cases where the risk is deemed to be high despite mitigation, a combination approach of surgery with or without post-operative radiation should be considered.

Marital Status and Overall Survival in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of an Ancillary Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9704.

BACKGROUND: Several registry-based analyses suggested a survival advantage for married versus single patients with pancreatic cancer. The mechanisms underlying the association of marital status and survival are likely multiple and complex and, therefore, may be obscured in analyses generated from large population-based databases. The goal of this research was to characterize this potential association of marital status with outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who underwent combined modality adjuvant therapy on a prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of 367 patients with known marital status treated on NRG Oncology/RTOG 97-04. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: Of 367 patients, 271 (74%) were married or partnered and 96 (26%) were single. Married or partnered patients were more likely to be male. There was no association between marital status and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) on univariate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 and 1.01, respectively) or multivariate analyses (HR, 1.05 and 0.98, respectively). Married or partnered male patients did not have improved survival compared with female or single patients. CONCLUSION: Ancillary analysis of data from NRG Oncology/RTOG 97-04 demonstrated no association between marital and/or partner status and OS or DFS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent external beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Clinical trial identification number. NCT00003216. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Several population-based studies have shown an epidemiological link between marital status and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. A better understanding of this association could offer an opportunity to improve outcomes through psychosocial interventions designed to mitigate the negative effects of not being married. Based on the results of this analysis, patients who have undergone a resection and are receiving adjuvant therapy on a clinical trial are unlikely to benefit from such interventions. Further efforts to study the association between marital status and survival should be focused on less selected subgroups of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Analysis of cardiac motion without respiratory motion for cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To study the heart motion using cardiac gated computed tomographies (CGCT) to provide guidance on treatment planning margins during cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS/METHODS: Ten patients were selected for this study, who received CGCT scans that were acquired with intravenous contrast under a voluntary breath-hold using a dual source CT scanner. For each patient, CGCT images were reconstructed in multiple phases (10%-90%) of the cardiac cycle and the left ventricle (LV), right ventricle (RV), ascending aorta (AAo), ostia of the right coronary artery (O-RCA), left coronary artery (O-LCA), and left anterior descending artery (LAD) were contoured at each phase. For these contours, the centroid displacements from their corresponding average positions were measured at each phase in the superior-inferior (SI), medial-lateral (ML), and anterior-posterior (AP). The average volumes as well as the maximum to minimum ratios were analyzed for the LV and RV. RESULTS: For the six contoured substructures, more than 90% of the measured displacements were <5 mm. For these patients, the average volumes ranged from 191.25 to 429.51 cc for LV and from 91.76 to 286.88 cc for RV. For each patient, the ratios of maximum to minimum volumes within a cardiac cycle ranged from 1.15 to 1.54 for LV and from 1.34 to 1.84 for RV. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, cardiac motion is variable depending on the specific substructure of the heart but is mostly within 5 mm. Depending on the location (central or peripheral) of the treatment target and treatment purposes, the treatment planning margins for targets and risk volumes should be adjusted accordingly. In the future, we will further assess heart motion and its dosimetric impact.

Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare clinically treated step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (ssIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans in dosimetric endpoints and pretreatment quality assurance (QA) measurements. METHODS: Five single fraction spine SBRT (18 Gy) cases - including one cervical, two thoracic, and two lumbar spines - clinically treated with ssIMRT were replanned with VMAT, and all plans were delivered to a phantom for comparing plan quality and delivery accuracy. Furthermore, we analyzed 98 clinically treated plans (18 Gy single fraction), including 34 ssIMRT and 29 VMAT for cervical/thoracic spine, and 19 ssIMRT and 16 VMAT for lumbar spine. The conformality index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were calculated, and QA measurement records were compared. For the spinal cord/cauda equina, the maximum dose to 0.03 cc (D0.03cc ) and volume receiving 10 or 12 Gy (V10Gy /V12Gy ) were recorded. Statistical significance was tested with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Compared to ssIMRT, replanned VMAT plans had lower V10Gy /V12Gy and D0.03cc to the spinal cord/cauda equina in all five cases, and better CI in three out of five cases. The VMAT replans were slightly less homogeneous than those of ssIMRT plans. Both modalities passed IMRT QA with >95% passing rate with (3%, 3 mm) gamma criteria. With the 98 clinical cases, for cervical/thoracic ssIMRT and VMAT plans, the median V10Gy of spinal cord was 4.15% and 1.85% (P = 0.004); the median D0.03cc of spinal cord was 10.85 Gy and 10.10 Gy (P = 0.032); the median CI was 1.28 and 1.08 (P = 0.009); the median HI were 1.34 and 1.33 (P = 0.697), respectively. For lumbar spine, no significant dosimetric endpoint differences were observed. The two modalities were comparable in delivery accuracy. CONCLUSION: From our clinically treated plans, we found that VMAT plans provided better dosimetric quality and comparable delivery accuracy when compared to ssIMRT for single fraction spine SBRT.

Combining automatic plan integrity check (APIC) with standard plan document and checklist method to reduce errors in treatment planning.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To report our experience of combining three approaches of an automatic plan integrity check (APIC), a standard plan documentation, and checklist methods to minimize errors in the treatment planning process. MATERIALS/METHODS: We developed APIC program and standardized plan documentation via scripting in the treatment planning system, with an enforce function of APIC usage. We used a checklist method to check for communication errors in patient charts (referred to as chart errors). Any errors in the plans and charts (referred to as the planning errors) discovered during the initial chart check by the therapists were reported to our institutional Workflow Enhancement (WE) system. Clinical Implementation of these three methods is a progressive process while the APIC was the major progress among the three methods. Thus, we chose to compared the total number of planning errors before (including data from 2013 to 2014) and after (including data from 2015 to 2018) APIC implementation. We assigned the severity of these errors into five categories: serious (S), near miss with safety net (NM), clinical interruption (CLI), minor impediment (MI), and bookkeeping (BK). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 253 planning error forms, containing 272 errors, were submitted during the study period, representing an error rate of 3.8%, 3.1%, 2.1%, 0.8%, 1.9% and 1.3% of total number of plans in these years respectively. A marked reduction of planning error rate in the S and NM categories was statistically significant (P < 0.01): from 0.6% before APIC to 0.1% after APIC. The error rate for all categories was also significantly reduced (P < 0.01), from 3.4% before APIC and 1.5% per plan after APIC. CONCLUSION: With three combined methods, we reduced both the number and the severity of errors significantly in the process of treatment planning.

Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Grade 2 gliomas occur most commonly in young adults and cause progressive neurologic deterioration and premature death. Early results of this trial showed that treatment with procarbazine, lomustine (also called CCNU), and vincristine after radiation therapy at the time of initial diagnosis resulted in longer progression-free survival, but not overall survival, than radiation therapy alone. We now report the long-term results. METHODS: We included patients with grade 2 astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma who were younger than 40 years of age and had undergone subtotal resection or biopsy or who were 40 years of age or older and had undergone biopsy or resection of any of the tumor. Patients were stratified according to age, histologic findings, Karnofsky performance-status score, and presence or absence of contrast enhancement on preoperative images. Patients were randomly assigned to radiation therapy alone or to radiation therapy followed by six cycles of combination chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 251 eligible patients were enrolled from 1998 through 2002. The median follow-up was 11.9 years; 55% of the patients died. Patients who received radiation therapy plus chemotherapy had longer median overall survival than did those who received radiation therapy alone (13.3 vs. 7.8 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; P=0.003). The rate of progression-free survival at 10 years was 51% in the group that received radiation therapy plus chemotherapy versus 21% in the group that received radiation therapy alone; the corresponding rates of overall survival at 10 years were 60% and 40%. A Cox model identified receipt of radiation therapy plus chemotherapy and histologic findings of oligodendroglioma as favorable prognostic variables for both progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with grade 2 glioma who were younger than 40 years of age and had undergone subtotal tumor resection or who were 40 years of age or older, progression-free survival and overall survival were longer among those who received combination chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy than among those who received radiation therapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003375.).

Fractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas: a single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been successfully used for the treatment of intracranial meningiomas given its steep dose gradients and high-dose conformality. However, treatment of skull base meningiomas (SBMs) may pose significant risk to adjacent radiation-sensitive structures such as the cranial nerves. Fractionated GKRS (fGKRS) may decrease this risk, but until recently it has not been practical with traditional pin-based systems. This study reports the authors' experience in treating SBMs with fGKRS, using a relocatable, noninvasive immobilization system.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent fGKRS for SBMs between 2013 and 2018 delivered using the Extend relocatable frame system or the Icon system. Patient demographics, pre- and post-GKRS tumor characteristics, perilesional edema, prior treatment details, and clinical symptoms were evaluated. Volumetric analysis of pre-GKRS, post-GKRS, and subsequent follow-up visits was performed.RESULTSTwenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Nineteen patients were treated with the Icon system, and 6 patients were treated with the Extend system. The mean pre-fGKRS tumor volume was 7.62 cm3 (range 4.57-13.07 cm3). The median margin dose was 25 Gy delivered in 4 (8%) or 5 (92%) fractions. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range 4.7-17.4 months). Two patients (9%) experienced new-onset cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. The mean postoperative tumor volume reduction was 15.9% with 6 patients (27%) experiencing improvement of cranial neuropathy at the first follow-up. Median first follow-up scans were obtained at 3.4 months (range 2.8-4.3 months). Three patients (12%) developed asymptomatic, mild perilesional edema by the first follow-up, which remained stable subsequently.CONCLUSIONSfGKRS with relocatable, noninvasive immobilization systems is well tolerated in patients with SBMs and demonstrated satisfactory tumor control as well as limited radiation toxicity. Future prospective studies with long-term follow-up and comparison to single-session GKRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy are necessary to validate these findings and determine the efficacy of this approach in the management of SBMs.

Clinical trial design for local therapies for brain metastases: a guideline by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases working group.

The goals of therapeutic and biomarker development form the foundation of clinical trial design, and change considerably from early-phase to late-phase trials. From these goals, decisions on specific clinical trial design elements, such as endpoint selection and statistical approaches, are formed. Whereas early-phase trials might focus on finding a therapeutic signal to make decisions on further development, late-phase trials focus on the confirmation of therapeutic impact by considering clinically meaningful endpoints. In this guideline from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) working group, we highlight issues related to, and provide recommendations for, the design of clinical trials on local therapies for CNS metastases from solid tumours. We discuss endpoint selection criteria, the analysis appropriate for early-phase and late-phase trials, the association between tumour-specific and clinically meaningful endpoints, and possible issues related to the estimation of local control in the context of competing risks. In light of these discussions, we make specific recommendations on the clinical trial design of local therapies for brain metastases.

Application of tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: understanding of nationwide practice patterns.

BACKGROUND: Tumor treating fields (TTF) harness magnetic fields to induce apoptosis in targeted regions. A 2015 landmark randomized phase III trial of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients demonstrated TTF + temozolomide to be superior to temozolomide alone. Given these results, we sought to assess practice patterns of providers in TTF utilization for GBM. METHODS: A survey was administered to practices in the United States self-identifying as specializing in radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, and/or neurology. Responses were collected anonymously; analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 106 providers responded; a minority (36%) were in private practice. Regarding case volume, 82% treated at least six high-grade gliomas/year. The provider most commonly certified to offer TTF therapy to GBM patients was the neuro-oncologist (40%), followed by the radiation oncologist (34%); 31% reported no TTF-certified physician in their practice. TTF users were more likely to have high volume, and be aware of TTF inclusion in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: More than 80% of TTF for GBM in the United States is performed by groups who treat at least six high-grade gliomas per year; unfortunately more than 30% were in practices bereft of anyone certified to offer TTF therapy. These results indicate that there remains fertile soil for TTF therapy nationwide to be introduced into practices for GBM treatment. Providers seeking to refer newly diagnosed GBM patients for TTF should seek out practices with TTF user-associated characteristics to ensure optimal access for their patients.

Funding source, conflict of interest and positive conclusions in neuro-oncology clinical trials.

We aimed to test any association between authors' conclusions and self-reported COI or funding sources in central nervous system (CNS) studies. A review was performed for CNS malignancy clinical trials published in the last 5 years. Two investigators independently classified study conclusions according to authors' endorsement of the experimental therapy. Statistical models were used to test for associations between positive conclusions and trials characteristics. From February 2010 to February 2015, 1256 articles were retrieved; 319 were considered eligible trials. Positive conclusions were reported in 56.8% of trials with industry-only, 55.6% with academia-only, 44.1% with academia and industry, 77.8% with none, and 76.4% with not described funding source (p = 0.011). Positive conclusions were reported in 60.4% of trials with unrelated COI, 60% with related COI, and 60% with no COI reported (p = 0.997). Factors that were significantly associated with the presence of positive conclusion included trials design (phase 1) [OR 11.64 (95 CI 4.66-29.09), p < 0.001], geographic location (outside North America or Europe) [OR 1.96 (95 CI 1.05-3.79), P = 0.025], primary outcomes (non-overall or progression free survival) [OR 3.74 (95 CI 2.27-6.18), p < 0.001], and failure to disclose funding source [OR 2.45 (95 CI 1.22-5.22), p = 0.011]. In a multivariable regression model, all these factors remained significantly associated with trial's positive conclusion. Funding source and self-reported COI did not appear to influence the CNS trials conclusion. Funding source information and COI disclosure were under-reported in 14.1 and 17.2% of the CNS trials. Continued efforts are needed to increase rates of both COI and funding source reporting.